SAFEGUARD I FOR LIFE-ENDING DECISIONS

PALLIATIVE CARE TRIAL

    Each of us dies only once.
So it might not be enough to be counseled about palliative care.
Should we put ourselves under the care of a team of people
who have helped many patients in their last days of life?

    Some systems of safeguards for life-ending decisions
require that a palliative care specialist be consulted.
All doctors know something about taking care of the human body
when it is beginning to shut down.
But since most of medicine is devoted to curing diseases
and repairing physical problems that have emerged,
only a few specialists have carefully considered
how best to take care of people whose only wish is
to have a pain-free and peaceful death.

    Palliative care can be offered in many different settings,
such as nursing homes, hospitals, or hospices.
And depending on the specific problems at the end of the patient's life,
one of these might be more appropriate than the others.

    Many people who oppose the right-to-die
say that adequate palliative care will end the desire for death.
And open-minded people of any persuasion
should be willing to give this claim a fair test
for each person who is drawing life to a close.

    Perhaps one week in a hospice or other care setting
where 24-hours-a-day palliative care is being given
would be a fair test to see if this particular patient
wants to continue to receive this kind of comfort-care
or still wants to exercise his or her right-to-die.

    A palliative care trial is a time-limited experiment
not a mandatory alternative to choosing death.
If palliative care does not work satisfactorily for this patient,
various other pathways towards death should remain open.
A few days of good palliative care
will empower everyone to make wiser end-of-life choices.
They can all carefully consider when and how
would be the ideal way for this patient to meet death.

    When a meaningful period of palliative care has been tried,
then there will be medical records showing
just what kinds of symptom-control were used.
Such medical records should not be made public.
But the fact of a palliative care trial can be used as good evidence
that all appropriate alternatives to immediate death were explored.




HOW A TRIAL OF PALLIATIVE CARE
COULD DISCOURAGE IRRATIONAL SUICIDE
AND OTHER FORMS OF PREMATURE DEATH


    Sometimes physical or psychological suffering
is the main push toward irrational suicide.
When all forms of suffering are treated by comfort-care specialists,
this should discourage formerly-frantic patients
from asking for death before it is absolutely necessary.

    Likewise, the proxies who were thinking
that some form of chosen death would be the best answer
might discover that many of the physical and psychological problems
that were leading them to choose death
have been adequately dealt with by the comfort-care now being used.

    Sometimes the patient and/or the proxies
have an imperfect grasp of the disease or condition
that is leading them to consider choosing death.
So when they put the patient into a palliative care trial,
this will be another opportunity to discover the real medical condition.
For example, if the pain they thought was caused by incurable cancer
actually has some other causes, which can be treated,
then they can avoid the mistake of choosing death too soon.

    Or if the traumas of terminal illness were the reasons for choosing death,
the breathing-space provided by good palliative care
can allow all concerned to reconsider any decision for death.
Emotional as well as physical problems should be addressed.
And when everyone involved feels better about the approaching death,
they can make wiser decisions.

    If the patient can be made comfortable
even tho death is not going to be avoided,
the last days can be meaningful for all involved.
And thus the palliative care did actually avoid a premature death.
Dying before it was absolutely necessary can be avoided
if the patient receives appropriate physical and emotional care.

    And if all palliative-care measures do not bring sufficient relief,
then all concerned can follow the other pathway towards death
they have been keeping in reserve
just in case the palliative care did not prove satisfactory.

    If the advocates of palliative care as an alternative to choosing death
prove to be correct in this case, then the patient and his or her family
will be thankful for the additional days
—or even just hours—that palliative care provides.



created February 1, 2007; revised 3-15-2008; 4-10-2008; 2-6-2010; 5-20-2010;
5-27-2011; 12-15-2011; 1-29-2012; 3-23-2012; 8-1-2012; 8-22-2012; 11-6-2012;
5-22-2013; 6-27-2013; 2-16-2015; 10-29-2015; 12-8-2017; 10-24-2018; 6-5-2020; 


Using symptom-control
instead of immediately choosing death is usually a wise alternative.
This is Safeguard I in How to Die: Safeguards for Life-Ending Decisions:
"Palliative Care Trial".



Another chapter of the same book combines palliative care with the right-to-die:
Chapter 42  Good Death Hospice: Creating the First Right-to-Die Hospice



Go to the Catalog of Safeguards for Life-Ending Decisions



Go to the list of 26 recommended safeguards.



Go to the index page for the Safeguards Website.



Go to the Right-to-Die Portal.




Go to the beginning of this website
James Leonard Park—Free Library