Page 43 - Rural Tourism Report Washington County
P. 43

CHAPTER 3: THE WASHINGTON COUNTY RURAL TOURISM SECTOR




            Rural Tourism Analysis by Site
            Washington County staff started with all rural
            sites in the consultant’s inventory of attractions
            (121) and further researched rural tourism related
            activities, events, and amenities offered on these
            sites using publicly available internet map services
            and/or promotional information and social media.

            In some cases, advertising regarding the initial list of
            properties was linked to publicity for similar activities
            elsewhere in the County’s rural area, so the roster
            was expanded to include 127 sites.

            County staff further attempted to contact the
            operator of each rural site on the list to inquire about   Washington County Scenic Bikeway Photo courtesy of  Washington
            activities hosted, ultimately conversing with 106 by   County Visitors Association
            phone. The aim was to gather more data to clarify
            the actual presence and characteristics of tourism in   Site research does not reflect the Tualatin Valley
            rural Washington County today. County permitting   Scenic Bikeway, the Tualatin River, or similar

            and case information were not used for this analysis.   amenities that travel through the region across
            The list of those contacted by County staff differs from   many properties. These regional amenities offer
            the roster of farmers, residents and rural tourism   recreational tourism opportunities in their own
            interests interviewed by the consultant.           right and may contribute to tourism opportunities
                                                               at some of the sites researched (for example by
            Though not an exhaustive inventory, County         offering alternative travel modes such as biking or
            staff's analysis considers a sample mix of locations   kayaking to events).
            intended to very generally reflect the larger rural
            area where tourism activities occur (see Appendix B,   Research included the following for each of the sites:
            “Washington County Analysis of Rural Sites”). While
            all 127 rural properties researched were included in     • Primary use of site;

            the analysis based on publicity indicating some form     • Whether on-site activities, events, or
            of invitation to visitors, further research clarified   amenities are offered or publicized to attract
            the extent of visitor activities - some sites providing   visitors;
            only small scale sporadic rural tourism activities      • Whether an on-site farm stand is operated;
            (e.g. small seasonal u-pick operations with no farm     • Land use district and whether designated as
            stand),and others hosting an array of larger events    farm or forest “resource” land (subject to
            including weddings and corporate gatherings.
                                                                   state protections);
            County staff also collected information on 30 urban     • Approximate acreage; and
            sites that host farmers markets or rural-related events,     • Participation in off-site farmers markets.

            as well as urban agricultural sites near rural lands.
                                                             WASHINGTON COUNTY RURAL TOURISM STUDY                39
   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48