Yes, I've publicly praised last year's Taker/HHH match and just last week I talked about how excited Undertaker's return had me, but that doesn't mean I'm exactly thrilled about Undertaker vs. Triple H II (err, III). The first big irritant for me is that there are plenty of other guys I'd rather Taker face, wrestlers he hasn't already faced at WrestleMania. Fact of the matter is, we probably won't have too many more fantastic matches out of Undertaker, and it's a shame that we won't get to see big WrestleMania matches between him and Chris Jericho, John Cena, CM Punk, Sheamus or even another go-round with Randy Orton.

The other problem is that I have no idea what Taker/HHH III could possibly be about. WWE did their level best to explain it all to us this week, but it was exactly the type of non-explanation explanation that most of us were likely expecting: Undertaker doesn't like that he won their match but couldn't leave the ring of his own volition (and was presumably locked up in a torch-lit projection room for the better part of a year). Trouble is, with Taker having been off television, and Triple H only intermittently featured, the match feels like it's coming out of left field, and as of now, there's nothing even at stake in the proposed contest.