WEBVTT

NOTE Specialised Antennas

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:02.080
<v Narrator>Multiband: traps.

2
00:00:02.080 --> 00:00:07.266
<v Pool>Question. What is the primary function of antenna traps?

3
00:00:08.166 --> 00:00:12.686
<v Pool>Answer. To enable multiband operation.

4
00:00:13.286 --> 00:00:17.606
<v Narrator>A trap is a parallel resonant circuit in an element.

5
00:00:17.606 --> 00:00:32.060
<v Narrator>At its resonant frequency it presents a high impedance and effectively cuts the element short there; at other frequencies it is a low impedance and the full length is in use.

6
00:00:32.060 --> 00:00:38.457
<v Narrator>One physical antenna, several electrical lengths. The cost is asked directly:

7
00:00:38.457 --> 00:00:44.977
<v Pool>Question. Which of the following is a disadvantage of multiband antennas?

8
00:00:45.877 --> 00:00:49.877
<v Pool>Answer. They have poor harmonic rejection.

9
00:00:50.477 --> 00:01:08.343
<v Narrator>A single-band antenna is a filter, it presents a bad match to your second harmonic and radiates it poorly. A multiband antenna is, by design, a good match on several bands at once, including ones your harmonics land on.

10
00:01:08.343 --> 00:01:14.054
<v Narrator>Spurious emissions get out more easily. Simple variations on a dipole.

11
00:01:14.054 --> 00:01:20.464
<v Pool>Question. What is the common name of a dipole with a single central support?

12
00:01:21.364 --> 00:01:24.531
<v Pool>Answer. Inverted V.

13
00:01:25.131 --> 00:01:43.211
<v Narrator>One mast, two legs sloping down. Slightly lower feed impedance and a slightly broader pattern than a flat dipole, and one support instead of two, which is why so many first HF antennas are inverted Vs.

14
00:01:43.211 --> 00:01:50.651
<v Pool>Question. What is the feed point impedance of an end-fed half-wave antenna?

15
00:01:51.551 --> 00:01:54.551
<v Pool>Answer. Very high.

16
00:01:55.151 --> 00:02:03.594
<v Narrator>Thousands of ohms, following from the current distribution: minimum current and maximum voltage at the end.

17
00:02:03.594 --> 00:02:15.351
<v Narrator>Feeding it needs a matching transformer with a large ratio, and it is why an end-fed wire connected straight to a radio puts RF all over the station.

18
00:02:15.351 --> 00:02:29.711
<v Pool>Question. Which of the following antenna types will be most effective as a near vertical incidence skywave (NVIS) antenna for short-skip communications on 40 meters during the day?

19
00:02:30.611 --> 00:02:39.038
<v Pool>Answer. A horizontal dipole placed between 1/10 and 1/4 wavelength above the ground.

20
00:02:39.638 --> 00:02:56.318
<v Narrator>Deliberately low, so most of the radiation goes up and comes back down within a few hundred miles. Everything the DX operator avoids, done on purpose. Wide bandwidth: log-periodic.

21
00:02:56.318 --> 00:03:02.080
<v Pool>Question. Which of the following describes a log-periodic antenna?

22
00:03:02.980 --> 00:03:10.100
<v Pool>Answer. Element length and spacing vary logarithmically along the boom.

23
00:03:10.700 --> 00:03:16.728
<v Pool>Question. Which of the following is an advantage of a log-periodic antenna?

24
00:03:17.628 --> 00:03:21.028
<v Pool>Answer. Wide bandwidth.

25
00:03:21.628 --> 00:03:29.432
<v Narrator>At any frequency in its range, a different subset of elements is near resonance and does the work.

26
00:03:29.432 --> 00:03:46.155
<v Narrator>The result covers a decade or more of frequency with a consistent pattern, the reason television receiving antennas look like this. The trade is size and modest gain compared with a Yagi of similar boom length.

27
00:03:46.155 --> 00:03:47.668
<v Narrator>Receiving antennas.

28
00:03:47.668 --> 00:03:52.948
<v Pool>Question. What is the primary use of a Beverage antenna?

