Page 112 - Rural Tourism Report Washington County
P. 112

CHAPTER 5: ASSESSMENT OF IMPACTS




                • Audio Controls: The use of directional
               speakers and proper audio mixing (e.g.             Events within Roadways
               de-emphasizing bass frequencies) were              Events within rights-of-way such as bicycle

               cited as techniques to reduce noise impacts.       races, runs, and parades, are not subject to
               None of the participants used noise (decibel)      land use review but do require Event Permits
               meters to measure sound levels, but did            through the County’s Traffic Engineering and
                                                                  Operations Sections. Permit requirements
               actively monitor levels by checking volume         include:  certificate of insurance, indemnity
               levels (by ear) on their grounds. Adhering         agreement, route map, traffic control and park-
               to regulations, particularly late evening          ing plan, Sheriff's Office approval, and agree-
               limits on noise, was also cited as a common        ment to clean the course following the event.
               practice to avoid conflicts with neighbors.
               None of the participants cited conflicts with      The county has received some comments from

               neighboring agricultural operations but            residents about roadway events, including re-
               it should be noted that the time-of-day            ports of noise and suggestions that applicants be
               controls are more apt to mitigate impacts          required to provide prior notice to affected Citi-
               to residential land uses than to agricultural      zen Participation Organizations (CPOs) and show
               land uses (i.e. if noise were to impact            how an event will benefit the immediate com-
               livestock, the looser controls during the day      munity. In certain cases, events were noted as
               and early evening may not be adequate).            making a roadway inaccessible to residents that
                                                                  live along it, especially where alternative entry/
                • Good Neighbor Policies: Providing advanced
               information about an event to a neighbor,          exit is unavailable.  Some note inability to leave
               or inviting them to attend, were cited as          their properties to run errands, but of particu-
               examples of engaging nearby land owners            lar concern, one event was said to significantly
                                                                  delay a resident from exiting her property for
               in order to head off possible impacts or           medical care.  The County may need to consider
               complaints. These good-neighbor actions            how road Event Permit applicants can be held to
               include advising neighbors about pending           compliance with traffic plans approved as part of
               impacts including the generation of noise,         permitting, to ensure that essential road access
               dust, and traffic obstructions. One participant    remains available to residents along the route.
               cited that these are not unique to tourism-
               based activities but typically done for

               agricultural activities (e.g. coordinating
               with neighbors around road obstructions
               during harvest, or when spraying fields
               with herbicides, pesticides, or fungicides).
               Similarly, outreach could be to both
               residential and agricultural neighbors.




      108     WASHINGTON COUNTY RURAL TOURISM STUDY
   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117