Main Search Premium Members Advanced Search Disclaimer
Cites 5 docs
Section 278 in The Indian Penal Code
Section 269 in The Indian Penal Code
THE AIR (PREVENTION AND CONTROL OF POLLUTION) ACT, 1981
Section 24 in The Indian Penal Code
Section 24(1) in The Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974

advertisement
User Queries

Try out our Premium Member services: Virtual Legal Assistant, Query Alert Service and an ad-free experience. Free for one month and pay only if you like it.

Kerala High Court
Arivazhakan.C. vs State Of Kerala on 18 February, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Crl.MC.No. 631 of 2009()


1. ARIVAZHAKAN.C., S/O.CHINNAPPAN,
                      ...  Petitioner
2. ANAND, S/O.RAMANUJAM, SREEKOVIL STREET

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE PUBLIC
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.DILIP J. AKKARA

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice M.N.KRISHNAN

 Dated :18/02/2009

 O R D E R
                        M.N. KRISHNAN, J
                       -----------------------
                  CRL.M.C.No. 631 OF 2009
                 ---------------------------------
             Dated this the 18th day of February, 2009


                              O R D E R

This application is filed to quash all proceedings relating to C.C. 2206/2007 of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Irinjalakuda. The police has filed a charge sheet against the accused and another person under Section 269, 278 IPC and Section 24(1) r/w. 43 of the Water Prevention and Control of Pollution Act 1974. The allegations against the accused are that they had carried the human waste in a tanker and had attempted to flow it in a residential locality which would give rise to infectious diseases and therefore had committed the above said offences. The learned counsel would contend that at any rate an action under Section 24(1) of the Water Prevention and Control of Pollution Act will not be maintainable. But whatever it may be, on the basis of the allegation an action may lie under Section 269 and 278 of the IPC and other is a technical question that requires consideration. The matter requires consideration at the hands of the court below at appropriate stage and therefore if it is being Crl.M.C. 631/2009 -2- tried as a warrant trial where charge has to be framed, it may be done at that stage otherwise let it be considered after the trial and at the time of final hearing.

The Crl.M.C is disposed of accordingly.

M.N. KRISHNAN,JUDGE vkm