Financial aid proposals to see DII membership vote

DII Presidents Council approved the proposals at August meeting

Posted on 8/8/16 10:54 AM

The Division II Presidents Council last week ensured three heavily discussed financial aid proposals will come to a membership vote in January at the NCAA Convention.

The proposals, which came out of a comprehensive three-year review led by the Division II Legislation Committee, would change the way financial aid is awarded to Division II student-athletes.

The Presidents Council easily approved two of the financial aid proposals in legislative form, one of which would eliminate term-by-term financial aid awards and another that would permit increases in athletically related financial aid at any time, for any reason.

The other financial aid proposal drew more deliberation among the presidents but was also ultimately approved. This proposal would change financial aid legislation so only institutional athletics aid would count toward individual and team equivalency limits. The model would exempt other forms of institutional aid, such as academic and need-based aid, from individual and team equivalency limits, making it possible for student-athletes to receive more nonathletics financial aid without affecting a team’s scholarship allotment. It is also expected to make financial aid legislation simpler and easier for administrators on campus to apply.

For those not dealing with financial aid on a daily basis, understanding the nuances of the legislation can be complex. The presidents took time during their meeting Wednesday and Thursday to review data, hear the stances of other groups in the membership, and debate potential impacts of the change.

“It’s a complicated issue,” said Steve Scott, Pittsburg State University president and chair of the Presidents Council. “I was really proud of the presidents at the table. They really dug into it –  they studied it and they asked a lot of questions.”

While some of the presidents expressed concern about gamesmanship and competitive equity, others felt the proposed legislation would bring flexibility in their financial decision-making, benefit their school’s financial aid directors and assist student-athletes in paying for college. The Division II Student-Athlete Advisory Committee has been supportive of the proposal.     

The council decided to sponsor the proposal so it could be considered at Convention. “In the end, people looked at it and thought, let’s give the entire membership an opportunity to weigh in on this and vote when we get to Nashville in January,” Scott said.

Other actions

Also at its meeting, the Presidents Council: