Page 41 - Green Builder Magazine May-June 2019 Issue
P. 41

CREDIT: BUILDINGANEXTERIOR.COM












                   Two perfect. Builders can be just as inspired designing an Accessory Dwelling Unit as with any full-sized home.
                   all. On the surface, regulations on ADUs appear to be more relaxed   property without having to sell it,” he says. For example, this bylaw
                   than those for tiny homes. Most cities do not outright ban ADUs, but   eliminates an option such as renting out the main home should the
                   very few cities actually embrace them—in most cases, regulations are   owner need to suddenly relocate and not want to quickly sell the
                   so restrictive that most jurisdictions grant no more than 10 permits   property for less than market value. It also opens a can of worms if
                   are issued each year, Peterson notes.                   a family member were to inherit the property and not want to sell.
                     The low rate is “largely attributable to restrictive ordinances and   Most U.S. cities have owner-occupancy bylaws for properties
                   bylaws, and long, involved, complex permitting processes,” Peterson   with ADUs. Some tighten the restriction further by requiring
                   states in Backdoor Revolution. “No wonder so few homeowners   residents of the ADU to be relatives of the property owners.
                   would dare to run the ADU development gauntlet—such formidable   Other cities require those relatives to be ill, disabled or elderly
                   roadblocks stand in their way.”                         and require extended care or supervision by the owner. And, there
                     Three of these roadblocks are what Peterson calls “poison pill   can be a time limit as to how long a relative may stay in the
                   regulations,” items that effectively kill an ADU effort: owner-  ADU, usually no more than a few years. Still other cities restrict
                   occupancy requirements, off-street parking requirements, and   occupancy to speci	c age or income groups, and some prohibit
                   conditional or discretionary reviews.                   the unit from being rented out.
                                                                             The sad thing is that there’s no real justification for owner-
                   LIVE HERE OR LOSE IT                                    occupancy requirements. Peterson believes it was once a logical
                   Under owner-occupancy, an owner must live on the property is there   ordinance somewhere, one that, for simplicity sake, other jurisdictions
                   is to be an ADU upon it. This precondition, “the default rule of the   simply copied—along with numerous other building codes—when
                   land for ADUs today,” e ectively bars any such construction, Peterson   developing their own ordinances. Now, these “accidental mindless
                   notes. It shoots down one of the principal reasons for building an   regulations” are seen as normal and well-reasoned, simply because
                   ADU: as an investment. “An owner can no longer move away from the   they’re on the books everywhere.

                   www.greenbuildermedia.com                                                       May/June 2019 GREEN BUILDER  39




          38-45 GB 0519 ADU.indd   39                                                                                           5/8/19   4:09 PM
   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46