WEBVTT
00:00:01.300 --> 00:00:04.720
In this video, we’re going to learn about rotational variables.
00:00:04.990 --> 00:00:12.350
We’ll see what these variables are, how to calculate them, and how they relate to linear or translational variables.
00:00:12.900 --> 00:00:17.290
To get started, imagine that you work for a car tire manufacturing company.
00:00:17.740 --> 00:00:22.260
Your role is to track the wear and tear on tires as they’re used.
00:00:22.660 --> 00:00:32.800
One day, you hear about a driving competition, where drivers outfitted in cars with tires made by your company will drive once all the way around the world.
00:00:33.350 --> 00:00:40.580
From your work study in tire wear, you have a rough idea of how much a tire wears down each time it rotates.
00:00:41.070 --> 00:00:50.770
To use this information to figure out how much the tires on the cars that drived once around the world will wear down, we want to know something about rotational variables.
00:00:51.270 --> 00:01:03.170
To get an idea for rotational motion, imagine that we have a large wheel that rotates about an axis through its centre and say further that we put a mark on the outer edge of the wheel.
00:01:03.630 --> 00:01:11.760
Over time, as the wheel rotated, this mark would travel a linear distance—an arc length—along the outer edge of the wheel we can call 𝑠.
00:01:12.200 --> 00:01:17.400
𝑠 is a linear distance measured in linear units such as metres.
00:01:17.900 --> 00:01:24.460
What’s interesting is we also have a rotational displacement as this mark on the edge of the wheel moves around.
00:01:24.920 --> 00:01:34.390
We can say that rotationally we’ve travelled a distance 𝜃, where because 𝜃 is an angle, it’s measured in units of radians.
00:01:34.730 --> 00:01:38.860
We know that in a complete circle, there are two 𝜋 radians.
00:01:39.420 --> 00:01:47.430
But that’s not an upper limit on the rotational distance this mark might travel no matter how many times the mark moved around in a circle.
00:01:48.170 --> 00:01:59.590
With a starting angle, we can call it 𝜃 sub 𝑖, and an ending angle, we can call it 𝜃 sub 𝑓, we’re able to calculate the rotational distance travelled no matter how many times the wheel turns.
00:02:00.130 --> 00:02:08.980
So the arc length 𝑠 measured in metres and the angular distance 𝜃 measured in radians are analogues one of another.
00:02:09.740 --> 00:02:15.280
In the linear world, we could call it, we talk about 𝑠 and in the rotational world, we talk about 𝜃.
00:02:15.860 --> 00:02:21.670
Now, imagine that instead of just wanting to know the distance travelled by the mark, we want to know its velocity.
00:02:21.780 --> 00:02:24.570
Say at the point in time where we’ve drawn it last.
00:02:25.020 --> 00:02:32.690
We know that velocity will point tangent to the edge of the wheel and that in SI units is measured in metres per second.
00:02:33.140 --> 00:02:45.970
We also know though that in whenever time it takes for the mark to move from its initial to its final position, not only has the dot moved a linear distance, but it’s moved through an angular distance.
00:02:46.350 --> 00:02:56.450
And we can call that angular distance in some amount of time—that is a value in radians per second—the angular velocity of the wheel.
00:02:57.100 --> 00:03:01.470
We typically represent this variable with the Greek letter lowercase 𝜔.
00:03:01.910 --> 00:03:06.320
Just like 𝜃 and 𝑠, 𝜔 and 𝑣 are analogues.
00:03:06.830 --> 00:03:14.300
We can imagine further that not only do we wanna know the velocity of the mark, but we also want to know its linear acceleration.
00:03:15.010 --> 00:03:20.120
We know that acceleration 𝑎 is the time rate of change of velocity 𝑣.
00:03:20.760 --> 00:03:27.640
When we want to solve for 𝑎, we take the time derivative of 𝑣 and the units of these two values bear this out.
00:03:28.190 --> 00:03:34.770
If we do the same thing with the units of angular velocity, we get a result in units of radians per second squared.
00:03:35.310 --> 00:03:42.090
That may sound like an angular acceleration and that’s exactly what it is—often represented by the Greek letter 𝛼.
00:03:43.070 --> 00:03:48.160
For every linear motion term then, there is an analogous rotational term.
00:03:48.630 --> 00:03:52.170
Let’s consider further how these pairs of terms correspond.
00:03:52.870 --> 00:03:57.940
We know that linear velocity is equal to change in position over change in time.
00:03:58.320 --> 00:04:02.550
It turns out we can write the angular velocity 𝜔 in a similar way.
00:04:02.790 --> 00:04:07.660
It’s equal to the change in the angular position Δ𝜃 over a change in time.
00:04:08.210 --> 00:04:18.430
And just as linear acceleration 𝑎 is equal to Δ𝑣 over Δ𝑡, so the angular acceleration 𝛼 is equal to Δ𝜔 over Δ𝑡.
00:04:18.930 --> 00:04:21.040
We can go even further with this.
00:04:21.510 --> 00:04:24.030
Remember the kinematic equations of motion.
