Try out our Premium Member services: Virtual Legal Assistant, Query Alert Service and an ad-free experience. Free for one month and pay only if you like it.
In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh CWP No. 22859 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 09.12.2011 Satish Kumar & others ....... Petitioners Versus Appellate Authority under AIR (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981 & others ........ Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.M. Kumar Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Narain Raina **** Present: Mr. Robin Dutt, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Sapan Dhir, Advocate for the caveator / respondent. **** 1. To be referred to the reporters or not ? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest? M.M. Kumar, J.
Learned counsel for the petitioners after arguing the case for some time requests for withdrawal of the writ petition with liberty to move an appropriate application before the learned Single Judge raising all the pleas, which have been raised in the instant petition. Let the application be filed in RSA No. 809 of 2010, in which the cause of action is closely related to the instant writ. Some interim order has also been passed by the learned Single Judge on 19.5.2011.
Ordered accordingly.
(M.M.KUMAR) JUDGE (RAJIV NARAIN RAINA) JUDGE December 09, 2011 'sp'