In recent years, the battle between Bluehost and AWS has been raging on. Around 2010, Bluehost started to offer a free tier to their clients. The idea behind this was to attract more clients by giving them a way to use their services for free for up to 1 year. However, the idea was not well received, and in 2013 Bluehost gained a significant market share by selling its web hosting service exclusively through its managed service company.
So now it is 2016 and we have Bluehost vs AWS. In this article, we will be comparing Bluehost with Amazon Web Services. We will also be presenting some pros and cons of each firm so that you can make an informed decision in your own eyes on which one is best for you!
- Overview of the AWS and Bluehost Comparison
There are two main advantages (and some disadvantages) to Bluehost over AWS. First, Bluehost is used by many of our customers, so it’s a good idea to briefly summarize the key differences between them in order to help you decide which provider will best suit your needs.
Second, Bluehost also offers a free plan as well as a paid premium offering for additional features. We’ll discuss these additional features in this article, but first we’d like to talk about the main differences between Bluehost and AWS.
The first is that Bluehost offers a free plan which is usable immediately. It comes with one Amazon account and can run on Linux or Windows servers. It runs on both Amazon EC2 instances and rack-mounted hardware (although this will vary based on region). The free plan can be extended with $5/month per EC2 instance or $25/month per server if you choose not to use CloudFront (and you get two free months of CloudFront storage).
Bluehost has three plans: Developer, Standard and Professional (which is actually what customers call the paid plans). All three come with dedicated EC2 instances and customer support, but there are significant benefits to the Professional plan: 1) unlimited storage space (and optionally private cloud) 2) unlimited bandwidth 3) multiple email accounts 4) 1-click setup 5) access to some Elastic Load Balancing services 6) custom logo
- Benefits of AWS
Bluehost is the biggest name in web hosting. It is also one of the most popular choices for hosting WordPress, Drupal and other content management systems. However, it has its downsides, such as lack of features or technical support. That may sound like a bad thing to you, but don’t panic!
Bluehost is all about saving money. It offers free plans that allow you to host unlimited websites for as little as $1 a month (yes, that’s one dollar!)
Bluehost does offer a few more features than the competitors and the price is also lower than other options. Bluehost offers free domain registration, free email account and free disk space for your website. On top of that, you get 25GB of disk space on every server (that’s enough room for around 1 million images).
But what if you want more? Let’s take a look at some of the features Bluehost offers:
Here are some additional features that Bluehost doesn’t have:
That said, there are still ways to improve your experience with Bluehost:
You can use your own domain name instead of using their domain name
You can use their domain name only when hosting your own domain
They do not provide any SSL/HTTPS protection (although they say they are working on this feature)
To summarize: while they do provide many things that other hosts don’t offer and save money compared to others in their business (and it’s definitely cheaper than some others), Bluehost is not the best choice for people who just want cheap web hosting but who want more from it than just hosting their website (all-in-one packages). If you want something similar to what Bluehost does but with more features, go for WP Engine or DigitalOcean .
- Benefits of Bluehost
In the process of doing a comparative analysis of the two hosting platforms, we came across some interesting points that are worth mentioning.
Bluehost and AWS are two of the most popular web hosting services in the world and these are companies that have been around for a while now. Both Bluehost and AWS claim to offer one-click install, which is one of their key selling points. However, there are some who think that this is not enough to make them stand out from their competitors.
This leads us to our primary question: which is better?
Bluehost or AWS?
The basic idea behind Bluehost is simple: you just get a free account with your choice of many preset packages and then, whenever you want to host it, all you need to do is fill out an online form at https://www.bluehost.com/ . You can have as many websites as you want on your account and it will be hosted according to its set schedule. Then, when your site gets popular (which happens relatively quickly for most people), your site will automatically be migrated onto the server that has been chosen for you by Bluehost’s system administrators — this will happen after only a few minutes time (just enough time for you to see if it was successful). Most users think this means they can manage their accounts without any intervention on their part whatsoever; they won’t even need to go into their website’s settings page any more!
