Page 35 - FY Annual Report 2017-18
P. 35

REGIONAL
 COLLABORATION
       the jurisdictions and organizations began reaching out
       to property owners in the watershed. Which properties           CEDAR MILL CREEK FLOOD
       were affected? How often did the properties flood? How    REMEDIATION COLLABORATIVE GOALS
       severe was the flooding?
                                                                  y Create an approach that minimizes or mitigates
       “We held several open houses to talk to people one on    flooding impacts while considering economic
       one, and we’ve responded to a lot of emails and phone    development, habitat value and quality of
       calls,” Brown said. “This was important to us because    life concerns.
       we needed to get a sense of the scope of the problem.”     y Develop a plan that can be phased.

       People submitted photos of flooding and shared their       y Identify funding sources.
       experiences with eroding creek banks, falling trees
                                                                  y Consider how multiple agencies’ regulations
       and flood insurance. In spring 2018, the Collaborative   can be addressed in a way that results in
       Project Team responded with a list of potential policies,   the greatest possible good for the public
       programs and possible structural projects that could     and for the ecosystem, i.e., a basin-wide
                                                                assessment approach.
       be implemented to mitigate the flooding. The public
       was asked to comment on the Collaborative website,      Source: cedarmillcreek.org
 Rocky Brown, Engineering Associate II  www.cedarmillcreek.org.

       “There isn’t one simple answer to managing this water-  Enrollment in the National Flood Insurance Program
       shed,” Brown said. “We’re going to have to continue to
 Watershed management:   work collaboratively, implementing coordinated, phased   Community Rating System program is one strategy
 COLLABORATIVE PARTNERS WORKING ON FLOOD REMEDIATION  strategies to mitigate flooding.”  under consideration. Communities—like Washington
                                                            County and the city of Beaverton—that demonstrate
                                                            commitment to flood mitigation and floodplain manage-
 Rocky Brown, LUT Engineering Associate II, spent most  In spring 2017, LUT and Clean Water Services (CWS)   ment can apply to the program, which provides reduced
 of FY 2017–18 talking to homeowners, businesses,  successfully applied to have the Cedar Mill Creek Flood   flood insurance rates for property owners in and adja-
 organizations  and  concerned  community  members  Remediation Collaborative (CMCFRC) watershed man-  cent to floodplains.
 about flood mitigation in the Cedar Mill/North Johnson   agement project designated as an Oregon Solutions
 Creek watershed.   project by Gov. Kate Brown. The Oregon Solutions pro-  “This could be a significant benefit,” Brown said. “We
 gram brings jurisdictions, agencies, businesses, orga-     realize that it doesn’t directly address flooding, but it
 “When we have heavy rains, some properties in these   nizations and community members together to address   does provide people with some financial relief in the
 areas experience significant flooding,” Brown said. “It’s   mutual problems.  near term.”
 a serious problem without an easy answer.”
 “The Oregon Solutions designation helped us bring          Heading into FY 2018–19, agencies within the collab-
 Cedar Mill and North Johnson creeks drain 5,300 acres   everyone to the table,” said Andrew Singelakis, LUT   orative signed a Declaration of Cooperation, which
 in the West Hills into Beaverton Creek in the Tualatin   Director. “We’ve created a dedicated partnership that   solidifies  the  participating organizations’ commit-
 Hills Nature Park. The creeks travel throughout the area   includes engineers, land use planners, flood plain man-  ment to manage and preserve the watershed while
 —impacting homes, businesses and roads.
 agers and natural resource experts to collaboratively      mitigating flooding.
 “Aside from those who live, work or drive the areas  manage watershed and flood risks.”  “The flooding in the watershed is the result of more
 between Highway 26 and Beaverton Creek, many peo-  In addition to LUT and CWS, the Collaborative includes   intense rainfall events, decades of development, log-
 ple aren’t aware of the water management issues we   the city of Beaverton, Tualatin Hills Park & Recreation   ging and more,” Brown said. “There’s a lot of history
 have in this watershed,” Brown said. “But it’s definitely   District, Federal Emergency Management Agency   associated with this situation. Mitigating it will take time
 a community livability and environmental issue.”  Cedar Mill Creek
 (FEMA) and others. Together, representatives from all      and study. But we’re making a good start.”



 31  |  Partnering for the Future  LUT Annual Report FY 2017–18    LUT Annual Report FY 2017–18  Partnering for the Future  |  32
   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40