2015 Division II Convention legislation

Student-athlete voice, meals, personnel among topics up for vote

Posted on 1/13/15 9:24 AM

Division II members will vote on 19 proposals at their business session this week at the NCAA Convention in Washington, D.C. By the time the business session ends on Saturday, the Division II attendees will have discussed food, recruiting, season length, publicity around signings, the start of a new National Collegiate Championship – and more.

Student-athlete voice

Two of the most anticipated proposals would give student-athletes a louder voice in the division’s rulemaking process. Proposal No. 2015-9 would give the Division II Student-Athlete Advisory Committee two seats and one joint vote on the Division II Management Council. If passed, the two student representatives would participate in Saturday’s post-Convention Management Council meeting immediately following the business session. Another proposal goes one step further: Proposal 2015-10 would give the division’s SAAC one vote on each proposal at the annual business session, beginning at the 2016 Convention.

Unlimited meals and snacks

Division II Presidents Council members have called this piece of legislation a “no-brainer,” but that doesn’t mean Proposal 2015-13 will pass quietly. Similar to Division I legislation passed in April, the Division II change would permit schools to provide meals and snacks to all student-athletes – scholarship and non-scholarship – incidental to their athletics participation. The legislation would provide more flexibility for athletes, who may not have time to eat at a dining facility in between practice and class, as well as ease the burden of monitoring on athletics departments. If passed, it would take effect Aug. 1.

Athletics department personnel

Two proposals that would impact a small portion of Division II schools have sparked widespread discussions and passionate responses across the membership over the last year. Proposal 2015-7 would require schools to employ a full-time athletics director without coaching duties beginning Aug. 1, with a grandfather clause exempting those currently holding both positions at the school.

Likewise, Proposal 2015-8 would require schools to have a full-time compliance administrator without coaching duties. Since there is no grandfather clause for compliance administrators, the Management and Presidents Councils delayed the proposal’s effective date until 2018 to give schools enough time to budget and hire.

Both proposals are intended to reduce conflicts of interest and create consistency across the division, as schools entering the membership process are already required to have full-time athletics directors and compliance administrators without coaching duties.

More legislation

Division II members will also vote on proposals that would: