Package evaluation to test Pajarito on Julia 1.14.0-DEV.24 (d5fb6bbb43*) started at 2025-11-02T17:06:47.748 ################################################################################ # Set-up # Installing PkgEval dependencies (TestEnv)... Set-up completed after 9.46s ################################################################################ # Installation # Installing Pajarito... Resolving package versions... Updating `~/.julia/environments/v1.14/Project.toml` [2f354839] + Pajarito v0.8.2 Updating `~/.julia/environments/v1.14/Manifest.toml` [6e4b80f9] + BenchmarkTools v1.6.3 [523fee87] + CodecBzip2 v0.8.5 [944b1d66] + CodecZlib v0.7.8 [bbf7d656] + CommonSubexpressions v0.3.1 [34da2185] + Compat v4.18.1 [864edb3b] + DataStructures v0.19.1 [163ba53b] + DiffResults v1.1.0 [b552c78f] + DiffRules v1.15.1 [ffbed154] + DocStringExtensions v0.9.5 [f6369f11] + ForwardDiff v1.2.2 [92d709cd] + IrrationalConstants v0.2.6 [692b3bcd] + JLLWrappers v1.7.1 [682c06a0] + JSON v1.2.0 [0f8b85d8] + JSON3 v1.14.3 [4076af6c] + JuMP v1.29.2 [2ab3a3ac] + LogExpFunctions v0.3.29 [1914dd2f] + MacroTools v0.5.16 [b8f27783] + MathOptInterface v1.46.0 [d8a4904e] + MutableArithmetics v1.6.7 [77ba4419] + NaNMath v1.1.3 [bac558e1] + OrderedCollections v1.8.1 [2f354839] + Pajarito v0.8.2 [69de0a69] + Parsers v2.8.3 [aea7be01] + PrecompileTools v1.3.3 [21216c6a] + Preferences v1.5.0 [276daf66] + SpecialFunctions v2.6.1 [1e83bf80] + StaticArraysCore v1.4.4 [10745b16] + Statistics v1.11.1 [856f2bd8] + StructTypes v1.11.0 [ec057cc2] + StructUtils v2.5.1 [3bb67fe8] + TranscodingStreams v0.11.3 [6e34b625] + Bzip2_jll v1.0.9+0 [efe28fd5] + OpenSpecFun_jll v0.5.6+0 [56f22d72] + Artifacts v1.11.0 [2a0f44e3] + Base64 v1.11.0 [ade2ca70] + Dates v1.11.0 [b77e0a4c] + InteractiveUtils v1.11.0 [ac6e5ff7] + JuliaSyntaxHighlighting v1.12.0 [8f399da3] + Libdl v1.11.0 [37e2e46d] + LinearAlgebra v1.13.0 [56ddb016] + Logging v1.11.0 [d6f4376e] + Markdown v1.11.0 [a63ad114] + Mmap v1.11.0 [de0858da] + Printf v1.11.0 [9abbd945] + Profile v1.11.0 [9a3f8284] + Random v1.11.0 [ea8e919c] + SHA v1.0.0 [9e88b42a] + Serialization v1.11.0 [2f01184e] + SparseArrays v1.13.0 [f489334b] + StyledStrings v1.11.0 [fa267f1f] + TOML v1.0.3 [8dfed614] + Test v1.11.0 [cf7118a7] + UUIDs v1.11.0 [4ec0a83e] + Unicode v1.11.0 [e66e0078] + CompilerSupportLibraries_jll v1.3.0+1 [4536629a] + OpenBLAS_jll v0.3.29+0 [05823500] + OpenLibm_jll v0.8.7+0 [bea87d4a] + SuiteSparse_jll v7.10.1+0 [83775a58] + Zlib_jll v1.3.1+2 [8e850b90] + libblastrampoline_jll v5.15.0+0 Installation completed after 4.71s ################################################################################ # Precompilation # Precompiling PkgEval dependencies... ┌ Error: Failed to use TestEnv.jl; test dependencies will not be precompiled │ exception = │ UndefVarError: `project_rel_path` not defined in `TestEnv` │ Suggestion: this global was defined as `Pkg.Operations.project_rel_path` but not assigned a value. │ Stacktrace: │ [1] get_test_dir(ctx::Pkg.Types.Context, pkgspec::PackageSpec) │ @ TestEnv ~/.julia/packages/TestEnv/nGMfF/src/julia-1.11/common.jl:75 │ [2] test_dir_has_project_file │ @ ~/.julia/packages/TestEnv/nGMfF/src/julia-1.11/common.jl:52 [inlined] │ [3] maybe_gen_project_override! │ @ ~/.julia/packages/TestEnv/nGMfF/src/julia-1.11/common.jl:83 [inlined] │ [4] activate(pkg::String; allow_reresolve::Bool) │ @ TestEnv ~/.julia/packages/TestEnv/nGMfF/src/julia-1.11/activate_set.jl:12 │ [5] activate(pkg::String) │ @ TestEnv ~/.julia/packages/TestEnv/nGMfF/src/julia-1.11/activate_set.jl:9 │ [6] top-level scope │ @ /PkgEval.jl/scripts/precompile.jl:24 │ [7] include(mod::Module, _path::String) │ @ Base ./Base.jl:309 │ [8] exec_options(opts::Base.JLOptions) │ @ Base ./client.jl:344 │ [9] _start() │ @ Base ./client.jl:577 └ @ Main /PkgEval.jl/scripts/precompile.jl:26 Precompiling package dependencies... Precompiling packages... 