Main Search Premium Members Advanced Search Disclaimer
Cites 4 docs
THE AIR (PREVENTION AND CONTROL OF POLLUTION) ACT, 1981
Section 37 in THE AIR (PREVENTION AND CONTROL OF POLLUTION) ACT, 1981
Section 38 in The Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974
Section 44 in The Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974

User Queries

Try out our Premium Member services: Virtual Legal Assistant, Query Alert Service and an ad-free experience. Free for one month and pay only if you like it.

Jharkhand High Court
Kadir Hussain vs The State Of Jharkhand on 18 December, 2014
                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
                                 A.B.A. No. 3020 of 2014
                                           -------
            Kadir Hussain                              .... Petitioner
                                          -Versus-
            The State of Jharkhand                     ..... Opposite Party
                                            -------
            CORAM :        HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.C.MISHRA
                                            -------
            For the Petitioner :               : M/s. Shashi Kumar Verma
            For the State :                    : M/s. Md. Hatim, A.P.P.
                                            -------

3/ 18.12.2014

. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with O.C.R. Case No. 37 of 2014, for the alleged offence under Section 37 of the Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981 and Sections 38 and 44 of the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act,1974.

There is direct allegation against the petitioner of running the stone crusher without obtaining the N.O.C. from the State Pollution Control Board. The cognizance has been taken against the petitioner on the basis of the official complaint filed by the competent authority.

In the facts of this case, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner, is hereby rejected.

(H.C.Mishra, J.) D.S.