Package evaluation to test RationalFunctionFields on Julia 1.14.0-DEV.24 (d5fb6bbb43*) started at 2025-11-02T15:23:40.857 ################################################################################ # Set-up # Installing PkgEval dependencies (TestEnv)... Set-up completed after 8.21s ################################################################################ # Installation # Installing RationalFunctionFields... Resolving package versions... Updating `~/.julia/environments/v1.14/Project.toml` [73480bc8] + RationalFunctionFields v0.2.2 Updating `~/.julia/environments/v1.14/Manifest.toml` [c3fe647b] + AbstractAlgebra v0.47.3 [a9b6321e] + Atomix v1.1.2 [861a8166] + Combinatorics v1.0.3 [e2ba6199] + ExprTools v0.1.10 [0b43b601] + Groebner v0.10.0 [18e54dd8] + IntegerMathUtils v0.1.3 [692b3bcd] + JLLWrappers v1.7.1 [1914dd2f] + MacroTools v0.5.16 [2edaba10] + Nemo v0.52.3 [3e851597] + ParamPunPam v0.5.5 [aea7be01] + PrecompileTools v1.3.3 [21216c6a] + Preferences v1.5.0 [27ebfcd6] + Primes v0.5.7 [92933f4c] + ProgressMeter v1.11.0 [fb686558] + RandomExtensions v0.4.4 [73480bc8] + RationalFunctionFields v0.2.2 [a759f4b9] + TimerOutputs v0.5.29 [013be700] + UnsafeAtomics v0.3.0 [e134572f] + FLINT_jll v301.300.102+0 [656ef2d0] + OpenBLAS32_jll v0.3.29+0 [56f22d72] + Artifacts v1.11.0 [ade2ca70] + Dates v1.11.0 [8ba89e20] + Distributed v1.11.0 [8f399da3] + Libdl v1.11.0 [37e2e46d] + LinearAlgebra v1.13.0 [56ddb016] + Logging v1.11.0 [de0858da] + Printf v1.11.0 [9a3f8284] + Random v1.11.0 [ea8e919c] + SHA v1.0.0 [9e88b42a] + Serialization v1.11.0 [6462fe0b] + Sockets v1.11.0 [2f01184e] + SparseArrays v1.13.0 [fa267f1f] + TOML v1.0.3 [4ec0a83e] + Unicode v1.11.0 [e66e0078] + CompilerSupportLibraries_jll v1.3.0+1 [781609d7] + GMP_jll v6.3.0+2 [3a97d323] + MPFR_jll v4.2.2+0 [4536629a] + OpenBLAS_jll v0.3.29+0 [bea87d4a] + SuiteSparse_jll v7.10.1+0 [8e850b90] + libblastrampoline_jll v5.15.0+0 Installation completed after 4.5s ################################################################################ # Precompilation # Precompiling PkgEval dependencies... ┌ Error: Failed to use TestEnv.jl; test dependencies will not be precompiled │ exception = │ UndefVarError: `project_rel_path` not defined in `TestEnv` │ Suggestion: this global was defined as `Pkg.Operations.project_rel_path` but not assigned a value. │ Stacktrace: │ [1] get_test_dir(ctx::Pkg.Types.Context, pkgspec::PackageSpec) │ @ TestEnv ~/.julia/packages/TestEnv/nGMfF/src/julia-1.11/common.jl:75 │ [2] test_dir_has_project_file │ @ ~/.julia/packages/TestEnv/nGMfF/src/julia-1.11/common.jl:52 [inlined] │ [3] maybe_gen_project_override! │ @ ~/.julia/packages/TestEnv/nGMfF/src/julia-1.11/common.jl:83 [inlined] │ [4] activate(pkg::String; allow_reresolve::Bool) │ @ TestEnv ~/.julia/packages/TestEnv/nGMfF/src/julia-1.11/activate_set.jl:12 │ [5] activate(pkg::String) │ @ TestEnv ~/.julia/packages/TestEnv/nGMfF/src/julia-1.11/activate_set.jl:9 │ [6] top-level scope │ @ /PkgEval.jl/scripts/precompile.jl:24 │ [7] include(mod::Module, _path::String) │ @ Base ./Base.jl:309 │ [8] exec_options(opts::Base.JLOptions) │ @ Base ./client.jl:344 │ [9] _start() │ @ Base ./client.jl:577 └ @ Main /PkgEval.jl/scripts/precompile.jl:26 Precompiling package dependencies... Precompiling packages... 112257.9 ms ✓ Groebner 8880.6 ms ✓ ParamPunPam 9266.1 ms ✓ RationalFunctionFields 3 dependencies successfully precompiled in 131 seconds. 