INTERPRETING
LAWS AGAINST
'ASSISTING SUICIDE'
SYNOPSIS:
Many of the legal systems of the Earth
contain a provision within their laws against murder
prohibiting and punishing 'assisting suicide'.
But laws against counseling or encouraging irrational suicide
were enacted before medical science advanced to
the point
that most deaths in hospitals involve some element of choice
concerning the timing and mode of death.
End-of-life medical decisions
are NOT assisting suicide.
But how do we tell the difference?
OUTLINE:
1.
LAWS AGAINST 'ASSISTING SUICIDE'
SHOULD NOT
APPLY TO COMPLEX END-OF-LIFE
SITUATIONS.
2.
CAN FREE-LANCE MERCY-KILLING
BE
DISTINGUISHED FROM GRANTING MERCIFUL DEATH?
3.
THE ORIGINAL THINKING BEHIND LAWS AGAINST
ASSISTING
IRRATIONAL SUICIDE.
4.
LAWS AGAINST ASSISTING SUICIDE
SHOULD NOT
APPLY TO VOLUNTARY DEATH.
5. OFFICIAL INTERPRETATION OF THE
LAWS
AGAINST
ASSISTING SUICIDE
CAN BE A STEP
TOWARD NEW RIGHT-TO-DIE LAWS.
6. GUIDELINES FOR PROSECUTORS CAN BE
ENSHRINED IN NEW LAWS.
INTERPRETING
LAWS AGAINST
'ASSISTING
SUICIDE'
by
James Leonard Park
1. LAWS AGAINST
'ASSISTING SUICIDE'
SHOULD NOT
APPLY TO COMPLEX END-OF-LIFE
SITUATIONS.
The laws against encouraging or assisting suicide
were written without regard to the
so-called 'right-to-die'.
In fact, whenever a life-ending decision takes place within a hospital,
the concept of 'assisted suicide' is seldom applied.
For example, consider these four legal methods of ending one's life.
Are any of these ever called 'assisting suicide'?
(1) increasing pain-medication;
(2) inducing terminal coma;
(3) disconnecting life-supports; &
(4) giving up water.
See
"Four Medical Methods of Managing Dying":
https://s3.amazonaws.com/aws-website-jamesleonardpark---freelibrary-3puxk/CY-L-END.html
Because such medical options are well-respected and
often used,
such methods of shortening the process of dying in a hospital
are seldom considered forms of 'assisting
suicide'.
2. CAN FREE-LANCE
MERCY-KILLING
BE
DISTINGUISHED FROM GRANTING MERCIFUL
DEATH?
The in-between cases are the most difficult.
These are situations in which a loved one
receives help in dying independent of medical care
—even
tho there might have been much medical attention
before the relatives decided that death was the best option.
And the question of 'assisting suicide' arises
when the actions that bring life to an end
have been taken by someone who is not a doctor or a nurse.
Then the public prosecutor must apply some discretion
to separate 'assisting
suicide' from helping
with a
voluntary death
or to separate 'mercy-killing'
from granting merciful
death.
See other essays
linked below that decisively separate
irrational suicide
from voluntary death
and mercy-killing
from merciful death.
3. THE ORIGINAL
THINKING
BEHIND LAWS AGAINST
ASSISTING IRRATIONAL SUICIDE.
Even tho the following expression has not yet
appeared in any law,
the real intent of all such laws is to discourage IRRATIONAL SUICIDE.
When teen-agers think of killing themselves because of the loss of
'love',
this would be a prime example of the urge toward irrational suicide.
If they get beyond that emotional hurt, they can continue to live.
Other examples of irrational 'reasons' for wanting
to die include:
self-loathing because of unusual sexual fantasies;
depression because of alcohol or other drugs in one's body;
bio-chemical imbalance due to biological causes;
financial disasters that could lead to bankruptcy;
public disgrace due to personal moral corruption;
free-floating, uncaused existential depression;
or because life has lost all meaning.