77556.4 ms ✓ MathOptInterface 63775.7 ms ✓ JuMP 19631.2 ms ✓ Pajarito 3 dependencies successfully precompiled in 163 seconds. 51 already precompiled. Precompilation completed after 175.86s ################################################################################ # Testing # Testing Pajarito Status `/tmp/jl_qKcwp8/Project.toml` [60bf3e95] GLPK v1.2.1 [b99e6be6] Hypatia v0.9.1 [4076af6c] JuMP v1.29.2 [b8f27783] MathOptInterface v1.46.0 [2f354839] Pajarito v0.8.2 [37e2e46d] LinearAlgebra v1.13.0 [de0858da] Printf v1.11.0 [2f01184e] SparseArrays v1.13.0 [8dfed614] Test v1.11.0 Status `/tmp/jl_qKcwp8/Manifest.toml` [6e4b80f9] BenchmarkTools v1.6.3 [523fee87] CodecBzip2 v0.8.5 [944b1d66] CodecZlib v0.7.8 [861a8166] Combinatorics v1.0.3 [bbf7d656] CommonSubexpressions v0.3.1 [34da2185] Compat v4.18.1 [864edb3b] DataStructures v0.19.1 [163ba53b] DiffResults v1.1.0 [b552c78f] DiffRules v1.15.1 [ffbed154] DocStringExtensions v0.9.5 [e2ba6199] ExprTools v0.1.10 [9aa1b823] FastClosures v0.3.2 [1a297f60] FillArrays v1.14.0 [f6369f11] ForwardDiff v1.2.2 [60bf3e95] GLPK v1.2.1 [14197337] GenericLinearAlgebra v0.3.19 [b99e6be6] Hypatia v0.9.1 [92d709cd] IrrationalConstants v0.2.6 [42fd0dbc] IterativeSolvers v0.9.4 [692b3bcd] JLLWrappers v1.7.1 [682c06a0] JSON v1.2.0 [0f8b85d8] JSON3 v1.14.3 [4076af6c] JuMP v1.29.2 ⌅ [0b1a1467] KrylovKit v0.9.5 [7a12625a] LinearMaps v3.11.4 [5c8ed15e] LinearOperators v2.11.0 [2ab3a3ac] LogExpFunctions v0.3.29 [607ca3ad] LowRankOpt v0.2.1 [1914dd2f] MacroTools v0.5.16 [b8f27783] MathOptInterface v1.46.0 [d8a4904e] MutableArithmetics v1.6.7 [a4795742] NLPModels v0.21.5 [792afdf1] NLPModelsJuMP v0.13.3 [77ba4419] NaNMath v1.1.3 [bac558e1] OrderedCollections v1.8.1 [65ce6f38] PackageExtensionCompat v1.0.2 [2f354839] Pajarito v0.8.2 [69de0a69] Parsers v2.8.3 [3a141323] PolynomialRoots v1.0.0 [aea7be01] PrecompileTools v1.3.3 [21216c6a] Preferences v1.5.0 [3cdcf5f2] RecipesBase v1.3.4 [ae029012] Requires v1.3.1 [ff4d7338] SolverCore v0.3.8 [276daf66] SpecialFunctions v2.6.1 [1e83bf80] StaticArraysCore v1.4.4 [10745b16] Statistics v1.11.1 [856f2bd8] StructTypes v1.11.0 [ec057cc2] StructUtils v2.5.1 [a759f4b9] TimerOutputs v0.5.29 [3bb67fe8] TranscodingStreams v0.11.3 [c4a57d5a] UnsafeArrays v1.0.8 [409d34a3] VectorInterface v0.5.0 [6e34b625] Bzip2_jll v1.0.9+0 [e8aa6df9] GLPK_jll v5.0.1+1 [efe28fd5] OpenSpecFun_jll v0.5.6+0 [0dad84c5] ArgTools v1.1.2 [56f22d72] Artifacts v1.11.0 [2a0f44e3] Base64 v1.11.0 [ade2ca70] Dates v1.11.0 [f43a241f] Downloads v1.7.0 [7b1f6079] FileWatching v1.11.0 [b77e0a4c] InteractiveUtils v1.11.0 [ac6e5ff7] JuliaSyntaxHighlighting v1.12.0 [b27032c2] LibCURL v1.0.0 [76f85450] LibGit2 v1.11.0 [8f399da3] Libdl v1.11.0 [37e2e46d] LinearAlgebra v1.13.0 [56ddb016] Logging v1.11.0 [d6f4376e] Markdown v1.11.0 [a63ad114] Mmap v1.11.0 [ca575930] NetworkOptions v1.3.0 [44cfe95a] Pkg v1.13.0 [de0858da] Printf v1.11.0 [9abbd945] Profile v1.11.0 [9a3f8284] Random v1.11.0 [ea8e919c] SHA v1.0.0 [9e88b42a] Serialization v1.11.0 [2f01184e] SparseArrays v1.13.0 [f489334b] StyledStrings v1.11.0 [4607b0f0] SuiteSparse [fa267f1f] TOML v1.0.3 [a4e569a6] Tar v1.10.0 [8dfed614] Test v1.11.0 [cf7118a7] UUIDs v1.11.0 [4ec0a83e] Unicode v1.11.0 [e66e0078] CompilerSupportLibraries_jll v1.3.0+1 [781609d7] GMP_jll v6.3.0+2 [deac9b47] LibCURL_jll v8.16.0+0 [e37daf67] LibGit2_jll v1.9.1+0 [29816b5a] LibSSH2_jll v1.11.3+1 [14a3606d] MozillaCACerts_jll v2025.9.9 [4536629a] OpenBLAS_jll v0.3.29+0 [05823500] OpenLibm_jll v0.8.7+0 [458c3c95] OpenSSL_jll v3.5.4+0 [efcefdf7] PCRE2_jll v10.47.0+0 [bea87d4a] SuiteSparse_jll v7.10.1+0 [83775a58] Zlib_jll v1.3.1+2 [3161d3a3] Zstd_jll v1.5.7+1 [8e850b90] libblastrampoline_jll v5.15.0+0 [8e850ede] nghttp2_jll v1.67.1+0 [3f19e933] p7zip_jll v17.6.0+0 Info Packages marked with ⌅ have new versions available but compatibility constraints restrict them from upgrading. Testing Running tests... starting Pajarito tests starting MOI tests ┌ Warning: cannot step in