Try out our Premium Member services: Virtual Legal Assistant, Query Alert Service and an ad-free experience. Free for one month and pay only if you like it.
111 mm men comm or ii; cmcurr macs mm» 1'1-us ms 15'"! ha? THE Hozrnm am, "fii_.fi,,_ ms cmm1z¢AL"z§%?a21*ij(;§Iq..nia§f;;3f:99[2oo9 BETWEEN: 1, SRIVINAY Ji_Y1'HA\R~ _V , PARTHER,''-1M'j''s-u.,P;--.iFQUNpR£Es BELGAQM, 595 c,'UVD'--1AM__BA(:;H NEAR R NA€f*}fi.R 'i2_m'AGE'"" ' BELGAUMI-590 ~ . _ « ' 2 SRIP_.N..PA?€.DiT , PAR'I'N'ER,* J.1P;'§"()UNDAR'IES ;B{":~LGAUi$'§,_ 695 C; UDYAMBAGH " EAR R C NPxC:AR' II STAGE % _ BEAEQGAHM-590008 PETITIONERS (BY*-SR! R CHANDANAGOUIDAR, ADV.) TBHARATI GOPAL GHATAGE AGE : 45 YEARS Oi;.'§C : HOUSEHOLD WORK "R/<:) PLOT No.1, S.No. 595 " ANGOL, BELGAUM -590 003 ... RESPONDENT
r7K~fv'"
THIS PETITION IS FILED {US 432 CR.P.C. PH:Ai*ir;{3'-fro; QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN c.c.No,;574;,V2ojca.%or; THE FILE OF' JMFC 11 COURT, BELGAUM. " -- TI-{IS PETITION comm an F0? An.M1sLs1<3t¢.A%M_'T§1:s %' BAY, THE COURT MADE THE_FOLL()W'i1§G: A * - 2 fl.onD£R , This petition is Cr.P.C. to quash the on the file of JMFCEI % No.1 and 2 are accused No.2 and 3 bcfére Couxt Accused No.1 and 2 am the partners of Respondent filed complaint against the petitioners and others under Section 200 Cr.F'.C. for the ofi"§nt$e'v----1:5un1aha' 1318 under Section 37, 38, 39 and 40 of Air " {PI*s§?enfion and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981 R[w &ctio11s 157, 268, 2'?8, 299, 336, 463, 503, 505 River Section 107 of WC. The Trial Court Vida order dated 04.07.2008 had. taken cowizance of the offence against Atfcuscd Nos. 1 to 3 and OWN, issued process. Aggrieved by this order of the 'the petitioners. are before this Court to , pmceedings.
3. The learned the under Section 43 of the:4_i%<_:t, of the offence except on a person who has given notice qf min manner prescribed and of his to the Board or Oficer authorised as that under Rule 20(3) of the shall be in Form No.9. In the absence ef" in the instant case, the '{';m_1rt taking cognizance of the offence "$9 nequirement under the Act i this oontention ofthe karned the at this stage. A perusal of the V that the xespondentl complainant gave 2 X' mgnpxgifla to several authoriiies including the Bmrd. " complaints given by the complainant are in aeeuxelxmce with the Act and Rules is a matter of evidence,