Originally published at https://www.searchenginejournal.com/great-seo-is-good-geo-but-not-everyones-been-doing-great-seo/567628/

35-Year SEO Veteran: Great SEO Is Good GEO — But Not Everyone's Been Doing Great SEO

A practical, experience-driven take on why “Generative Engine Optimization (GEO)” is often just strong, fundamentals-first SEO—and why many sites struggling today were never doing great SEO in the first place.

Key takeaways

What “Great SEO is Good GEO” means in practice

The central idea is straightforward: if your SEO program already prioritizes user intent, clear information architecture, strong technical hygiene, and content that demonstrates genuine expertise, you’re likely positioned to perform well as discovery shifts toward AI-generated summaries and conversational interfaces.

Conversely, if performance depended on fragile tactics—like publishing lots of near-duplicate pages, chasing keywords without satisfying intent, or treating content as a ranking trick—then “GEO” will feel like a disruptive new discipline. In reality, it’s often exposing long-standing weaknesses.

Foundations that support both SEO and GEO

Why “not everyone’s been doing great SEO”

Many organizations have historically equated SEO with publishing volume, keyword placement, and link accumulation—without ensuring the content is genuinely helpful, differentiated, and easy to understand. As generative results raise the bar for clarity and usefulness, those gaps become more visible.

If you want to benefit from GEO-style visibility, focus on being the most reliable, unambiguous source for a topic—not the loudest publisher.

Action checklist (SEO that supports GEO)