Main Search Premium Members Advanced Search Disclaimer
Cites 3 docs
Section 33B in The Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974
Article 226 in The Constitution Of India 1949
THE AIR (PREVENTION AND CONTROL OF POLLUTION) ACT, 1981

Try out our Premium Member services: Virtual Legal Assistant, Query Alert Service and an ad-free experience. Free for one month and pay only if you like it.

Gujarat High Court
Afron vs State on 19 April, 2012
Author: Mr.Bhaskar Bhattacharya, J.B.Pardiwala,
  
 Gujarat High Court Case Information System 
    
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

SCA/5713/2012	 2/ 2	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

SPECIAL
CIVIL APPLICATION No. 5713 of 2012
 

 
 
=========================================================


 

AFRON
PRINTS - Petitioner(s)
 

Versus
 

STATE
OF GUJARAT & 1 - Respondent(s)
 

=========================================================
 
Appearance : 
MR
JAPAN V DAVE for
Petitioner(s) : 1, 
MS. SHRUTI PATHAK, ASSTT.GOVERNMENT PLEADER for
Respondent(s) : 1, 
None for Respondent(s) :
2, 
=========================================================


 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE 
			
			 

MR.BHASKAR
			BHATTACHARYA
		
	
	 
		 
		 
			 

and
		
	
	 
		 
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA
		
	

 

 
 


 

Date
: 19/04/2012 

 

 
 
ORAL
ORDER

(Per : HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA) By this application under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioner has challenged an order dated July 12, 2011 passed by the Gujarat Pollution Control Board, thereby directing closure of the unit of the petitioner.

In view of the fact that the order is appealable under Section 33B of the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974, we are not inclined to entertain this application. This application is dismissed on this ground alone. We make it clear that we have not otherwise gone into the merits of the case and dismissal of the petition will not stand in the way of the petitioner in seeking appropriate remedy before the appropriate forum in accordance with law.

(Bhaskar Bhattacharya, Actg. C.J.) (J.B.

Pardiwala, J.) */Mohandas     Top