35-Year SEO Veteran: Great SEO Is Good GEO — But Not Everyone's Been Doing Great SEO
A practical, experience-driven take on why “Generative Engine Optimization (GEO)” is often just strong, fundamentals-first SEO—and why many sites struggling today were never doing great SEO in the first place.
Key takeaways
- GEO isn’t a replacement for SEO; in many cases, it’s the same core disciplines applied to new search interfaces (AI Overviews, chat-based discovery, etc.).
- Great SEO tends to translate well to generative experiences because it emphasizes clarity, helpfulness, structure, and credibility.
- Sites that relied on shortcuts (thin content, manipulative tactics, weak UX, unclear intent matching) are more likely to struggle in both classic and AI-driven results.
- Entity understanding and topical depth matter: being unambiguous about “who you are,” “what you do,” and “why you’re trustworthy” helps both search engines and LLMs.
- Content should answer real questions with scannable formatting, precise definitions, and verifiable claims—ideal for users and for machine summarization.
What “Great SEO is Good GEO” means in practice
The central idea is straightforward: if your SEO program already prioritizes user intent, clear information architecture, strong technical hygiene, and content that demonstrates genuine expertise, you’re likely positioned to perform well as discovery shifts toward AI-generated summaries and conversational interfaces.
Conversely, if performance depended on fragile tactics—like publishing lots of near-duplicate pages, chasing keywords without satisfying intent, or treating content as a ranking trick—then “GEO” will feel like a disruptive new discipline. In reality, it’s often exposing long-standing weaknesses.
Foundations that support both SEO and GEO
- Intent-first page design: match the query’s purpose (learn, compare, buy, solve) with the right format and depth.
- Information gain: add something meaningfully useful—original examples, clear steps, unique data, or expert judgment.
- Structured readability: descriptive headings, short paragraphs, lists, definitions, and direct answers help users and machines extract meaning.
- Trust signals: transparent authorship, citations where appropriate, updated timestamps, and consistent brand/entity details across the site.
- Technical quality: fast pages, crawlable internal linking, clean canonicals, minimal index bloat, and accessible HTML structure.
Why “not everyone’s been doing great SEO”
Many organizations have historically equated SEO with publishing volume, keyword placement, and link accumulation—without ensuring the content is genuinely helpful, differentiated, and easy to understand. As generative results raise the bar for clarity and usefulness, those gaps become more visible.
If you want to benefit from GEO-style visibility, focus on being the most reliable, unambiguous source for a topic—not the loudest publisher.
Action checklist (SEO that supports GEO)
- Audit for clarity: can a new visitor understand what the page is about in 10 seconds?
- Answer the question early: provide a direct response near the top, then expand with context and detail.
- Use explicit entities: name products, people, places, categories, and standards precisely and consistently.
- Strengthen internal linking: connect related pages with descriptive anchor text to show topical relationships.
- Reduce thin/duplicative pages: consolidate where needed to improve depth and reduce index clutter.
- Update and maintain: keep key pages current; stale content is harder to trust and summarize.