centering direction └ @ Hypatia.Solvers ~/.julia/packages/Hypatia/O8Y4K/src/Solvers/steppers/combined.jl:111 ┌ Warning: cannot step in centering direction └ @ Hypatia.Solvers ~/.julia/packages/Hypatia/O8Y4K/src/Solvers/steppers/combined.jl:111 ┌ Warning: cannot step in centering direction └ @ Hypatia.Solvers ~/.julia/packages/Hypatia/O8Y4K/src/Solvers/steppers/combined.jl:111 ┌ Warning: cannot step in centering direction └ @ Hypatia.Solvers ~/.julia/packages/Hypatia/O8Y4K/src/Solvers/steppers/combined.jl:111 ┌ Warning: cannot step in centering direction └ @ Hypatia.Solvers ~/.julia/packages/Hypatia/O8Y4K/src/Solvers/steppers/combined.jl:111 ┌ Warning: cannot step in centering direction └ @ Hypatia.Solvers ~/.julia/packages/Hypatia/O8Y4K/src/Solvers/steppers/combined.jl:111 test_linear_Indicator_ON_ONE: Error During Test at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Test/Test.jl:264 Got exception outside of a @test MathOptInterface.Bridges.BridgeRequiresFiniteDomainError{MathOptInterface.Bridges.Constraint.SOS1ToMILPBridge{Float64, MathOptInterface.VectorOfVariables}, MathOptInterface.VariableIndex}: There was an error reformulating your model into a form supported by the solver because one of the bridges requires that all variables have a finite domain. To fix this error, add a lower and upper bound to all variables in your model. If you have double checked that all variables have finite bounds and you are still encountering this issue, please open a GitHub issue at https://github.com/jump-dev/MathOptInterface.jl ## Common mistakes A common mistake is to add the variable bounds as affine constraints. For example, if you are using JuMP, do not use `@constraint` to add variable bounds: ```julia using JuMP model = Model() @variable(model, x) @constraint(model, x >= 0) @constraint(model, x <= 1) ``` do instead: ```julia using JuMP model = Model() @variable(model, 0 <= x <= 1) ``` ## Large bound values Do not add arbitrarily large variable bounds to fix this error. Doing so will likely result in a reformulation that takes a long time to build and solve. Use domain knowledge to find the tightest valid bounds. Alternatively, use a solver that has native support for the constraint types you are using so that you do not need to use the bridging system. Stacktrace: [1] final_touch(bridge::MathOptInterface.Bridges.Constraint.SOS1ToMILPBridge{Float64, MathOptInterface.VectorOfVariables}, model::MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{GLPK.Optimizer}) @ MathOptInterface.Bridges.Constraint ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/Constraint/bridges/SOS1ToMILPBridge.jl:206 [2] _final_touch(bridges::OrderedCollections.OrderedSet{MathOptInterface.Bridges.Constraint.SOS1ToMILPBridge{Float64, MathOptInterface.VectorOfVariables}}, model::MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{GLPK.Optimizer}) @ MathOptInterface.Bridges.Constraint ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/Constraint/map.jl:340 [3] final_touch(map::MathOptInterface.Bridges.Constraint.Map, model::MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{GLPK.Optimizer}) @ MathOptInterface.Bridges.Constraint ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/Constraint/map.jl:347 [4] final_touch @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/bridge_optimizer.jl:456 [inlined] [5] final_touch @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/bridge_optimizer.jl:461 [inlined] [6] final_touch @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/bridge_optimizer.jl:462 [inlined] [7] default_copy_to(dest::MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{GLPK.Optimizer}}, src::MathOptInterface.Utilities.UniversalFallback{MathOptInterface.Utilities.Model{Float64}}) @ MathOptInterface.Utilities ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Utilities/copy.jl:394 [8] copy_to @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/bridge_optimizer.jl:448 [inlined] [9] optimize! @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/MathOptInterface.jl:121 [inlined] [10] optimize!