Package evaluation to test RationalFunctionFields on Julia 1.14.0-DEV.1354 (1806b0bc31*) started at 2025-12-11T14:47:07.361 ################################################################################ # Set-up # Installing PkgEval dependencies (TestEnv)... Activating project at `~/.julia/environments/v1.14` Set-up completed after 8.86s ################################################################################ # Installation # Installing RationalFunctionFields... Resolving package versions... Updating `~/.julia/environments/v1.14/Project.toml` [73480bc8] + RationalFunctionFields v0.2.2 Updating `~/.julia/environments/v1.14/Manifest.toml` [c3fe647b] + AbstractAlgebra v0.47.6 [a9b6321e] + Atomix v1.1.2 [861a8166] + Combinatorics v1.0.3 [e2ba6199] + ExprTools v0.1.10 [0b43b601] + Groebner v0.10.0 [18e54dd8] + IntegerMathUtils v0.1.3 [692b3bcd] + JLLWrappers v1.7.1 [1914dd2f] + MacroTools v0.5.16 ⌅ [2edaba10] + Nemo v0.52.4 [3e851597] + ParamPunPam v0.5.6 [aea7be01] + PrecompileTools v1.3.3 [21216c6a] + Preferences v1.5.0 [27ebfcd6] + Primes v0.5.7 [92933f4c] + ProgressMeter v1.11.0 [fb686558] + RandomExtensions v0.4.4 [73480bc8] + RationalFunctionFields v0.2.2 [a759f4b9] + TimerOutputs v0.5.29 [013be700] + UnsafeAtomics v0.3.0 ⌅ [e134572f] + FLINT_jll v301.300.102+0 [656ef2d0] + OpenBLAS32_jll v0.3.29+0 [56f22d72] + Artifacts v1.11.0 [ade2ca70] + Dates v1.11.0 [8ba89e20] + Distributed v1.11.0 [8f399da3] + Libdl v1.11.0 [37e2e46d] + LinearAlgebra v1.13.0 [56ddb016] + Logging v1.11.0 [de0858da] + Printf v1.11.0 [9a3f8284] + Random v1.11.0 [ea8e919c] + SHA v1.0.0 [9e88b42a] + Serialization v1.11.0 [6462fe0b] + Sockets v1.11.0 [2f01184e] + SparseArrays v1.13.0 [fa267f1f] + TOML v1.0.3 [4ec0a83e] + Unicode v1.11.0 [e66e0078] + CompilerSupportLibraries_jll v1.3.0+1 [781609d7] + GMP_jll v6.3.0+2 [3a97d323] + MPFR_jll v4.2.2+0 [4536629a] + OpenBLAS_jll v0.3.29+0 [bea87d4a] + SuiteSparse_jll v7.10.1+0 [8e850b90] + libblastrampoline_jll v5.15.0+0 Info Packages marked with ⌅ have new versions available but compatibility constraints restrict them from upgrading. To see why use `status --outdated -m` Installation completed after 4.24s ################################################################################ # Precompilation # ERROR: LoadError: MethodError: no method matching setindex!(::Base.ScopedValues.ScopedValue{IO}, ::Nothing) The function `setindex!` exists, but no method is defined for this combination of argument types. Stacktrace: [1] top-level scope @ /PkgEval.jl/scripts/precompile.jl:10 [2] include(mod::Module, _path::String) @ Base ./Base.jl:309 [3] exec_options(opts::Base.JLOptions) @ Base ./client.jl:344 [4] _start() @ Base ./client.jl:577 in expression starting at /PkgEval.jl/scripts/precompile.jl:6 caused by: MethodError: no method matching setindex!(::Base.ScopedValues.ScopedValue{IO}, ::Base.DevNull) The function `setindex!` exists, but no method is defined for this combination of argument types. Stacktrace: [1] top-level scope @ /PkgEval.jl/scripts/precompile.jl:7 [2] include(mod::Module, _path::String) @ Base ./Base.jl:309 [3] exec_options(opts::Base.JLOptions) @ Base ./client.jl:344 [4] _start() @ Base ./client.jl:577 Precompilation failed after 9.0s ################################################################################ # Testing # Testing RationalFunctionFields Status `/tmp/jl_p5t2Cp/Project.toml` [c3fe647b] AbstractAlgebra v0.47.6 [861a8166] Combinatorics v1.0.3 [0b43b601] Groebner