Package evaluation to test RationalFunctionFields on Julia 1.14.0-DEV.30 (073666df8b*) started at 2025-11-04T15:29:27.065 ################################################################################ # Set-up # Installing PkgEval dependencies (TestEnv)... Set-up completed after 8.88s ################################################################################ # Installation # Installing RationalFunctionFields... Resolving package versions... Updating `~/.julia/environments/v1.14/Project.toml` [73480bc8] + RationalFunctionFields v0.2.2 Updating `~/.julia/environments/v1.14/Manifest.toml` [c3fe647b] + AbstractAlgebra v0.47.3 [a9b6321e] + Atomix v1.1.2 [861a8166] + Combinatorics v1.0.3 [e2ba6199] + ExprTools v0.1.10 [0b43b601] + Groebner v0.10.0 [18e54dd8] + IntegerMathUtils v0.1.3 [692b3bcd] + JLLWrappers v1.7.1 [1914dd2f] + MacroTools v0.5.16 [2edaba10] + Nemo v0.52.3 [3e851597] + ParamPunPam v0.5.5 [aea7be01] + PrecompileTools v1.3.3 [21216c6a] + Preferences v1.5.0 [27ebfcd6] + Primes v0.5.7 [92933f4c] + ProgressMeter v1.11.0 [fb686558] + RandomExtensions v0.4.4 [73480bc8] + RationalFunctionFields v0.2.2 [a759f4b9] + TimerOutputs v0.5.29 [013be700] + UnsafeAtomics v0.3.0 [e134572f] + FLINT_jll v301.300.102+0 [656ef2d0] + OpenBLAS32_jll v0.3.29+0 [56f22d72] + Artifacts v1.11.0 [ade2ca70] + Dates v1.11.0 [8ba89e20] + Distributed v1.11.0 [8f399da3] + Libdl v1.11.0 [37e2e46d] + LinearAlgebra v1.13.0 [56ddb016] + Logging v1.11.0 [de0858da] + Printf v1.11.0 [9a3f8284] + Random v1.11.0 [ea8e919c] + SHA v1.0.0 [9e88b42a] + Serialization v1.11.0 [6462fe0b] + Sockets v1.11.0 [2f01184e] + SparseArrays v1.13.0 [fa267f1f] + TOML v1.0.3 [4ec0a83e] + Unicode v1.11.0 [e66e0078] + CompilerSupportLibraries_jll v1.3.0+1 [781609d7] + GMP_jll v6.3.0+2 [3a97d323] + MPFR_jll v4.2.2+0 [4536629a] + OpenBLAS_jll v0.3.29+0 [bea87d4a] + SuiteSparse_jll v7.10.1+0 [8e850b90] + libblastrampoline_jll v5.15.0+0 Installation completed after 4.55s ################################################################################ # Precompilation # Precompiling PkgEval dependencies... ┌ Error: Failed to use TestEnv.jl; test dependencies will not be precompiled │ exception = │ UndefVarError: `project_rel_path` not defined in `TestEnv` │ Suggestion: this global was defined as `Pkg.Operations.project_rel_path` but not assigned a value. │ Stacktrace: │ [1] get_test_dir(ctx::Pkg.Types.Context, pkgspec::PackageSpec) │ @ TestEnv ~/.julia/packages/TestEnv/nGMfF/src/julia-1.11/common.jl:75 │ [2] test_dir_has_project_file │ @ ~/.julia/packages/TestEnv/nGMfF/src/julia-1.11/common.jl:52 [inlined] │ [3] maybe_gen_project_override! │ @ ~/.julia/packages/TestEnv/nGMfF/src/julia-1.11/common.jl:83 [inlined] │ [4] activate(pkg::String; allow_reresolve::Bool) │ @ TestEnv ~/.julia/packages/TestEnv/nGMfF/src/julia-1.11/activate_set.jl:12 │ [5] activate(pkg::String) │ @ TestEnv ~/.julia/packages/TestEnv/nGMfF/src/julia-1.11/activate_set.jl:9 │ [6] top-level scope │ @ /PkgEval.jl/scripts/precompile.jl:24 │ [7] include(mod::Module, _path::String) │ @ Base ./Base.jl:309 │ [8] exec_options(opts::Base.JLOptions) │ @ Base ./client.jl:344 │ [9] _start() │ @ Base ./client.jl:577 └ @ Main /PkgEval.jl/scripts/precompile.jl:26 Precompiling package dependencies... Precompiling packages... 118836.4 ms ✓ Groebner 9293.4 ms ✓ ParamPunPam 9574.7 ms ✓ RationalFunctionFields 3 dependencies successfully precompiled in 141 seconds. 28 already precompiled. Precompilation completed after 149.5s ################################################################################ # Testing # Testing RationalFunctionFields Status `/tmp/jl_aGvSaE/Project.toml` [c3fe647b] AbstractAlgebra v0.47.3 [861a8166] Combinatorics v1.0.3 [0b43b601] Groebner v0.10.0 [2edaba10] Nemo v0.52.3 [3e851597] ParamPunPam v0.5.5 [73480bc8] RationalFunctionFields v0.2.2 ⌅ [98d24dd4] TestSetExtensions v2.0.0 [a759f4b9] TimerOutputs v0.5.29 [37e2e46d] LinearAlgebra v1.13.0 [9a3f8284] Random v1.11.0 [8dfed614] Test v1.11.0 Status `/tmp/jl_aGvSaE/Manifest.toml` [c3fe647b] AbstractAlgebra v0.47.3 [a9b6321e] Atomix v1.1.2 [861a8166] Combinatorics v1.0.3 [ab62b9b5] DeepDiffs v1.2.0 [e2ba6199] ExprTools v0.1.10 [0b43b601] Groebner v0.10.0 [18e54dd8] IntegerMathUtils v0.1.3 [692b3bcd] JLLWrappers v1.7.1 [1914dd2f] MacroTools v0.5.16 [2edaba10] Nemo v0.52.3 [3e851597] ParamPunPam v0.5.5 [aea7be01] PrecompileTools v1.3.3 [21216c6a] Preferences v1.5.0 [27ebfcd6] Primes v0.5.7 [92933f4c] ProgressMeter v1.11.0 [fb686558] RandomExtensions v0.4.4 [73480bc8] RationalFunctionFields v0.2.2 ⌅ [98d24dd4] TestSetExtensions v2.0.0 [a759f4b9] TimerOutputs v0.5.29 [013be700] UnsafeAtomics v0.3.0 [e134572f] FLINT_jll v301.300.102+0 [656ef2d0] OpenBLAS32_jll v0.3.29+0 [56f22d72] Artifacts v1.11.0 [2a0f44e3] Base64 v1.11.0 [ade2ca70] Dates v1.11.0 [8ba89e20] Distributed v1.11.0 [b77e0a4c] InteractiveUtils v1.11.0 [ac6e5ff7] JuliaSyntaxHighlighting v1.12.0 [8f399da3] Libdl v1.11.0 [37e2e46d] LinearAlgebra v1.13.0 [56ddb016] Logging v1.11.0 [d6f4376e] Markdown v1.11.0 [de0858da] Printf v1.11.0 [9a3f8284] Random v1.11.0 [ea8e919c] SHA v1.0.0 [9e88b42a] Serialization v1.11.0 [6462fe0b] Sockets v1.11.0 [2f01184e] SparseArrays v1.13.0 [f489334b] StyledStrings v1.11.0 [fa267f1f] TOML v1.0.3 [8dfed614] Test v1.11.0 [4ec0a83e] Unicode v1.11.0 [e66e0078] CompilerSupportLibraries_jll v1.3.0+1 [781609d7] GMP_jll v6.3.0+2 [3a97d323] MPFR_jll v4.2.2+0 [4536629a] OpenBLAS_jll v0.3.29+0 [bea87d4a] SuiteSparse_jll v7.10.1+0 [8e850b90] libblastrampoline_jll v5.15.0+0 Info Packages marked with ⌅ have new versions available but compatibility constraints restrict them from upgrading. Testing Running tests... [ Info: Testing started ┌ Info: Names for generators were not provided, so they have been generated as follows: │ 26__Tag_3 = (x^3 + y^3 + z^3)//(x + y + z) │ 26__Tag_1 = (x^2 + y^2 + z^2)//(x + y + z) └ 26__Tag_2 = x + y + z ┌ Info: Names for generators were not provided, so they have been generated as follows: │ 106__Tag_3 = x*y*z │ 106__Tag_1 = x + y + z └ 106__Tag_2 = x*y + x*z + y*z ┌ Info: Names for generators were not provided, so they have been generated as follows: │ 130__Tag_3 = a + b + c │ 130__Tag_1 = a └ 130__Tag_2 = b ┌ Info: Names for generators were not provided, so they have been generated as follows: │ 38__Tag_3 = a + b + c │ 38__Tag_1 = a └ 38__Tag_2 = b ┌ Info: Names for generators were not provided, so they have been generated as follows: │ 197__Tag_3 = 5*a │ 197__Tag_1 = 2*c └ 197__Tag_2 = 3*b ┌ Info: Names for generators were not provided, so they have been generated as follows: │ 255__Tag_1 = a + b + c └ 255__Tag_2 = a^2 + b^2 + c^2 ┌ Info: Names for generators were not provided, so they have been generated as follows: │ 132__Tag_3 = a^4 + b^4 │ 132__Tag_1 = a^2 + b^2 └ 132__Tag_2 = a^3 + b^3 ┌ Info: Names for generators were not provided, so they have been generated as follows: └ 230__Tag_1 = T1^2 ┌ Info: Names for generators were not provided, so they have been generated as follows: │ 87__Tag_3 = _t │ 87__Tag_1 = T1 └ 87__Tag_2 = t ┌ Info: Names for generators were not provided, so they have been generated as follows: │ 3__Tag_3 = x │ 3__Tag_1 = x - 1 └ 3__Tag_2 = x^5 - 1 ┌ Info: Names for generators were not provided, so they have been generated as follows: └ 94__Tag_1 = x^2 ┌ Info: Names for generators were not provided, so they have been generated as follows: │ 15__Tag_3 = x^4 + y^4 │ 15__Tag_1 = x^2 + y^2 └ 15__Tag_2 = x^3 + y^3 ┌ Info: Names for generators were not provided, so they have been generated as follows: │ 110__Tag_1 = x1 │ 110__Tag_2 = a │ 110__Tag_5 = (a + b)//x2 │ 110__Tag_4 = c//x2 └ 110__Tag_3 = a*c + c^2 [ Info: Search for polynomial generators concluded in 10.120457182 [ Info: Search for polynomial generators concluded in 0.816011722 [ Info: Search for polynomial generators concluded in 0.001237607 [ Info: Search for polynomial generators concluded in 0.002678942 [ Info: Search for polynomial generators concluded in 0.000468455 [ Info: Search for polynomial generators concluded in 0.053993939 [ Info: Search for polynomial generators concluded in 0.707168355 [ Info: Search for polynomial generators concluded in 0.001828861 [ Info: Search for polynomial generators concluded in 2.291595569 [ Info: Search for polynomial generators concluded in 0.852107326 [ Info: Simplifying generating set. Simplification level: standard ⌜ # Computing specializations.. Time: 0:00:12 ✓ # Computing specializations.. Time: 0:00:14 [ Info: Search for polynomial generators concluded in 0.010283515 [ Info: Selecting generators in 0.009067117 [ Info: Inclusion checked with probability 0.99 in 0.004252986 seconds [ Info: Simplifying generating set. Simplification level: strong [ Info: Search for polynomial generators concluded in 0.008052338 [ Info: Computing 3 Groebner bases for degrees (3, 3) for block orderings ⌜ # Computing specializations.. Time: 0:00:32 ✓ # Computing specializations.. Time: 0:00:32 [ Info: Computed Groebner bases in 43.809860641 seconds [ Info: Selecting generators in 0.000609554 [ Info: Inclusion checked with probability 0.99 in 0.003414916 seconds [ Info: Simplifying generating set. Simplification level: standard [ Info: Search for polynomial generators concluded in 0.262740843 [ Info: Selecting generators in 0.008360185 [ Info: Inclusion checked with probability 0.99 in 0.013384614 seconds [ Info: Simplifying generating set. Simplification level: strong [ Info: Search for polynomial generators concluded in 0.047922483 [ Info: Computing 5 Groebner bases for degrees (3, 3) for block orderings [ Info: Computed Groebner bases in 2.115463831 seconds [ Info: Selecting generators in 0.007915059 [ Info: Inclusion checked with probability 0.99 in 0.01287355 seconds Test Summary: | Pass Total Time All the tests | 149 149 11m40.5s RationalFunctionField | 2 2 1m37.4s Transcendence basis computations and algebraicity checks | 13 13 6.7s RationalFunctionField: constructive field membership (basic) | 6 6 1m08.9s RationalFunctionField: constructive field membership | 82 82 5.3s RationalFunctionField: simplification | 1 1 4m52.4s RationalFunctionField: membership | 24 24 1m47.3s Linear relations over the rationals | 10 10 20.1s Rational function comparison | 7 7 0.9s RationalFunctionField: simplification | 4 4 1m39.2s 700.937804 seconds (335.69 M allocations: 76.466 GiB, 2.44% gc time, 52.06% compilation time: <1% of which was recompilation) Testing RationalFunctionFields tests passed Testing completed after 718.9s PkgEval succeeded after 913.26s