But this solution has its downside too; because once the site gets popular, its traffic will go up by default — but when traffic increases beyond a certain limit (or when your visitors become sick), then unfortunately it will go down again — so if you want traffic above a certain level (say 5 000 per month), then you should expect your website will start getting much less traffic than before; unless you automate the process somehow or use another service like CloudFlare or Backblaze B2B . It could also be argued that every user actually sees his own statistics reports on his website every day; if these reports give him negative numbers then he might assume that something went wrong with his server’s configuration or something like that — but he would be wrong in this case too — there would be no way he can tell him why his traffic went down while everything looked just as it did before!
However, what makes Bluehost different from its competitor actually lies within the fundamental concept behind Bluehost itself. The difference lies in how Bluehost compares
- Cost of AWS vs Bluehost
Every discussion about AWS Alternative costs is bound to come up again. You’ve heard the numbers, and you probably agree that AWS is way cheaper than Bluehost. But what if you’re not a tech person? What if you just want to know how much it costs to host a website with the hosting platform of your choice?
Well, that’s right: Bluehost vs AWS cost comparison chart. Take a look at the chart and see if you agree with us!
Bluehost vs aws cost comparison chart
Bluehost and aws are two leading services for web hosting. They have a lot in common: both companies have offices in the US and have been around since 2009. Both offer free plans (with unlimited storage) as well as paid plans with unlimited storage, bandwidth, number of domains, SSL certificates, etc. But what really sets them apart is their prices for each plan. Bluehost offers one simple price point: $2 per month for unlimited storage (aka “free”). Bluehost also offers different packages with various features and capacities ranging from $3 per month for unlimited storage to $15 per month for unlimited storage plus 20 GB of bandwidth (aka “premium”).
AWS offers two price points: $0 per month or just 10 cents per hour (when using an Amazon EC2 instance). If you want more than 10 GB of bandwidth, then all you need to pay is 10 cents per hour or one cent per GB (when using an EC2 instance). The difference between the two pricing schemes depends on your needs: if you need 1 GB of bandwidth or 4 GB of bandwidth then this setup will be cheaper; however, if you require more than 3 GB of bandwidth then it will be more expensive because that requires more time – so it pays to adjust your time-to-cash costs accordingly while your bill stays the same!
So, next time when someone tells you that they need “free [or] cheap [or] cheap/free/cheap” support – just remember that their expenses are based on your actual costs (and not some arbitrary price point), and that they might need some adjustments when dividing those expenses by their billing amount!
- How to Pick a Hosting Provider
We started the blog a little over a year ago as a way to share thoughts on the tech industry, and technology in particular. The first part of this post is a comparison between Bluehost and AWS, with an eye for some of the things that are different about each as well as some of the similarities.
Both companies offer data centers, web hosting and cloud services. Bluehost offers all three: hosting, VPNs and email services. It also has a data center that is dedicated to 1-click hosting (meaning you can get your website up in minutes using just 3 clicks). They also offer “Cloud Hosting” which includes all of those services plus security monitoring for your own server(s).
AWS offers these three services in addition to many others: Amazon S3 storage (for storing files or large files), CloudFront content delivery network (CDN) offering high performance CDNs across the Internet, Elastic Load Balancers (ELBs) providing load balancing/delegation of applications running on servers within their data centers, API Gateway (AWS’ version of JQuery), Amazon EC2 instances with support for multiple languages and regions.
The main differences between them are:
Bluehost – Depreciation – Depreciation occurs when you buy an item that depreciates in value more quickly than its replacement cost. With each year that passes since you bought an item (whether it depreciates or not), you pay more in depreciation costs. At the end of life there will be no new items produced so there is less depreciation. Since there are no new items produced at Bluehost’s disposal to replace any existing ones, there will be no depreciation either because no items have been replaced yet or because they aren’t being used anymore anyway.
