Page 109 - Rural Tourism Report Washington County
P. 109

CHAPTER 5: ASSESSMENT OF IMPACTS





             Table 5.1 details key site characteristics for the case studies.

             Table 5.1: Case Study Site Characteristics


                                                Nearest                          Parking
                Case Study        Address                 Land Use  Acreage                         Access
                                              Community                         Capacity

             Baggenstos Farm  15801 SW Roy    Sherwood    EFU      85.01     350             On Roy Rogers Road
             Store            Rogers Rd.                                                     (rural arterial road)
             Oak Knoll Winery
             Vineyard, Winery   29700 SW      Hillsboro   EFU      4.47      327             On Burkhalter Road
             & Tasting Room   Burkhalter Rd.                                                 (rural collector road)
                                                                                             On Brunswick Canyon
                              21277 NW                                       Variable, up to   Road (gravel), 1 mile
             Hornings Hideout Brunswick       North Plains EFC     157.34    5,000           off of Pumpkin Ridge
                              Canyon Rd
                                                                                             Road (rural local road)
                                                                             Not specified   On Nelson Road
             Tree to Tree
             Adventure Park   2975 SW Nelson   Gaston     EFC      25.86     but has car and  (gravel), 1/3 mile off
             (Ropes/ Zip Line)  Rd                                           bus capacity in  of Scoggins Road
                                                                             excess of needs (rural collector road)

            Case Study Findings
            Consultant team staff conducted on-site interviews with each operation
            to document the nature of activities provided, the level of impacts
            reported in response to these activities, and the techniques employed
            to manage potential impacts. Appendix D presents the set of questions
            used to guide the operator interviews, and interviewee responses.


            The case study research provided valuable information on existing
            tourism-based activities, identifying 13 unique activities for inclusion
            in the impact assessment. The case studies also helped characterize
            these activities based on the attributes that could lead to impacts
            and the magnitude of these impacts. While none of the case study
            participants claimed that their operations resulted in complaints in

            recent years, they were able to highlight how the characteristics of
            their operation could lead to impacts and how their management
            techniques have prevented impacts from occurring.

            Table 5.2 lists the various activities identified during the case study
            research. Some of these can be classified into broader categories that
                                                                                 Baggenstos Farm. Photo courtesy of
            can be used to develop a framework for evaluating tourism activities.  Scott Chapman

                                                             WASHINGTON COUNTY RURAL TOURISM STUDY                105
   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114