IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT
                        CHANDIGARH

                        CWP No. 22819 of 2011
                   Date of Decision: December 12, 2011
Nand Lal                                               ...Petitioner
                                   Versus
Punjab Pollution Control Board and others            ..Respondents


CORAM:        HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR
              HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV NARAIN RAINA

Present:      Mr. Balram Singh, Advocate
              for the petitioner

1.     To be referred to the Reporters or not?
2.     Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

M.M. KUMAR, J.

1. The instant petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution prays for quashing of impugned notices dated 21.01.2011, 11.04.2011 and 12.08.2011 (P-2 to P-4) respectively issued by Senior Environmental Engineer, Zonal Office-respondent No.2 whereby directions has been issued to Chief Engineer (Operation)-respondent No.4 to disconnect the electric supply to the shop of the petitioner.

2. It is conceded as a fact that the appeal under Section 31 of the Air (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act, 1981, is maintainable.

3. Let an appeal be filed against order dated 12.08.2011 (P-4). If such an appeal is filed within four weeks from today then the application for condonation of delay shall be sympathetically considered.

4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of.

(M.M. KUMAR) JUDGE (RAJIV NARAIN RAINA) JUDGE December 12, 2011 Atul