MEDICAL
METHODS OF MANAGING DYING
Copyright
© 2018 by James Leonard Park
The following books are organized in order of quality, beginning with the best.
The
paragraphs in black are intended to present objective facts about
each book.
The
remarks in red
are the evaluations and opinions of this reviewer.
This
bibliography reviews books about the four most common
methods of managing the process of dying within modern medical care:
(1) increasing
pain-medication,
(2) beginning
terminal sedation,
(3) withdrawing
all
curative treatments and life-supports, &
(4) giving
up food and water.
Here is a brief explanation of
these recommended methods:
"Methods of Managing Dying in a
Right-to-Die Hospice":
https://s3.amazonaws.com/aws-website-jamesleonardpark---freelibrary-3puxk/METHODS.html
2.
L. W. Sumner
Assisted
Death:
A
Study in Ethics and Law
(New
York: Oxford University Press: www.oup.org,
2011)
236 pages
(ISBN: 978-0-19-960798-3; hardcover)
(Library of
Congress call number: K5178.S86 2011)
(Medical call number:
WB33.1S955a 2011)
A
careful philosophical exploration of end-of-life medical choices,
which are intended or foreseen to shorten the process of
dying:
1. 'euthanasia' and 'physician-assisted suicide';
2.
using pain-killers, knowing that vital functions will be
suppressed;
3. terminal sedationkeeping
the patient unconscious until death;
4. terminal
dehydrationgiving
up all food and water by all method.
Specific chapters discuss these important themes:
(2)
patient consent and/or refusal of medical treatments.
(3) using
pain-relieving drugs with the purpose of reducing suffering
and/or
the intention of bringing death;
(4) evaluating and responding to
patient requests for death;
(5) deciding death for others.
Part II deals with the attempts to control end-of-life choices
using
various laws and regulations.
Almost all
laws dealing with life-ending decisions
focus just on two
high-profile methods of choosing death:
(1) 'euthanasia'the
doctor gives a lethal injection;
(2) 'physician-assisted
suicide'the
doctor prescribes a gentle poison.
But even in jurisdictions where
both of these life-ending options
have been available for many
years,
less than 2% of all deaths are achieved by these methods.
Many
more deaths are achieved by other methods,
which have the same resultdeathbut
have not been controversial:
(1) ending all curative treatment and
life-support systems;
(2) increasing pain-killing drugs to relief
suffering
with the knowledge that the process of dying will also
be shortened;
(3) choosing terminal sedation
keeping
the patient continuously unconscious until natural death; &
(4)
giving up all food and water
which
will result in death by dehydration within a few days.
Because these four additional methods of choosing death
have not
been thoroly discussed or studied,
we do not have precise data
about how
often
they occur.
Also, these additional methods of dying are often
combined.
In fact, it would be possible to use all four at
once.
Even in locations where the
controversial methods are banned,
doctors are already
recommending the less controversial methods
when the
patient faces the last few days in the hospital.
When we
ourselves are on our death-beds,
we already do have these
possible methods of dying.
This book supports the right-to-die
and offers common-sense methods
to avoid abuses and
mistakes.
It
should be read by careful students of choices at the end of life.
3.
Lois Snyder & Arthur L. Caplan, editors
Assisting
Suicide:
Finding
Common Ground
(Bloomington,
IN: Indiana University Press: http://iupress.indiana.edu, 2002)
232 pages
(ISBN: 0-253-33977-4; hardcover)
(Library of Congress
call number: R726.A855 2002)
This
book grew out of a consensus panel,
which attempted to identify
the common ground
among both proponents
and opponents
of making life-ending decisions.
17 different authors contributed
their thoughts.
How does taking gentle
poison provided by a doctor
differ ethically and legally from
ending medical treatments and life-supports?
Can guidelines be applied consistently to all end-of-life
situations?
Who should write and enforce any such guidelines or
safeguards?
Why should physicians be
expected to be the main agents of death?
Should others (both
professional and lay persons)
also participate in planning and
carrying forward plans for death?
Chapter
Six explicitly discusses several methods of choosing death:
(1)
increasing pain-medication with the knowledge that death will
come;
(2) withdrawing life-supports with approval of the patient
and/or the family;
(3) giving up eating and drinking as a method
of bringing death;
(4) terminal sedationkeeping
the patient asleep for the last days;
(5) physician prescribes
sufficient sleeping pills
to cause death if taken all at once by
the patient.
Each of these methods of
choosing death
is illustrated by the case-history
of an actual
patient who chose that pathway towards death.
4.
Joanne Lynn, MD, editor
By
No Extraordinary Means:
The
Choice to Forgo Life-Sustaining Food and Water
(Bloomington,
IN: Indiana University Press, 1986)
272 pages
(ISBN: 0-253-31287-6; hardcover)
(Library of
Congress call number: R726.B9 1986)
(Medical call number: W50B993
1986)
See review in the first bibliography
below.
Best
Books on the Right-to-Die
Books
Opposing the Right-to-Die
Best
Books on Preparing for Death