Try out our Premium Member services: Virtual Legal Assistant, Query Alert Service and an ad-free experience. Free for one month and pay only if you like it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR MONDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2017/6TH AGRAHAYANA, 1939 WP(C).No. 30129 of 2016 (M) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------- SUNIL ALIYAR AGED 44, S/O.MUHAMMED ALIYAR, ARINJAL HOUSE, PAINKULAM, THODUPUZHA, IDUKKI PIN 685 608. BY ADVS.SRI.S.RENJITH SRI.K.R.PRATHISH RESPONDENT(S): -------------- 1. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICE, IDUKKI DISTRICT-685584. 2. THE ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER THE KERALA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, IDUKKI DISTRICT, OFFICE, THODUPUZHA-685584. 3. KUMARAMANGALAM GRAMA PANCHAYAT KUMARAMANGALAM PO, THODUPUZHA, IDUKKI 685 606. 4. THE TAHSILDAR THODUPUZHA, IDUKKI DISTRICT--685584. 5. AGRICULTURAL OFFICER KUMARAMANGALAM PO, THODUPUZHA-685584. 6. SUNNY JOSEPH PROPRIETOR, M/S.MADAVANA WATER SERVICE CENTRE, MADAVANA HOSUE, KUMARAMANGALAM, P.O.THODUPUZHA, IDUKKI 685 608. 7. THE WATER (PREVENTION AND CONTROL OF POLLUTION) APPELLATE AUTHORITY DEVI KRIPA BUILDING, T.C.13/29(8), 2ND FLOOR, KANNAMMOOLA, PETTAH, THIRUVANANTHAPRUAM 695 024, REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN. R2 BY ADV. SRI.NAVEEN.T R2 BY ADV. SRI. T.NAVEEN SC, KERALA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, R3 BY ADV. SRI.N.JAGATH R6 BY ADV. SRI.JOSEPH JOHN R1,R4,R5 BY ADV. GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27-11-2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 30129 of 2016 (M) ---------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ----------------------- EXT.P1 COPY OF THE COMPLAINT SUBMITTED BY THE PETIITONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 22.3.2016 EXT.P2 COPY OF THE REPORT OF THE 5TH RESPONDENT DATED 16.12.2015 EXT.P3 COPY OF THE REPORT OF THE 4TH RESPONDENT DATED 12.12.2015 EXT.P4 COPY OF THE COMPLAINT SUBMITTED BY THE PETIITONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT OFFICE EXT.P5 COPY OF THE CONSENT DATED 13.7.2016 ISSUED TO THE 6TH RESPONDENT EXT.P6 COPY OF THE APPEAL SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE WATER (PREVENTION AND CONTROL OF POLLUTION) APPELLATE AUTHORITY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. EXT.P7 COPY OF THE STAY APPLICATION EXT.P8 COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 5.7.2016 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT EXT.P9 COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS: ----------------------- EXT.R6 (A): THE TRUE PROJECT RPORT OF MY SERVIC STAION SUBMITTD TO THE 2ND RSPONDENT. EXT.R6 (B): THE NO OBJECION LETTER ISSUED BY ASST.DIVISIONAL OFFICE, FIRE & RESCUE IDUKKI DATED 15/07/2016. EXT.R6(C): TRUE COPY OF LETTR ISSUED BY THE TAHSILDAR THODUPUZHA TO THE SECRETARY, KUMARAMANGALAM GRAMA PANCHAYAT DATED 18/2/2016. ANNEXURE 1: A TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE G.O. (P) NO.04/2016/ENVT.DT.17/12/2016. ANNEXURE R2(A): TRUE COPY OF THE CONSENT NO.PCB/IDK/ICE/57/2015 DATED 10.8.2015 FOR ESTABLISHING A WATER SERVICE UNIT. ANNEXURE R2(B): TRUE COPY OF THE CONSENT NO.PCB/IDK/ICO/370/2016 DATED 13/7/2016 FOR OPERATING A WATER SERVIC UNIT. ANNEXURE R2(C): TRUE COPY OF TH CIRCULAR NO.PCB/TAC/18/2004 DATED 9/8/2004. TRUE COPY PA TO JUDGE SCL. P.B. SURESH KUMAR, J. ------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.30129 of 2016 -------------------------------------- Dated this the 27th day of November, 2017 JUDGMENT
Ext.P6 is an appeal preferred by the petitioner under Section 28 of the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 challenging Ext.P5, before the seventh respondent. The limited prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, when this matter was taken up for admission, is for a direction to the seventh respondent to take a decision on Ext.P6 appeal.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned counsel for the sixth respondent, the learned Government Pleader as also the learned Standing Counsel for the second respondent.
3. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it appropriate to direct the seventh respondent to take a decision on Ext.P6 appeal, within three W.P.(C) No.30129 of 2016 -2- weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after affording the petitioner as also the sixth respondent an opportunity of hearing. Ordered accordingly.
The writ petition is disposed of as above.
Sd/-
P.B. SURESH KUMAR JUDGE Scl/27.11.2017