28 already precompiled. Precompilation completed after 141.89s ################################################################################ # Testing # Testing RationalFunctionFields Status `/tmp/jl_p6gGW8/Project.toml` [c3fe647b] AbstractAlgebra v0.47.3 [861a8166] Combinatorics v1.0.3 [0b43b601] Groebner v0.10.0 [2edaba10] Nemo v0.52.3 [3e851597] ParamPunPam v0.5.5 [73480bc8] RationalFunctionFields v0.2.2 ⌅ [98d24dd4] TestSetExtensions v2.0.0 [a759f4b9] TimerOutputs v0.5.29 [37e2e46d] LinearAlgebra v1.13.0 [9a3f8284] Random v1.11.0 [8dfed614] Test v1.11.0 Status `/tmp/jl_p6gGW8/Manifest.toml` [c3fe647b] AbstractAlgebra v0.47.3 [a9b6321e] Atomix v1.1.2 [861a8166] Combinatorics v1.0.3 [ab62b9b5] DeepDiffs v1.2.0 [e2ba6199] ExprTools v0.1.10 [0b43b601] Groebner v0.10.0 [18e54dd8] IntegerMathUtils v0.1.3 [692b3bcd] JLLWrappers v1.7.1 [1914dd2f] MacroTools v0.5.16 [2edaba10] Nemo v0.52.3 [3e851597] ParamPunPam v0.5.5 [aea7be01] PrecompileTools v1.3.3 [21216c6a] Preferences v1.5.0 [27ebfcd6] Primes v0.5.7 [92933f4c] ProgressMeter v1.11.0 [fb686558] RandomExtensions v0.4.4 [73480bc8] RationalFunctionFields v0.2.2 ⌅ [98d24dd4] TestSetExtensions v2.0.0 [a759f4b9] TimerOutputs v0.5.29 [013be700] UnsafeAtomics v0.3.0 [e134572f] FLINT_jll v301.300.102+0 [656ef2d0] OpenBLAS32_jll v0.3.29+0 [56f22d72] Artifacts v1.11.0 [2a0f44e3] Base64 v1.11.0 [ade2ca70] Dates v1.11.0 [8ba89e20] Distributed v1.11.0 [b77e0a4c] InteractiveUtils v1.11.0 [ac6e5ff7] JuliaSyntaxHighlighting v1.12.0 [8f399da3] Libdl v1.11.0 [37e2e46d] LinearAlgebra v1.13.0 [56ddb016] Logging v1.11.0 [d6f4376e] Markdown v1.11.0 [de0858da] Printf v1.11.0 [9a3f8284] Random v1.11.0 [ea8e919c] SHA v1.0.0 [9e88b42a] Serialization v1.11.0 [6462fe0b] Sockets v1.11.0 [2f01184e] SparseArrays v1.13.0 [f489334b] StyledStrings v1.11.0 [fa267f1f] TOML v1.0.3 [8dfed614] Test v1.11.0 [4ec0a83e] Unicode v1.11.0 [e66e0078] CompilerSupportLibraries_jll v1.3.0+1 [781609d7] GMP_jll v6.3.0+2 [3a97d323] MPFR_jll v4.2.2+0 [4536629a] OpenBLAS_jll v0.3.29+0 [bea87d4a] SuiteSparse_jll v7.10.1+0 [8e850b90] libblastrampoline_jll v5.15.0+0 Info Packages marked with ⌅ have new versions available but compatibility constraints restrict them from upgrading. Testing Running tests... [ Info: Testing started ┌ Info: Names for generators were not provided, so they have been generated as follows: │ 142__Tag_3 = (x^3 + y^3 + z^3)//(x + y + z) │ 142__Tag_1 = (x^2 + y^2 + z^2)//(x + y + z) └ 142__Tag_2 = x + y + z ┌ Info: Names for generators were not provided, so they have been generated as follows: │ 29__Tag_3 = x*y*z │ 29__Tag_1 = x + y + z └ 29__Tag_2 = x*y + x*z + y*z ┌ Info: Names for generators were not provided, so they have been generated as follows: │ 217__Tag_3 = a + b + c │ 217__Tag_1 = a └ 217__Tag_2 = b ┌ Info: Names for generators were not provided, so they have been generated as follows: │ 80__Tag_3 = a + b + c │ 80__Tag_1 = a └ 80__Tag_2 = b ┌ Info: Names for generators were not provided, so they have been generated as follows: │ 37__Tag_3 = 5*a │ 37__Tag_1 = 2*c └ 37__Tag_2 = 3*b ┌ Info: Names for generators were not provided, so they have been generated as follows: │ 184__Tag_1 = a + b + c └ 184__Tag_2 = a^2 + b^2 + c^2 ┌ Info: Names for generators were not provided, so they have been generated as follows: │ 32__Tag_3 = a^4 + b^4 │ 32__Tag_1 = a^2 + b^2 └ 32__Tag_2 = a^3 + b^3 ┌ Info: Names for generators were not provided, so they have been generated as follows: └ 83__Tag_1 = T1^2 ┌ Info: Names for generators were not provided, so they have been generated as follows: │ 33__Tag_3 = _t │ 33__Tag_1 = T1 └ 33__Tag_2 = t ┌ Info: Names for generators were not provided, so