00:04:24.450 --> 00:04:29.590
These are equations which help describe object motion when acceleration 𝑎 is constant.
00:04:30.060 --> 00:04:35.580
They let us solve for object motion variables such as displacement or initial velocity.
00:04:36.020 --> 00:04:40.790
It turns out there are an analogous set of rotational kinematic equations.
00:04:41.400 --> 00:04:49.390
These four equations are written exactly like their linear counterparts with the rotational variables substituted in for the linear ones.
00:04:49.950 --> 00:04:57.890
And just like the linear kinematic equations, the rotational ones require constant acceleration—in this case, angular acceleration.
00:04:58.310 --> 00:05:08.240
Now that we have an idea of where rotational variables come from and how they’re related to their linear correspondents, let’s get some practice working with them through a couple of examples.
00:05:09.070 --> 00:05:13.680
A piece of dust falls onto a spinning compact disc and sticks in place.
00:05:13.940 --> 00:05:23.330
The spin rate of the disk is 5.00 times 10 to the two rpm and the piece of dust lands 4.30 centimetres from the disk’s centre.
00:05:23.830 --> 00:05:30.570
What is the total distance travelled by the piece of dust in 1.80 times 10 to the two seconds of rotation?
00:05:30.970 --> 00:05:42.110
Assume that the disk is negligibly slowed by the dust falling on it and that the time taken for the dust to accelerate to the same speed as the part of the disk that it lands on is negligible.
00:05:42.670 --> 00:05:47.430
We’ll call this total distance travelled by the piece of dust lowercase 𝑠.
00:05:48.020 --> 00:05:57.730
In this scenario, we’re told that a piece of dust falls at distance—we’ve called 𝑟—of 4.30 centimetres from the centre of a rotating disc.
00:05:58.250 --> 00:06:06.250
The disc is spinning at an angular speed—we’ve called capital Ω—5.00 times 10 to the two revolutions every minute.
00:06:06.870 --> 00:06:16.060
After the dust has been on the rotating disk for a time of 1.80 times 10 to the two seconds, we want to know the linear distance 𝑠 it has travelled.
00:06:16.630 --> 00:06:25.170
The linear distance 𝑠 will equal the number of times the disc rotates in this amount of time multiplied by two times 𝜋 times 𝑟.
00:06:25.720 --> 00:06:30.570
We’re given the distance 𝑟 from the centre of rotation at which the dust settles.
00:06:30.910 --> 00:06:35.590
But we don’t yet know how many times the disc rotates in our amount of time 𝑡.
00:06:36.070 --> 00:06:40.530
To figure that out, we can use our angular rotation rate capital Ω.
00:06:41.140 --> 00:06:49.580
To make capital Ω as useful as possible to us, we’ll convert it from its given units of revolutions per minute to revolutions per second.
00:06:50.080 --> 00:06:57.340
To do that, we can multiply capital Ω by one minute per 60 seconds, which is effectively multiplying it by one.
00:06:57.710 --> 00:07:03.840
But what it does do is it cancels out the units of minutes and leaves us with time units of seconds.
00:07:04.540 --> 00:07:12.560
The total number of rotations our disk will make in the time 𝑡 is equal to that time multiplied by the rotational rate.
00:07:13.110 --> 00:07:22.780
When we plug in our given value for 𝑡, we see that the units of seconds cancel out and the units of our number of rotations will indeed be in revolutions.
00:07:23.250 --> 00:07:42.270
When we plug these numbers in for 𝑁 rotation in our equation for 𝑠 and then insert the value of our radius 𝑟 converting it from units of centimetres to units of metres, we see looking at this overall expression that the units of revolutions cancel out.
00:07:42.500 --> 00:07:45.070
And we’ll be left with an answer in units of metres.
00:07:45.580 --> 00:07:50.840
When we calculate 𝑠, we find that to three significant figures, it’s 405 metres.
00:07:51.220 --> 00:07:55.470
That’s the distance this piece of dust would travel in the amount of time 𝑡.
00:07:56.120 --> 00:07:59.860
Now, let’s try a second example involving rotational variables.
00:08:00.580 --> 00:08:07.900
A phonograph turntable rotating at 33 and a third rpm slows down and stops in 1.00 minutes.
00:08:08.340 --> 00:08:12.570
What is the turntable’s angular acceleration assuming it is constant?
00:08:13.060 --> 00:08:16.800
How many complete revolutions does the turntable make while stopping?
00:08:17.410 --> 00:08:24.340
We’ll call the turntable’s angular acceleration 𝛼 and the number of complete revolutions it makes while stopping 𝑁.
00:08:24.990 --> 00:08:34.360
In this scenario, we have a rotating turntable which initially has an angular speed we’ve called capital Ω, 33 to third revolutions per minute.
00:08:34.860 --> 00:08:39.360
Over a time span of 1.00 minutes, it slows to a stop.
00:08:39.830 --> 00:08:49.200
Since we’re told that its angular acceleration as it does so is constant, that means that the kinematic equations of motion apply to the motion of the turntable.
