Division III Presidents Council opposes two significant proposals

Group opposes easing restrictions on football contact, reaching recruits via social media

Posted on 10/30/15 2:02 PM

Two key membership-sponsored proposals have met resistance from Division III’s top governing body.

In a Thursday teleconference, the Division III Presidents Council voted to oppose a proposal that would permit contact during football’s spring segment and another that would deregulate several rules pertaining to contacting recruits electronically, particularly via social media. Both will be subject to a membership vote at the 2016 NCAA Convention in San Antonio. The Presidents Council’s decision to oppose both proposals echoed the positions the Division III Management Council took earlier this month.

The football proposal was brought forward by 25 Division III schools and would permit as many as seven days of practice with full equipment involving contact, including three days of live tackling. The Presidents Council opposed the proposal because it worried additional contact could pose health and safety concerns and might place a strain on facilities and athletic training staff.

Like the Management Council, the Presidents Council opposed the proposal that would ease restrictions on electronic correspondence with recruits because of concerns voiced by student-athletes at the campus and conference level. The Minnesota Intercollegiate Athletic Conference and North Coast Athletic Conference brought the proposal forward and contend that current limitations on public communication – via social media platforms, for instance – are cumbersome and inhibit effective correspondence between coaches and recruits. Both councils, though, cited the strong opposition expressed by student-athletes as their rationale for voting against the proposal.   

“We’re still trying to determine what is appropriate for our prospective students and what isn’t,” said Alan Cureton, Presidents Council chair and president of the University of Northwestern-St. Paul. “Our intent is to respect the boundaries of a student-athlete’s personal domain, including social media.”

Other actions