COMPREHENSIVE
REPATRIATION
OF
CITIZENS OF OTHER COUNTRIES AND THEIR FAMILIES
SYNOPSIS:
At present about 10 million citizens of other
countries
reside in the USA without
permission.
Immigration reform will make fundamental changes in this situation:
Many foreign nationals
will be offered pathways to
U.S. citizenship.
But some citizens of
other countries will be returned to their
homelands.
Comprehensive repatriation embraces whole extended
families,
rather than individual citizens of other countries.
We should determine complete family connections
including the possible U.S. citizenship of some members
and create careful plans for all who will move to other countries.
Each integrated family can be
moved as a group
with their possessions back to the country where most are
citizens.
Whenever possible, immigration reform
should keep
families together.
Adult children born and raised in the USA,
even if their parents were
not
legal residents,
should be permitted to remain if they can live on
their
own.
They broke no laws themselves in the process of being born.
So they should not be punished for their parents' wrongful behavior.
All non-citizens children who have lived most of their lives in the USA
should be offered reasonable pathways to U.S. citizenship.
OUTLINE:
1.
COMPASSION VERSUS JUSTICE
2.
HOW TO CONDUCT COMPREHENSIVE REPATRIATION
A. SELLING THE HOUSE IN THE USA
AND BUYING A
NEW
HOUSE IN THE HOMELAND
B. JOBS AND BUSINESSES
HELD BY CITIZENS OF OTHER COUNTRIES
C. THESE ECONOMIC CHANGES
MAKE THE
REPATRIATION MORE
PERMANENT.
D. THE COST OF THE REPATRIATION WILL BE PAID
FROM THE ASSETS OF THE
DEPARTING FAMILY.
3.
AMNESTY AS AN ALTERNATIVE
4. HARM MIGHT COME TO PEOPLE
RETURNING TO
THEIR COUNTRIES OF
ORIGIN
5. NATIONAL IDENTITY FILE
6. NOT REWARDING UNLAWFUL BEHAVIOR
7. THE CHILDREN OF CITIZENS
OF OTHER COUNTRIES
8. OTHER SUGGESTIONS?
RESULT:
Readers of this chapter perhaps began with an all-or-nothing stance
with respect to returning foreign nationals to their homelands.
But after reading the specific suggestions,
it became clear that it would be possible to keep families together:
Some whole families will remain in the USA.
Other whole families will be returned to their homelands.
This might be a wise middle way between
deporting all
unauthorized foreign nationals
and allowing all
foreign visitors to stay and become citizens.
COMPREHENSIVE
REPATRIATION
OF
CITIZENS OF OTHER COUNTRIES
AND THEIR FAMILIES
by
James Leonard Park
I
am myself
an immigrant from another country—in
my case, Canada.
But I entered the USA in 1949 by completely
legal means.
My whole family applied to emigrate to the USA and we were accepted.
When we crossed the border by train,
we were each interviewed, photographed,
& fingerprinted.
All of these records were carefully preserved by the U.S. government.
I know this because I was able to see my childhood photograph
when I applied for a certificate of citizenship when I reached age
65.
I am thankful for the many possibilities that
were opened to me
simply by the fact that I have lived in the United State of America.
I became a naturalized citizen in 1955—with
most of my
family.
Thus, I am not against immigration as such.
I do favor the freedom to move across borders to establish a new life.
But the orderly way I came to the USA
should be the pattern for all
other immigrants.
The United States does have orderly ways of welcoming immigrants.
Every year about half a million immigrants enter the USA with permission.
And immigration reform will probably improve the process.
However, because our borders have not been
well-managed,
millions of others have come to the USA without authorization.
And they make up a sub-culture
that knows itself to be in violation of
the laws of immigration.
Just what to do about
the millions of residents of the USA
who are citizens of other
countries living here without permission
is a national problem now before us.
1. COMPASSION VERSUS JUSTICE
The American people are generous and compassionate.
We wish we could welcome everyone
who would like to make a better life for themselves and their families.
Almost all Americans are immigrants or the
descendants of immigrants.
Only the descendants of the indigenous peoples—"indians"—
are not immigrants from other places on the Earth.
(Even the indigenous peoples came to the Americas 40,000
years ago.)
And almost all Indians are now so intermarried with immigrants
that very few have no ancestors from other places on the
Earth.
However, justice
suggests
systematic methods
for admitting new people to our country.
And this will include deciding just which individuals and
families can come
—and
how many each year.
We do, in fact, have immigration regulations on the books.
And organized and controlled immigration does follow these
rules.
But there are major problems with our present patterns of
immigration.
The new policy proposed here
seeks a middle way between
compassion and justice:
Instead of simply returning foreign nationals to their
homelands,
we should carefully investigate all their connections
in the USA.
All members of some families will be offered pathways to U.S.
citizenship.
They will continue to live in the USA and to contribute to our
culture.
But other families will be required to return to their homelands.
They will be kept together
as a family, even if some hold U.S.
citizenship.
Repatriated families will be offered all necessary
help and sufficient time
for them to sell their homes and businesses in a orderly
fashion
and to move all of their possessions back to their country of origin
with the least possible
disruption—personal and financial.
2. HOW TO CONDUCT
COMPREHENSIVE REPATRIATION
When it has been determined by an immigration judge
that a family must return to its homeland,
the first step towards comprehensive
repatriation
involves discovering the full
constellation of the extended family.
Because we are dealing with large settled populations,
we should not depend on
police methods for rounding up the
people.
They can be allowed to continue working and/or pursuing
their education
while the process of moving back to their country of origin
is planned.
Each comprehensive repatriation might
take about one year.
In consultation with the affected family,
a target date can be set for their move back to their home country.
And in the case of large families of citizens of other countries,
a single date for repatriation might not be practical.
Citizens of other countries who have been living in the USA
for years
have many personal and financial connections to
reorganize
before they can depart in a reasonable and orderly way.
When any family moves from one country to another,
there are hundreds of matters to be handled.
A.
SELLING THE HOUSE IN THE USA
AND BUYING A
NEW
HOUSE IN THE HOMELAND
Not all foreign nationals in the USA are home-owners,
but probably a significant proportion do own homes.
Perhaps half of the families to be returned to their
home countries
will have some real estate in the USA to transfer into
other ownership.
If we ourselves are homeowners, we know how
disruptive this would be,
but we would also welcome the opportunity to locate and buy new homes
in our countries of origin if we know
that we must return to the
country where we are citizens.
The cash realized from the sale of homes and
businesses in the USA
will be used to purchase new homes and businesses
in the country where most of the family members hold citizenship.
Family relationships must be preserved as much as
possible
in this process of comprehensive repatriation.
For example, if the foreign nationals have spent some years in the
USA,
they will probably have some U.S. citizens in the family.
The most common way for mixed
citizenship to emerge
is by the natural
process of having babies.
Under present law, any baby delivered within the borders of the USA
automatically becomes a U.S. citizen at birth
—no
matter what citizenship the parents had when the child was born.
Birthright
citizenship is not universal for all countries
and perhaps it should be examined for the USA.
What sense does it make to allow a pregnant woman
to come into the USA in order to give birth to a U.S. citizen?
Marriage is another family connection that might
have been established
between a foreign national and a U.S. citizen.
If a man who is a citizen of Canada has married an American woman,
where should they live once their real history is disclosed?
Compassion
says one thing: Let them live wherever
they wish.
But justice says
another: At least one violated the law,
for which there must be meaningful consequences.
When they married, they knew the citizenship facts and
implications.
If the Canadian husband and father relocates
to
Canada,
he will buy a new home in Canada and find new employment.
Once this has been settled, the rest of the family can decide
what to do.
For those who have been Americans all of their lives, it will be a
change.
But they will not be the first Americans who have ever moved to Canada.
And if they have significant assets in the USA, which they can sell,
they should be able to set themselves up well in Canada.
Sometimes the marriage will end
because the American spouse is more committed to living in America
than to living with her or his Canadian spouse.
Or perhaps they will try having a marriage across the border.
Once their real citizenships have been firmly established,
they will be permitted to visit across the border frequently.
Problem: Some children have always lived
in the USA.
They did not choose parents from different countries.
And once they have lived for more than 10 years in the USA,
they are certainly more American than they are Canadian.
Compassion
says: Keep the family together, in one country or the
other.
Justice says:
Canadian
citizens must
return to Canada
if they do not qualify for any pathway to American citizenship.
B.
JOBS AND BUSINESSES
HELD BY CITIZENS
OF OTHER COUNTRIES
When foreign nationals have been living in the USA
for some years,
they have some ways of supporting themselves.
(Only a few depend on public assistance.)
When they are employed by American companies,
such employment can be ended before the agreed-upon date for departure.
The employer and the employee can decide
what would be the best date for this employment to end.
The American business will find someone authorized to work in the USA
to take over the job formerly filled by the foreign worker.
And once the citizens being repatriated have decided
just where they are
going to live in their homelands,
they can seek new employment there.
Perhaps their years of employment in the USA
will give them good foundations for finding similar jobs at
home.
If the citizens of other countries have owned
businesses in the
USA,
these businesses probably have some obvious cash value.
Giving foreign nationals one year to move back to their homelands
can allow them to make arrangements for selling their
businesses
and starting similar businesses in their home countries.
Sometimes businesses operating mostly within the USA
can continue to be owned by foreign nationals
even after those owners have re-settled in their
homelands.
C.
THESE ECONOMIC CHANGES
MAKE THE REPATRIATION
MORE
PERMANENT.
When the citizens of other countries have
established their new homes
and started new businesses back in their homelands,
they are much less likely to try to cross the border into the USA again.
But if their only roots are in America,
their only thought is how to
get back into
the USA.
Why would they want to stay in their original homelands?
If we ourselves were expelled from the USA
while our homes, cars, jobs, family, friends,
and every other part of our lives remained in the United States,
what would our strongest urge be
after being put into another country?
We would think of nothing else but how to get back to our lives.
But if we have carefully moved
back to our country of citizenship,
if we have new homes, cars, jobs, & friends,
then we are much more likely to stay where we have relocated.
The American authorities in charge of each case of
repatriation
will cooperate with the countries of citizenship
to make certain that the repatriated citizens are putting down deep
roots
rather than planning to return to the USA as soon as possible.
Perhaps there should be provisions in the new system
for checking on the location
of the family for about five
years,
to make sure that they have stayed in their country of citizenship.
If they disappear, this will be good reason
to check for their presence
in the USA once again.
They are most likely to attempt to return to the location in the USA
where they
lived once before.
And, of course, while they continue to live in their
home
countries,
they have the same opportunities as any other people in those countries
to apply to emigrate to the USA if they so wish.
D.
THE
COST OF THE REPATRIATION WILL BE PAID
FROM THE
ASSETS OF THE
DEPARTING FAMILY.
Because comprehensive repatriation is much more
expensive than
just putting foreigners on a bus or a plane and hoping
for the best,
the cost of each repatriation will have to be borne
by those who have
violated the immigration law.
Sometimes the costs of repatriation will consume all their liquid
assets.
In such cases, the two governments will have to cooperate
to make sure that the newly settled immigrant family will have
the
necessary loans and other support in their home countries
in order to establish their
residence in their homelands
once again.
And having loans from home-country sources will be another
connection
that will help to keep them in the countries where they are
citizens.
Lenders will make certain that the newly-returned family is going to
stay
and that they are able to earn enough money to re-pay
the loans.
As a side-effect of comprehensive repatriation,
the culture and economy of the home countries will be enriched.
The skills learned by the returning citizens during their years in the
USA
might be transferable to making a living in their
home countries.
We often hear that immigrants
have contributed tremendously
to
the wealth of the USA.
Once returned to their homelands, those families can use their talents
to
contribute to the wealth of
the countries where they are citizens.
3. AMNESTY AS AN ALTERNATIVE
One possible alternative to repatriation is amnesty,
which means forgetting the facts of the past.
People who have been in the USA for a certain number of years
—no matter how they got here—will be permitted to stay.
And they can apply to become U.S. citizens in the same ways
as all authorized migrants to the USA.
This policy has been tried before—with
mixed
results.
It did allow millions of foreign nationals to become U.S. citizens.
However, amnesty did not
stop
the continuing flow
of citizens of other countries coming into the USA without
permission.
Immigration reform in the United States will
probably provide
reasonable pathways to citizenship for many foreign nationals in the
USA.
But no matter how many families America accepts,
some families will be
required to return to their homelands.
4. HARM MIGHT COME TO
PEOPLE
RETURNING TO
THEIR COUNTRIES OF ORIGIN
One of the strongest arguments against returning
foreign nationals
is that they will suffer or be killed in their countries of origin.
And we do have
reasonable methods for granting
political asylum.
However, these laws are so open-ended
that almost anyone can claim to be coming to
the USA
to avoid political persecution in their countries of origin.
They say the magic words "political asylum".
And they merge into the general population of the USA.
Compassion says that we should allow
any people who fear persecution to come to the USA.
But when we are dealing with unstable countries or failed states,
most of the people of
those countries could claim
that harm will come to them if they stay in their
home countries.
So, should we allow whole
populations to move to the USA
when their own countries become unstable
or when civil war breaks out?
Any policy of amnesty without other profound changes
will only encourage more citizens of other countries
to move the
USA without permission.
This is what happened with the first amnesty in 1986:
No effective changes were instituted to prevent new immigrants
from ignoring the laws and continuing do-it-yourself immigration.
5. NATIONAL IDENTITY FILE
One possible way to prevent further violations of
the immigration laws
would be to establish an Identity
File for each person living
in the USA.
A new File could be created for each person who comes into America.
Eventually there should be a File for every man, woman, &
child
(whatever their citizenship status)
living within the borders of the United States of America.
As a side-effect of having such a National Identity
File,
the census now mandated for every 10 years
could be conducted by consulting the data in the computer files,
which already record where every person is living, etc.
Another chapter
deals extensively with the details
of establishing a National
Identity
Bureau.
6. NOT REWARDING UNLAWFUL
BEHAVIOR
When citizens of other countries know
that they are
living in the USA without permission,
they try not to
attract the attention of any government agency.
They become an invisible population.
For example, why attempt to get a driver's license?
So instead of learning to drive and passing a driving test,
they just buy cars and start driving.
This is a danger to themselves and to everyone else on the road.
In some states, their cars are taken away
when they are discovered to be driving without a license.
But since they cannot get
a driver's license,
they just buy new cars and continue their illegal driving.
In short, our pattern of poorly
enforcing immigration laws
leads to the creation of a
criminal underclass
—people
who know that they are permanently
outside the law
and so have less motivation to follow any of our laws.
Declaring amnesty for all citizens of other countries
would reward their unlawful behavior of entering without
permission.
And what would then prevent millions of others from following suit?
If they can set one foot on U.S. soil,
should they be allowed to become U.S. citizens?
Everyone agrees that the present situation is not
ideal.
So what changes should we make?
What new practices will do
the least harm and create
the most good?
7. THE CHILDREN OF CITIZENS
OF OTHER COUNTRIES
It is well known that in the United States of
America,
any person born within our borders is automatically
a
citizen of the
USA.
This law emerged from the automatic policy for everyone else:
Whenever anyone was born,
that new person was a citizen of that country by birth.
But this is not a universal policy everywhere on
Earth.
In some countries, children born to foreign nationals
are registered as having the same
citizenship as their parents.
(This is also the policy for children of U.S. citizens
who happen to be born in other countries:
They are U.S. citizens because their
parents are Americans.)
Children who have lived most of their lives in the
USA
(whatever their official citizenship)
are as completely a part of American culture as anyone else.
What sense does it make to send them to a foreign country?
A new policy with regard to the children of foreign
nationals
might decide each case on an
individual basis.
Perhaps the children of foreign nationals could
apply for citizenship
if they have lived in the United States for at least five years.
(Five years is also the waiting period for citizenship
for all immigrants given permission to enter the USA.)
Children who are not yet citizens
because their parents were not citizens
should be given a choice:
Which country should be their home country?
Or should they hold dual
citizenship?
In order to follow this pathway toward
citizenship,
they must admit the unlawful behavior of their parents.
No one is responsible for crimes committed by other persons,
including the violation of entering a country without permission.
But when such children publicly acknowledge
that they are the children of foreign nationals,
their parents should also be officially registered.
If the parents are still alive,
they can be repatriated according to the laws that apply to them.
And in some cases, especially when the children are very young,
the children will
automatically go with their parents
back to the parents' country of origin.
If one or both parents are dead,
then the case for staying in the USA is stronger for the children.
We do not want any such new policies to lead to
false claims
of death and/or abandonment.
What are the actual housing arrangements of these children?
What is the actual day-to-day family structure?
When the other people living with the child in question are identified,
their right to be living in the USA will also be examined.
Compassionate and wise decisions will have to be made
about just which persons should be returned to their original homelands
—making the best possible decisions for all family members involved.
For example, if the main bread-winner is going to be
repatriated,
then it might not be wise
to leave dependent children in the USA
with no means of support except public assistance.
Children who have already lived for many years in
the USA
will be given an easier pathway to citizenship
than children living in other countries
who would also like to come to the USA and become citizens.
In order not to divide families
where some of the
adults are U.S. citizens and some are not,
new provisions will probably have to be invented,
which would allow most of
the
family to remain in the United States.
And the non-citizens would be given appropriate pathways to
citizenship.
But in other cases, most of the adults will be
non-citizens.
When most of them return to their countries of origin
as described above, including all of their assets, etc.,
then the children will have to adjust to going back to their parents'
country.
Since they have already spent some part of their
lives inside the USA,
this fact could be included in any applications to return to
the USA.
The process of moving from one country to another
should be orderly and recorded.
Even children born inside the USA to foreign nationals
will sometimes be returned with their parents to their parents'
homeland.
But after returning to their country of origin,
both the parents and the children would be able to apply
to enter the USA following the established means of immigration.
Immigration reform will certainly change some of the
rigid rules,
which have led to the absurd results we can all cite.
Another chapter
explores ways to handle children of foreign nationals:
https://s3.amazonaws.com/aws-website-jamesleonardpark---freelibrary-3puxk/CY-DREAM.html
8. OTHER
SUGGESTIONS?
The policy of returning citizens of other countries
to their homelands
will probably remain a part of any immigration reform.
But some modifications and elaborations of the principles outlined here
will doubtless be suggested—and some will be implemented.
Let the discussion proceed:
Just what should we do about the present situation?
RESULT:
Reading
this chapter has opened a new perspective
on the problems created by the old deportation practice
of deporting foreign nationals one-by-one.
Instead of tearing families apart using the immigration laws,
we should be able to maintain family integrity either in America
or back in the home country of most adults in the family.
Keep families together as much as possible
—either
in America or in the homeland of the parents.
AUTHOR:
James Park is an independent philosopher,
who is grateful to have lived 90% of his life in the USA.
None of his relatives or friends is living in the USA without
permission.
Others authors are welcome to suggest different solutions
to the present situation of having millions of citizens of other
countries
living without permission inside the borders of the United States of
America.
A few related essays by James Park:
I
am an
Immigrant
Immigration
Problems and Solutions:
Keeping the Debate Constructive
Immigration
Reform:
A Range of Options
Register
all
Foreign Nationals:
Carrots & Sticks
End
Deportation of Persons Likely to Qualify for
a Pathway to Citizenship under Immigration Reform
Registration
without Deportation:
Bringing
Millions of Foreign Nationals out of the Shadows
25
Million Foreign Nationals in the USA:
How Many Will Stay?
Children
of
Foreign Nationals:
New
Pathways
to Citizenship
Born in the USA:
The Easy Way to Become a U.S. Citizen
Comprehensive
Repatriation of Citizens of other Countries and their Families
National
Identity File:
Directory
USA
Created
August 7, 2009; Revised 8-12-2009;
3-7-2010; 5-7-2010; 7-27-2010;
8-5-2010; 8-25-2010; 11-17-2010;
1-6-2011; 10-1-2011; 10-18-2011; 5-20-2012; 12-30-2012;
7-31-2013; 8-15-2013; 8-27-2013; 8-13-2014;
11-5-2015; 4-5-2016; 1-12-2017; 2-25-2017; 10-23-2017; 5-21-2019;
11-20-2020;