Cites 7 docs - [View All]
THE AIR (PREVENTION AND CONTROL OF POLLUTION) ACT, 1981
Section 4 in The Mines Act, 1952
Section 21 in The Mines Act, 1952
Section 379 in The Indian Penal Code
Section 438(2) in The Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973
User Queries

Try out our Premium Member services: Virtual Legal Assistant, Query Alert Service and an ad-free experience. Free for one month and pay only if you like it.

Patna High Court - Orders
Dhananjay Sharma vs The State Of Bihar on 13 September, 2012
                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              Criminal Miscellaneous No.22651 of 2012
               ======================================================
               Dhananjay Sharma
                                                                  .... .... Petitioner/s
                                               Versus
               The State Of Bihar
                                                             .... .... Opposite Party/s
               ======================================================
               CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR
               SINGH
               ORAL ORDER

03/ 13-09-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 379 of the Indian Penal Code, 7 of Bihar Minerals (Prevention of Illegal Mining, Transportation and Storage) Rules, 2003, 41 of the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974, 37 of the Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981, 15 of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, 4/40/62 of Bihar Minor Mineral Concession. Rules, 1972 and section 4/21 of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957.

The accusation is of running crusher without any authorization.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.22651 of 2012 (3) dt.13-09-2012 2/2 petitioner that as per the informant the seizure does not suggest that the crusher machine was in a running position when the petitioner was earlier a licensee.

Considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named petitioner be released on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Jehanabad in connection with Makhdumpur P.S. Case No. 418 of 2011, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.) DKS/ .