(m::MathOptInterface.Utilities.CachingOptimizer{MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{GLPK.Optimizer}}, MathOptInterface.Utilities.UniversalFallback{MathOptInterface.Utilities.Model{Float64}}}) @ MathOptInterface.Utilities ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Utilities/cachingoptimizer.jl:370 [11] optimize!(model::JuMP.Model; ignore_optimize_hook::Bool, _differentiation_backend::MathOptInterface.Nonlinear.SparseReverseMode, kwargs::@Kwargs{}) @ JuMP ~/.julia/packages/JuMP/vfM5V/src/optimizer_interface.jl:609 [12] optimize! @ ~/.julia/packages/JuMP/vfM5V/src/optimizer_interface.jl:560 [inlined] [13] setup_models(opt::Pajarito.Optimizer) @ Pajarito ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/src/models.jl:138 [14] optimize(opt::Pajarito.Optimizer) @ Pajarito ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/src/algorithms.jl:12 [15] optimize! @ ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/src/MOI_wrapper.jl:109 [inlined] [16] optimize! @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/MathOptInterface.jl:122 [inlined] [17] optimize!(m::MathOptInterface.Utilities.CachingOptimizer{Pajarito.Optimizer, MathOptInterface.Utilities.UniversalFallback{MathOptInterface.Utilities.Model{Float64}}}) @ MathOptInterface.Utilities ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Utilities/cachingoptimizer.jl:370 [18] optimize! @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/bridge_optimizer.jl:367 [inlined] [19] test_linear_Indicator_ON_ONE(model::MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{MathOptInterface.Utilities.CachingOptimizer{Pajarito.Optimizer, MathOptInterface.Utilities.UniversalFallback{MathOptInterface.Utilities.Model{Float64}}}}, config::MathOptInterface.Test.Config{Float64}) @ MathOptInterface.Test ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Test/test_linear.jl:3393 [20] macro expansion @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Test/Test.jl:270 [inlined] [21] macro expansion @ /opt/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.14/Test/src/Test.jl:1961 [inlined] [22] runtests(model::MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{MathOptInterface.Utilities.CachingOptimizer{Pajarito.Optimizer, MathOptInterface.Utilities.UniversalFallback{MathOptInterface.Utilities.Model{Float64}}}}, config::MathOptInterface.Test.Config{Float64}; include::Vector{String}, exclude::Vector{String}, warn_unsupported::Bool, verbose::Bool, exclude_tests_after::VersionNumber, test_module::Module) @ MathOptInterface.Test ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Test/Test.jl:265 [23] runtests @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Test/Test.jl:223 [inlined] [24] run_moi_tests(use_iter::Bool, solve_subp::Bool, oa_solver::MathOptInterface.OptimizerWithAttributes, conic_solver::MathOptInterface.OptimizerWithAttributes) @ Main.TestMOI ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/MOI_tests.jl:52 [25] macro expansion @ ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/MOI_tests.jl:24 [inlined] [26] macro expansion @ /opt/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.14/Test/src/Test.jl:1961 [inlined] [27] macro expansion @ ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/MOI_tests.jl:24 [inlined] [28] macro expansion @ /opt/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.14/Test/src/Test.jl:1961 [inlined] [29] runtests(oa_solver::MathOptInterface.OptimizerWithAttributes, conic_solver::MathOptInterface.OptimizerWithAttributes) @ Main.TestMOI ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/MOI_tests.jl:23 [30] top-level scope @ ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/runtests.jl:33 [31] macro expansion @ /opt/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.14/Test/src/Test.jl:1961 [inlined] [32] macro expansion @ ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/runtests.jl:36 [inlined] [33] macro expansion @ /opt/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.14/Test/src/Test.jl:1961 [inlined] [34] macro expansion @ ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/runtests.jl:36 [inlined] [35] include(mapexpr::Function, mod::Module, _path::String) @ Base ./Base.jl:310 [36] top-level scope @ none:6 [37] eval(m::Module, e::Any) @ Core ./boot.jl:489 [38] exec_options(opts::Base.JLOptions) @ Base ./client.jl:310 [39] _start() @ Base ./client.jl:577 test_linear_Indicator_ON_ZERO: Error During Test at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Test/Test.jl:264 Got exception outside of a @test MathOptInterface.Bridges.BridgeRequiresFiniteDomainError{MathOptInterface.Bridges.Constraint.SOS1ToMILPBridge{Float64, MathOptInterface.VectorOfVariables}, MathOptInterface.VariableIndex}: There was an error reformulating your model into a form supported by the solver because one of the bridges requires that all variables have a finite domain. To fix this error, add a lower and upper bound to all variables in your model. If you have double checked that all variables have finite bounds and you are still encountering this issue, please open a GitHub issue at https://github.com/jump-dev/MathOptInterface.jl ## Common mistakes A common mistake is to add the variable bounds as affine constraints. For example, if you are using JuMP, do not use `@constraint` to add variable bounds: ```julia using JuMP model = Model() @variable(model, x) @constraint(model, x >= 0) @constraint(model, x <= 1) ``` do instead: ```julia using JuMP model = Model() @variable(model, 0 <= x <= 1) ``` ## Large bound values Do not add arbitrarily large variable bounds to fix this error. Doing so will likely result in a reformulation that takes a long time to build and solve. Use domain knowledge to find the tightest valid bounds. Alternatively, use a solver that has native support for the constraint types you are using so that you do not need to use the bridging system. Stacktrace: [1] final_touch(bridge::MathOptInterface.Bridges.Constraint.SOS1ToMILPBridge{Float64, MathOptInterface.VectorOfVariables}, model::MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{GLPK.Optimizer}) @ MathOptInterface.Bridges.Constraint ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/Constraint/bridges/SOS1ToMILPBridge.jl:206 [2] _final_touch(bridges::OrderedCollections.OrderedSet{MathOptInterface.Bridges.Constraint.SOS1ToMILPBridge{Float64, MathOptInterface.VectorOfVariables}}, model::MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{GLPK.Optimizer}) @ MathOptInterface.Bridges.Constraint ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/Constraint/map.jl:340 [3] final_touch(map::MathOptInterface.Bridges.Constraint.Map, model::MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{GLPK.Optimizer}) @ MathOptInterface.Bridges.Constraint ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/Constraint/map.jl:347 [4] final_touch @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/bridge_optimizer.jl:456 [inlined] [5] final_touch @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/bridge_optimizer.jl:461 [inlined] [6] final_touch @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/bridge_optimizer.jl:462 [inlined] [7] default_copy_to(dest::MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{GLPK.Optimizer}}, src::MathOptInterface.Utilities.UniversalFallback{MathOptInterface.Utilities.Model{Float64}}) @ MathOptInterface.Utilities ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Utilities/copy.jl:394 [8] copy_to @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/bridge_optimizer.jl:448 [inlined] [9] optimize! @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/MathOptInterface.jl:121 [inlined] [10] optimize!