Please show this page to the Instructor to receive your reward.
Total score
{{ total_payoff }}
Your reward
{{ reward_count }} reward(s), worth €{{ reward_value }}
Please go to the enumerator to receive your reward.
The enumerator will give you the completion password after all rewards have been distributed.
Study Debrief
This experiment studied how neighbouring forest owners choose between two forest management strategies. Management Strategy A involved additional management activities that can help maintain the economic, ecological, and recreational value of forests. Management Strategy B focused on timber production and included only standard management activities.
The study examined situations where one owner's management choice can also affect neighbouring forests. Management Strategy A involved an additional cost, but its benefits could be shared with the neighbouring forest. This means that each owner may prefer the other owner to choose Strategy A while choosing Strategy B themselves.
We also investigated the effect of communication messages that emphasise moral responsibility — such as treating others as one would like to be treated — on these interactions.
Finally, the study explored how these dynamics and communication strategies may influence voting behaviour and policy preferences related to forest management.
All decisions were anonymous and will be analysed only in aggregate form. Thank you again for your time and contribution.