v0.10.0 ⌅ [2edaba10] Nemo v0.52.4 [3e851597] ParamPunPam v0.5.6 [73480bc8] RationalFunctionFields v0.2.2 ⌅ [98d24dd4] TestSetExtensions v2.0.0 [a759f4b9] TimerOutputs v0.5.29 [37e2e46d] LinearAlgebra v1.13.0 [9a3f8284] Random v1.11.0 [8dfed614] Test v1.11.0 Status `/tmp/jl_p5t2Cp/Manifest.toml` [c3fe647b] AbstractAlgebra v0.47.6 [a9b6321e] Atomix v1.1.2 [861a8166] Combinatorics v1.0.3 [ab62b9b5] DeepDiffs v1.2.0 [e2ba6199] ExprTools v0.1.10 [0b43b601] Groebner v0.10.0 [18e54dd8] IntegerMathUtils v0.1.3 [692b3bcd] JLLWrappers v1.7.1 [1914dd2f] MacroTools v0.5.16 ⌅ [2edaba10] Nemo v0.52.4 [3e851597] ParamPunPam v0.5.6 [aea7be01] PrecompileTools v1.3.3 [21216c6a] Preferences v1.5.0 [27ebfcd6] Primes v0.5.7 [92933f4c] ProgressMeter v1.11.0 [fb686558] RandomExtensions v0.4.4 [73480bc8] RationalFunctionFields v0.2.2 ⌅ [98d24dd4] TestSetExtensions v2.0.0 [a759f4b9] TimerOutputs v0.5.29 [013be700] UnsafeAtomics v0.3.0 ⌅ [e134572f] FLINT_jll v301.300.102+0 [656ef2d0] OpenBLAS32_jll v0.3.29+0 [56f22d72] Artifacts v1.11.0 [2a0f44e3] Base64 v1.11.0 [ade2ca70] Dates v1.11.0 [8ba89e20] Distributed v1.11.0 [b77e0a4c] InteractiveUtils v1.11.0 [ac6e5ff7] JuliaSyntaxHighlighting v1.13.0 [8f399da3] Libdl v1.11.0 [37e2e46d] LinearAlgebra v1.13.0 [56ddb016] Logging v1.11.0 [d6f4376e] Markdown v1.11.0 [de0858da] Printf v1.11.0 [9a3f8284] Random v1.11.0 [ea8e919c] SHA v1.0.0 [9e88b42a] Serialization v1.11.0 [6462fe0b] Sockets v1.11.0 [2f01184e] SparseArrays v1.13.0 [f489334b] StyledStrings v1.13.0 [fa267f1f] TOML v1.0.3 [8dfed614] Test v1.11.0 [4ec0a83e] Unicode v1.11.0 [e66e0078] CompilerSupportLibraries_jll v1.3.0+1 [781609d7] GMP_jll v6.3.0+2 [3a97d323] MPFR_jll v4.2.2+0 [4536629a] OpenBLAS_jll v0.3.29+0 [bea87d4a] SuiteSparse_jll v7.10.1+0 [8e850b90] libblastrampoline_jll v5.15.0+0 Info Packages marked with ⌅ have new versions available but compatibility constraints restrict them from upgrading. Testing Running tests... ┌ Warning: The call to compilecache failed to create a usable precompiled cache file for RationalFunctionFields [73480bc8-48a2-41cc-880f-208b490ccf65] │ exception = Required dependency Base.PkgId(Base.UUID("1914dd2f-81c6-5fcd-8719-6d5c9610ff09"), "MacroTools") failed to load from a cache file. └ @ Base loading.jl:2891 [ Info: Testing started ┌ Info: Names for generators were not provided, so they have been generated as follows: │ 4__Tag_3 = (x^3 + y^3 + z^3)//(x + y + z) │ 4__Tag_1 = (x^2 + y^2 + z^2)//(x + y + z) └ 4__Tag_2 = x + y + z ┌ Info: Names for generators were not provided, so they have been generated as follows: │ 203__Tag_3 = x*y*z │ 203__Tag_1 = x + y + z └ 203__Tag_2 = x*y + x*z + y*z ┌ Info: Names for generators were not provided, so they have been generated as follows: │ 88__Tag_3 = a + b + c │ 88__Tag_1 = a └ 88__Tag_2 = b ┌ Info: Names for generators were not provided, so they have been generated as follows: │ 126__Tag_3 = a + b + c │ 126__Tag_1 = a └ 126__Tag_2 = b ┌ Info: Names for generators were not provided, so they have been generated as follows: │ 170__Tag_3 = 5*a │ 170__Tag_1 = 2*c └ 170__Tag_2 = 3*b ┌ Info: Names for generators were not provided, so they have been generated as follows: │ 5__Tag_1 = a + b + c └ 5__Tag_2 = a^2 + b^2 + c^2 ┌ Info: Names for generators were not provided, so they have been generated as follows: │ 244__Tag_3 = a^4 + b^4 │ 244__Tag_1 = a^2 + b^2 └ 244__Tag_2 = a^3 + b^3 ┌ Info: Names for generators were not provided, so they have been generated as