(m::MathOptInterface.Utilities.CachingOptimizer{MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{GLPK.Optimizer}}, MathOptInterface.Utilities.UniversalFallback{MathOptInterface.Utilities.Model{Float64}}}) @ MathOptInterface.Utilities ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Utilities/cachingoptimizer.jl:370 [11] optimize!(model::JuMP.Model; ignore_optimize_hook::Bool, _differentiation_backend::MathOptInterface.Nonlinear.SparseReverseMode, kwargs::@Kwargs{}) @ JuMP ~/.julia/packages/JuMP/vfM5V/src/optimizer_interface.jl:609 [12] optimize! @ ~/.julia/packages/JuMP/vfM5V/src/optimizer_interface.jl:560 [inlined] [13] setup_models(opt::Pajarito.Optimizer) @ Pajarito ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/src/models.jl:138 [14] optimize(opt::Pajarito.Optimizer) @ Pajarito ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/src/algorithms.jl:12 [15] optimize! @ ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/src/MOI_wrapper.jl:109 [inlined] [16] optimize! @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/MathOptInterface.jl:122 [inlined] [17] optimize!(m::MathOptInterface.Utilities.CachingOptimizer{Pajarito.Optimizer, MathOptInterface.Utilities.UniversalFallback{MathOptInterface.Utilities.Model{Float64}}}) @ MathOptInterface.Utilities ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Utilities/cachingoptimizer.jl:370 [18] optimize! @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/bridge_optimizer.jl:367 [inlined] [19] test_linear_Indicator_ON_ZERO(model::MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{MathOptInterface.Utilities.CachingOptimizer{Pajarito.Optimizer, MathOptInterface.Utilities.UniversalFallback{MathOptInterface.Utilities.Model{Float64}}}}, config::MathOptInterface.Test.Config{Float64}) @ MathOptInterface.Test ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Test/test_linear.jl:3511 [20] macro expansion @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Test/Test.jl:270 [inlined] [21] macro expansion @ /opt/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.14/Test/src/Test.jl:1961 [inlined] [22] runtests(model::MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{MathOptInterface.Utilities.CachingOptimizer{Pajarito.Optimizer, MathOptInterface.Utilities.UniversalFallback{MathOptInterface.Utilities.Model{Float64}}}}, config::MathOptInterface.Test.Config{Float64}; include::Vector{String}, exclude::Vector{String}, warn_unsupported::Bool, verbose::Bool, exclude_tests_after::VersionNumber, test_module::Module) @ MathOptInterface.Test ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Test/Test.jl:265 [23] runtests @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Test/Test.jl:223 [inlined] [24] run_moi_tests(use_iter::Bool, solve_subp::Bool, oa_solver::MathOptInterface.OptimizerWithAttributes, conic_solver::MathOptInterface.OptimizerWithAttributes) @ Main.TestMOI ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/MOI_tests.jl:52 [25] macro expansion @ ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/MOI_tests.jl:24 [inlined] [26] macro expansion @ /opt/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.14/Test/src/Test.jl:1961 [inlined] [27] macro expansion @ ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/MOI_tests.jl:24 [inlined] [28] macro expansion @ /opt/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.14/Test/src/Test.jl:1961 [inlined] [29] runtests(oa_solver::MathOptInterface.OptimizerWithAttributes, conic_solver::MathOptInterface.OptimizerWithAttributes) @ Main.TestMOI ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/MOI_tests.jl:23 [30] top-level scope @ ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/runtests.jl:33 [31] macro expansion @ /opt/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.14/Test/src/Test.jl:1961 [inlined] [32] macro expansion @ ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/runtests.jl:36 [inlined] [33] macro expansion @ /opt/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.14/Test/src/Test.jl:1961 [inlined] [34] macro expansion @ ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/runtests.jl:36 [inlined] [35] include(mapexpr::Function, mod::Module, _path::String) @ Base ./Base.jl:310 [36] top-level scope @ none:6 [37] eval(m::Module, e::Any) @ Core ./boot.jl:489 [38] exec_options(opts::Base.JLOptions) @ Base ./client.jl:310 [39] _start() @ Base ./client.jl:577 test_linear_Indicator_integration: Error During Test at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Test/Test.jl:264 Got exception outside of a @test MathOptInterface.Bridges.BridgeRequiresFiniteDomainError{MathOptInterface.Bridges.Constraint.SOS1ToMILPBridge{Float64, MathOptInterface.VectorOfVariables}, MathOptInterface.VariableIndex}: There was an error reformulating your model into a form supported by the solver because one of the bridges requires that all variables have a finite domain. To fix this error, add a lower and upper bound to all variables in your model. If you have double checked that all variables have finite bounds and you are still encountering this issue, please open a GitHub issue at https://github.com/jump-dev/MathOptInterface.jl ## Common mistakes A common mistake is to add the variable bounds as affine constraints. For example, if you are using JuMP, do not use `@constraint` to add variable bounds: ```julia using JuMP model = Model() @variable(model, x) @constraint(model, x >= 0) @constraint(model, x <= 1) ``` do instead: ```julia using JuMP model = Model() @variable(model, 0 <= x <= 1) ``` ## Large bound values Do not add arbitrarily large variable bounds to fix this error. Doing so will likely result in a reformulation that takes a long time to build and solve. Use domain knowledge to find the tightest valid bounds. Alternatively, use a solver that has native support for the constraint types you are using so that you do not need to use the bridging system. Stacktrace: [1] final_touch(bridge::MathOptInterface.Bridges.Constraint.SOS1ToMILPBridge{Float64, MathOptInterface.VectorOfVariables}, model::MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{GLPK.Optimizer}) @ MathOptInterface.Bridges.Constraint ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/Constraint/bridges/SOS1ToMILPBridge.jl:206 [2] _final_touch(bridges::OrderedCollections.OrderedSet{MathOptInterface.Bridges.Constraint.SOS1ToMILPBridge{Float64, MathOptInterface.VectorOfVariables}}, model::MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{GLPK.Optimizer}) @ MathOptInterface.Bridges.Constraint ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/Constraint/map.jl:340 [3] final_touch(map::MathOptInterface.Bridges.Constraint.Map, model::MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{GLPK.Optimizer}) @ MathOptInterface.Bridges.Constraint ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/Constraint/map.jl:347 [4] final_touch @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/bridge_optimizer.jl:456 [inlined] [5] final_touch @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/bridge_optimizer.jl:461 [inlined] [6] final_touch @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/bridge_optimizer.jl:462 [inlined] [7] default_copy_to(dest::MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{GLPK.Optimizer}}, src::MathOptInterface.Utilities.UniversalFallback{MathOptInterface.Utilities.Model{Float64}}) @ MathOptInterface.Utilities ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Utilities/copy.jl:394 [8] copy_to @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/bridge_optimizer.jl:448 [inlined] [9] optimize! @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/MathOptInterface.jl:121 [inlined] [10] optimize!(m::MathOptInterface.Utilities.CachingOptimizer{MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{GLPK.Optimizer}}, MathOptInterface.Utilities.UniversalFallback{MathOptInterface.Utilities.Model{Float64}}}) @ MathOptInterface.Utilities ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Utilities/cachingoptimizer.jl:370 [11] optimize!