Package evaluation to test SDDP on Julia 1.14.0-DEV.1260 (89243d1cdf*) started at 2025-11-16T20:09:06.129 ################################################################################ # Set-up # Installing PkgEval dependencies (TestEnv)... Set-up completed after 10.56s ################################################################################ # Installation # Installing SDDP... Resolving package versions... Installed Bzip2_jll ──────────── v1.0.9+0 Installed ConcurrentUtilities ── v2.5.0 Installed CodecZlib ──────────── v0.7.8 Installed URIs ───────────────── v1.6.1 Installed DiffResults ────────── v1.1.0 Installed MacroTools ─────────── v0.5.16 Installed ForwardDiff ────────── v1.3.0 Installed DataStructures ─────── v0.19.3 Installed ExprTools ──────────── v0.1.10 Installed ExceptionUnwrapping ── v0.1.11 Installed RecipesBase ────────── v1.3.4 Installed OrderedCollections ─── v1.8.1 Installed Compat ─────────────── v4.18.1 Installed Statistics ─────────── v1.11.1 Installed TranscodingStreams ─── v0.11.3 Installed PrecompileTools ────── v1.3.3 Installed TimerOutputs ───────── v0.5.29 Installed CommonSubexpressions ─ v0.3.1 Installed OpenSSL ────────────── v1.6.0 Installed LoggingExtras ──────── v1.2.0 Installed StaticArraysCore ───── v1.4.4 Installed MbedTLS ────────────── v1.1.9 Installed StructUtils ────────── v2.6.0 Installed IrrationalConstants ── v0.2.6 Installed CodecBzip2 ─────────── v0.8.5 Installed NaNMath ────────────── v1.1.3 Installed JSON3 ──────────────── v1.14.3 Installed OpenSpecFun_jll ────── v0.5.6+0 Installed HTTP ───────────────── v1.10.19 Installed BitFlags ───────────── v0.1.9 Installed LogExpFunctions ────── v0.3.29 Installed DiffRules ──────────── v1.15.1 Installed Parsers ────────────── v2.8.3 Installed JuMP ───────────────── v1.29.3 Installed Reexport ───────────── v1.2.2 Installed JSON ───────────────── v1.3.0 Installed SpecialFunctions ───── v2.6.1 Installed MutableArithmetics ─── v1.6.7 Installed Preferences ────────── v1.5.0 Installed SimpleBufferStream ─── v1.2.0 Installed MbedTLS_jll ────────── v2.28.10+0 Installed JLLWrappers ────────── v1.7.1 Installed StructTypes ────────── v1.11.0 Installed BenchmarkTools ─────── v1.6.3 Installed SDDP ───────────────── v1.13.1 Installed DocStringExtensions ── v0.9.5 Installed MathOptInterface ───── v1.46.0 Installing 3 artifacts Installed artifact OpenSpecFun 194.9 KiB Installed artifact Bzip2 503.5 KiB Installed artifact MbedTLS 2.2 MiB Updating `~/.julia/environments/v1.14/Project.toml` [f4570300] + SDDP v1.13.1 Updating `~/.julia/environments/v1.14/Manifest.toml` [6e4b80f9] + BenchmarkTools v1.6.3 [d1d4a3ce] + BitFlags v0.1.9 [523fee87] + CodecBzip2 v0.8.5 [944b1d66] + CodecZlib v0.7.8 [bbf7d656] + CommonSubexpressions v0.3.1 [34da2185] + Compat v4.18.1 [f0e56b4a] + ConcurrentUtilities v2.5.0 [864edb3b] + DataStructures v0.19.3 [163ba53b] + DiffResults v1.1.0 [b552c78f] + DiffRules v1.15.1 [ffbed154] + DocStringExtensions v0.9.5 [460bff9d] + ExceptionUnwrapping v0.1.11 [e2ba6199] + ExprTools v0.1.10 [f6369f11] + ForwardDiff v1.3.0 [cd3eb016] + HTTP v1.10.19 [92d709cd] + IrrationalConstants v0.2.6 [692b3bcd] + JLLWrappers v1.7.1 [682c06a0] + JSON v1.3.0 [0f8b85d8] + JSON3 v1.14.3 [4076af6c] + JuMP v1.29.3 [2ab3a3ac] + LogExpFunctions v0.3.29 [e6f89c97] + LoggingExtras v1.2.0 [1914dd2f] + MacroTools v0.5.16 [b8f27783] + MathOptInterface v1.46.0 [739be429] + MbedTLS v1.1.9 [d8a4904e] + MutableArithmetics v1.6.7 [77ba4419] + NaNMath v1.1.3 [4d8831e6] + OpenSSL v1.6.0 [bac558e1] + OrderedCollections v1.8.1 [69de0a69] + Parsers v2.8.3 [aea7be01] + PrecompileTools v1.3.3 [21216c6a] + Preferences v1.5.0 [3cdcf5f2] + RecipesBase v1.3.4 [189a3867] + Reexport v1.2.2 [f4570300] + SDDP v1.13.1 [777ac1f9] + SimpleBufferStream v1.2.0 [276daf66] + SpecialFunctions v2.6.1 [1e83bf80] + StaticArraysCore v1.4.4 [10745b16] + Statistics v1.11.1 [856f2bd8] + StructTypes v1.11.0 [ec057cc2] + StructUtils v2.6.0 [a759f4b9] + TimerOutputs v0.5.29 [3bb67fe8] + TranscodingStreams v0.11.3 [5c2747f8] + URIs v1.6.1 [6e34b625] + Bzip2_jll v1.0.9+0 [c8ffd9c3] + MbedTLS_jll v2.28.10+0 [efe28fd5] + OpenSpecFun_jll v0.5.6+0 [56f22d72] + Artifacts v1.11.0 [2a0f44e3] + Base64 v1.11.0 [ade2ca70] + Dates v1.11.0 [8ba89e20] + Distributed v1.11.0 [b77e0a4c] + InteractiveUtils v1.11.0 [ac6e5ff7] + JuliaSyntaxHighlighting v1.12.0 [8f399da3] + Libdl v1.11.0 [37e2e46d] + LinearAlgebra v1.13.0 [56ddb016] + Logging v1.11.0 [d6f4376e] + Markdown v1.11.0 [a63ad114] + Mmap v1.11.0 [ca575930] + NetworkOptions v1.3.0 [de0858da] + Printf v1.11.0 [9abbd945] + Profile v1.11.0 [9a3f8284] + Random v1.11.0 [ea8e919c] + SHA v1.0.0 [9e88b42a] + Serialization v1.11.0 [6462fe0b] + Sockets v1.11.0 [2f01184e] + SparseArrays v1.13.0 [f489334b] + StyledStrings v1.11.0 [fa267f1f] + TOML v1.0.3 [8dfed614] + Test v1.11.0 [cf7118a7] + UUIDs v1.11.0 [4ec0a83e] + Unicode v1.11.0 [e66e0078] + CompilerSupportLibraries_jll v1.3.0+1 [14a3606d] + MozillaCACerts_jll v2025.11.4 [4536629a] + OpenBLAS_jll v0.3.29+0 [05823500] + OpenLibm_jll v0.8.7+0 [458c3c95] + OpenSSL_jll v3.5.4+0 [bea87d4a] + SuiteSparse_jll v7.10.1+0 [83775a58] + Zlib_jll v1.3.1+2 [8e850b90] + libblastrampoline_jll v5.15.0+0 Installation completed after 10.26s ################################################################################ # Precompilation # Precompiling PkgEval dependencies... Precompiling packages... WARNING: Imported binding Operations.project_rel_path was undeclared at import time during import to TestEnv. 5476.7 ms ✓ TestEnv 1 dependency successfully precompiled in 6 seconds. 27 already precompiled. 1 dependency had output during precompilation: ┌ TestEnv │ WARNING: Imported binding Operations.project_rel_path was undeclared at import time during import to TestEnv. └ ┌ Error: Failed to use TestEnv.jl; test dependencies will not be precompiled │ exception = │ UndefVarError: `project_rel_path` not defined in `TestEnv` │ Suggestion: this global was defined as `Pkg.Operations.project_rel_path` but not assigned a value. │ Stacktrace: │ [1] get_test_dir(ctx::Pkg.Types.Context, pkgspec::PackageSpec) │ @ TestEnv ~/.julia/packages/TestEnv/i9lgt/src/julia-1.11/common.jl:75 │ [2] test_dir_has_project_file │ @ ~/.julia/packages/TestEnv/i9lgt/src/julia-1.11/common.jl:52 [inlined] │ [3] maybe_gen_project_override! │ @ ~/.julia/packages/TestEnv/i9lgt/src/julia-1.11/common.jl:83 [inlined] │ [4] activate(pkg::String; allow_reresolve::Bool) │ @ TestEnv ~/.julia/packages/TestEnv/i9lgt/src/julia-1.11/activate_set.jl:12 │ [5] activate(pkg::String) │ @ TestEnv ~/.julia/packages/TestEnv/i9lgt/src/julia-1.11/activate_set.jl:9 │ [6] top-level scope │ @ /PkgEval.jl/scripts/precompile.jl:24 │ [7] include(mod::Module, _path::String) │ @ Base ./Base.jl:309 │ [8] exec_options(opts::Base.JLOptions) │ @ Base ./client.jl:344 │ [9] _start() │ @ Base ./client.jl:577 └ @ Main /PkgEval.jl/scripts/precompile.jl:26 Precompiling package dependencies... Precompiling packages... 4625.8 ms ✓ MacroTools 850.6 ms ✓ Reexport 1197.1 ms ✓ Statistics 2135.0 ms ✓ IrrationalConstants 1012.5 ms ✓ StaticArraysCore 1253.9 ms ✓ URIs 1293.4 ms ✓ OrderedCollections 917.9 ms ✓ BitFlags 1203.4 ms ✓ DocStringExtensions 1901.8 ms ✓ ConcurrentUtilities 923.3 ms ✓ ExprTools 1378.5 ms ✓ TranscodingStreams 835.3 ms ✓ SimpleBufferStream 1053.9 ms ✓ NaNMath 1596.2 ms ✓ StructTypes 1087.7 ms ✓ LoggingExtras 1522.8 ms ✓ StructUtils 1211.1 ms ✓ Compat 1217.2 ms ✓ Preferences 1641.1 ms ✓ ExceptionUnwrapping 11840.5 ms ✓ MutableArithmetics 1918.3 ms ✓ CommonSubexpressions 1391.9 ms ✓ Statistics → SparseArraysExt 998.4 ms ✓ DiffResults 3712.8 ms ✓ DataStructures 4278.9 ms ✓ OpenSSL 1644.1 ms ✓ LogExpFunctions 3431.7 ms ✓ TimerOutputs 1011.8 ms ✓ CodecZlib 879.2 ms ✓ Compat → CompatLinearAlgebraExt 1248.9 ms ✓ JLLWrappers 983.2 ms ✓ PrecompileTools 1482.3 ms ✓ Bzip2_jll 1509.7 ms ✓ MbedTLS_jll 1517.4 ms ✓ OpenSpecFun_jll 3059.6 ms ✓ RecipesBase 17966.2 ms ✓ Parsers 1051.2 ms ✓ CodecBzip2 2218.1 ms ✓ MbedTLS 5337.2 ms ✓ SpecialFunctions 13177.5 ms ✓ JSON3 5954.0 ms ✓ JSON 24567.6 ms ✓ HTTP 1185.4 ms ✓ DiffRules 2684.2 ms ✓ BenchmarkTools 5499.9 ms ✓ ForwardDiff 80989.3 ms ✓ MathOptInterface 65642.1 ms ✓ JuMP 27415.5 ms ✓ SDDP 49 dependencies successfully precompiled in 324 seconds. 23 already precompiled. Precompilation completed after 340.87s ################################################################################ # Testing # Testing SDDP Status `/tmp/jl_DBJ69F/Project.toml` [87dc4568] HiGHS v1.20.1 [b6b21f68] Ipopt v1.13.0 [682c06a0] JSON v1.3.0 [7d188eb4] JSONSchema v1.5.0 [91a5bcdd] Plots v1.41.1 [f4570300] SDDP v1.13.1 [10745b16] Statistics v1.11.1 [8ba89e20] Distributed v1.11.0 [f43a241f] Downloads v1.7.0 [44cfe95a] Pkg v1.13.0 [9a3f8284] Random v1.11.0 [8dfed614] Test v1.11.0 Status `/tmp/jl_DBJ69F/Manifest.toml` [66dad0bd] AliasTables v1.1.3 [6e4b80f9] BenchmarkTools v1.6.3 [d1d4a3ce] BitFlags v0.1.9 [523fee87] CodecBzip2 v0.8.5 [944b1d66] CodecZlib v0.7.8 [35d6a980] ColorSchemes v3.31.0 [3da002f7] ColorTypes v0.12.1 [c3611d14] ColorVectorSpace v0.11.0 [5ae59095] Colors v0.13.1 [bbf7d656] CommonSubexpressions v0.3.1 [34da2185] Compat v4.18.1 [f0e56b4a] ConcurrentUtilities v2.5.0 [d38c429a] Contour v0.6.3 [9a962f9c] DataAPI v1.16.0 [864edb3b] DataStructures v0.19.3 [8bb1440f] DelimitedFiles v1.9.1 [163ba53b] DiffResults v1.1.0 [b552c78f] DiffRules v1.15.1 [ffbed154] DocStringExtensions v0.9.5 [460bff9d] ExceptionUnwrapping v0.1.11 [e2ba6199] ExprTools v0.1.10 [c87230d0] FFMPEG v0.4.5 [53c48c17] FixedPointNumbers v0.8.5 [1fa38f19] Format v1.3.7 [f6369f11] ForwardDiff v1.3.0 [28b8d3ca] GR v0.73.18 [42e2da0e] Grisu v1.0.2 [cd3eb016] HTTP v1.10.19 [87dc4568] HiGHS v1.20.1 [b6b21f68] Ipopt v1.13.0 [92d709cd] IrrationalConstants v0.2.6 [1019f520] JLFzf v0.1.11 [692b3bcd] JLLWrappers v1.7.1 [682c06a0] JSON v1.3.0 [0f8b85d8] JSON3 v1.14.3 [7d188eb4] JSONSchema v1.5.0 [4076af6c] JuMP v1.29.3 [b964fa9f] LaTeXStrings v1.4.0 [23fbe1c1] Latexify v0.16.10 [2ab3a3ac] LogExpFunctions v0.3.29 [e6f89c97] LoggingExtras v1.2.0 [1914dd2f] MacroTools v0.5.16 [8c4f8055] MathOptIIS v0.1.1 [b8f27783] MathOptInterface v1.46.0 [739be429] MbedTLS v1.1.9 [442fdcdd] Measures v0.3.3 [e1d29d7a] Missings v1.2.0 [d8a4904e] MutableArithmetics v1.6.7 [77ba4419] NaNMath v1.1.3 [4d8831e6] OpenSSL v1.6.0 [bac558e1] OrderedCollections v1.8.1 [69de0a69] Parsers v2.8.3 [ccf2f8ad] PlotThemes v3.3.0 [995b91a9] PlotUtils v1.4.4 [91a5bcdd] Plots v1.41.1 [aea7be01] PrecompileTools v1.3.3 [21216c6a] Preferences v1.5.0 [43287f4e] PtrArrays v1.3.0 [3cdcf5f2] RecipesBase v1.3.4 [01d81517] RecipesPipeline v0.6.12 [189a3867] Reexport v1.2.2 [05181044] RelocatableFolders v1.0.1 [ae029012] Requires v1.3.1 [f4570300] SDDP v1.13.1 [6c6a2e73] Scratch v1.3.0 [992d4aef] Showoff v1.0.3 [777ac1f9] SimpleBufferStream v1.2.0 [a2af1166] SortingAlgorithms v1.2.2 [276daf66] SpecialFunctions v2.6.1 [860ef19b] StableRNGs v1.0.4 [1e83bf80] StaticArraysCore v1.4.4 [10745b16] Statistics v1.11.1 [82ae8749] StatsAPI v1.7.1 [2913bbd2] StatsBase v0.34.8 [856f2bd8] StructTypes v1.11.0 [ec057cc2] StructUtils v2.6.0 [62fd8b95] TensorCore v0.1.1 [a759f4b9] TimerOutputs v0.5.29 [3bb67fe8] TranscodingStreams v0.11.3 [5c2747f8] URIs v1.6.1 [1cfade01] UnicodeFun v0.4.1 [41fe7b60] Unzip v0.2.0 [ae81ac8f] ASL_jll v0.1.3+0 [6e34b625] Bzip2_jll v1.0.9+0 [83423d85] Cairo_jll v1.18.5+0 [ee1fde0b] Dbus_jll v1.16.2+0 [2702e6a9] EpollShim_jll v0.0.20230411+1 [2e619515] Expat_jll v2.7.3+0 [b22a6f82] FFMPEG_jll v8.0.0+0 [a3f928ae] Fontconfig_jll v2.17.1+0 [d7e528f0] FreeType2_jll v2.13.4+0 [559328eb] FriBidi_jll v1.0.17+0 [0656b61e] GLFW_jll v3.4.0+2 [d2c73de3] GR_jll v0.73.18+0 [b0724c58] GettextRuntime_jll v0.22.4+0 [61579ee1] Ghostscript_jll v9.55.1+0 [7746bdde] Glib_jll v2.86.0+0 [3b182d85] Graphite2_jll v1.3.15+0 [2e76f6c2] HarfBuzz_jll v8.5.1+0 [8fd58aa0] HiGHS_jll v1.12.0+0 [e33a78d0] Hwloc_jll v2.12.2+0 [9cc047cb] Ipopt_jll v300.1400.1900+0 [aacddb02] JpegTurbo_jll v3.1.3+0 [c1c5ebd0] LAME_jll v3.100.3+0 [88015f11] LERC_jll v4.0.1+0 [1d63c593] LLVMOpenMP_jll v18.1.8+0 [dd4b983a] LZO_jll v2.10.3+0 [e9f186c6] Libffi_jll v3.4.7+0 [7e76a0d4] Libglvnd_jll v1.7.1+1 [94ce4f54] Libiconv_jll v1.18.0+0 [4b2f31a3] Libmount_jll v2.41.2+0 [89763e89] Libtiff_jll v4.7.2+0 [38a345b3] Libuuid_jll v2.41.2+0 [d00139f3] METIS_jll v5.1.3+0 [d7ed1dd3] MUMPS_seq_jll v500.800.100+0 [c8ffd9c3] MbedTLS_jll v2.28.10+0 [e7412a2a] Ogg_jll v1.3.6+0 [656ef2d0] OpenBLAS32_jll v0.3.29+0 [efe28fd5] OpenSpecFun_jll v0.5.6+0 [91d4177d] Opus_jll v1.5.2+0 [36c8627f] Pango_jll v1.57.0+0 ⌅ [30392449] Pixman_jll v0.44.2+0 [c0090381] Qt6Base_jll v6.8.2+2 [629bc702] Qt6Declarative_jll v6.8.2+1 [ce943373] Qt6ShaderTools_jll v6.8.2+1 [e99dba38] Qt6Wayland_jll v6.8.2+2 ⌅ [319450e9] SPRAL_jll v2025.5.20+0 [a44049a8] Vulkan_Loader_jll v1.3.243+0 [a2964d1f] Wayland_jll v1.24.0+0 ⌅ [02c8fc9c] XML2_jll v2.13.9+0 [ffd25f8a] XZ_jll v5.8.1+0 [f67eecfb] Xorg_libICE_jll v1.1.2+0 [c834827a] Xorg_libSM_jll v1.2.6+0 [4f6342f7] Xorg_libX11_jll v1.8.12+0 [0c0b7dd1] Xorg_libXau_jll v1.0.13+0 [935fb764] Xorg_libXcursor_jll v1.2.4+0 [a3789734] Xorg_libXdmcp_jll v1.1.6+0 [1082639a] Xorg_libXext_jll v1.3.7+0 [d091e8ba] Xorg_libXfixes_jll v6.0.2+0 [a51aa0fd] Xorg_libXi_jll v1.8.3+0 [d1454406] Xorg_libXinerama_jll v1.1.6+0 [ec84b674] Xorg_libXrandr_jll v1.5.5+0 [ea2f1a96] Xorg_libXrender_jll v0.9.12+0 [a65dc6b1] Xorg_libpciaccess_jll v0.18.1+0 [c7cfdc94] Xorg_libxcb_jll v1.17.1+0 [cc61e674] Xorg_libxkbfile_jll v1.1.3+0 [e920d4aa] Xorg_xcb_util_cursor_jll v0.1.6+0 [12413925] Xorg_xcb_util_image_jll v0.4.1+0 [2def613f] Xorg_xcb_util_jll v0.4.1+0 [975044d2] Xorg_xcb_util_keysyms_jll v0.4.1+0 [0d47668e] Xorg_xcb_util_renderutil_jll v0.3.10+0 [c22f9ab0] Xorg_xcb_util_wm_jll v0.4.2+0 [35661453] Xorg_xkbcomp_jll v1.4.7+0 [33bec58e] Xorg_xkeyboard_config_jll v2.44.0+0 [c5fb5394] Xorg_xtrans_jll v1.6.0+0 [35ca27e7] eudev_jll v3.2.14+0 [214eeab7] fzf_jll v0.61.1+0 [a4ae2306] libaom_jll v3.13.1+0 [0ac62f75] libass_jll v0.17.4+0 [1183f4f0] libdecor_jll v0.2.2+0 [2db6ffa8] libevdev_jll v1.13.4+0 [f638f0a6] libfdk_aac_jll v2.0.4+0 [36db933b] libinput_jll v1.28.1+0 [b53b4c65] libpng_jll v1.6.50+0 [f27f6e37] libvorbis_jll v1.3.8+0 [009596ad] mtdev_jll v1.1.7+0 [1270edf5] x264_jll v10164.0.1+0 [dfaa095f] x265_jll v4.1.0+0 [d8fb68d0] xkbcommon_jll v1.9.2+0 [0dad84c5] ArgTools v1.1.2 [56f22d72] Artifacts v1.11.0 [2a0f44e3] Base64 v1.11.0 [ade2ca70] Dates v1.11.0 [8ba89e20] Distributed v1.11.0 [f43a241f] Downloads v1.7.0 [7b1f6079] FileWatching v1.11.0 [b77e0a4c] InteractiveUtils v1.11.0 [ac6e5ff7] JuliaSyntaxHighlighting v1.12.0 [b27032c2] LibCURL v1.0.0 [76f85450] LibGit2 v1.11.0 [8f399da3] Libdl v1.11.0 [37e2e46d] LinearAlgebra v1.13.0 [56ddb016] Logging v1.11.0 [d6f4376e] Markdown v1.11.0 [a63ad114] Mmap v1.11.0 [ca575930] NetworkOptions v1.3.0 [44cfe95a] Pkg v1.13.0 [de0858da] Printf v1.11.0 [9abbd945] Profile v1.11.0 [3fa0cd96] REPL v1.11.0 [9a3f8284] Random v1.11.0 [ea8e919c] SHA v1.0.0 [9e88b42a] Serialization v1.11.0 [6462fe0b] Sockets v1.11.0 [2f01184e] SparseArrays v1.13.0 [f489334b] StyledStrings v1.11.0 [fa267f1f] TOML v1.0.3 [a4e569a6] Tar v1.10.0 [8dfed614] Test v1.11.0 [cf7118a7] UUIDs v1.11.0 [4ec0a83e] Unicode v1.11.0 [e66e0078] CompilerSupportLibraries_jll v1.3.0+1 [deac9b47] LibCURL_jll v8.16.0+0 [e37daf67] LibGit2_jll v1.9.1+0 [29816b5a] LibSSH2_jll v1.11.3+1 [14a3606d] MozillaCACerts_jll v2025.11.4 [4536629a] OpenBLAS_jll v0.3.29+0 [05823500] OpenLibm_jll v0.8.7+0 [458c3c95] OpenSSL_jll v3.5.4+0 [efcefdf7] PCRE2_jll v10.47.0+0 [bea87d4a] SuiteSparse_jll v7.10.1+0 [83775a58] Zlib_jll v1.3.1+2 [3161d3a3] Zstd_jll v1.5.7+1 [8e850b90] libblastrampoline_jll v5.15.0+0 [8e850ede] nghttp2_jll v1.68.0+1 [3f19e933] p7zip_jll v17.7.0+0 Info Packages marked with ⌅ have new versions available but compatibility constraints restrict them from upgrading. Testing Running tests... [ Info: Experimental.jl [ Info: fetching remote ref https://jump.dev/MathOptFormat/schemas/mof.1.schema.json [ Info: Inner.jl Node: 3 - elapsed time: 0.4 plus 11.05 for vertex selection. Node: 2 - elapsed time: 0.31 plus 0.3 for vertex selection. Node: 1 - elapsed time: 0.31 plus 0.29 for vertex selection. First-stage upper bound: 45.83333333333332 Total time for upper bound: 12.663913199 ┌ Warning: You must select an optimizer for performing vertex selection. └ @ SDDP.Inner ~/.julia/packages/SDDP/ScjyB/src/Inner.jl:1048 Node: 19 - elapsed time: 0.38 plus 0.35 for vertex selection. Node: 18 - elapsed time: 0.47 plus 0.34 for vertex selection. Node: 17 - elapsed time: 1.53 plus 0.33 for vertex selection. Node: 16 - elapsed time: 0.44 plus 0.34 for vertex selection. Node: 15 - elapsed time: 0.45 plus 0.34 for vertex selection. Node: 14 - elapsed time: 0.48 plus 0.34 for vertex selection. Node: 13 - elapsed time: 0.46 plus 0.34 for vertex selection. Node: 12 - elapsed time: 0.47 plus 0.33 for vertex selection. Node: 11 - elapsed time: 0.51 plus 0.32 for vertex selection. Node: 10 - elapsed time: 0.44 plus 0.33 for vertex selection. Node: 9 - elapsed time: 0.46 plus 0.33 for vertex selection. Node: 8 - elapsed time: 0.48 plus 0.33 for vertex selection. Node: 7 - elapsed time: 0.46 plus 0.34 for vertex selection. Node: 6 - elapsed time: 0.46 plus 0.33 for vertex selection. Node: 5 - elapsed time: 0.45 plus 0.34 for vertex selection. Node: 4 - elapsed time: 0.44 plus 0.33 for vertex selection. Node: 3 - elapsed time: 0.46 plus 0.34 for vertex selection. Node: 2 - elapsed time: 0.48 plus 0.34 for vertex selection. Node: 1 - elapsed time: 0.47 plus 0.33 for vertex selection. Selection removed 500 vertices [ Info: MSPFormat.jl [ Info: algorithm.jl ┌ Warning: Unable to recover in direct mode! Remove `direct = true` when creating the policy graph. └ @ SDDP ~/.julia/packages/SDDP/ScjyB/src/algorithm.jl:401 [ Info: Writing cuts to the file `model_infeasible_node_1.cuts.json` [ Info: Writing cuts to the file `model_infeasible_node_1.cuts.json` ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 2 state variables : 1 scenarios : 1.00000e+00 existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [3, 3] JuMP.AffExpr in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [1, 1] JuMP.VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [2, 2] JuMP.VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [1, 1] numerical stability report matrix range [1e+00, 1e+00] objective range [1e+00, 1e+00] bounds range [0e+00, 0e+00] rhs range [2e+00, 2e+00] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- † 1 0.000000e+00 0.000000e+00 6.080942e-01 4 1 3 0.000000e+00 0.000000e+00 1.190759e+00 12 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : iteration_limit total time (s) : 1.190759e+00 total solves : 12 best bound : 0.000000e+00 simulation ci : 0.000000e+00 ± 0.000000e+00 numeric issues : 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 3 state variables : 1 scenarios : 8.00000e+00 existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [6, 6] JuMP.AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [1, 1] JuMP.VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [4, 4] JuMP.VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [2, 3] numerical stability report matrix range [1e+00, 1e+00] objective range [1e+00, 3e+02] bounds range [1e+02, 2e+02] rhs range [0e+00, 0e+00] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 1.100000e+05 1.075000e+05 5.760510e-01 9 1 20 7.500000e+04 1.075000e+05 1.251713e+00 204 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : simulation_stopping total time (s) : 1.251713e+00 total solves : 204 best bound : 1.075000e+05 simulation ci : 8.268750e+04 ± 1.084410e+04 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- ┌ Warning: Re-training a model with existing cuts! │ │ Are you sure you want to do this? The output from this training may be │ misleading because the policy is already partially trained. │ │ If you meant to train a new policy with different settings, you must │ build a new model. │ │ If you meant to refine a previously trained policy, turn off this │ warning by passing `add_to_existing_cuts = true` as a keyword argument │ to `SDDP.train`. │ │ In a future release, this warning may turn into an error. └ @ SDDP ~/.julia/packages/SDDP/ScjyB/src/algorithm.jl:1181 ┌ Warning: Re-training a model with existing cuts! │ │ Are you sure you want to do this? The output from this training may be │ misleading because the policy is already partially trained. │ │ If you meant to train a new policy with different settings, you must │ build a new model. │ │ If you meant to refine a previously trained policy, turn off this │ warning by passing `add_to_existing_cuts = true` as a keyword argument │ to `SDDP.train`. │ │ In a future release, this warning may turn into an error. └ @ SDDP ~/.julia/packages/SDDP/ScjyB/src/algorithm.jl:1181 [ Info: binary_expansion.jl [ Info: deterministic_equivalent.jl [ Info: modeling_aids.jl ┌ Warning: Budget for nodes is less than the number of stages. Using one node per stage. └ @ SDDP ~/.julia/packages/SDDP/ScjyB/src/modeling_aids.jl:125 [ Info: user_interface.jl [ Info: backward_sampling_schemes.jl [ Info: bellman_functions.jl ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 3 state variables : 1 scenarios : 2.70000e+01 existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [6, 6] JuMP.AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [2, 2] JuMP.VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [5, 5] JuMP.VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [1, 2] numerical stability report matrix range [1e+00, 1e+00] objective range [1e+00, 1e+01] bounds range [5e+00, 2e+01] rhs range [2e+00, 1e+01] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 2.500000e+01 2.138889e+01 1.566045e+00 12 1 10 2.500000e+00 3.361111e+01 1.593440e+00 120 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : iteration_limit total time (s) : 1.593440e+00 total solves : 120 best bound : 3.361111e+01 simulation ci : 2.775000e+01 ± 3.280073e+01 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 3 state variables : 1 scenarios : 2.70000e+01 existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [6, 6] JuMP.AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [2, 2] JuMP.VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [5, 5] JuMP.VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [1, 2] numerical stability report matrix range [1e+00, 1e+00] objective range [1e+00, 1e+01] bounds range [5e+00, 2e+01] rhs range [2e+00, 1e+01] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 2.500000e+01 2.083333e+01 7.007761e-01 12 1 10 2.500000e+00 3.361111e+01 7.320850e-01 120 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : iteration_limit total time (s) : 7.320850e-01 total solves : 120 best bound : 3.361111e+01 simulation ci : 2.775000e+01 ± 3.280073e+01 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 1 state variables : 1 scenarios : Inf existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [8, 8] JuMP.AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [2, 2] JuMP.VariableRef in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [3, 3] JuMP.VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [5, 5] JuMP.VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [1, 1] numerical stability report matrix range [1e+00, 1e+00] objective range [1e+00, 1e+01] bounds range [5e+00, 2e+01] rhs range [0e+00, 0e+00] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 9.250000e+01 5.268631e+01 1.029110e-02 46 1 50 0.000000e+00 1.191663e+02 5.444260e-01 1625 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : iteration_limit total time (s) : 5.444260e-01 total solves : 1625 best bound : 1.191663e+02 simulation ci : 7.795000e+01 ± 2.885518e+01 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 1 state variables : 1 scenarios : Inf existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [8, 8] JuMP.AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [2, 2] JuMP.VariableRef in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [3, 3] JuMP.VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [5, 5] JuMP.VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [1, 1] numerical stability report matrix range [1e+00, 1e+00] objective range [1e+00, 1e+01] bounds range [5e+00, 2e+01] rhs range [0e+00, 0e+00] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 9.250000e+01 5.268631e+01 1.073909e-02 46 1 50 0.000000e+00 1.191663e+02 6.253390e-01 1625 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : iteration_limit total time (s) : 6.253390e-01 total solves : 1625 best bound : 1.191663e+02 simulation ci : 7.795000e+01 ± 2.885518e+01 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- [ Info: duality_handlers.jl ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 2 state variables : 2 scenarios : 1.00000e+02 existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [5, 11] JuMP.AffExpr in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [2, 2] JuMP.VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [3, 7] JuMP.VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [2, 7] JuMP.VariableRef in MOI.ZeroOne : [4, 4] numerical stability report matrix range [1e+00, 6e+00] objective range [1e+00, 3e+01] bounds range [1e+00, 1e+02] rhs range [0e+00, 0e+00] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 -4.650000e+01 -7.053967e+01 3.546175e+00 103 1 3S -5.785826e+01 -6.755367e+01 5.292657e+00 309 1 4S -6.230988e+01 -6.688020e+01 6.371567e+00 412 1 5S -7.577792e+01 -6.680771e+01 7.535932e+00 515 1 6S -6.064080e+01 -6.678327e+01 8.690355e+00 618 1 7S -6.493167e+01 -6.677772e+01 9.746264e+00 721 1 15S -4.168889e+01 -6.677644e+01 1.567808e+01 1545 1 25S -4.168889e+01 -6.677644e+01 2.158816e+01 2575 1 35S -3.268889e+01 -6.677644e+01 2.758254e+01 3605 1 45S -4.168889e+01 -6.677644e+01 3.340813e+01 4635 1 55S -4.868889e+01 -6.677644e+01 3.921657e+01 5665 1 65S -4.168889e+01 -6.677644e+01 4.499541e+01 6695 1 75S -8.368889e+01 -6.677644e+01 5.089147e+01 7725 1 85S -6.068889e+01 -6.677644e+01 5.664674e+01 8755 1 95S -6.468889e+01 -6.677644e+01 6.236562e+01 9785 1 100 -8.368889e+01 -6.677644e+01 6.471594e+01 10300 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : iteration_limit total time (s) : 6.471594e+01 total solves : 10300 best bound : -6.677644e+01 simulation ci : -5.960112e+01 ± 3.154656e+00 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- ****************************************************************************** This program contains Ipopt, a library for large-scale nonlinear optimization. Ipopt is released as open source code under the Eclipse Public License (EPL). For more information visit https://github.com/coin-or/Ipopt ****************************************************************************** [ Info: forward_passes.jl ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 2 state variables : 1 scenarios : 4.00000e+00 existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [3, 3] JuMP.VariableRef in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [1, 1] JuMP.VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [1, 1] JuMP.VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [2, 2] numerical stability report matrix range [0e+00, 0e+00] objective range [1e+00, 1e+00] bounds range [1e+00, 1e+02] rhs range [0e+00, 0e+00] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 3.000000e+00 6.000000e+00 1.915932e-03 8 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : iteration_limit total time (s) : 1.915932e-03 total solves : 8 best bound : 6.000000e+00 simulation ci : 3.000000e+00 ± NaN numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- ┌ Warning: Re-training a model with existing cuts! │ │ Are you sure you want to do this? The output from this training may be │ misleading because the policy is already partially trained. │ │ If you meant to train a new policy with different settings, you must │ build a new model. │ │ If you meant to refine a previously trained policy, turn off this │ warning by passing `add_to_existing_cuts = true` as a keyword argument │ to `SDDP.train`. │ │ In a future release, this warning may turn into an error. └ @ SDDP ~/.julia/packages/SDDP/ScjyB/src/algorithm.jl:1181 [ Info: local_improvement_search.jl [ Info: exp = 15 [ Info: OA(exp) = 220 [ Info: piecewise = 7 [ Info: OA(piecewise) = 6 [ Info: squared = 3 [ Info: OA(squared) = 16 [ Info: parallel_schemes.jl ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 2 state variables : 1 scenarios : 4.00000e+00 existing cuts : false options solver : Asynchronous mode with 4 workers. risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [3, 3] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [1, 1] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [1, 1] numerical stability report matrix range [0e+00, 0e+00] objective range [1e+00, 1e+00] bounds range [1e+00, 6e+00] rhs range [0e+00, 0e+00] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 5.000000e+00 6.000000e+00 3.130361e+02 2 4 20 5.000000e+00 6.000000e+00 3.162954e+02 40 3 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : iteration_limit total time (s) : 3.162954e+02 total solves : 40 best bound : 6.000000e+00 simulation ci : 6.000000e+00 ± 9.215182e-01 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- ┌ Warning: Re-training a model with existing cuts! │ │ Are you sure you want to do this? The output from this training may be │ misleading because the policy is already partially trained. │ │ If you meant to train a new policy with different settings, you must │ build a new model. │ │ If you meant to refine a previously trained policy, turn off this │ warning by passing `add_to_existing_cuts = true` as a keyword argument │ to `SDDP.train`. │ │ In a future