{{ block title }} Part 2: Game {{ player.round_number }} Review {{ endblock }} {{ block content }}

Review Questionnaire

{{ formfield 'ans1' label="1. Please describe the decision-making process you used in Game 3? (2-4 sentences - 60 character min)" }}

2. Please answer the following questions by pointing the slider to the point that best reflects your beliefs prior to making any choice in the interaction about behavior of the individual with whom you were randomly paired for this interaction:

I expected that if I continued at turn 1 then RED/BLUE would continue at turn 2 with probability	0
I expected that if I continued at turns 1 and 3 and RED/BLUE continued at turn 2, then RED/BLUE would continue in turn 4 with probability:	0
I expected that if I continued at turns 1, 3 and 5 and RED/BLUE continued at turns 2 and 4, then RED/BLUE would continue at turn 6 with probability:	0

{{ formfield_errors "ans2a" }} {{ formfield_errors "ans2b" }} {{ formfield_errors "ans2c" }}
{{ formfield 'ans3' label="3. What decision-making process did you expect the other participant to follow, and did they play like you expected them to? (1-3 sentences - 40 character min)" }}
4. Did you see the other participant primarily as a teammate or an opponent? (Please select your answer on the sliding scale below based on how close your view of them was to a teammate versus opponent)

{{ formfield_errors "ans4" }} {{ if not participant.control }} 5. Did learning the IQ of the other participant effect the way you approached your strategy? (Please select your answer on the sliding scale below based on how much of an effect learning their IQ had on your strategy)

{{ formfield_errors 'ans5' }}
{{ formfield 'ans6' label="6. Why or why not? (1-3 sentences) - 40 character min" }} {{ endif }} {{ if player.round_number == 3 }} Please indicate to what degree you agree with the following sentence: "IQ is an accurate gauge of Intelligence"

{{ formfield_errors 'ans7' }} {{ endif }} {{ endblock }}