29
00:03:53.848 --> 00:04:00.008
<v Pool>Answer. Directional receiving for MF and low HF bands.

30
00:04:00.608 --> 00:04:08.829
<v Narrator>A very long wire, one to several wavelengths, laid close to the ground and terminated at the far end.

31
00:04:08.829 --> 00:04:24.540
<v Narrator>It is a poor radiator and an excellent receiving antenna: directional, quiet, and unbothered by the ground losses that would ruin it for transmitting. Receive-only antennas are a real category.

32
00:04:24.540 --> 00:04:33.168
<v Narrator>On 160 and 80 metres, hearing is the hard part, and an antenna optimised purely for it is worth the space.

33
00:04:33.168 --> 00:04:45.772
<v Pool>Question. In which direction or directions does an electrically small loop (less than 1/10 wavelength in circumference) have nulls in its radiation pattern?

34
00:04:46.672 --> 00:04:50.072
<v Pool>Answer. Broadside to the loop.

35
00:04:50.672 --> 00:05:03.710
<v Narrator>A small loop responds to the magnetic field and has deep, sharp nulls in the plane of the loop, which is what makes it the classic direction-finding antenna.

36
00:05:03.710 --> 00:05:13.592
<v Narrator>You locate a source by rotating for a null, not for a peak: nulls are far sharper than maxima. Mobile and VHF specials.

37
00:05:13.592 --> 00:05:20.914
<v Pool>Question. How does a "screwdriver" mobile antenna adjust its feed point impedance?

38
00:05:21.814 --> 00:05:26.254
<v Pool>Answer. By varying the base loading inductance.

39
00:05:26.854 --> 00:05:35.799
<v Narrator>A motor moves a contact along a coil, changing the loading inductance and retuning the antenna from inside the car.

40
00:05:35.799 --> 00:05:45.756
<v Narrator>It is the practical answer to mobile HF, where a resonant antenna is impossible and a fixed loading coil works on one band only.

41
00:05:45.756 --> 00:05:54.436
<v Pool>Question. In which direction is the maximum radiation from a VHF/UHF "halo" antenna?

42
00:05:55.336 --> 00:06:00.656
<v Pool>Answer. Omnidirectional in the plane of the halo.

43
00:06:01.256 --> 00:06:21.625
<v Narrator>A dipole bent into a near-circle. It gives horizontal polarisation, matching VHF weak-signal practice, while remaining omnidirectional, which a straight horizontal dipole cannot. Standard for mobile VHF SSB work.

44
00:06:21.625 --> 00:06:36.325
<v Narrator>The selection table. Need, Several bands, one antenna; Antenna, trapped dipole (poor harmonic rejection). Need, One support, simple; Antenna, inverted V.

45
00:06:36.325 --> 00:06:56.693
<v Narrator>Need, 50 to 300 miles reliably; Antenna, low horizontal dipole, 1/10 to 1/4 wavelength up. Need, Very wide frequency range; Antenna, log-periodic. Need, Quiet directional receiving on 160/80 m; Antenna, Beverage.

46
00:06:56.693 --> 00:07:14.468
<v Narrator>Need, Direction finding; Antenna, small loop, using its nulls. Need, HF from a vehicle; Antenna, screwdriver. Need, Horizontal and omnidirectional at VHF; Antenna, halo. Check yourself.

47
00:07:14.468 --> 00:07:32.242
<v Narrator>Why does a multiband antenna make harmonic radiation more likely to get out? You need to find the direction of an interfering source. What antenna, and do you look for a peak or a null?

48
00:07:32.242 --> 00:07:40.217
<v Narrator>What is the feed point impedance of an end-fed half wave, and what follows from it?

49
00:07:46.217 --> 00:08:03.056
<v Narrator>It presents a good match on several bands, including the ones your harmonics fall on. A single-band antenna acts as a filter against them. A small loop, and you rotate for the null, nulls are much sharper than peaks.

50
00:08:03.056 --> 00:08:13.503
<v Narrator>Very high, thousands of ohms. It needs a large-ratio matching transformer, and fed without one it puts RF current through the station.