they have been generated as follows: │ 60__Tag_3 = x │ 60__Tag_1 = x - 1 └ 60__Tag_2 = x^5 - 1 ┌ Info: Names for generators were not provided, so they have been generated as follows: └ 86__Tag_1 = x^2 ┌ Info: Names for generators were not provided, so they have been generated as follows: │ 170__Tag_3 = x^4 + y^4 │ 170__Tag_1 = x^2 + y^2 └ 170__Tag_2 = x^3 + y^3 ┌ Info: Names for generators were not provided, so they have been generated as follows: │ 229__Tag_1 = x1 │ 229__Tag_2 = a │ 229__Tag_5 = (a + b)//x2 │ 229__Tag_4 = c//x2 └ 229__Tag_3 = a*c + c^2 [ Info: Search for polynomial generators concluded in 13.898841322 [ Info: Search for polynomial generators concluded in 1.070482867 [ Info: Search for polynomial generators concluded in 0.001963922 [ Info: Search for polynomial generators concluded in 0.003890834 [ Info: Search for polynomial generators concluded in 0.000746793 [ Info: Search for polynomial generators concluded in 0.067267259 [ Info: Search for polynomial generators concluded in 0.89062177 [ Info: Search for polynomial generators concluded in 0.002360938 [ Info: Search for polynomial generators concluded in 3.3478024 [ Info: Search for polynomial generators concluded in 1.235759831 [ Info: Simplifying generating set. Simplification level: standard ⌜ # Computing specializations.. Time: 0:00:12 ✓ # Computing specializations.. Time: 0:00:14 [ Info: Search for polynomial generators concluded in 0.00658932 [ Info: Selecting generators in 0.009374234 [ Info: Inclusion checked with probability 0.99 in 0.003754596 seconds [ Info: Simplifying generating set. Simplification level: strong [ Info: Search for polynomial generators concluded in 0.006805428 [ Info: Computing 3 Groebner bases for degrees (3, 3) for block orderings ⌜ # Computing specializations.. Time: 0:00:33 ✓ # Computing specializations.. Time: 0:00:33 [ Info: Computed Groebner bases in 45.674401881 seconds [ Info: Selecting generators in 0.000813112 [ Info: Inclusion checked with probability 0.99 in 0.004158802 seconds [ Info: Simplifying generating set. Simplification level: standard [ Info: Search for polynomial generators concluded in 0.285626121 [ Info: Selecting generators in 0.008930867 [ Info: Inclusion checked with probability 0.99 in 0.013215607 seconds [ Info: Simplifying generating set. Simplification level: strong [ Info: Search for polynomial generators concluded in 0.047696958 [ Info: Computing 5 Groebner bases for degrees (3, 3) for block orderings ⌜ # Computing specializations.. Time: 0:00:00 Points: 101   ✓ # Computing specializations.. Time: 0:00:00 [ Info: Computed Groebner bases in 2.026682459 seconds [ Info: Selecting generators in 0.007809968 [ Info: Inclusion checked with probability 0.99 in 0.013355616 seconds Test Summary: | Pass Total Time All the tests | 149 149 11m46.9s RationalFunctionField | 2 2 1m22.4s Transcendence basis computations and algebraicity checks | 13 13 6.8s RationalFunctionField: constructive field membership (basic) | 6 6 1m10.8s RationalFunctionField: constructive field membership | 82 82 6.6s RationalFunctionField: simplification | 1 1 4m53.7s RationalFunctionField: membership | 24 24 1m47.4s Linear relations over the rationals | 10 10 28.3s Rational function comparison | 7 7 1.3s RationalFunctionField: simplification | 4 4 1m47.3s 707.365237 seconds (335.13 M allocations: 76.311 GiB, 2.25% gc time, 52.64% compilation time: <1% of which was recompilation) Testing RationalFunctionFields tests passed Testing completed after 725.3s PkgEval succeeded after 908.11s