A A A

Straight Shoot: Drugs In Professional Wrestling

Evan Bourne was suspended for the second time under WWE's wellness policy, but are his violations any worse than others in pro wrestling history? Aubrey Sitterson breaks down the long and storied history of pro wrestling drug abuse and the struggles of today's superstars.


Straight Shoot - Drugs
Credit: WWE

Welcome to another installment of Straight Shoot, where we pull on our boots and bounce around the ring with some of professional wrestling's most fascinating issues. If you haven't already, catch up on this week's Raw with our Monday Night Raw Recap weekly write-ups. Then follow writer Aubrey Sitterson on Twitter and make sure to check back every Thursday afternoon for a new Straight Shoot.

Earlier this week, WWE issued a 60-day suspension to Evan Bourne for a violation of its Talent Wellness Program, which is a nice way of saying that the guy failed a drug test. This isn't a new thing for Bourne, as he was booted off of television for a month this past November for his first violation, which was later revealed to be related to the smoking of synthetic cannabis, which is a nice way of saying "fake weed." While I understand the need to keep a wrestling roster clean and punish those using illicit substances, I have to question the wisdom of how WWE's current Talent Wellness Program is administered.

Going back at least to the 1980s, the popular conception of professional wrestlers has been that they're all juiced up maniacs, crazy on roid rage. Given the explosive anger on display in many matches and the oversized, heavily muscled physiques that no amount of Muscle Milk and creatine will ever give a guy like myself, it's an understandable conclusion to draw. But the fact is, outside some notable exceptions, the average size of wrestlers in the country's top promotions has actually dropped steadily since the hulking behemoth heyday of the late 1980s and early 1990s. And while it's certainly possible that the exceptions above are granted special dispensations from their corporate overlords, it's rather more likely that they're just genetic freaks that can put on mass much more easily than mere mortals like us.

Current WWE wrestler Mason Ryan


Ever since a 1993 steroid controversy that saw Vince McMahon put on trial for distributing drugs to wrestlers, WWE has made intermittent efforts to clean up their organization. Arguably the biggest and most significant of these was the institution of the current Talent Wellness Program in 2006, which came soon after the death of Eddie Guerrero. While Guerrero's death was ruled the result of heart failure related to cardiovascular disease, not drugs, his health certainly wasn't helped by years of drug use. The following year saw the infamous Benoit murder-suicides, which also possessed a potential link to drug abuse, as well as the Signature Pharmacy scandal, in which a large number of WWE's top stars were discovered to have been receiving steroids and other prescription drugs illegally. This led WWE to take a very public, very hard line against drug use, vowing to announce the names of performers punished under their new three-strikes-and-you're-out-policy.

While I certainly won't defend the use of steroids outside of medically approved instances, they weren't the most dangerous substance being used and abused by talent - just the most visible. For as long as professional wrestlers have travelled town to town, subjecting their bodies to intense physical punishment for money, there have been wrestlers who used alcohol to dull the pain, and a percentage of those have fallen into full-blown alcoholism, wrecking both lives and careers. While excessive steroid use can cause long-term damage over time, the effects of alcohol abuse can be just as serious and far more immediate. And yet, for a combination of reasons, WWE performers are allowed to get as drunk as they want on their own time.

I'm not suggesting that WWE or any wrestling promotion forbid its wrestlers from drinking - it'd be completely unenforceable, and for most people, that kind of draconian measure just isn't necessary - but when discussing drug use, it's important to take into account all drugs, even legal and socially acceptable ones. Plus, alcohol abuse becomes more dangerous by orders of magnitude when combined with other legally obtainable drugs, like prescription painkillers.

Umaga's official cause of death was a combination of painkillers, anxiety medication and muscle relaxers


Anyone who's read about wrestling in the late 1980s and early-to-mid 1990s is familiar with the stories of wrestlers, oftentimes top talents, zonked out of their minds on painkillers and booze, before, after and sometimes even during their matches. For some, painkillers became not just a way to get over an injury, but a method for self-medicating untreated or still healing ailments, or simply to just as a way to relax after a rough night (or week) of performing. But taken in the huge quantities that wrestlers would sometimes consume and wash down with alcohol, these highly addictive painkillers became increasingly dangerous, and have taken the lives of numerous wrestlers in a much more direct manner than any type of steroid or performance enhancing drug.

Thankfully, WWE has recognized the fact that even legal medicines can be dangerous to their wrestlers, and have kept their Substance Abuse and Drug Testing Policy up-to-date by prohibiting the "non-medical use" of muscle relaxers, benzodiazepines and other prescription medicines as well as the synthetic cannabinoids that resulted in Bourne's first suspension back in November. What's truly impressive about WWE's policy, however, is that it seems to recognize that while marijuana remains illegal in most of the country, even for medical uses, it lumps punishment for pot-smoking in with alcohol use and not more serious drugs. Under the current policy, a positive test for either alcohol or marijuana results in a $2,500 fine. The problem is, when it comes to marijuana, that's still too stiff a punishment.

The first thing to understand is that if a WWE performer is punished for drinking alcohol, it means that there was "reasonable suspicion" they were drinking, which led to a test that then revealed they had imbibed less than 12 hours before an event or performance. Read between the lines, and that basically means that if you show up to work seeming drunk, and it's proven that you have been drinking, you have to shell out $2,500. Considering the considerable danger wrestling drunk can put a performer and his opponent in, this seems rather lenient to me.

But while you more or less have to be drunk at a wrestling match in order to get fined for alcohol, marijuana can show up on a drug test for more than 30 days after the last time you smoked - even longer if you're testing hair. That means that someone could have smoked weed a day, week or even a month ago, and still end up getting slapped with a hefty fine as a result of a random test. Should responsible home use of marijuana really garner the same punishment of someone trying to wrestle while intoxicated?

Jeff Hardy appeared seriously impaired at TNA's 2011 Victory Road event

Not only is the $2,500 fine unfairly administered, but it's also too high for marijuana usage. While it's probably little more than a drop in the bucket to WWE's top stars, for younger, less established talents, that's a substantial cut into a paycheck that has to help them travel around the country and pay for their own quite expensive health insurance. It should come as no surprise then that wrestlers like Bourne would decide to risk getting caught smoking synthetic cannabinoids instead of having to open up their wallet for a $2,500 fine.

But the real issue here should be harm reduction. Wrestlers live extraordinarily tough lifestyles, putting their bodies through hell on a nightly basis and sustaining injuries that a couple extra strength Tylenols just can't handle. These guys are going to find a way to self-medicate, so it's important to ensure they do it in the healthiest way possible. By punishing marijuana use with such a heavy fine - even when enjoyed at home, thousands of miles away from the arena - WWE is driving its talent back into the arms of legal, but more dangerous forms of intoxication, like alcohol and prescription drugs. Even if someone's painkiller prescription is approved by WWE doctors, there's nothing keeping them from abusing it afterhours and mixing it with alcohol use, nor is there any good way to test for it.

No one overdoses on marijuana, nobody gets violent when smoking weed and there's nothing physically addictive in THC - none of those things can be said about alcohol or most popular painkillers. The use of marijuana, or any drug, should never be tolerated during a wrestling performance, but to punish people for using such a benign drug on their own time while allowing others to indulge in far more risky, yet legal, drug-related behaviors, reeks not just of hypocrisy, but of short-sighted adherence to the letter of the law instead of the spirit of it.

The primary goal of WWE's Talent Wellness Program should be to keep the company's wrestlers healthy, and all policy-based decisions should be based on that objective. Leveling heavy fines for at-home marijuana use might promote a drug-free environment in theory, but not in practice, as wrestlers will find other more dangerous alternatives to alleviate their pain and relax. By issuing this tacit approval of alcohol and prescription drug use, WWE's Talent Wellness Program runs in opposition to its stated purpose, making a dangerous profession that much more risky.

What do you think about marijuana use by wrestlers? Should it be more tolerated or would WWE be wise to classify it along with harder drugs? Tell us in the comments below!