release, this warning may turn into an error. └ @ SDDP ~/.julia/packages/SDDP/ScjyB/src/algorithm.jl:1181 ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 2 state variables : 1 scenarios : 4.00000e+00 existing cuts : true options solver : Asynchronous mode with 4 workers. risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [3, 3] AffExpr in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [2, 2] VariableRef in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [1, 1] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [2, 2] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [1, 1] numerical stability report matrix range [1e+00, 1e+00] objective range [1e+00, 1e+00] bounds range [1e+00, 6e+00] rhs range [4e+00, 4e+00] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 5.000000e+00 6.000000e+00 4.922621e-01 48 1 20 9.000000e+00 6.000000e+00 1.009789e+00 162 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : iteration_limit total time (s) : 1.009789e+00 total solves : 162 best bound : 6.000000e+00 simulation ci : 5.900000e+00 ± 9.633534e-01 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- [ Info: risk_measures.jl ┌ Warning: Radius is very small. You should probably use `SDDP.Expectation()` instead. └ @ SDDP ~/.julia/packages/SDDP/ScjyB/src/plugins/risk_measures.jl:528 ┌ Warning: Radius is very small. You should probably use `SDDP.Expectation()` instead. └ @ SDDP ~/.julia/packages/SDDP/ScjyB/src/plugins/risk_measures.jl:528 ┌ Warning: Radius is very small. You should probably use `SDDP.Expectation()` instead. └ @ SDDP ~/.julia/packages/SDDP/ScjyB/src/plugins/risk_measures.jl:528 [ Info: sampling_schemes.jl [ Info: stopping_rules.jl ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 2 state variables : 1 scenarios : 1.00000e+00 existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [3, 3] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [2, 2] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [1, 1] numerical stability report matrix range [0e+00, 0e+00] objective range [1e+00, 1e+00] bounds range [0e+00, 0e+00] rhs range [0e+00, 0e+00] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 0.000000e+00 0.000000e+00 2.481019e-01 4 1 50 0.000000e+00 0.000000e+00 6.661570e-01 200 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : first_stage_stopping total time (s) : 6.661570e-01 total solves : 200 best bound : 0.000000e+00 simulation ci : 0.000000e+00 ± 0.000000e+00 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- ┌ Warning: Are you really sure you want to use this stopping rule? Read why we don't recommend it by typing `? SDDP.Statistical` into the REPL to read the docstring. │ │ If you understand what you are doing, you can disable this warning with `SDDP.Statistical(; disable_warning = true)` └ @ SDDP ~/.julia/packages/SDDP/ScjyB/src/plugins/stopping_rules.jl:132 Simulated policy value: [ 5.035598e+00, 6.964402e+00] Simulated policy value: [ 5.282880e+00, 7.117120e+00] Simulated policy value: [ 5.606329e+00, 7.393671e+00] ┌ Warning: Are you really sure you want to use this stopping rule? Read why we don't recommend it by typing `? SDDP.Statistical` into the REPL to read the docstring. │ │ If you understand what you are doing, you can disable this warning with `SDDP.Statistical(; disable_warning = true)` └ @ SDDP ~/.julia/packages/SDDP/ScjyB/src/plugins/stopping_rules.jl:132 Simulated policy value: [ 5.035598e+00, 6.964402e+00] Simulated policy value: [ 5.282880e+00, 7.117120e+00] Simulated policy value: [ 5.606329e+00, 7.393671e+00] ┌ Warning: Are you really sure you want to use this stopping rule? Read why we don't recommend it by typing `? SDDP.Statistical` into the REPL to read the docstring. │ │ If you understand what you are doing, you can disable this warning with `SDDP.Statistical(; disable_warning = true)` └ @ SDDP ~/.julia/packages/SDDP/ScjyB/src/plugins/stopping_rules.jl:132 [ Info: threaded.jl [ Info: value_functions.jl [ Info: visualization.jl ERROR: LoadError: ParseError: # Error @ /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/Unzip/BU542/src/Unzip.jl:144:18 function zip_missing(::Tuple{}, longer)  map(function (second_one) # └──────────┘ ── Invalid signature in function definition Stacktrace:  [1] top-level scope  @ ~/.julia/packages/Unzip/BU542/src/Unzip.jl:144  [2] include(mod::Module, _path::String)  @ Base ./Base.jl:309  [3] include_package_for_output(pkg::Base.PkgId, input::String, depot_path::Vector{String}, dl_load_path::Vector{String}, load_path::Vector{String}, concrete_deps::Vector{Pair{Base.PkgId, UInt128}}, source::Nothing)  @ Base ./loading.jl:3147  [4] top-level scope  @ stdin:5  [5] eval(m::Module, e::Any)  @ Core ./boot.jl:489  [6] include_string(mapexpr::typeof(identity), mod::Module, code::String, filename::String)  @ Base ./loading.jl:2993  [7] include_string  @ ./loading.jl:3003 [inlined]  [8] exec_options(opts::Base.JLOptions)  @ Base ./client.jl:342  [9] _start()  @ Base ./client.jl:577 in expression starting at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/Unzip/BU542/src/Unzip.jl:144 in expression starting at stdin:5 ERROR: LoadError: ParseError: # Error @ /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/Unzip/BU542/src/Unzip.jl:144:18 function zip_missing(::Tuple{}, longer)  map(function (second_one) # └──────────┘ ── Invalid signature in function definition Stacktrace:  [1] top-level scope  @ ~/.julia/packages/Unzip/BU542/src/Unzip.jl:144  [2] include(mod::Module, _path::String)  @ Base ./Base.jl:309  [3] include_package_for_output(pkg::Base.PkgId, input::String, depot_path::Vector{String}, dl_load_path::Vector{String}, load_path::Vector{String}, concrete_deps::Vector{Pair{Base.PkgId, UInt128}}, source::Nothing)  @ Base ./loading.jl:3147  [4] top-level scope  @ stdin:5  [5] eval(m::Module, e::Any)  @ Core ./boot.jl:489  [6] include_string(mapexpr::typeof(identity), mod::Module, code::String, filename::String)  @ Base ./loading.jl:2993  [7] include_string  @ ./loading.jl:3003 [inlined]  [8] exec_options(opts::Base.JLOptions)  @ Base ./client.jl:342  [9] _start()  @ Base ./client.jl:577 in expression starting at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/Unzip/BU542/src/Unzip.jl:144 in expression starting at stdin:5 1 dependency had output during precompilation: ┌ Unzip │ [Output was shown above] └ visualization.jl: Error During Test at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/SDDP/ScjyB/test/runtests.jl:13 Got exception outside of a @test LoadError: The following 1 package failed to precompile: Unzip Failed to precompile Unzip [41fe7b60-77ed-43a1-b4f0-825fd5a5650d] to "/home/pkgeval/.julia/compiled/v1.14/Unzip/jl_cEt4Mz" (ProcessExited(1)). in expression starting at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/Plots/8ZnR3/src/Plots.jl:1 in expression starting at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/SDDP/ScjyB/test/visualization/visualization.jl:6 [ Info: FAST_hydro_thermal.jl ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 2 state variables : 1 scenarios : 2.00000e+00 existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [6, 6] AffExpr in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [1, 1] AffExpr in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [1, 1] VariableRef in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [1, 1] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [3, 4] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [2, 2] numerical stability report matrix range [1e+00, 1e+00] objective range [1e+00, 5e+00] bounds range [8e+00, 8e+00] rhs range [6e+00, 6e+00] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 -2.000000e+01 -1.000000e+01 4.946682e+00 5 1 20 0.000000e+00 -1.000000e+01 5.360375e+00 104 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : simulation_stopping total time (s) : 5.360375e+00 total solves : 104 best bound : -1.000000e+01 simulation ci : -1.100000e+01 ± 4.474009e+00 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- [ Info: FAST_production_management.jl ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 3 state variables : 2 scenarios : 4.00000e+00 existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [8, 8] AffExpr in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [3, 3] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [5, 5] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [1, 1] numerical stability report matrix range [1e+00, 1e+00] objective range [2e-01, 3e+00] bounds range [5e+01, 5e+01] rhs range [0e+00, 0e+00] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 5 -5.320000e+00 -2.396000e+01 6.310358e-01 52 1 10 -2.396000e+01 -2.396000e+01 6.472459e-01 92 1 15 -4.260000e+01 -2.396000e+01 6.535099e-01 132 1 20 -2.396000e+01 -2.396000e+01 6.604638e-01 172 1 25 -5.320000e+00 -2.396000e+01 6.694310e-01 224 1 30 -5.320000e+00 -2.396000e+01 6.777439e-01 264 1 35 -2.396000e+01 -2.396000e+01 6.867938e-01 304 1 40 -2.396000e+01 -2.396000e+01 6.966639e-01 344 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : simulation_stopping total time (s) : 6.966639e-01 total solves : 344 best bound : -2.396000e+01 simulation ci : -1.868714e+01 ± 3.990349e+00 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── Time Allocations ─────────────────────── ──────────────────────── Tot / % measured: 948ms / 72.7% 12.1MiB / 60.0% Section ncalls time %tot avg alloc %tot avg ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── forward_pass 40 553ms 80.3% 13.8ms 1.54MiB 21.3% 39.5KiB solve_subproblem 120 552ms 80.2% 4.60ms 1.38MiB 19.0% 11.7KiB get_dual_solution 120 29.0μs 0.0% 242ns 13.1KiB 0.2% 112B sample_scenario 40 217μs 0.0% 5.42μs 22.3KiB 0.3% 572B backward_pass 40 129ms 18.7% 3.21ms 5.52MiB 76.2% 141KiB solve_subproblem 160 106ms 15.4% 664μs 721KiB 9.7% 4.51KiB get_dual_solution 160 741μs 0.1% 4.63μs 185KiB 2.5% 1.16KiB prepare_backward_pass 160 69.0μs 0.0% 432ns 15.0KiB 0.2% 96.0B calculate_bound 40 7.02ms 1.0% 175μs 182KiB 2.4% 4.54KiB get_dual_solution 40 10.3μs 0.0% 258ns 4.38KiB 0.1% 112B get_dual_solution 36 7.88μs 0.0% 219ns 3.94KiB 0.1% 112B ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 3 state variables : 2 scenarios : 4.00000e+00 existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [8, 8] AffExpr in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [3, 3] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [5, 5] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [1, 1] numerical stability report matrix range [1e+00, 1e+00] objective range [2e-01, 3e+00] bounds range [5e+01, 5e+01] rhs range [0e+00, 0e+00] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 5 -2.396000e+01 -2.396000e+01 6.379781e-01 52 1 10 -2.396000e+01 -2.396000e+01 6.470861e-01 92 1 15 -2.396000e+01 -2.396000e+01 6.549540e-01 132 1 20 -4.260000e+01 -2.396000e+01 6.648932e-01 172 1 25 -5.320000e+00 -2.396000e+01 6.771340e-01 224 1 30 -2.396000e+01 -2.396000e+01 6.893191e-01 264 1 35 -2.396000e+01 -2.396000e+01 7.034581e-01 304 1 40 -5.320000e+00 -2.396000e+01 7.197840e-01 344 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : simulation_stopping total time (s) : 7.197840e-01 total solves : 344 best bound : -2.396000e+01 simulation ci : -2.237170e+01 ± 4.300524e+00 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── Time Allocations ─────────────────────── ──────────────────────── Tot / % measured: 724ms / 74.9% 13.6MiB / 94.4% Section ncalls time %tot avg alloc %tot avg ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── forward_pass 40 432ms 79.6% 10.8ms 1.54MiB 12.0% 39.5KiB solve_subproblem 120 431ms 79.4% 3.59ms 1.38MiB 10.7% 11.7KiB get_dual_solution 120 31.0μs 0.0% 258ns 13.1KiB 0.1% 112B sample_scenario 40 278μs 0.1% 6.95μs 22.5KiB 0.2% 575B backward_pass 40 103ms 18.9% 2.57ms 11.1MiB 86.6% 285KiB solve_subproblem 160 55.0ms 10.1% 344μs 722KiB 5.5% 4.51KiB get_dual_solution 160 804μs 0.1% 5.03μs 185KiB 1.4% 1.16KiB prepare_backward_pass 160 66.0μs 0.0% 413ns 15.0KiB 0.1% 96.0B calculate_bound 40 7.76ms 1.4% 194μs 183KiB 1.4% 4.58KiB get_dual_solution 40 12.9μs 0.0% 322ns 4.38KiB 0.0% 112B get_dual_solution 36 8.20μs 0.0% 228ns 3.94KiB 0.0% 112B ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── [ Info: FAST_quickstart.jl ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 2 state variables : 1 scenarios : 2.00000e+00 existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [3, 4] AffExpr in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [1, 1] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [2, 3] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [2, 2] numerical stability report matrix range [1e+00, 1e+00] objective range [1e+00, 2e+00] bounds range [2e+00, 5e+00] rhs range [0e+00, 0e+00] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 0.000000e+00 -2.500000e+00 5.808799e-01 5 1 2 -2.500000e+00 -2.000000e+00 5.823960e-01 14 1 3 -1.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 8.006411e-01 19 1 4 -1.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 8.013840e-01 24 1 5 -1.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 8.020270e-01 29 1 6 -3.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 8.966551e-01 34 1 7 -1.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 8.976951e-01 39 1 8 -1.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 8.983111e-01 44 1 9 -3.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 8.989251e-01 49 1 10 -1.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 9.139540e-01 54 1 11 -3.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 9.147041e-01 59 1 12 -3.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 9.153740e-01 64 1 13 -1.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 9.160521e-01 69 1 14 -1.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 9.167559e-01 74 1 15 -3.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 9.174440e-01 79 1 16 -1.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 9.181640e-01 84 1 17 -3.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 9.188850e-01 89 1 18 -3.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 9.195900e-01 94 1 19 -1.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 9.203219e-01 99 1 20 -3.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 9.210861e-01 104 1 21 -1.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 9.223950e-01 113 1 22 -1.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 9.231861e-01 118 1 23 -3.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 9.239671e-01 123 1 24 -3.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 9.247711e-01 128 1 25 -1.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 9.255600e-01 133 1 26 -3.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 9.263601e-01 138 1 27 -3.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 9.271929e-01 143 1 28 -1.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 9.280350e-01 148 1 29 -3.