-1-

IN THE HIGH comm' or KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE mm DAY OF JULY, 2010
BEFORE A

TH 12 HONBLE3 MRJUSTICE SUBHASPI I3  ii:   

CRIMINAL PETITION Ns{).Aé:3/291.9 ~:'  

BETWEEN:

1. M/s Noor Enterprises  '
{sondenalahally Iron Oaje M"i;1'é's'jA  
Sondenalahaiiy Village, C._N;._Ha;IIi.   

Tumkur, District. 
2. Sri.H.N00r A_I:1rifi'Ied_    _ . _ _
A.T.R0ad.:.- I-I:3s_IiG1;-éI'_V I _ __  V  _   '
BangaI0re_VVRuIra¢I DiSt1'ipI'~é' 55:2" I 1?}.  .PETITIONERS

 ' = fay ws}%:,'c.§Vf;~_<§u.:a1aan§iI~a, Adv.)
AN D: I I

I{arnataIg2._VStat<'§' .I'7'():IIl;1I.i.OI1 Cofiirol Board
Pa1~isa1"a.%.I3h21van, No.49. Church Street

:.'f'B'an.ga1-ms; -1.;-5503001.  """ " _ ...RESPONDE3N'I'

I  _ 'V:-.§B5{'5r:i.'j:.R.B.Satyan2Irayan Sirlgh. Adv.)

'1'1?$1Is='C;21'r»/IINAJ. PE'I'I'I'ION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482

" " ~ PRAYING 'mA'r 'I'Hl.S I~£ON'BLE COURT MAY BE PLEZASED TO

  «gukxala "'"1i_Ia'. EI\E'I'IRE PROCEEDINGS IN C.C.NO.285/07 PENDING

 BEZFAGERIIZHIHE COURT OF CIVIL JUDE [JRDN] AND JIVII-'C AT
':CiKE{z=1INAYAKANAHAl,I,I.

THIS PETI'E'ION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION 'I"'i"IIS DAY, THE
COURT MADE THE FOI4IAOWING:



0 R D E R
Petitioners have called in question the  
C.C.No.285/200'? pending on  t  

Chikkanayakanahalli.

2. Respondent Karnataka  Board

filed a private compiaint unde1* Cr.'PV.'C.'AVVlv:>ei"ore the learned Magistrate interaliq:'ail'eging:tbhattiv'theb'petitioners had a licence to carry Metric Tones and in case if the' theV.--duantii.y. they have to approach: l"or"VeX}f$jansiori as required under Section Zflatofllthel and Control of Pollution.) Act. 1974 and V1fiVo_i'lA.Vii"'(lE"brever1tion and Control of Pollution) o:-c~--1-m-dvrfiiiiu-fitmlni->--¢-¢'°*%*"VO'>'-fi"'1'i9*"0|fIV4K3°'79">"';:v%L";fiQt':'*"* v ha3=-~b(=Tg3-y»-ciarjfied byut-he Govem-mgm -v Endia dated 12.2.2002. It is further alleged that. filed for expansion after due date i.e. on basis of these allegations. the complaiiit is

3. l/earned counsel for the petitioners submit that. there is Lfno allegation of violation of any of the provisions of the Act. it is not in dispute that. the petitioner hol.ds licence tinder Water {Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act. 1974 and Air «%\::':L V...

_3_ (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act'. 1981 and capacity oi' mining is also fixed. Only in case if t.here is expansion. permission is necessary and for such permission. an a.ppl'ic.aiiiovi1 has already made to expand from 12.000 metric: '5.o.iieVs.i it lakh metric tones. Complainant does-inoi----disc_tose Fany oE'fej:ic'e. alleged to have been committed by ln"

circumstances. when there is no -priirna facie Caste-V_n'1"adevVVont in" the complaint to proceedfixrith ihcornplainanav._Ait_x.lvouid be abuse of process of the Court 0'

4. On the othler_;l*1ani1_. learned co--t;tns_e:lflfor the respondent submitted that, is 0 mentioned that, the appiicatio.:ril"olr istiled 31.3.2003.

5. Exfenllif is filed beyond the period pi-esc1'ib;e'd', _\.iV'l'1€'ll'1'E'-1"' to grant or notto grant. it is left to the leatithoérilty. the complaint must disclosed violation of licence conditioni whielln fa-rn~ou11ts t.o an offence and such allegation is it not foi7.thcor:1ingAfi'oni the complaint. In the absence of such " '-Tijj'~ell'e;.§ation'. vprinia facie case is not made out by the complainant. it-..Vl'~Aecordingly. this petition is allowed. Proceedings in ff c._c,.iiio.2s5/2007 stands quashed.

However. liberty is reserved to the respr§%1:ién11.." Complainant to proceed against the petitioner, if tfié:re .1f;§ " violation.

*APl_ =.: ..,.m--. ».;~,,h,. .0, ,