Try out our Premium Member services: Virtual Legal Assistant, Query Alert Service and an ad-free experience. Free for one month and pay only if you like it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B. A. No. 2317 of 2014 Vijay Kumar Jain ...... ... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ..... ... Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Raj Mangal Singh, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. ------ 5/ 23.12.2014
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Gua (Barajamda) P.S. Case No. 9 of 2014 corresponding to G.R. No. 99 of 2014, for the alleged offences under Sections 214, 414, 420, 467, 468, 120-B of the Indian Penal Code, Rule 7, 8, 9 of the Jharkhand Mineral Dealer Rules, 2007, Section 38, 41 of the Air Pollution Act and Section 4, 21 of the M.M.R.D.A. Act, 1957.
From the FIR, it appears that the police case has been instituted against the petitioner for running a crusher illegally.
In the facts of this case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to petitioner, Vijay Kumar Jain. Accordingly, it is directed that in the event of his surrender / arrest, the petitioner, named above, shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand), with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chaibasa, in connection with Gua (Barajamda) P.S. Case No. 9 of 2014 corresponding to G.R. No. 99 of 2014, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
( H. C. Mishra, J.) R.Kr.