Lily-Rose Depp touched down in Los Angeles on Tuesday, as the jury resumed deliberations in her father Johnny's $100million libel trial with ex-wife Amber Heard.

The French-American actress, who celebrated her 23rd birthday four days ago, maintained a low profile, concealing her features with a black safety covering and cat eye sunglasses.

Accompanied by a bodyguard on her arrival, Lily-Rose wore a grey denim jacket layered over a black jumper and trousers.

Travelling: Lily-Rose Depp touched down in Los Angeles on Tuesday, as the jury resumed deliberations in her father Johnny's $100million libel trial with ex-wife Amber Heard

The Chanel brand ambassador, who, for her outing kept her blonde locks in a tousled bun at her neck, was also pictured scrolling through her phone.

During her birthday celebrations last week, Lily-Rose, whose mother is singer Vanessa Paradis, was putting the family drama behind her as she shared a series of stunning snaps while wearing a sash reading: 'Birthday princess'.

Lily-Rose's father Johnny, 58, is suing his ex-wife Amber, 36, for $50million for defamation over her 2018 op-ed for the Washington Post, in which she spoke about being a victim of domestic abuse.

Civil law: Lily-Rose's father Johnny, 58, is suing his ex-wife Amber, 36, for $50million for defamation over her 2018 op-ed for the Washington Post, in which she spoke about being a victim of domestic abuse (pictured on Friday)

Aquaman star Amber has countersued for $100million and the court case has captured attention over the last few weeks, with Amber alleging she was beaten and threatened by her husband.

Johnny has denied his ex-wife's allegations of abusive behaviour and recently declared in court he has lost 'nothing less than everything' as a result of the claims.

Asked what he has lost following the publication of Amber's essay, he said: 'Nothing less than everything.

Landed: Accompanied by a bodyguard on her arrival, Lily-Rose wore a grey denim jacket layered over a black jumper and trousers

Outing: The French-American actress, who celebrated her 23rd birthday four days ago, maintained a low profile, concealing her features with a black safety covering and cat eye sunglasses

'When the allegations were made [and] rapidly circling the globe, telling people I was a drunken cocaine-fuelled menace who beat women – suddenly in my 50s – it's over. You're done.

'So what did it do to me? What effect did it have on me? I put it to you this way, no matter the outcome of this trial, the second the allegations were made against me, the accusations, the second that more and more metastasized and turned into fodder for the media, once that happened, I lost then.'

The Edward Scissorhands actor also said that he believes the allegations will follow him forever because of the high profile nature of the case.

He added: 'That is to say, I lost because that is not a thing that anyone is just going to put on your back for a short period of time. I will live with that for the rest of my life because of the allegations and because it was such a high profile case.

Court: Amber has countersued for $100million and the court case has captured attention, with Amber alleging she was beaten and threatened by her husband - claims he denies

'So I lost then, no matter the outcome of this trial. I'll carry that for the rest of my days. It never had to be that way. It never had to happen, and I don't quite understand why it did in the way that it did.'

Elsewhere in the court case, Amber testified she fought 'really hard' to stay in the Aquaman sequel when scenes from the movie were axed and 'communication stopped' with the producers after Johnny's team depicted her abuse allegations as a 'hoax'.

She said she has been labelled a 'liar' during the $100million defamation trial because Johnny, 58, is the 'bigger star' and had 'more publicity reach'.

Amber told the courtroom in Virginia that the 'sophisticated PR machine' behind Johnny had worked to label her as a liar in the media - which has impacted her career.

Jurors began deliberations in the bitter $100million libel six-week trial on Friday.

The seven-person jury deliberated for more than two hours and resumed discussions on Tuesday after the US Memorial Day holiday.