Page 114 - Rural Tourism Report Washington County
P. 114

CHAPTER 5: ASSESSMENT OF IMPACTS




            Impact Assessment Framework                        Examples of Contributing Tourism-Based

            Using information from the case study findings, and   Activities
            from stakeholder/public outreach described in prior     • Concerts (stage performances with amplified audio)
            chapters of this report, the project team developed     • Wedding receptions and other celebratory
            a framework to associate impacts with examples of      gatherings
            contributing activities, and then provided potential     • Corporate events (social gatherings and team
            mitigating strategies (best management practices)      building recreational-based activities)
            for eliminating or reducing impacts. Potential          • Direct sales and marketing of farm crops (on-
            impacts and examples of contributing tourism           site sale of agricultural products and associated
            based activities are as follows:                       promotional activities including u-pick operations,


            Potential Impacts                                      produce festivals, tours, Community Supported
                • Traffic (congestion from all types of users on   Agriculture (CSA) member parties)
               public roadways);                                    • Vehicle rallies (large gathering of show or
                                                                   performance vehicles)
                • Noise (audible sounds disrupting residential
               neighbors or agricultural operations, includes   Table 5.3 presents the impact assessment framework
               both noise generated on-site and by patrons     highlighting applicable mitigation strategies for im-
               while traveling to site);                       pacts of note. The set of mitigating strategies includes
                                                               those employed by the case study participants as well
                • Long-term disturbance of farm and forest     as additional ones identified as part of the larger study
               land (including repetitive compression of soil   or observed as best practices in peer programs.
               by vehicles and people on undeveloped fields)
               that may take it out of production;             The framework addresses cumulative impacts due to

                • Public safety (guaranteeing patrons have     multiple tourism operations even though these were
               access to potable water, proper sanitation,     not encountered during the case study research and
               first-aid services, and emergency               are hard to quantify. Examples of individual activities
               management services);                           that may result in cumulative impacts include, for
                                                               example, multiple nearby weddings, a concert and a
                • Dust (airborne particulates traveling to/from   wedding together or nearby, large-scale recreational
               site); and
                                                               activities (e.g. mud run), and multiple wineries open
                • Inappropriate patron behavior including      to the public at the same time. Cumulative effects
               trespass on residential and agricultural        are most likely to affect traffic and noise where
               properties, littering, public drunkenness, and   negative impacts can be magnified when multiple
               unsafe behavior on roadways (e.g. violating     tourism activities add impacts on top of baseline
               traffic laws or controls to avoid congestion).  conditions. A mitigating strategy to promote coor-

                                                               dination among operators is included. Similar coor-
                                                               dination was highlighted by agricultural operators
                                                               (e.g. communicating harvest plans to neighbors).


      110     WASHINGTON COUNTY RURAL TOURISM STUDY
   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119