People would never fall in loveI. THE BEGINNING OF THE ROMANTIC MYTH ..................................1
if they had not heard love talked about. —La Rochefoucauld
II. THE EXPERIENCE OF 'FALLING IN LOVE' ....................................4
A. Love at First Sight ......................................................................6
B. The Blindness of Romantic Love ..........................................7
C. Falling in Love with Love .........................................................8III. BEING POSSESSED BY ROMANTIC LOVE ..................................9
IV. MODIFICATIONS OF THE ROMANTIC TRADITION ...................12
V. ROMANTIC LOVE AND MARRIAGE ...............................................12
VI. HOW DID WE LEARN THE ROMANTIC RESPONSE ................14
VII. EMOTIONAL PROGRAMMING: ROMANTIC & RELIGIOUS ....17
VIII. BEGINNING TO DOUBT OUR ROMANTIC FEELINGS ...........19
IX. CONCLUSION: ROMANTIC LOVE IS AN ILLUSION .................22
X. GOOD-BYE TO FANTASY,
HELLO TO REALITY
.........................23
It is almost incredible that so many different peoples
should be attracted to a pattern of love that is essentially Western,
strongly Anglo-Saxon, and relatively new on earth.
Western love, in a manner scarcely to be found in earlier history,
attempts to combine sexual outlet, affectionate friendship
and the procreative familial functions, all in a single relationship.
Romantic attraction is considered to be the adequate,
and indeed the only basis for choosing one's lifelong partner;
the sexual desires deliberately aroused in courtship
are supposed to be held in check until after marriage;
the sexual drives of both partners are
supposed to be completely and permanently satisfied within marriage
even though there was no testing period beforehand;
and tenderness, mystery, and excitement
are expected to coexist with household cares, child-rearing problems
and the routine of fifteen thousand nights together.
All in all, anthropologists consider it
one of the most difficult human relationships ever attempted;
just as certainly, it is also one of the most appealing.
—Morton Hunt The Natural History of Love p. 342I. THE BEGINNING OF THE ROMANTIC MYTH
Hum
your favorite love-song
as you read this chapter.
Most of those delightful, melting, transporting
feelings of 'love'
belong to a complex romantic game, a
cultural tradition of feeling and behavior
that was invented about 800 years
ago by the French troubadours:
Chapter
1 ROMANTIC LOVE IS
A HOAX!
EMOTIONAL PROGRAMMING TO ‘FALL IN LOVE'
by JAMES PARK 1
Toward the end of the eleventh century A. D.,
a handful of poets and noblemen in southern France
concocted a set of love sentiments
most of which had no precedent in Western civilization,
and out of them constructed a new and quite original relationship
between man and woman known as...courtly love.
...[It] began as a game and a literary conceit,
but unexpectedly grew into a social philosophy
that shaped the manners and morals of the West.
It started as a playful exercise in flattery,
but became a spiritual force guiding the flatterers;
it was first a private sport of the feudal aristocracy,
but became finally the ideal of the middle classes;
and with wonderfully consistent inconsistency,
it exalted at one and the same time
adultery and chastity, duplicity and faithfulness,
self-indulgence and austerity, suffering and delight.
Although satirists have slain and buried it
in the tinsel costume of all its follies a thousand times over,
it has not stayed interred for one night,
and men and women throughout the Western world
still live by and take for granted a number of its principal concepts.
[Morton Hunt The Natural History of Love (New York: Knopf,
1959)
p. 131]
For 800 years
our culture has been developing an elaborate romantic myth,
one of the outstanding features of which
is the denial of its cultural origin.
If we have drunk deeply from the pool
of romantic fantasy,
we find that romantic feelings 'just
happen' to us without effort,
as if 'love' were the easiest, most natural
of all human feelings.
We are told that
romance needs no justification or analysis;
we should just let ourselves fall into
the warm, enchanting pool of love.
We should allow those happy feelings
to flow over us, drowning our cares.
If we feel a vague longing or a nebulous
dissatisfaction with life,
we should just 'fall in love' and let
romance solve everything.
'Falling in love'
is a deep and enjoyable emotional adventure,
based on a story or script implanted
in our 'hearts' by romantic folklore.
It is a fantasy for our feelings, a drama
written hundreds of years ago,
a fairy tale we want to replicate in
our own lives.
We human beings
are narrative animals—story-telling creatures.
And the dream of romantic love is one
of our favorite stories.
This wonderful delusion has now touched
almost all of the human race.
Its promises are unbelievably great—even
tho sometimes distant.
And we cling to this hope, despite our
personal experiences with 'love'.
We might even admit that the romantic myth
is an immature fable,
but if we learned the basic script at
an early age,
this emotional programming might remain alive within
us as we mature.
2
NEW WAYS
OF LOVING:
HOW AUTHENTICITY TRANSFORMS RELATIONSHIPS
by JAMES PARK
The oldest roots
of this cultural tradition of feeling and behavior
reach back to the Greek god Eros and
the Roman god Cupid.
But romantic love only became a wide-spread
fashion in the Middle Ages.
'Falling in love' has always been an
emotional possibility.
And before the Middle Ages, some people
probably experienced
exaggerated, fantasy feelings close to
what we now call "romantic love".
But such accidental eruptions of personal,
deluded feelings
did not become the passion of the masses
until the French troubadours refined
and spread the emotional game of love.
We might compare
this fashion in feelings to styles in music.
Even tho each style of music has always
been a human possibility,
any given style (eg classical, rock-and-roll)
had a beginning in history.
Later composers adapted the stylistic
conventions they heard.
And just as we might want to trace the
roots of any given style of music
(discovering the first classical
music or the first rock-and-roll),
we might also be curious about the earliest
inventors of romantic love,
the people who—as a matter of historical
fact—started the feeling
that has now become a taken-for-granted
cultural phenomenon.
How
to cite the above pages from New Ways
of Loving
Students and scholars are invited to quote
anything from the above pages.
Here is the proper form for the footnote or other reference:
James Park New
Ways of Loving:
How Authenticity Transforms Relationships
(Minneapolis, MN: Existential Books, 2007—6th edition)
p. x
{the page numbers appear
at the bottom of the pages, with the footer}
Additional resources on the Internet exploring romantic love
1. Romantic Love Bibliography—The Best Critical Books .
2. The
Romantic Love Test: How Do We Know If We Are in Love?
This test includes what is perhaps the
first explicit definition of romantic love
—in the form of 26 defining features
of the phenomenon: the A-Z of romance.
3. Outline of a presentation on The Romantic Love Test .
4. Outline of a presentation unpacking the dynamics of romantic love .
5. An electronic
magazine article (3 pages)
summarizing this chapter:
"Romantic
Love is a Hoax! Emotional Programming to 'Fall in Love' "
6. An extensive
discussion of the question:
When
Was
Romantic Love Invented?
Return to table of contents for New Ways of Loving by James Park.
Return to the LOVE page.
Go to a complete
listing of resources critical of romantic illusions:
The
Romantic
Love Portal
.
Go to
the beginning of this website:
James
Leonard Park—Free
Library
.