follows: └ 76__Tag_1 = T1^2 ┌ Info: Names for generators were not provided, so they have been generated as follows: │ 209__Tag_3 = _t │ 209__Tag_1 = T1 └ 209__Tag_2 = t ┌ Info: Names for generators were not provided, so they have been generated as follows: │ 139__Tag_3 = x │ 139__Tag_1 = x - 1 └ 139__Tag_2 = x^5 - 1 ┌ Info: Names for generators were not provided, so they have been generated as follows: └ 71__Tag_1 = x^2 ┌ Info: Names for generators were not provided, so they have been generated as follows: │ 124__Tag_3 = x^4 + y^4 │ 124__Tag_1 = x^2 + y^2 └ 124__Tag_2 = x^3 + y^3 ┌ Info: Names for generators were not provided, so they have been generated as follows: │ 164__Tag_1 = x1 │ 164__Tag_2 = a │ 164__Tag_5 = (a + b)//x2 │ 164__Tag_4 = c//x2 └ 164__Tag_3 = a*c + c^2 [ Info: Search for polynomial generators concluded in 8.487903328 [ Info: Search for polynomial generators concluded in 0.699452881 [ Info: Search for polynomial generators concluded in 0.002031043 [ Info: Search for polynomial generators concluded in 0.004559252 [ Info: Search for polynomial generators concluded in 0.000846673 [ Info: Search for polynomial generators concluded in 0.072013756 [ Info: Search for polynomial generators concluded in 0.897352179 [ Info: Search for polynomial generators concluded in 0.002524919 [ Info: Search for polynomial generators concluded in 1.922353234 [ Info: Search for polynomial generators concluded in 0.786336273 [ Info: Simplifying generating set. Simplification level: standard [ Info: Search for polynomial generators concluded in 0.006168729 [ Info: Selecting generators in 0.009444112 [ Info: Inclusion checked with probability 0.99 in 0.003419492 seconds [ Info: Simplifying generating set. Simplification level: strong [ Info: Search for polynomial generators concluded in 0.006270678 [ Info: Computing 3 Groebner bases for degrees (3, 3) for block orderings [ Info: Computed Groebner bases in 26.714926847 seconds [ Info: Selecting generators in 0.000678774 [ Info: Inclusion checked with probability 0.99 in 0.003139925 seconds [ Info: Simplifying generating set. Simplification level: standard [ Info: Search for polynomial generators concluded in 0.21404541 [ Info: Selecting generators in 0.008571799 [ Info: Inclusion checked with probability 0.99 in 0.012198899 seconds [ Info: Simplifying generating set. Simplification level: strong [ Info: Search for polynomial generators concluded in 0.040668874 [ Info: Computing 5 Groebner bases for degrees (3, 3) for block orderings [ Info: Computed Groebner bases in 2.077970608 seconds [ Info: Selecting generators in 0.007644687 [ Info: Inclusion checked with probability 0.99 in 0.011108698 seconds Test Summary: | Pass Total Time All the tests | 149 149 8m31.9s RationalFunctionField | 2 2 1m08.3s Transcendence basis computations and algebraicity checks | 13 13 5.5s RationalFunctionField: constructive field membership (basic) | 6 6 41.0s RationalFunctionField: constructive field membership | 82 82 5.4s RationalFunctionField: simplification | 1 1 3m38.0s RationalFunctionField: membership | 24 24 1m16.0s Linear relations over the rationals | 10 10 18.6s Rational function comparison | 7 7 1.2s RationalFunctionField: simplification | 4 4 1m16.5s 512.397045 seconds (336.24 M allocations: 76.572 GiB, 3.26% gc time, 49.15% compilation time: <1% of which was recompilation) Testing RationalFunctionFields tests passed Testing completed after 890.95s PkgEval succeeded after 933.52s