Division III Presidents review grad rates, discuss legislation

Council declines to support legislation to allow football conditioning in the offseason

Posted on 11/3/14 4:42 PM

At its last meeting before the NCAA Convention convenes in January, the Division III Presidents Council reviewed the division’s graduation rates, including the Academic Success Rate data, and discussed how members can use that information to continue to improve those figures.

Numbers released earlier this week show that the division’s national, four-year average Academic Success Rate is 87 percent.

That figure is based on data for the 2013-14 academic year submitted by 140 schools that took part in Division III’s voluntary reporting program, now in its fifth year. Since 2009, more than 200 Division III member schools have taken part in the program, and this year’s program attracted the highest number of participants to date.

“We were delighted to see the improvements,” said Sharon Herzberger, president of Whittier College and chair of the Presidents Council, which met last week at the NCAA national office in Indianapolis. “The fact that our students are doing so well in the Academic Success Rate is something we should be proud of as a division.”

The NCAA’s Academic Success Rate was created to to provide a more accurate picture of graduation by tracking student-athletes who transfer.  The federal graduation rate for Division III student-athletes in 2013-14 was 69 percent compared to 59 percent for the overall student body, but the federal rate does not include students who were in good academic standing but chose to transfer to other schools to finish their degrees.

The council also discussed methods for using the data to identify and improve weaknesses in academic success for student-athletes. Among the sports offered in Division III, the lowest Academic Success Rate reported was for football players, at 76 percent. Meanwhile, the federal graduation rate for Division III football players was 55 percent, also lowest in the division and 1 percentage point below the average for all male students.

Among other findings in the Academic Success Rate report, the council discussed how the size of an incoming class of football recruits can ultimately impact student-athlete success in the classroom. In Division III, for every 10 football players added to a football cohort, the data reveal, the Academic Success Rate could be expected to diminish by an average of 1 percent.

“We saw that the rate with football players is something to still work on,” Herzberger said, “and that’s a particular sport we know, as a division, we have to work on.”

In preparation for the NCAA Convention, which will take place Jan. 15-17 in the Washington, D.C. area, the council also discussed several pieces of legislation that will be considered by Division III membership:

“We feel that our division stands for student-athletes being able to participate in all kinds of events and all kinds of activities on a college campus,” Herzberger said. “That would mean students should be able to study abroad. They should be able to participate as the lead in a play. They should be able sing in the choir, and they should be able to focus on their academics. And so we do not like the fact that this proposal seems to be even more increasing the time and the focus on athletics in the nontraditional season.”

One reason the schools put forth the proposal is because student-athletes participating in sports other than football are now able to have more complete practices during their sports’ nontraditional segments. However, council members said that a broader discussion with the membership at the 2015 Convention might indicate that the membership wants to reconsider what happens in other sports’ nontraditional segments.

“The council wants to have a more serious discussion about nontraditional seasons in general and whether the growth in the nontraditional season across sports is a healthy thing for our student-athletes, or whether we would take a step back from it,” Herzberger said.