Because persons suffering from any such problems
need help rather than
punishment,
most laws against 'committing suicide' have been repealed.
But because no rational person would recommend
death
as the solution to such temporary problems,
the prohibition of assisting
irrational suicide was left in the laws
when the provisions against
committing suicide were removed.
4. LAWS AGAINST
ASSISTING SUICIDE
SHOULD NOT APPLY TO
VOLUNTARY DEATH.
When these laws were written many decades ago,
the idea of 'rational
suicide'
had not yet dawned.
In order to avoid further confusion,
the expression voluntary
death will replace the confusing one.
Voluntary
death differs from irrational
suicide in four ways:
(1) Irrational suicide is harmful
to the person who dies.
(2) Irrational suicide is based
on faulty thinking.
(3) Irrational suicide is often
capricious.
(4) Irrational suicide is always
regretted by others.
See: Will
this Death be an "Irrational Suicide" or a "Voluntary Death"?
https://s3.amazonaws.com/aws-website-jamesleonardpark---freelibrary-3puxk/CY-IS-VD.html
Operational
separation can be achieved
by applying the most relevant of the following safeguards for
life-ending decisions:
https://s3.amazonaws.com/aws-website-jamesleonardpark---freelibrary-3puxk/SG-A-Z.html
The prime example
of voluntary death arises from terminal illness:
When we have begun the inevitable decline towards death,
there comes a point when applying additional medical treatments
makes little or no sense:
Using more medical technology might extend our lives by a few
days,
but do those additional days add any meaning to our lives?
5. OFFICIAL
INTERPRETATION
OF THE LAWS AGAINST ASSISTING SUICIDE
CAN BE A STEP TOWARD NEW
RIGHT-TO-DIE LAWS.
The Netherlands was one of the first countries
to
liberalize its practices and laws with regard to life-ending decisions.
Before the law against 'euthanasia' was changed,
guidelines were issued and later revised several times
which allowed doctors to grant merciful death to their patients
if the patients were suffering and there was no hope of recovery.
Reason and compassion guided these changes.
Then after a few years, the law in the Netherlands
was officially changed to embody the safeguards.
This could be a paradigm for other countries (or
states of the USA)
for evolutionary modifications of their laws concerning end-of-life
choices.
Prosecutors everywhere in the world already have
considerably leeway
when they must decide what
kinds of behavior to prosecute
and what other kinds of
behavior should NOT lead to prosecution.
One of the most significant safeguards for
life-ending decisions
is a review
by the prosecutor in that jurisdiction
concerning the planned death before
the death takes place.
In February 2010, the Public Prosecutor
for England and Wales
issued a set of guidelines
for local prosecutors,
setting forth the factors
favoring prosecutions for assisting suicide
and the other factors that
would yield a decision not to
prosecute.
The law here being interpreted and enforced
is a very brief 1961 law prohibiting 'assisting suicide'.
Read a review
and
critique of these new guidelines for the UK.
6. GUIDELINES FOR
PROSECUTORS
CAN BE
ENSHRINED IN NEW LAWS.
After a few years of applying such guidelines or
safeguards
to situations that might previously have been considered
giving assistance and support for an irrational suicide,
the laws against assisting suicide might be changed.
Under revised laws, irrational suicide will not be
endorsed.
And people who help others to kill themselves for foolish 'reasons'
will still be subject to prosecution—and punishment if found guilty.
But the new laws will recognize for the first time
that there are often very
good reasons
for choosing to die now
rather than waiting to die
later.
Such laws will embody safeguards
so that harmful behavior
can be separated from helpful
behavior.
Here is a list of 26
recommended
safeguards,
which are available to be adapted for any new laws concerning the
right-to-die.
Safeguard S from this list is:
Review
by the
Prosecutor (or other Lawyer) Before the Death Takes Place.
New laws can be
enacted anywhere on planet Earth
which will provide step-by-step,
practical methods
for separating unlawful
encouragement and aid for irrational suicide
from lawful
end-of-life medical decisions.
Sensible safeguards that can be understood and applied by anyone
will distinguish the crime
of assisting an irrational suicide
from the opposite end of the spectrum of end-of-life choices
—namely making wise medical decisions when
death is inevitable.
Any such new laws should discourage
all forms of irrational
suicide
and encourage
reasonable acceptance of unavoidable death.
We can continue to outlaw any assistance
with foolish self-killing
and other forms of causing premature death.
And we can permit careful consideration of all reasonable options
for making medical decisions at the end of our lives.
And here is a draft
law
against causing premature death,
which embodies all 26 of the recommended safeguards
for separating harmful
behavior—irrational suicide
and mercy-killing—
from helpful behavior—voluntary death and
merciful death
and all other forms of reasonable life-ending medical decisions.
Created
10-13-2009; Revised 10-14-2009;
1-21-2010; 3-11-2010; 3-12-2010;
5-2-2010; 12-3-2010; 4-2-2011; 4-3-2011;
1-14-2012; 2-28-2012; 3-16-2012; 7-18-2012;
9-1-2012;
4-6-2013; 6-13-2013; 12-13-2013; 6-19-2014;
5-19-2015; 7-15-2015;
10-9-2015; 8-6-2016; 5-17-2017; 12-5-2017; 12-1-2018; 12-31-2019;
AUTHOR:
James Leonard Park is an independent philosopher,
living and writing in Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
He is an advocate of the right-to-die, with good safeguards.
He has drafted a model
law
against assisting premature death,
which could be adapted by any jurisdiction
that now has a law against 'assisting suicide' on the books.
This draft-legislation contains practical ways of separating
voluntary death from irrational suicide
and merciful death
from mercy-killing.
If we prohibit assisting or cooperating with a premature death,
timely death will become more obvious and permissible.
An op-ed article has been created on the same theme:
"Replacing Laws Against 'Assisting Suicide' ":
https://s3.amazonaws.com/aws-website-jamesleonardpark---freelibrary-3puxk/ASL.html
If your own lawmaker will pay attention,
you could send this chapter and/or this op-ed piece
to see if these might be helpful in drafting a new law
to revise or replace any existing law against 'assisting suicide'.
The URL for Interpreting
Laws Against 'Assisting Suicide' is:
https://s3.amazonaws.com/aws-website-jamesleonardpark---freelibrary-3puxk/CY-ASLAW.html
Some related chapters:
A
New Way
to
Secure the Right-to-Die:
Laws Against Causing Premature Death
Two
Approaches
to Right-to-Die Laws:
Granting Permission and Banning Harms
Pulling
the
Plug:
A Paradigm for Life-Ending Decisions
Losing the Marks of Personhood:
Discussing Degrees of Mental Decline
Advance
Directives for Medical Care:
24 Important Questions to Answer
Fifteen
Safeguards
for Life-Ending Decisions
Will
this Death
be an "Irrational Suicide" or a "Voluntary Death"?
Will
this Death
be a "Mercy-Killing" or a "Merciful Death"?
Four
Medical
Methods of Managing Dying
VDD:
Why
Giving Up
Water is Better than other Means of Voluntary Death
Voluntary
Death by Dehydration:
Safeguards to Make Sure it is a Wise Choice
Choosing Your Date of Death:
How to Achieve a Timely Death
—Not
too Soon,
Not too Late
Depressed?
Don't
Kill
Yourself!
Further
reading:
Best
Books on Voluntary Death
Best
Books on Preparing for Death
Medical
Methods
of Managing Dying
Books
on Terminal Care
Books
on Helping Patients to Die
Books
Supporting
the Right-to-Die
Books
Opposing
the Right-to-Die
Go to the Right-to-Die
Portal.
Return to the DEATH
page.
Go to the Medical
Ethics
index page.
Go to other
on-line essays by James Park,
organized into 10 subject-areas.
Go to
the beginning of this website
James
Leonard Park—Free
Library