00:08:49.670 --> 00:09:02.300
In particular, we’re helped by the equation which says that 𝜔 sub 𝑓, the final angular speed, is equal to 𝜔 sub zero, the initial angular speed, plus 𝛼, the angular acceleration, times time.
00:09:02.850 --> 00:09:07.980
In this expression, our angular speeds are written in units of radians per second.
00:09:08.470 --> 00:09:15.960
When we apply this relationship to our scenario, we know that because the turntable ends up at rest, 𝜔 sub 𝑓 is zero.
00:09:16.410 --> 00:09:23.970
And we want now to solve for 𝜔 sub zero, the initial angular speed of our disc, in units of radians per second.
00:09:24.410 --> 00:09:27.640
To do that, let’s start by writing down capital Ω.
00:09:28.090 --> 00:09:38.740
If we multiply capital Ω by the conversion factor two 𝜋 radians are in every revolution, then we’ve effectively changed the units of this expression now to radians per minute.
00:09:39.280 --> 00:09:48.640
To get the units to radians per second, we can multiply by the conversion factor one minute is in every 60 seconds, cancelling out the units of minutes.
00:09:49.180 --> 00:09:52.220
We now have our expression for 𝜔 sub zero.
00:09:52.370 --> 00:09:56.740
It’s 33 and a third times two 𝜋 over 60 radians per second.
00:09:57.320 --> 00:10:03.890
With that value known, we can now rearrange our kinematic equation to solve for the angular acceleration 𝛼.
00:10:04.360 --> 00:10:07.690
𝛼 is equal to negative 𝜔 sub zero over 𝑡.
00:10:08.180 --> 00:10:18.950
Plugging in these values, we see 𝛼 is negative 33.33 repeating 𝜋 over 30 times one over 60 in units of radians per second squared.
00:10:19.410 --> 00:10:24.000
This is equal to negative 0.058 radians per second squared.
00:10:24.440 --> 00:10:27.840
That’s the angular acceleration of the disk as it slows down.
00:10:28.310 --> 00:10:34.230
Next, we wanna solve for the number of complete rotations the phonograph goes through as it slows to a stop.
00:10:34.770 --> 00:10:39.550
Considering what we know: we know the initial angular speed of the phonograph.
00:10:39.630 --> 00:10:41.550
We know its angular acceleration.
00:10:41.860 --> 00:10:44.540
We know its final angular speed zero.
00:10:45.060 --> 00:10:48.950
And we essentially wanna calculate an angular distance that is travelled.
00:10:49.450 --> 00:10:56.310
We can begin solving for 𝑁 by working from a kinematic equation that lets us solve for the angular displacement 𝜃.
00:10:56.740 --> 00:11:01.810
The total angular displacement of the phonograph as it comes to a stop is 𝜃.
00:11:02.270 --> 00:11:09.820
And if we divide 𝜃 by two 𝜋 radians, then that will equal a total number of revolutions 𝑁 we complete.
00:11:10.290 --> 00:11:18.030
Since we’ve solved for 𝜔 sub zero and 𝛼 and we’re given 𝑡 in the problem statement, we’re ready to plug in and solve for 𝑁.
00:11:18.470 --> 00:11:31.790
When we have our values for 𝜔 sub zero and 𝛼 and 𝑡 in units of seconds plugged into this equation, notice as we go from left to right that the units of seconds cancel out in our first term.
00:11:32.050 --> 00:11:35.500
The units of seconds squared cancel out in our second term.
00:11:35.990 --> 00:11:44.730
And because we’re dividing all of this by two 𝜋 radians, the units of radians also cancel out, leaving us with a unitless result.
00:11:45.150 --> 00:11:50.950
When we enter this expression on our calculator, we get a result of approximately 16.7.
00:11:51.430 --> 00:11:59.880
But since 𝑁 is the number of complete revolutions the phonograph makes before it comes to a stop, that means that 𝑁 is 16.
00:12:00.630 --> 00:12:08.750
And so, we’ve used the rotational kinematic equations to solve for the number of times the phonograph spins before coming to a stop.
00:12:09.390 --> 00:12:12.810
Let’s summarize what we’ve learned about rotational variables.
00:12:13.590 --> 00:12:19.050
We’ve seen that rotational variables exist for each linear motion variable.
00:12:19.420 --> 00:12:23.090
For a linear displacement 𝑠, there’s angular displacement 𝜃.
00:12:23.500 --> 00:12:27.100
For linear velocity 𝑣, there’s angular velocity 𝜔.
00:12:27.630 --> 00:12:31.750
And for linear acceleration 𝑎, there’s angular acceleration 𝛼.
00:12:32.310 --> 00:12:39.500
We’ve also seen that the mathematical relationships between linear variables match those between rotational variables.
00:12:39.920 --> 00:12:50.480
For example, just as linear velocity equals change in displacement over change in time, so angular velocity equals change in angle Δ𝜃 over Δ𝑡.
00:12:51.390 --> 00:13:03.900
And finally, we saw that the kinematic equations of motion apply for both linear and rotational variables, so long as acceleration whether linear or rotational is constant.