Try out our Premium Member services: Virtual Legal Assistant, Query Alert Service and an ad-free experience. Free for one month and pay only if you like it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE THURSDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF MARCH 2018 / 24TH PHALGUNA, 1939 WP(C).No. 6203 of 2008 PETITIONER: VODAFONE ESSAR CELLULAR LTD. XL/5115, ASHIS BUILDING, 2ND FLOOR,SHANMUGHAM ROAD, KOCHI-682 031, REPRESENTED BY ITS SENIOR MANAGER, (LEGAL) M.V. RAJESH. BY ADVS.SRI.E.K.NANDAKUMAR SRI.ANIL D. NAIR SRI.P.BENNY THOMAS SRI.K.JOHN MATHAI RESPONDENT(S): 1. KERALA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, (REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY), PATTOM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-4. 2. MEMBER SECRETARY, KERALA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, PATTOM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-4. 3. KERALA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, DISTRICT OFFICE, 19/269A, PERINTHALMANNA ROAD,UP HILL P.O., MALAPPURAM-676 505. 4. KERALA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, DISTRICT OFFICE, ALISSERY ROAD, SOUTH OF COLLECTORATE JN., ALAPPUZHA-688 001. 5. KERALA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, DISTRICT OFFICE, POONKUNNAM, THRISSUR. 6. KERALA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, DISTRICT OFFICE, ST.ANTONY'S COMPLEX, NAGAMBADAM, KOTTAYAM-1. BY SRI. M.AJAY, SC SRI. T.NAVEEN SC SRI.M.K.CHANDRA MOHANDAS,SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 15-03-2018, ALONG WITH WP(C) 30243/2006 AND CONNECTED CASES,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PBS WP(C).No. 6203 of 2008 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF LICENSE AGREEMENT FOR CELLULAR MOBILE TELEPHONE SERVICE IN KERALA CIRCLE ISSUED BY THE MINISTRY OF COMMUNICATIONS, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA IN FAVOUR OF BPL INDIA LTD., THE PREDECESSOR IN INTEREST OF THE PETITIONER COMPANY. EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE AMENDMENT IN THE LICENSE AGREEMENT DATED 3.4.2002 EXTENDING THE PERIOD OF LICENSE GRANTED IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER. EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPTS DATED 12/12/2007 ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPTS DATED 28.11.2007 ISSUED BY 5TH RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPTS DATED 12.11.2007 ISSUED BY 5TH RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P6 TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND DRAFT DATED 7.12.2007 DRAWN IN FAVOUR OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT SUBMITTED BEFORE 3RD RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P7 TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND DRAFT DATED 26.11.2007 DRAWN IN FAVOUR OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 4TH RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P8 TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND DRAFT DATED 29.10.2007 DRAWN IN FAVOUR OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 5TH RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P9 TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND DRAFT DATED 19.12.2007 DRAWN IN FAVOUR OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 6TH RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P10 TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED 30.1.2008 ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P11 TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED 21.1.2008 ISSUED BY THE 6TH RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P12 TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED 21.1.2008 ISSUED BY THE 6TH RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P13 TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED 19.1.2007 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P14 TRUE COPY OF THE INTERIM ORDER DATED 16.3.2007 IN WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 8788 OF 2007. WP(C).No. 6203 of 2008 EXHIBIT P15 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 28.9.2006 ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P16 TRUE COPY OF THE INTERIM ORDER DATED 16.11.2006 IN WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 30243 OF 2006. RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURE ANNEXURE R2(A) A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTIFICATION DATED 23.10.2002. /TRUE COPY/ PS TO JUDGE PBS 26/4/2018 S. SIRI JAGAN, J. ------------------------------------ W.P.(C)No.6203 OF 2008 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 11th day of March, 2008 ORDER
Admit. Standing counsel takes notice on behalf of the respondents.
Heard both sides on the question of interim relief. The petitioner seeks a direction to the 2nd respondent and officers of the 1st respondent Board to consider applications for consent filed by the petitioner for operation of Diesel Generator sets as backup facility in telecommunication towers without insisting for payment of consent fee based on the total capital investment incurred for the installation of the entire telecommunication tower and amenities as demanded in Exts.P10, P11 and P12.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that consent fee has been prescribed in Appendix-II to Kerala Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Rules, 1994, which prescribes fee on the total capital investment of the industrial plant on a slab basis. 'Industrial Plant' is defined in Section 2(k) of the Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981 thus: W.P.(c) No.6203/08 2
b