IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
                      AT CHANDIGARH

                                                 CWP No. 1295 of 2019
                                                 Date of decision: 18.01.2019

Ms/ Dev Shri Krishana Stone Crusher
                                                              ... Petitioner
                                        Versus


State of Haryana and others
                                                              ... Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA MURARI,
       CHIEF JUSTICE
       HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN PALLI, JUDGE

Present:     Mr. S.K. Garg Narwana, Senior Advocate, with
             Mr. Japjit Singh Johal,
             for the petitioner.
                    ***

KRISHNA MURARI, CHIEF JUSTICE (Oral) By means of this petition, challenge has been made to the order dated 04.12.2018/07.12.2018, passed by the Haryana State Pollution Control Board, withdrawing the consent granted to the petitioner to set up a stone crushing unit, in exercise of powers conferred under Section 21 of Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, [for short 'the Act'].

In view of the provisions of Section 31 of the Act, the petitioner has a statutory alternative remedy of filing an appeal against the said order.

In view of the existence of statutory alternative remedy of appeal, which has not been availed by the petitioner, we are not inclined to entertain the writ petition and the same is accordingly dismissed on the ground of existence of statutory alternative remedy.

(KRISHNA MURARI) CHIEF JUSTICE (ARUN PALLI) JUDGE January, 18, 2019 AK Sharma Whether speaking / reasoned: YES Whether Reportable: NO 1 of 1 ::: Downloaded on - 10-02-2019 11:54:18 :::