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 9.288890e-01 153 1 30 -3.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 9.297650e-01 158 1 31 -1.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 9.306390e-01 163 1 32 -1.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 9.315071e-01 168 1 33 -1.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 9.324040e-01 173 1 34 -3.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 9.333169e-01 178 1 35 -1.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 9.342351e-01 183 1 36 -3.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 9.351950e-01 188 1 37 -1.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 9.361501e-01 193 1 38 -1.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 9.371250e-01 198 1 39 -1.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 9.380929e-01 203 1 40 -1.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 9.390881e-01 208 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : simulation_stopping total time (s) : 9.390881e-01 total solves : 208 best bound : -2.000000e+00 simulation ci : -1.812500e+00 ± 3.171441e-01 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- [ Info: Hydro_thermal.jl ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 3 state variables : 1 scenarios : Inf existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [6, 6] AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [2, 2] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [5, 5] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [1, 1] numerical stability report matrix range [1e+00, 1e+00] objective range [1e+00, 3e+00] bounds range [5e+00, 2e+01] rhs range [2e+00, 1e+01] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 4.000000e+01 1.882708e+01 7.880101e-01 51 1 29 5.650894e+02 2.314032e+02 1.840725e+00 5475 1 36 5.572874e+02 2.348274e+02 2.947431e+00 9420 1 44 7.789968e+01 2.358255e+02 4.303171e+00 11772 1 60 4.050355e+01 2.361589e+02 5.309930e+00 14148 1 65 6.875772e+02 2.362457e+02 6.477495e+00 16611 1 75 6.724519e+02 2.363362e+02 7.482386e+00 18477 1 86 3.635265e+02 2.363807e+02 8.640660e+00 20490 1 96 9.550598e+01 2.364021e+02 9.672567e+00 22248 1 100 4.969839e+02 2.364135e+02 1.075483e+01 23928 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : iteration_limit total time (s) : 1.075483e+01 total solves : 23928 best bound : 2.364135e+02 simulation ci : 2.345669e+02 ± 6.032770e+01 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- On average, 2.1 units of thermal are used in the first stage. [ Info: StochDynamicProgramming.jl_multistock.jl ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 5 state variables : 3 scenarios : 1.43489e+07 existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [13, 13] AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [3, 3] AffExpr in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [1, 1] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [7, 7] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [6, 7] numerical stability report matrix range [1e+00, 1e+00] objective range [3e-01, 2e+00] bounds range [5e-01, 5e+00] rhs range [2e+00, 2e+00] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 10 -4.977586e+00 -4.446713e+00 1.509150e+00 1400 1 20 -4.764789e+00 -4.394789e+00 1.717697e+00 2800 1 30 -4.672487e+00 -4.377000e+00 1.929230e+00 4200 1 40 -4.483495e+00 -4.370632e+00 2.165687e+00 5600 1 50 -4.167321e+00 -4.364999e+00 2.401411e+00 7000 1 60 -4.362455e+00 -4.358864e+00 2.641080e+00 8400 1 70 -4.849916e+00 -4.355337e+00 2.882576e+00 9800 1 80 -4.861568e+00 -4.353006e+00 3.139076e+00 11200 1 90 -4.268264e+00 -4.350407e+00 3.398571e+00 12600 1 100 -4.539897e+00 -4.348641e+00 3.658740e+00 14000 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : iteration_limit total time (s) : 3.658740e+00 total solves : 14000 best bound : -4.348641e+00 simulation ci : -4.325070e+00 ± 8.068871e-02 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- [ Info: StochDynamicProgramming.jl_stock.jl ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 5 state variables : 1 scenarios : 1.00000e+05 existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [5, 5] AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [1, 1] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [3, 3] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [2, 3] numerical stability report matrix range [1e+00, 1e+00] objective range [3e-01, 2e+00] bounds range [5e-01, 2e+00] rhs range [0e+00, 0e+00] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 10 -1.671715e+00 -1.476962e+00 1.372625e+00 1050 1 20 -1.529197e+00 -1.471817e+00 1.445777e+00 1600 1 30 -1.410768e+00 -1.471408e+00 1.608375e+00 2650 1 40 -1.596461e+00 -1.471258e+00 1.687720e+00 3200 1 50 -1.002277e+00 -1.471216e+00 1.861854e+00 4250 1 60 -1.085156e+00 -1.471164e+00 1.948690e+00 4800 1 70 -1.391746e+00 -1.471164e+00 2.128148e+00 5850 1 80 -1.448703e+00 -1.471132e+00 2.220506e+00 6400 1 90 -1.488989e+00 -1.471087e+00 2.401832e+00 7450 1 100 -1.564260e+00 -1.471075e+00 2.515600e+00 8000 1 110 -1.738157e+00 -1.471075e+00 2.615048e+00 8550 1 120 -1.591292e+00 -1.471075e+00 2.719660e+00 9100 1 130 -1.271481e+00 -1.471075e+00 2.835838e+00 9650 1 140 -1.249746e+00 -1.471075e+00 2.965334e+00 10200 1 150 -1.536222e+00 -1.471075e+00 3.101126e+00 10750 1 160 -1.565422e+00 -1.471075e+00 3.250976e+00 11300 1 170 -1.631076e+00 -1.471075e+00 3.504459e+00 11850 1 180 -1.494909e+00 -1.471075e+00 3.638745e+00 12400 1 182 -9.083563e-01 -1.471075e+00 3.663400e+00 12510 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : simulation_stopping total time (s) : 3.663400e+00 total solves : 12510 best bound : -1.471075e+00 simulation ci : -1.462065e+00 ± 2.699238e-02 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- [ Info: StructDualDynProg.jl_prob5.2_2stages.jl ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 2 state variables : 4 scenarios : 2.00000e+00 existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [29, 29] AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [4, 5] AffExpr in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [3, 3] AffExpr in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [4, 4] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [22, 22] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [1, 1] numerical stability report matrix range [1e+00, 1e+00] objective range [1e+00, 1e+06] bounds range [0e+00, 0e+00] rhs range [0e+00, 0e+00] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 10 3.455904e+05 3.147347e+05 5.586579e-01 54 1 20 3.336455e+05 3.402383e+05 5.726500e-01 104 1 30 3.993519e+05 3.403155e+05 5.861609e-01 158 1 40 3.337559e+05 3.403155e+05 5.988650e-01 208 1 48 3.337559e+05 3.403155e+05 6.108201e-01 248 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : simulation_stopping total time (s) : 6.108201e-01 total solves : 248 best bound : 3.403155e+05 simulation ci : 1.298444e+08 ± 1.785864e+08 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- [ Info: StructDualDynProg.jl_prob5.2_3stages.jl ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 3 state variables : 4 scenarios : 4.00000e+00 existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [29, 29] AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [4, 5] AffExpr in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [3, 3] AffExpr in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [4, 4] VariableRef in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [3, 3] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [22, 22] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [1, 1] numerical stability report matrix range [1e+00, 1e+00] objective range [1e+00, 1e+05] bounds range [0e+00, 0e+00] rhs range [0e+00, 0e+00] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 10 4.403329e+05 3.509666e+05 7.035332e-01 92 1 20 4.506600e+05 4.054833e+05 7.271440e-01 172 1 30 3.959476e+05 4.067125e+05 7.505510e-01 264 1 40 4.497721e+05 4.067125e+05 7.754071e-01 344 1 47 3.959476e+05 4.067125e+05 7.965631e-01 400 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : simulation_stopping total time (s) : 7.965631e-01 total solves : 400 best bound : 4.067125e+05 simulation ci : 2.696242e+07 ± 3.645299e+07 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- [ Info: agriculture_mccardle_farm.jl ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 10 state variables : 4 scenarios : 2.70000e+01 existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [24, 24] AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [3, 3] AffExpr in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [1, 1] AffExpr in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [1, 6] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [20, 20] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [1, 2] numerical stability report matrix range [1e+00, 8e+01] objective range [1e+00, 1e+03] bounds range [6e+01, 6e+01] rhs range [2e+02, 3e+03] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 8.316000e+03 0.000000e+00 7.952287e+00 14 1 40 2.308500e+03 4.074139e+03 8.908507e+00 776 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : simulation_stopping total time (s) : 8.908507e+00 total solves : 776 best bound : 4.074139e+03 simulation ci : 4.224313e+03 ± 6.692189e+02 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- [ Info: air_conditioning.jl ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 3 state variables : 1 scenarios : 4.00000e+00 existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [6, 6] AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [1, 1] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [4, 4] VariableRef in MOI.Integer : [3, 3] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [2, 3] numerical stability report matrix range [1e+00, 1e+00] objective range [1e+00, 3e+02] bounds range [1e+02, 2e+02] rhs range [0e+00, 0e+00] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1L 7.000000e+04 6.250000e+04 3.022498e+00 8 1 5L 4.000000e+04 6.250000e+04 4.169226e+00 52 1 11L 4.000000e+04 6.250000e+04 5.264284e+00 100 1 17L 4.000000e+04 6.250000e+04 6.375152e+00 148 1 20L 6.000000e+04 6.250000e+04 7.038128e+00 172 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : simulation_stopping total time (s) : 7.038128e+00 total solves : 172 best bound : 6.250000e+04 simulation ci : 5.475000e+04 ± 7.336233e+03 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Lower bound is: 62500.0 With first stage solutions 200.0 (production) and 100.0 (stored_production). ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 3 state variables : 1 scenarios : 4.00000e+00 existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [6, 6] AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [1, 1] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [4, 4] VariableRef in MOI.Integer : [3, 3] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [2, 3] numerical stability report matrix range [1e+00, 1e+00] objective range [1e+00, 3e+02] bounds range [1e+02, 2e+02] rhs range [0e+00, 0e+00] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 7.000000e+04 6.250000e+04 6.668890e-01 8 1 16 4.000000e+04 6.250000e+04 1.667309e+00 140 1 20 4.000000e+04 6.250000e+04 1.937518e+00 172 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : simulation_stopping total time (s) : 1.937518e+00 total solves : 172 best bound : 6.250000e+04 simulation ci : 5.950000e+04 ± 8.933885e+03 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Lower bound is: 62500.0 With first stage solutions 200.0 (production) and 100.0 (stored_production). [ Info: air_conditioning_forward.jl ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 3 state variables : 1 scenarios : 4.00000e+00 existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [5, 5] AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [1, 1] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [4, 4] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [2, 3] numerical stability report matrix range [1e+00, 1e+00] objective range [1e+00, 3e+02] bounds range [1e+02, 2e+02] rhs range [1e+02, 3e+02] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 7.000000e+04 6.250000e+04 1.472623e+00 5 1 10 4.000000e+04 6.250000e+04 2.115713e+00 50 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : iteration_limit total time (s) : 2.115713e+00 total solves : 50 best bound : 6.250000e+04 simulation ci : 5.450000e+04 ± 1.135842e+04 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- [ Info: all_blacks.jl ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 3 state variables : 2 scenarios : 1.00000e+00 existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [6, 6] AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [2, 2] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [2, 3] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [3, 3] VariableRef in MOI.ZeroOne : [3, 3] numerical stability report matrix range [1e+00, 1e+00] objective range [1e+00, 6e+00] bounds range [1e+00, 1e+02] rhs range [0e+00, 0e+00] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1L 6.000000e+00 9.000000e+00 8.731799e-01 6 1 20L 9.000000e+00 9.000000e+00 1.010206e+00 123 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : simulation_stopping total time (s) : 1.010206e+00 total solves : 123 best bound : 9.000000e+00 simulation ci : 8.850000e+00 ± 2.940000e-01 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- [ Info: asset_management_simple.jl ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 7 state variables : 2 scenarios : 8.00000e+00 existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [5, 7] AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [1, 1] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [3, 5] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [1, 1] numerical stability report matrix range [1e+00, 1e+00] objective range [1e+00, 4e+00] bounds range [1e+03, 1e+03] rhs range [6e+01, 8e+01] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 5 -1.109375e+01 2.605769e-01 2.435027e+00 87 1 10 -1.109375e+01 2.605769e-01 2.446175e+00 142 1 15 3.105797e+00 5.434132e-01 2.458376e+00 197 1 20 -2.463349e+01 1.503415e+00 2.471640e+00 252 1 25 -1.421085e-14 1.514085e+00 2.485031e+00 307 1 30 4.864000e+01 1.514085e+00 4.882465e+00 394 1 35 4.864000e+01 1.514085e+00 4.898363e+00 449 1 40 -8.870299e+00 1.514085e+00 4.916455e+00 504 1 45 -1.428571e+00 1.514085e+00 4.934828e+00 559 1 48 -1.428571e+00 1.514085e+00 4.946626e+00 592 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : simulation_stopping total time (s) : 4.946626e+00 total solves : 592 best bound : 1.514085e+00 simulation ci : 2.494033e+00 ± 5.472486e+00 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- [ Info: asset_management_stagewise.jl ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 7 state variables : 2 scenarios : 3.20000e+01 existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : #108 sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [5, 7] AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [1, 1] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [2, 5] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [1, 1] numerical stability report matrix range [1e+00, 1e+00] objective range [2e-02, 4e+00] bounds range [1e+03, 1e+03] rhs range [6e+01, 8e+01] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 10 1.395796e+01 1.428818e+00 2.853367e+00 278 1 20 1.440356e+01 1.278425e+00 2.892827e+00 428 1 30 8.388546e+00 1.278425e+00 2.961900e+00 706 1 40 6.666667e-03 1.278410e+00 3.007675e+00 856 1 50 -5.614035e+00 1.278410e+00 3.088237e+00 1134 1 60 1.426676e+01 1.278410e+00 3.145967e+00 1284 1 64 1.261296e+01 1.278410e+00 3.170872e+00 1344 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : simulation_stopping total time (s) : 3.170872e+00 total solves : 1344 best bound : 1.278410e+00 simulation ci : 8.172580e-01 ± 5.385320e+00 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 7 state variables : 2 scenarios : 3.20000e+01 existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : #108 sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [5, 7] AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [1, 1] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [2, 5] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [1, 1] numerical stability report matrix range [1e+00, 1e+00] objective range [2e-02, 4e+00] bounds range [1e+03, 1e+03] rhs range [6e+01, 8e+01] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 10 1.111809e+00 1.278488e+00 1.789017e+00 278 1 20 1.111084e+01 1.278410e+00 1.855129e+00 428 1 30 2.293779e+01 1.278410e+00 1.960117e+00 706 1 40 1.426676e+01 1.278410e+00 2.063920e+00 856 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : simulation_stopping total time (s) : 2.063920e+00 total solves : 856 best bound : 1.278410e+00 simulation ci : 3.654300e+00 ± 6.176856e+00 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- [ Info: belief.jl ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 4 state variables : 1 scenarios : Inf existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [7, 7] AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [1, 1] AffExpr in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [2, 2] VariableRef in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [1, 1] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [5, 5] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [3, 3] numerical stability report matrix range [1e+00, 1e+00] objective range [1e+00, 2e+00] bounds range [2e+00, 1e+02] rhs range [0e+00, 0e+00] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 10 4.787277e+00 9.346930e+00 5.847212e+00 900 1 20 6.374753e+00 1.361934e+01 6.224638e+00 1720 1 30 2.848217e+01 1.624016e+01 7.257031e+00 3036 1 40 1.973944e+01 1.776547e+01 8.234954e+00 4192 1 50 4.000000e+00 1.889360e+01 9.091237e+00 5020 1 60 1.142478e+01 1.907862e+01 1.008400e+01 5808 1 70 9.386421e+00 1.961295e+01 1.108135e+01 6540 1 80 5.667851e+01 1.890911e+01 1.185636e+01 7088 1 90 3.740597e+01 1.993139e+01 1.352601e+01 8180 1 100 9.867183e+00 2.001688e+01 1.429169e+01 8664 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : iteration_limit total time (s) : 1.429169e+01 total solves : 8664 best bound : 2.001688e+01 simulation ci : 2.301336e+01 ± 4.670816e+00 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- [ Info: biobjective_hydro.jl ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 3 state variables : 1 scenarios : 1.33100e+03 existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [9, 9] AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [2, 4] AffExpr in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [3, 5] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [8, 8] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [5, 6] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 0.000000e+00 0.000000e+00 3.833577e+00 36 1 10 0.000000e+00 0.000000e+00 3.884687e+00 360 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : iteration_limit total time (s) : 3.884687e+00 total solves : 360 best bound : 0.000000e+00 simulation ci : 0.000000e+00 ± 0.000000e+00 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 3 state variables : 1 scenarios : 1.33100e+03 existing cuts : true options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [9, 9] AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [2, 4] AffExpr in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [3, 7] VariableRef in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [1, 1] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [8, 8] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [5, 6] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 9.500000e+02 5.500000e+02 7.587194e-03 407 1 10 2.850000e+02 5.728212e+02 7.644820e-02 731 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : iteration_limit total time (s) : 7.644820e-02 total solves : 731 best bound : 5.728212e+02 simulation ci : 6.480000e+02 ± 1.400040e+02 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 3 state variables : 1 scenarios : 1.33100e+03 existing cuts : true options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [9, 9] AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [2, 4] AffExpr in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [3, 13] VariableRef in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [1, 1] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [8, 8] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [5, 6] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 4.150000e+02 3.347014e+02 7.871151e-03 778 1 10 2.825000e+02 3.465177e+02 7.838511e-02 1102 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : iteration_limit total time (s) : 7.838511e-02 total solves : 1102 best bound : 3.465177e+02 simulation ci : 3.598954e+02 ± 6.281469e+01 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 3 state variables : 1 scenarios : 1.33100e+03 existing cuts : true options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [9, 9] AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [2, 4] AffExpr in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [3, 20] VariableRef in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [1, 1] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [8, 8] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [5, 6] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 2.387500e+02 1.994007e+02 8.286953e-03 1149 1 10 2.587500e+02 2.052799e+02 7.760787e-02 1473 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : iteration_limit total time (s) : 7.760787e-02 total solves : 1473 best bound : 2.052799e+02 simulation ci : 2.206923e+02 ± 2.764045e+01 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 3 state variables : 1 scenarios : 1.33100e+03 existing cuts : true options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [9, 9] AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [2, 4] AffExpr in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [3, 24] VariableRef in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [1, 1] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [8, 8] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [5, 6] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 9.375000e+02 4.637735e+02 8.913040e-03 1520 1 10 2.875000e+02 4.661908e+02 8.226705e-02 1844 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : iteration_limit total time (s) : 8.226705e-02 total solves : 1844 best bound : 4.661908e+02 simulation ci : 5.075000e+02 ± 1.503394e+02 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 3 state variables : 1 scenarios : 1.33100e+03 existing cuts : true options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [9, 9] AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [2, 4] AffExpr in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [3, 30] VariableRef in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [1, 1] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [8, 8] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [5, 6] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 1.112500e+02 1.129545e+02 9.155989e-03 1891 1 10 1.000000e+02 1.129771e+02 1.454248e-01 2215 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : iteration_limit total time (s) : 1.454248e-01 total solves : 2215 best bound : 1.129771e+02 simulation ci : 1.068750e+02 ± 2.168477e+01 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 3 state variables : 1 scenarios : 1.33100e+03 existing cuts : true options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [9, 9] AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [2, 4] AffExpr in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [3, 34] VariableRef in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [1, 1] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [8, 8] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [5, 6] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 4.562500e+02 2.788383e+02 8.645058e-03 2262 1 10 1.625000e+02 2.794553e+02 8.150411e-02 2586 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : iteration_limit total time (s) : 8.150411e-02 total solves : 2586 best bound : 2.794553e+02 simulation ci : 2.690625e+02 ± 6.720434e+01 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 3 state variables : 1 scenarios : 1.33100e+03 existing cuts : true options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [9, 9] AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [2, 4] AffExpr in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [3, 37] VariableRef in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [1, 1] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [8, 8] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [5, 6] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 4.810804e+02 4.073537e+02 9.424925e-03 2633 1 10 5.487500e+02 4.077574e+02 8.778286e-02 2957 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : iteration_limit total time (s) : 8.778286e-02 total solves : 2957 best bound : 4.077574e+02 simulation ci : 3.863418e+02 ± 9.936379e+01 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 3 state variables : 1 scenarios : 1.33100e+03 existing cuts : true options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [9, 9] AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [2, 4] AffExpr in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [3, 43] VariableRef in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [1, 1] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [8, 8] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [5, 6] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 2.718750e+02 5.198033e+02 9.368181e-03 3004 1 10 6.771875e+02 5.210100e+02 8.699203e-02 3328 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : iteration_limit total time (s) : 8.699203e-02 total solves : 3328 best bound : 5.210100e+02 simulation ci : 5.831217e+02 ± 1.295425e+02 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 3 state variables : 1 scenarios : 1.33100e+03 existing cuts : true options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [9, 9] AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [2, 4] AffExpr in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [3, 50] VariableRef in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [1, 1] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [8, 8] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [5, 6] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 7.812500e+01 5.720558e+01 8.658171e-03 3375 1 10 5.312500e+01 5.938345e+01 7.806802e-02 3699 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : iteration_limit total time (s) : 7.806802e-02 total solves : 3699 best bound : 5.938345e+01 simulation ci : 6.187500e+01 ± 1.306667e+01 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- [ Info: booking_management.jl ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 5 state variables : 2 scenarios : 3.20000e+01 existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [10, 10] AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [2, 2] AffExpr in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [2, 2] AffExpr in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [6, 6] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [5, 6] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [6, 6] VariableRef in MOI.ZeroOne : [5, 5] numerical stability report matrix range [1e+00, 1e+00] objective range [1e+00, 6e+00] bounds range [1e+00, 1e+01] rhs range [1e+00, 1e+00] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 5 8.000000e+00 9.440450e+00 2.815789e+00 235 1 10 1.000000e+01 9.159200e+00 3.294192e+00 310 1 15 1.000000e+01 9.159200e+00 3.827881e+00 385 1 20 1.000000e+01 9.159200e+00 4.346789e+00 460 1 25 1.000000e+01 9.159200e+00 7.104263e+00 695 1 30 4.000000e+00 9.159200e+00 7.609331e+00 770 1 35 1.000000e+01 9.159200e+00 8.082183e+00 845 1 40 1.000000e+01 9.159200e+00 8.611199e+00 920 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : simulation_stopping total time (s) : 8.611199e+00 total solves : 920 best bound : 9.159200e+00 simulation ci : 7.200000e+00 ± 8.485598e-01 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 3 state variables : 4 scenarios : 2.16000e+02 existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [18, 18] AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [4, 4] AffExpr in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [4, 4] AffExpr in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [12, 12] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [9, 10] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [10, 10] VariableRef in MOI.ZeroOne : [9, 9] numerical stability report matrix range [1e+00, 1e+00] objective range [1e+00, 4e+00] bounds range [1e+00, 2e+01] rhs range [1e+00, 1e+00] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 10 5.000000e+00 6.959189e+00 2.176725e+00 510 1 20 1.000000e+01 6.834387e+00 3.819643e+00 720 1 30 7.000000e+00 6.834387e+00 7.733610e+00 1230 1 40 1.000000e+01 6.823805e+00 9.371620e+00 1440 1 50 3.000000e+00 6.823805e+00 1.342018e+01 1950 1 60 2.000000e+00 6.823805e+00 1.515419e+01 2160 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : simulation_stopping total time (s) : 1.515419e+01 total solves : 2160 best bound : 6.823805e+00 simulation ci : 6.183333e+00 ± 6.694539e-01 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- [ Info: generation_expansion.jl ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 5 state variables : 5 scenarios : 3.27680e+04 existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [14, 14] AffExpr in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [7, 7] AffExpr in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [4, 4] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [8, 8] VariableRef in MOI.Integer : [5, 5] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [5, 6] numerical stability report matrix range [1e+00, 1e+00] objective range [1e+00, 5e+05] bounds range [1e+00, 1e+00] rhs range [0e+00, 0e+00] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 10 5.299676e+06 2.074407e+06 1.132533e+01 920 1 20 6.049875e+06 2.075240e+06 1.389746e+01 1340 1 30 5.496647e+05 2.078257e+06 2.367824e+01 2260 1 40 3.985383e+04 2.078257e+06 2.607033e+01 2680 1 50 2.994548e+05 2.078257e+06 3.567874e+01 3600 1 60 3.799457e+06 2.078257e+06 3.819553e+01 4020 1 61 3.549665e+06 2.078257e+06 3.844041e+01 4062 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : simulation_stopping total time (s) : 3.844041e+01 total solves : 4062 best bound : 2.078257e+06 simulation ci : 2.437601e+06 ± 5.082681e+05 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 5 state variables : 5 scenarios : 3.27680e+04 existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [14, 14] AffExpr in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [7, 7] AffExpr in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [4, 4] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [8, 8] VariableRef in MOI.Integer : [5, 5] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [5, 6] numerical stability report matrix range [1e+00, 1e+00] objective range [1e+00, 5e+05] bounds range [1e+00, 1e+00] rhs range [0e+00, 0e+00] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 10L 2.049870e+06 2.079457e+06 2.955679e+01 920 1 20L 2.799668e+06 2.079457e+06 4.856091e+01 1340 1 30L 3.799443e+06 2.079457e+06 7.722170e+01 2260 1 40L 4.299882e+06 2.079457e+06 9.647978e+01 2680 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : simulation_stopping total time (s) : 9.647978e+01 total solves : 2680 best bound : 2.079457e+06 simulation ci : 1.602238e+06 ± 4.944385e+05 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- [ Info: hydro_valley.jl [ Info: infinite_horizon_hydro_thermal.jl ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 1 state variables : 1 scenarios : Inf existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [8, 8] AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [2, 2] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [5, 5] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [1, 1] numerical stability report matrix range [1e+00, 1e+00] objective range [1e+00, 1e+01] bounds range [5e+00, 2e+01] rhs range [0e+00, 0e+00] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 100 1.000000e+01 1.188534e+02 2.726927e+00 1914 1 200 0.000000e+00 1.191645e+02 3.187472e+00 3840 1 300 7.500000e+01 1.191666e+02 3.681785e+00 5738 1 328 2.500000e+00 1.191667e+02 3.793593e+00 6034 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : simulation_stopping total time (s) : 3.793593e+00 total solves : 6034 best bound : 1.191667e+02 simulation ci : 2.272866e+01 ± 3.596240e+00 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Confidence_interval = 128.14 ± 13.91 ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 1 state variables : 1 scenarios : Inf existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [8, 8] AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [2, 2] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [5, 5] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [1, 1] numerical stability report matrix range [1e+00, 1e+00] objective range [1e+00, 1e+01] bounds range [5e+00, 2e+01] rhs range [0e+00, 0e+00] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 100 1.000000e+01 1.191232e+02 9.344730e-01 2806 1 200 0.000000e+00 1.191666e+02 1.983178e+00 4749 1 287 5.000000e+00 1.191667e+02 2.519033e+00 5662 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : simulation_stopping total time (s) : 2.519033e+00 total solves : 5662 best bound : 1.191667e+02 simulation ci : 2.112369e+01 ± 3.684376e+00 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Confidence_interval = 122.02 ± 14.06 [ Info: infinite_horizon_trivial.jl ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 1 state variables : 1 scenarios : Inf existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [3, 3] AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [1, 1] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [1, 1] numerical stability report matrix range [1e+00, 1e+00] objective range [1e+00, 1e+00] bounds range [0e+00, 0e+00] rhs range [0e+00, 0e+00] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 10 2.000000e+01 1.998872e+01 4.264891e-01 1033 1 20 8.000000e+00 2.000000e+01 4.593060e-01 1209 1 30 1.200000e+01 2.000000e+01 6.130841e-01 2304 1 40 3.000000e+01 2.000000e+01 7.421181e-01 2594 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : simulation_stopping total time (s) : 7.421181e-01 total solves : 2594 best bound : 2.000000e+01 simulation ci : 1.970000e+01 ± 4.721453e+00 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- [ Info: inner_hydro_1d.jl Building and solving primal outer model for lower bounds ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 4 state variables : 1 scenarios : 1.00000e+03 existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : A convex combination of 0.5 * SDDP.Expectation() + 0.5 * SDDP.AVaR(0.2) sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [9, 9] AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [2, 2] VariableRef in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [1, 1] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [7, 7] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [6, 7] numerical stability report matrix range [1e+00, 1e+00] objective range [1e+00, 5e+01] bounds range [2e+01, 2e+02] rhs range [8e+01, 8e+01] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 1.948878e+03 2.847167e+03 1.134529e+00 35 1 10 7.500000e+02 2.935390e+03 1.200687e+00 350 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : iteration_limit total time (s) : 1.200687e+00 total solves : 350 best bound : 2.935390e+03 simulation ci : 1.544902e+03 ± 5.533339e+02 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Building and solving inner model for upper bounds: Node: 3 - elapsed time: 0.34 plus 0.8 for vertex selection. Node: 2 - elapsed time: 0.39 plus 0.16 for vertex selection. Node: 1 - elapsed time: 0.41 plus 0.18 for vertex selection. First-stage upper bound: 2969.680973503913 Total time for upper bound: 2.2824768229999997 Bounds: Risk-neutral confidence interval: 1411.99 ± 82.02 Risk-adjusted lower bound: 2935.39 Risk-adjusted upper bound: 2969.68 [ Info: no_strong_duality.jl ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 1 state variables : 1 scenarios : Inf existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [3, 3] AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [1, 1] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [1, 1] numerical stability report matrix range [1e+00, 1e+00] objective range [1e+00, 1e+00] bounds range [0e+00, 0e+00] rhs range [0e+00, 0e+00] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 1.000000e+00 1.500000e+00 1.327960e-01 3 1 40 2.000000e+00 2.000000e+00 3.467612e-01 604 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : simulation_stopping total time (s) : 3.467612e-01 total solves : 604 best bound : 2.000000e+00 simulation ci : 2.150000e+00 ± 5.038753e-01 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- [ Info: objective_state_newsvendor.jl ====================================================================================== Information request received. A stacktrace will print followed by a 1.0 second profile. --trace-compile is enabled during profile collection. ====================================================================================== cmd: /opt/julia/bin/julia 482 running 1 of 1 signal (10): User defined signal 1 jl_is_va_tuple at /source/src/julia_internal.h:1204 [inlined] jl_is_va_tuple at /source/src/julia_internal.h:1200 [inlined] obviously_unequal at /source/src/subtype.c:466 ijl_types_equal at /source/src/subtype.c:2328 jl_specializations_get_linfo_ at /source/src/gf.c:236 cache_method at /source/src/gf.c:1667 ml_matches at /source/src/gf.c:5155 ml_matches at /source/src/gf.c:4847 [inlined] ijl_matching_methods at /source/src/gf.c:3234 [inlined] ijl_matching_methods at /source/src/gf.c:3221 _methods_by_ftype at ./runtime_internals.jl:1603 [inlined] _findall at ./../usr/share/julia/Compiler/src/methodtable.jl:97 [inlined] #findall#5 at ./../usr/share/julia/Compiler/src/methodtable.jl:70 [inlined] findall at ./../usr/share/julia/Compiler/src/methodtable.jl:70 [inlined] #findall#7 at ./../usr/share/julia/Compiler/src/methodtable.jl:111 findall at ./../usr/share/julia/Compiler/src/methodtable.jl:102 [inlined] find_simple_method_matches at ./../usr/share/julia/Compiler/src/abstractinterpretation.jl:376 #find_method_matches#131 at ./../usr/share/julia/Compiler/src/abstractinterpretation.jl:338 [inlined] find_method_matches at ./../usr/share/julia/Compiler/src/abstractinterpretation.jl:332 [inlined] abstract_call_gf_by_type at ./../usr/share/julia/Compiler/src/abstractinterpretation.jl:119 abstract_call_known at ./../usr/share/julia/Compiler/src/abstractinterpretation.jl:2796 abstract_call at ./../usr/share/julia/Compiler/src/abstractinterpretation.jl:2904 abstract_call at ./../usr/share/julia/Compiler/src/abstractinterpretation.jl:2897 [inlined] abstract_call at ./../usr/share/julia/Compiler/src/abstractinterpretation.jl:3057 abstract_eval_call at ./../usr/share/julia/Compiler/src/abstractinterpretation.jl:3075 [inlined] abstract_eval_statement_expr at ./../usr/share/julia/Compiler/src/abstractinterpretation.jl:3433 abstract_eval_basic_statement at ./../usr/share/julia/Compiler/src/abstractinterpretation.jl:3832 [inlined] abstract_eval_basic_statement at ./../usr/share/julia/Compiler/src/abstractinterpretation.jl:3789 [inlined] typeinf_local at ./../usr/share/julia/Compiler/src/abstractinterpretation.jl:4338 jfptr_typeinf_local_88644.1 at /opt/julia/lib/julia/sys.so (unknown line) _jl_invoke at /source/src/gf.c:4116 [inlined] ijl_apply_generic at /source/src/gf.c:4313 typeinf at ./../usr/share/julia/Compiler/src/abstractinterpretation.jl:4495 typeinf_ext at ./../usr/share/julia/Compiler/src/typeinfer.jl:1527 typeinf_ext_toplevel at ./../usr/share/julia/Compiler/src/typeinfer.jl:1704 [inlined] typeinf_ext_toplevel at ./../usr/share/julia/Compiler/src/typeinfer.jl:1713 jfptr_typeinf_ext_toplevel_88291.1 at /opt/julia/lib/julia/sys.so (unknown line) _jl_invoke at /source/src/gf.c:4116 [inlined] ijl_apply_generic at /source/src/gf.c:4313 jl_apply at /source/src/julia.h:2284 [inlined] jl_type_infer at /source/src/gf.c:463 jl_compile_method_internal at /source/src/gf.c:3636 _jl_invoke at /source/src/gf.c:4108 [inlined] ijl_apply_generic at /source/src/gf.c:4313 jl_apply at /source/src/julia.h:2284 [inlined] do_call at /source/src/interpreter.c:123 eval_value at /source/src/interpreter.c:243 eval_stmt_value at /source/src/interpreter.c:194 [inlined] eval_body at /source/src/interpreter.c:679 jl_interpret_toplevel_thunk at /source/src/interpreter.c:884 jl_toplevel_eval_flex at /source/src/toplevel.c:742 jl_eval_toplevel_stmts at /source/src/toplevel.c:585 jl_toplevel_eval_flex at /source/src/toplevel.c:683 ijl_toplevel_eval at /source/src/toplevel.c:754 ijl_toplevel_eval_in at /source/src/toplevel.c:799 eval at ./boot.jl:489 include_string at ./loading.jl:2993 _jl_invoke at /source/src/gf.c:4116 [inlined] ijl_apply_generic at /source/src/gf.c:4313 _include at ./loading.jl:3053 include at ./Base.jl:310 IncludeInto at ./Base.jl:311 [inlined] macro expansion at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/SDDP/ScjyB/test/runtests.jl:16 [inlined] macro expansion at /source/usr/share/julia/stdlib/v1.14/Test/src/Test.jl:1961 [inlined] util_test_directory at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/SDDP/ScjyB/test/runtests.jl:14 util_test_directory at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/SDDP/ScjyB/test/runtests.jl:10 unknown function (ip: 0x737814bc0a92) at (unknown file) _jl_invoke at /source/src/gf.c:4116 [inlined] ijl_apply_generic at /source/src/gf.c:4313 jl_apply at /source/src/julia.h:2284 [inlined] do_call at /source/src/interpreter.c:123 eval_value at /source/src/interpreter.c:243 eval_stmt_value at /source/src/interpreter.c:194 [inlined] eval_body at /source/src/interpreter.c:679 eval_body at /source/src/interpreter.c:550 eval_body at /source/src/interpreter.c:558 eval_body at /source/src/interpreter.c:558 eval_body at /source/src/interpreter.c:558 jl_interpret_toplevel_thunk at /source/src/interpreter.c:884 jl_toplevel_eval_flex at /source/src/toplevel.c:742 jl_eval_toplevel_stmts at /source/src/toplevel.c:585 jl_toplevel_eval_flex at /source/src/toplevel.c:683 ijl_toplevel_eval at /source/src/toplevel.c:754 ijl_toplevel_eval_in at /source/src/toplevel.c:799 eval at ./boot.jl:489 include_string at ./loading.jl:2993 _jl_invoke at /source/src/gf.c:4116 [inlined] ijl_apply_generic at /source/src/gf.c:4313 _include at ./loading.jl:3053 include at ./Base.jl:310 IncludeInto at ./Base.jl:311 jfptr_IncludeInto_57745.1 at /opt/julia/lib/julia/sys.so (unknown line) _jl_invoke at /source/src/gf.c:4116 [inlined] ijl_apply_generic at /source/src/gf.c:4313 jl_apply at /source/src/julia.h:2284 [inlined] do_call at /source/src/interpreter.c:123 eval_value at /source/src/interpreter.c:243 eval_stmt_value at /source/src/interpreter.c:194 [inlined] eval_body at /source/src/interpreter.c:679 jl_interpret_toplevel_thunk at /source/src/interpreter.c:884 jl_toplevel_eval_flex at /source/src/toplevel.c:742 jl_eval_toplevel_stmts at /source/src/toplevel.c:585 jl_toplevel_eval_flex at /source/src/toplevel.c:683 ijl_toplevel_eval at /source/src/toplevel.c:754 ijl_toplevel_eval_in at /source/src/toplevel.c:799 eval at ./boot.jl:489 exec_options at ./client.jl:310 _start at ./client.jl:577 jfptr__start_78750.1 at /opt/julia/lib/julia/sys.so (unknown line) _jl_invoke at /source/src/gf.c:4116 [inlined] ijl_apply_generic at /source/src/gf.c:4313 jl_apply at /source/src/julia.h:2284 [inlined] true_main at /source/src/jlapi.c:971 jl_repl_entrypoint at /source/src/jlapi.c:1138 main at /source/cli/loader_exe.c:58 unknown function (ip: 0x737846b7b249) at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 __libc_start_main at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (unknown line) unknown function (ip: 0x4010b8) at /workspace/srcdir/glibc-2.17/csu/../sysdeps/x86_64/start.S unknown function (ip: (nil)) at (unknown file) ============================================================== Profile collected. A report will print at the next yield point. Disabling --trace-compile ============================================================== ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ┌ Warning: There were no samples collected in one or more groups. │ This may be due to idle threads, or you may need to run your │ program longer (perhaps by running it multiple times), │ or adjust the delay between samples with `Profile.init()`. └ @ Profile /opt/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.14/Profile/src/Profile.jl:1361 -------------------------------------------------------------------Overhead ╎ [+additional indent] Count File:Line Function ========================================================= Thread 1 (default) Task 0x000073782cbfc010 Total snapshots: 46. Utilization: 100% ╎41 @Base/client.jl:577 _start() ╎ 41 @Base/client.jl:310 exec_options(opts::Base.JLOptions) ╎ 41 @Base/boot.jl:489 eval(m::Module, e::Any) ╎ 41 @Base/Base.jl:311 (::Base.IncludeInto)(fname::String) ╎ 41 @Base/Base.jl:310 include(mapexpr::Function, mod::Module, _path::Str… ╎ 41 @Base/loading.jl:3053 _include(mapexpr::Function, mod::Module, _pat… ╎ ╎ 41 @Base/loading.jl:2993 include_string(mapexpr::typeof(identity), mo… ╎ ╎ 41 @Base/boot.jl:489 eval(m::Module, e::Any) ╎ ╎ 41 …yB/test/runtests.jl:10 util_test_directory(dir::String) ╎ ╎ 41 …yB/test/runtests.jl:14 util_test_directory(dir::String, exclud… ╎ ╎ 41 @Test/src/Test.jl:1961 macro expansion ╎ ╎ ╎ 41 …B/test/runtests.jl:16 macro expansion ╎ ╎ ╎ 41 @Base/Base.jl:311 IncludeInto ╎ ╎ ╎ 41 @Base/Base.jl:310 include(mapexpr::Function, mod::Module, _… ╎ ╎ ╎ 41 @Base/loading.jl:3053 _include(mapexpr::Function, mod::Mod… ╎ ╎ ╎ 41 @Base/loading.jl:2993 include_string(mapexpr::typeof(iden… 26╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 41 @Base/boot.jl:489 eval(m::Module, e::Any) ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 15 @Compiler/…fer.jl:1713 typeinf_ext_toplevel(mi::Core.Me… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 7 @Compiler/…er.jl:1704 typeinf_ext_toplevel ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 7 @Compiler/…er.jl:1527 typeinf_ext(interp::Compiler.Na… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 4 @Compiler/…on.jl:4495 typeinf(interp::Compiler.Nativ… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 4 @Compiler/…n.jl:4338 typeinf_local(interp::Compiler… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 4 @Compiler/…n.jl:3789 abstract_eval_basic_statement ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 4 @Compiler/….jl:3832 abstract_eval_basic_statement ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 4 @Compiler/….jl:3433 abstract_eval_statement_expr… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 4 @Compiler/….jl:3075 abstract_eval_call ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 4 @Compiler/…jl:3057 abstract_call(interp::Compi… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 4 @Compiler/…jl:2897 abstract_call ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 4 @Compiler/…l:2904 abstract_call(interp::Comp… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 4 @Compiler/…l:2796 abstract_call_known(inter… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 4 @Compiler/…l:328 abstract_call_gf_by_type(… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 4 @Compiler/…l:247 (::Compiler.var"#inferca… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 4 @Compiler/…l:177 (::Compiler.var"#handle… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 4 @Compiler/…l:858 abstract_call_method_w… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 4 @Compiler/…l:889 abstract_call_method_… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 4 @Compiler/…l:1340 const_prop_call(int… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 4 @Compiler/…l:4495 typeinf(interp::Co… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 4 @Compiler/…l:4338 typeinf_local(int… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 4 @Compiler/…l:3789 abstract_eval_ba… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 4 @Compiler/…l:3832 abstract_eval_b… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 4 @Compiler/…l:3433 abstract_eval_… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ +1 4 @Compiler/…l:3075 abstract_eval_… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ +2 4 @Compiler/…l:3057 abstract_call(… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ +3 4 @Compiler/…l:2897 abstract_call ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ +4 4 @Compiler/…l:2904 abstract_call(… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ +5 4 @Compiler/…l:2796 abstract_call_… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ +6 4 @Compiler/…l:328 abstract_call_g… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ +7 4 @Compiler/…l:247 (::Compiler.var… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ +8 4 @Compiler/…l:177 (::Compiler.var… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ +9 4 @Compiler/…l:858 abstract_call_m… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ +10 4 @Compiler/…l:889 abstract_call_m… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ +11 4 @Compiler/…l:1340 const_prop_cal… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ +12 2 @Compiler/…l:4495 typeinf(interp… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ +13 2 @Compiler/…l:4338 typeinf_local(… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ +14 2 @Compiler/…l:3789 abstract_eval_… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ +15 2 @Compiler/…l:3832 abstract_eval_… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ +16 2 @Compiler/…l:3433 abstract_eval_… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ +17 2 @Compiler/…l:3075 abstract_eval_… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ +18 2 @Compiler/…l:3057 abstract_call(… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ +19 2 @Compiler/…l:2897 abstract_call ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ +20 2 @Compiler/…l:2904 abstract_call(… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ +21 2 @Compiler/…l:2796 abstract_call_… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ +22 2 @Compiler/…l:328 abstract_call_g… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ +23 2 @Compiler/…l:247 (::Compiler.var… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ +24 2 @Compiler/…l:177 (::Compiler.var… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ +25 2 @Compiler/…l:858 abstract_call_m… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ +26 2 @Compiler/…l:889 abstract_call_m… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ +27 2 @Compiler/…l:1340 const_prop_cal… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ +28 2 @Compiler/…l:4495 typeinf(interp… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ +29 2 @Compiler/…l:4338 typeinf_local(… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ +30 2 @Compiler/…l:3789 abstract_eval_… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ +31 2 @Compiler/…l:3832 abstract_eval_… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ +32 2 @Compiler/…l:3433 abstract_eval_… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ +33 2 @Compiler/…l:3075 abstract_eval_… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ +34 2 @Compiler/…l:3057 abstract_call(… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ +35 2 @Compiler/…l:2897 abstract_call ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ +36 2 @Compiler/…l:2904 abstract_call(… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ +37 2 @Compiler/…l:2796 abstract_call_… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ +38 2 @Compiler/…l:328 abstract_call_g… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ +39 2 @Compiler/…l:247 (::Compiler.var… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ +40 2 @Compiler/…l:177 (::Compiler.var… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ +41 2 @Compiler/…l:858 abstract_call_m… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ +42 2 @Compiler/…l:889 abstract_call_m… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ +43 2 @Compiler/…l:1340 const_prop_cal… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ +44 2 @Compiler/…l:4495 typeinf(interp… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ +45 2 @Compiler/…l:4338 typeinf_local(… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ +46 2 @Compiler/…l:3789 abstract_eval_… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ +47 2 @Compiler/…l:3832 abstract_eval_… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ +48 2 @Compiler/…l:3433 abstract_eval_… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ +49 2 @Compiler/…l:3075 abstract_eval_… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ +50 2 @Compiler/…l:3057 abstract_call(… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ +51 2 @Compiler/…l:2897 abstract_call ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ +52 2 @Compiler/…l:2904 abstract_call(… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ +53 2 @Compiler/…l:2796 abstract_call_… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ +54 2 @Compiler/…l:328 abstract_call_g… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ +55 2 @Compiler/…l:247 (::Compiler.var… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ +56 2 @Compiler/…l:177 (::Compiler.var… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ +57 2 @Compiler/…l:858 abstract_call_m… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ +58 2 @Compiler/…l:889 abstract_call_m… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ +59 2 @Compiler/…l:1340 const_prop_cal… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ +60 2 @Compiler/…l:4495 typeinf(interp… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ +61 2 @Compiler/…l:4338 typeinf_local(… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ +62 2 @Compiler/…l:3789 abstract_eval_… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ +63 2 @Compiler/…l:3832 abstract_eval_… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ +64 2 @Compiler/…l:3433 abstract_eval_… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ +65 2 @Compiler/…l:3075 abstract_eval_… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ +66 2 @Compiler/…l:3057 abstract_call(… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ +67 2 @Compiler/…l:2897 abstract_call ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ +68 2 @Compiler/…l:2904 abstract_call(… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ +69 2 @Compiler/…l:2648 abstract_call_… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ +70 2 @Compiler/…l:1865 abstract_apply… 1╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ +71 1 @Compiler/…l:1793 (::Compiler.va… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ +71 1 @Compiler/…l:1845 (::Compiler.va… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ +72 1 @Compiler/…l:2904 abstract_call(… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ +73 1 @Compiler/…l:2796 abstract_call_… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ +74 1 @Compiler/…l:328 abstract_call_g… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ +75 1 @Compiler/…l:247 (::Compiler.var… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ +76 1 @Compiler/…l:177 (::Compiler.var… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ +77 1 @Compiler/…l:858 abstract_call_m… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ +78 1 @Compiler/…l:889 abstract_call_m… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ +79 1 @Compiler/…l:1340 const_prop_cal… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ +80 1 @Compiler/…l:4502 typeinf(interp… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ +81 1 @Compiler/…l:278 finish_nocycle(… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ +82 1 @Compiler/…l:1021 optimize(inter… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ +83 1 @Compiler/…l:1048 run_passes_ipo… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ +84 1 @Compiler/…l:1035 run_passes_ipo… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ +85 1 @Compiler/…l:1405 sroa_pass!(ir:… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ +86 1 @Compiler/…l:573 lift_comparison… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ +87 1 @Compiler/…l:629 lift_comparison… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ +88 1 @Compiler/…l:781 perform_lifting! ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ +89 1 @Compiler/…l:781 perform_lifting… 1╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ +90 1 @Base/…ct.jl:31 IdDict ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ +12 2 @Compiler/…l:4502 typeinf(interp… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ +13 2 @Compiler/…l:278 finish_nocycle(… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ +14 2 @Compiler/…l:1021 optimize(inter… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ +15 2 @Compiler/…l:1048 run_passes_ipo… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ +16 1 @Compiler/…l:1035 run_passes_ipo… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ +17 1 @Compiler/…l:1334 sroa_pass!(ir:… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ +18 1 @Compiler/…l:5 is_known_call(x::… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ +19 1 @Compiler/…l:482 argextype 1╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ +20 1 @Compiler/…l:483 argextype ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ +16 1 @Compiler/…l:1070 run_passes_ipo… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ +17 1 @Compiler/…l:433 verify_ir(ir::C… 1╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ +18 1 @Compiler/…l:0 check_op(ir::Comp… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 3 @Compiler/…on.jl:4502 typeinf(interp::Compiler.Nativ… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 2 @Compiler/…er.jl:278 finish_nocycle(interp::Compile… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 2 @Compiler/…e.jl:1021 optimize(interp::Compiler.Nat… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 2 @Compiler/….jl:1048 run_passes_ipo_safe ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 2 @Compiler/….jl:1035 run_passes_ipo_safe(ci::Core… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 2 @Compiler/….jl:2110 adce_pass!(ir::Compiler.IRC… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 2 @Compiler/….jl:807 IncrementalCompact ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 2 @Compiler/…jl:707 CFGTransformState!(blocks::… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 2 @Compiler/…jl:242 construct_domtree(blocks::… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 2 @Compiler/…l:252 update_domtree! ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 1 @Compiler/…l:162 DFS!(D::Compiler.DFSTree,… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 1 @Base/…ay.jl:1020 setindex! 1╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 1 @Base/…ay.jl:1024 _setindex! ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 1 @Compiler/…l:184 DFS!(D::Compiler.DFSTree,… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 1 @Base/…ay.jl:1345 push! ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 1 @Base/…ay.jl:1348 _push! ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 1 @Base/…ay.jl:1205 _growend! ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 1 @Base/…ay.jl:1181 _growend_internal!(a… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 1 @Base/…ay.jl:1101 array_new_memory ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 1 @Base/…ot.jl:588 GenericMemory ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 1 @Compiler/…er.jl:285 finish_nocycle(interp::Compile… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 1 @Compiler/…r.jl:145 finish!(interp::Compiler.Nativ… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 1 @Compiler/…r.jl:480 transform_result_for_cache(in… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 1 @Compiler/….jl:408 compute_inlining_cost ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 1 @Compiler/….jl:457 inline_cost_model(interp::Co… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 1 @Compiler/…jl:1481 inline_cost_model(ir::Compi… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 1 @Compiler/…jl:1459 statement_or_branch_cost ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 1 @Compiler/…l:1444 statement_cost(ex::Expr, l… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 1 @Compiler/…l:479 argextype ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 1 @Compiler/…l:510 argextype ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 1 @Compiler/…l:536 abstract_eval_ssavalue ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 1 @Compiler/…l:1224 getindex ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 1 @Compiler/…l:1241 getindex ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 1 @Compiler/…l:318 getindex 1╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 1 @Base/int.jl:560 <= ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 8 @Compiler/…er.jl:1705 typeinf_ext_toplevel 8╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 8 @Compiler/…er.jl:1698 add_codeinsts_to_jit!(interp::C… problem nodes : 3 state variables : 1 scenarios : 8.51840e+04 existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [6, 6] AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [1, 3] AffExpr in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [2, 2] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [3, 4] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [3, 3] numerical stability report matrix range [8e-01, 2e+00] objective range [1e+00, 2e+00] bounds range [1e+00, 1e+02] rhs range [5e+01, 5e+01] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 10 3.675000e+00 4.115510e+00 1.348329e+00 1350 1 20 5.062500e+00 4.110713e+00 1.553016e+00 2700 1 30 4.500000e+00 4.104200e+00 1.766891e+00 4050 1 40 3.812500e+00 4.102669e+00 1.986785e+00 5400 1 50 4.725000e+00 4.095504e+00 2.214708e+00 6750 1 60 4.050000e+00 4.092999e+00 2.442069e+00 8100 1 70 4.606250e+00 4.091524e+00 3.078588e+00 9450 1 80 3.875000e+00 4.089694e+00 3.326778e+00 10800 1 90 3.750000e+00 4.089490e+00 3.578785e+00 12150 1 100 5.125000e+00 4.087894e+00 3.838215e+00 13500 1 110 4.500000e+00 4.087478e+00 4.098096e+00 14850 1 120 3.650000e+00 4.086704e+00 4.362529e+00 16200 1 130 4.406250e+00 4.086063e+00 4.626511e+00 17550 1 140 3.375000e+00 4.085981e+00 4.884818e+00 18900 1 150 3.000000e+00 4.085945e+00 5.162439e+00 20250 1 160 3.812500e+00 4.085838e+00 5.448078e+00 21600 1 170 4.250000e+00 4.085728e+00 5.734869e+00 22950 1 180 3.243750e+00 4.085593e+00 6.010878e+00 24300 1 190 4.306250e+00 4.085487e+00 6.294243e+00 25650 1 200 5.237500e+00 4.085446e+00 6.623311e+00 27000 1 210 4.500000e+00 4.085441e+00 6.955473e+00 28350 1 220 3.612500e+00 4.085405e+00 7.291027e+00 29700 1 230 3.700000e+00 4.085382e+00 7.648138e+00 31050 1 240 3.437500e+00 4.085254e+00 7.990903e+00 32400 1 250 4.100000e+00 4.085115e+00 8.340437e+00 33750 1 260 3.000000e+00 4.084973e+00 8.706129e+00 35100 1 270 4.918750e+00 4.084943e+00 9.062380e+00 36450 1 280 2.756250e+00 4.084920e+00 9.435987e+00 37800 1 290 3.737500e+00 4.084868e+00 9.804563e+00 39150 1 300 5.750000e+00 4.084868e+00 1.014286e+01 40500 1 310 5.156250e+00 4.084858e+00 1.051147e+01 41850 1 320 3.131250e+00 4.084855e+00 1.096353e+01 43200 1 330 4.125000e+00 4.084846e+00 1.133265e+01 44550 1 340 5.875000e+00 4.084820e+00 1.171481e+01 45900 1 350 4.587500e+00 4.084810e+00 1.207661e+01 47250 1 360 5.087500e+00 4.084805e+00 1.244705e+01 48600 1 370 4.393750e+00 4.084802e+00 1.283195e+01 49950 1 380 4.750000e+00 4.084792e+00 1.321610e+01 51300 1 ====================================================================================== Information request received. A stacktrace will print followed by a 1.0 second profile. --trace-compile is enabled during profile collection. ====================================================================================== cmd: /opt/julia/bin/julia 1 running 0 of 1 signal (10): User defined signal 1 epoll_pwait at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (unknown line) uv__io_poll at /workspace/srcdir/libuv/src/unix/linux.c:1404 uv_run at /workspace/srcdir/libuv/src/unix/core.c:430 ijl_task_get_next at /source/src/scheduler.c:457 390 4.437500e+00 4.084785e+00 1.363500e+01 52650 1 wait at ./task.jl:1246 wait_forever at ./task.jl:1168 jfptr_wait_forever_60660.1 at /opt/julia/lib/julia/sys.so (unknown line) _jl_invoke at /source/src/gf.c:4116 [inlined] ijl_apply_generic at /source/src/gf.c:4313 jl_apply at /source/src/julia.h:2284 [inlined] start_task at /source/src/task.c:1272 unknown function (ip: (nil)) at (unknown file) 400 4.181250e+00 4.084785e+00 1.431170e+01 54000 1 ============================================================== Profile collected. A report will print at the next yield point. Disabling --trace-compile ============================================================== 410 3.650000e+00 4.084777e+00 1.495887e+01 55350 1 420 3.750000e+00 4.084769e+00 1.593677e+01 56700 1 430 3.725000e+00 4.084762e+00 1.687587e+01 58050 1 440 4.218750e+00 4.084751e+00 1.779355e+01 59400 1 ┌ Warning: There were no samples collected in one or more groups. │ This may be due to idle threads, or you may need to run your │ program longer (perhaps by running it multiple times), │ or adjust the delay between samples with `Profile.init()`. └ @ Profile /opt/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.14/Profile/src/Profile.jl:1361 Overhead ╎ [+additional indent] Count File:Line Function ========================================================= Thread 1 (default) Task 0x0000777937f1b850 Total snapshots: 364. Utilization: 0% ╎364 @Base/task.jl:1168 wait_forever() 363╎ 364 @Base/task.jl:1246 wait() 450 5.500000e+00 4.084751e+00 1.831264e+01 60750 1 460 3.637500e+00 4.084747e+00 1.867674e+01 62100 1 470 2.993750e+00 4.084743e+00 1.904119e+01 63450 1 480 5.237500e+00 4.084743e+00 1.939808e+01 64800 1 490 4.212500e+00 4.084743e+00 1.976185e+01 66150 1 497 2.981250e+00 4.084743e+00 2.000734e+01 67095 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : time_limit total time (s) : 2.000734e+01 total solves : 67095 best bound : 4.084743e+00 simulation ci : 4.081124e+00 ± 6.732165e-02 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 3 state variables : 1 scenarios : 8.51840e+04 existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [6, 6] AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [1, 3] AffExpr in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [2, 2] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [3, 4] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [3, 3] numerical stability report matrix range [8e-01, 2e+00] objective range [1e+00, 2e+00] bounds range [1e+00, 1e+02] rhs range [5e+01, 5e+01] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 10 4.875000e+00 4.345744e+00 1.113681e+00 1350 1 20 3.375000e+00 4.339578e+00 1.818487e+00 2700 1 30 3.225000e+00 4.337789e+00 2.685928e+00 4050 1 [482] signal 15: Terminated in expression starting at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/SDDP/ScjyB/docs/src/examples/objective_state_newsvendor.jl:81 ijl_field_index at /source/src/datatype.c:1804 get_checked_fieldindex at /source/src/builtins.c:1017 [inlined] jl_f_getfield at /source/src/builtins.c:1051 getproperty at ./Base_compiler.jl:57 [inlined] objective_state at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/SDDP/ScjyB/src/user_interface.jl:1375 [inlined] #220 at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/SDDP/ScjyB/docs/src/examples/objective_state_newsvendor.jl:62 unknown function (ip: 0x7378290a878b) at (unknown file) _jl_invoke at /source/src/gf.c:4116 [inlined] ijl_apply_generic at /source/src/gf.c:4313 parameterize at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/SDDP/ScjyB/src/algorithm.jl:298 #solve_subproblem#78 at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/SDDP/ScjyB/src/algorithm.jl:504 solve_subproblem at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/SDDP/ScjyB/src/algorithm.jl:491 unknown function (ip: 0x7378290aaea7) at (unknown file) _jl_invoke at /source/src/gf.c:4116 [inlined] ijl_apply_generic at /source/src/gf.c:4313 solve_all_children at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/SDDP/ScjyB/src/algorithm.jl:831 unknown function (ip: 0x7378291e0bf8) at (unknown file) _jl_invoke at /source/src/gf.c:4116 [inlined] ijl_apply_generic at /source/src/gf.c:4313 backward_pass at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/SDDP/ScjyB/src/algorithm.jl:675 unknown function (ip: 0x7378291dcf38) at (unknown file) _jl_invoke at /source/src/gf.c:4116 [inlined] ijl_apply_generic at /source/src/gf.c:4313 iteration at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/SDDP/ScjyB/src/algorithm.jl:969 #master_loop##0 at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/SDDP/ScjyB/src/plugins/parallel_schemes.jl:50 disable_sigint at ./c.jl:167 [inlined] master_loop at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/SDDP/ScjyB/src/plugins/parallel_schemes.jl:49 unknown function (ip: 0x737814bd8861) at (unknown file) _jl_invoke at /source/src/gf.c:4116 [inlined] ijl_apply_generic at /source/src/gf.c:4313 #train#91 at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/SDDP/ScjyB/src/algorithm.jl:1291 train at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/SDDP/ScjyB/src/algorithm.jl:1116 [inlined] #newsvendor_example#210 at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/SDDP/ScjyB/docs/src/examples/objective_state_newsvendor.jl:66 newsvendor_example at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/SDDP/ScjyB/docs/src/examples/objective_state_newsvendor.jl:34 unknown function (ip: 0x73782907d872) at (unknown file) _jl_invoke at /source/src/gf.c:4116 [inlined] ijl_apply_generic at /source/src/gf.c:4313 jl_apply at /source/src/julia.h:2284 [inlined] do_call at /source/src/interpreter.c:123 eval_value at /source/src/interpreter.c:243 eval_stmt_value at /source/src/interpreter.c:194 [inlined] eval_body at /source/src/interpreter.c:679 jl_interpret_toplevel_thunk at /source/src/interpreter.c:884 jl_toplevel_eval_flex at /source/src/toplevel.c:742 jl_eval_toplevel_stmts at /source/src/toplevel.c:585 jl_toplevel_eval_flex at /source/src/toplevel.c:683 ijl_toplevel_eval at /source/src/toplevel.c:754 ijl_toplevel_eval_in at /source/src/toplevel.c:799 eval at ./boot.jl:489 include_string at ./loading.jl:2993 _jl_invoke at /source/src/gf.c:4116 [inlined] ijl_apply_generic at /source/src/gf.c:4313 _include at ./loading.jl:3053 include at ./Base.jl:310 IncludeInto at ./Base.jl:311 [inlined] macro expansion at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/SDDP/ScjyB/test/runtests.jl:16 [inlined] macro expansion at /source/usr/share/julia/stdlib/v1.14/Test/src/Test.jl:1961 [inlined] util_test_directory at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/SDDP/ScjyB/test/runtests.jl:14 util_test_directory at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/SDDP/ScjyB/test/runtests.jl:10 unknown function (ip: 0x737814bc0a92) at (unknown file) _jl_invoke at /source/src/gf.c:4116 [inlined] ijl_apply_generic at /source/src/gf.c:4313 jl_apply at /source/src/julia.h:2284 [inlined] do_call at /source/src/interpreter.c:123 eval_value at /source/src/interpreter.c:243 eval_stmt_value at /source/src/interpreter.c:194 [inlined] eval_body at /source/src/interpreter.c:679 eval_body at /source/src/interpreter.c:550 eval_body at /source/src/interpreter.c:558 eval_body at /source/src/interpreter.c:558 eval_body at /source/src/interpreter.c:558 jl_interpret_toplevel_thunk at /source/src/interpreter.c:884 jl_toplevel_eval_flex at /source/src/toplevel.c:742 jl_eval_toplevel_stmts at /source/src/toplevel.c:585 jl_toplevel_eval_flex at /source/src/toplevel.c:683 ijl_toplevel_eval at /source/src/toplevel.c:754 ijl_toplevel_eval_in at /source/src/toplevel.c:799 eval at ./boot.jl:489 include_string at ./loading.jl:2993 _jl_invoke at /source/src/gf.c:4116 [inlined] ijl_apply_generic at /source/src/gf.c:4313 _include at ./loading.jl:3053 include at ./Base.jl:310 IncludeInto at ./Base.jl:311 jfptr_IncludeInto_57745.1 at /opt/julia/lib/julia/sys.so (unknown line) _jl_invoke at /source/src/gf.c:4116 [inlined] ijl_apply_generic at /source/src/gf.c:4313 jl_apply at /source/src/julia.h:2284 [inlined] do_call at /source/src/interpreter.c:123 eval_value at /source/src/interpreter.c:243 eval_stmt_value at /source/src/interpreter.c:194 [inlined] eval_body at /source/src/interpreter.c:679 jl_interpret_toplevel_thunk at /source/src/interpreter.c:884 jl_toplevel_eval_flex at /source/src/toplevel.c:742 jl_eval_toplevel_stmts at /source/src/toplevel.c:585 jl_toplevel_eval_flex at /source/src/toplevel.c:683 ijl_toplevel_eval at /source/src/toplevel.c:754 ijl_toplevel_eval_in at /source/src/toplevel.c:799 eval at ./boot.jl:489 exec_options at ./client.jl:310 _start at ./client.jl:577 jfptr__start_78750.1 at /opt/julia/lib/julia/sys.so (unknown line) _jl_invoke at /source/src/gf.c:4116 [inlined] ijl_apply_generic at /source/src/gf.c:4313 jl_apply at /source/src/julia.h:2284 [inlined] true_main at /source/src/jlapi.c:971 jl_repl_entrypoint at /source/src/jlapi.c:1138 main at /source/cli/loader_exe.c:58 unknown function (ip: 0x737846b7b249) at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 __libc_start_main at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (unknown line) unknown function (ip: 0x4010b8) at /workspace/srcdir/glibc-2.17/csu/../sysdeps/x86_64/start.S unknown function (ip: (nil)) at (unknown file) Allocations: 571183699 (Pool: 571180094; Big: 3605); GC: 116 PkgEval terminated after 2736.1s: test duration exceeded the time limit