Try out our Premium Member services: Virtual Legal Assistant, Query Alert Service and an ad-free experience. Free for one month and pay only if you like it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. - 1 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 31872 of 2019 Petitioner :- Munendra Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rakesh Kumar Verma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Hari Nath Tripathi Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J.
Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J.
Heard Sri R.K. Verma, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri H.N. Tripathi, learned counsel for the respondent Nos.2, 3 and 4, learned Standing Counsel for respondent no.1 and perused the record.
At the very outset learned counsel for the respondents has raised preliminary objection regarding maintainability of the writ petition as there lies statutory appeal under Section 31 of The AIR (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981.
The petitioner does not dispute the above provision of law.
In view of the efficacious alternative remedy in terms of statutory appeal being available to the petitioner under the aforesaid Act, the writ petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to approach the authority concerned.
It is, however provided that in case petitioner prefers an appeal within the period of three weeks from today, the same shall be considered and decided on merits within further period of four weeks.
(Ajit Kumar, J.) (Ramesh Sinha, J.) Order Date :- 30.9.2019 Gaurav