Try out our Premium Member services: Virtual Legal Assistant, Query Alert Service and an ad-free experience. Free for one month and pay only if you like it.
Civil Writ Petition No.6753 of 2014 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Civil Writ Petition No.6753 of 2014 Date of Decision: 18.11.2014 Haryana State Pollution Control Board ..Petitioner versus Central Board of Direct Taxes and others ..Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIVE BHALLA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.S.WALIA Present: Mr. Sandeep Goyal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Urvashi Dhugga, Advocate, for respondents no.1 and 2. Mr. Tejinder K.Joshi, Advocate, for respondent no.3. RAJIVE BHALLA, J. (ORAL)
The petitioner prays for issuance of a writ of mandamus to direct the Central Board of Direct Taxes to decide application, dated 31.01.2013, filed under Section 119 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") to condone delay in filing applications for exemption under section 10(23C)(iv) of the Act and for registration under Section 12A of the Act for assessment year 2006-07.
The petitioner also prays for quashing of orders dated 29.7.2013 (Annexure P-9) and dated 09.01.2014 (Annexure P-10), rejecting the prayer for registration under Section 12AA of the Act KUMAR VIRENDER 2014.12.09 15:41 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this docunt High Court Chandigarh Civil Writ Petition No.6753 of 2014 2 and for exemption under section 10(23C)(iv) of the Act, respectively.
We have heard counsel for the parties.
The Haryana State Pollution Control Board is a statutory body constituted under the Water (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 to perform statutory functions under the Air (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act, 1981. A perusal of the impugned order reveals that consideration has been confined to accounts and expenditure of the petitioner without taking into consideration its objects etc. Faced with these observations, counsel for the revenue submits that she has instructions to state that the revenue may be allowed to withdraw the impugned order and pass a fresh order after considering the matter in its entirety. In view of statement made by counsel for the revenue, order dated 9.1.2014 is deemed to have been withdrawn. The Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, Panchkula, shall pass a fresh order after taking into consideration the objects and reasons for constituting the petitioner-Board by reference to the Water (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 and Air (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act, 1981 and all other relevant statutory functions assigned to the Board. Counsel for the petitioner states, on instructions, that they would not raise any objection regarding limitation, while deciding the application.
The prayer with respect to quashing of order (Annexure P-9) rejecting registration cannot be considered at this stage as, admittedly, the matter is pending adjudication before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal.
KUMAR VIRENDER The prayer for issuance of a mandamus to the Central 2014.12.09 15:41 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this docunt High Court Chandigarh Civil Writ Petition No.6753 of 2014 3 Board of Direct Taxes, to decide the applications for condonation of delay is accepted by directing the Board to decide the applications, within three months of receipt of a certified copy of this order.
The writ petition is disposed of in the above terms.
( RAJIVE BHALLA ) JUDGE ( B.S.WALIA ) 18.11.2014 JUDGE kanchan/VK KUMAR VIRENDER 2014.12.09 15:41 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this docunt High Court Chandigarh