(model::JuMP.Model; ignore_optimize_hook::Bool, _differentiation_backend::MathOptInterface.Nonlinear.SparseReverseMode, kwargs::@Kwargs{}) @ JuMP ~/.julia/packages/JuMP/vfM5V/src/optimizer_interface.jl:609 [12] optimize! @ ~/.julia/packages/JuMP/vfM5V/src/optimizer_interface.jl:560 [inlined] [13] setup_models(opt::Pajarito.Optimizer) @ Pajarito ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/src/models.jl:138 [14] optimize(opt::Pajarito.Optimizer) @ Pajarito ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/src/algorithms.jl:12 [15] optimize! @ ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/src/MOI_wrapper.jl:109 [inlined] [16] optimize! @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/MathOptInterface.jl:122 [inlined] [17] optimize!(m::MathOptInterface.Utilities.CachingOptimizer{Pajarito.Optimizer, MathOptInterface.Utilities.UniversalFallback{MathOptInterface.Utilities.Model{Float64}}}) @ MathOptInterface.Utilities ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Utilities/cachingoptimizer.jl:370 [18] optimize! @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/bridge_optimizer.jl:367 [inlined] [19] test_linear_Indicator_integration(model::MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{MathOptInterface.Utilities.CachingOptimizer{Pajarito.Optimizer, MathOptInterface.Utilities.UniversalFallback{MathOptInterface.Utilities.Model{Float64}}}}, config::MathOptInterface.Test.Config{Float64}) @ MathOptInterface.Test ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Test/test_linear.jl:3292 [20] macro expansion @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Test/Test.jl:270 [inlined] [21] macro expansion @ /opt/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.14/Test/src/Test.jl:1961 [inlined] [22] runtests(model::MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{MathOptInterface.Utilities.CachingOptimizer{Pajarito.Optimizer, MathOptInterface.Utilities.UniversalFallback{MathOptInterface.Utilities.Model{Float64}}}}, config::MathOptInterface.Test.Config{Float64}; include::Vector{String}, exclude::Vector{String}, warn_unsupported::Bool, verbose::Bool, exclude_tests_after::VersionNumber, test_module::Module) @ MathOptInterface.Test ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Test/Test.jl:265 [23] runtests @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Test/Test.jl:223 [inlined] [24] run_moi_tests(use_iter::Bool, solve_subp::Bool, oa_solver::MathOptInterface.OptimizerWithAttributes, conic_solver::MathOptInterface.OptimizerWithAttributes) @ Main.TestMOI ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/MOI_tests.jl:52 [25] macro expansion @ ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/MOI_tests.jl:24 [inlined] [26] macro expansion @ /opt/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.14/Test/src/Test.jl:1961 [inlined] [27] macro expansion @ ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/MOI_tests.jl:24 [inlined] [28] macro expansion @ /opt/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.14/Test/src/Test.jl:1961 [inlined] [29] runtests(oa_solver::MathOptInterface.OptimizerWithAttributes, conic_solver::MathOptInterface.OptimizerWithAttributes) @ Main.TestMOI ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/MOI_tests.jl:23 [30] top-level scope @ ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/runtests.jl:33 [31] macro expansion @ /opt/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.14/Test/src/Test.jl:1961 [inlined] [32] macro expansion @ ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/runtests.jl:36 [inlined] [33] macro expansion @ /opt/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.14/Test/src/Test.jl:1961 [inlined] [34] macro expansion @ ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/runtests.jl:36 [inlined] [35] include(mapexpr::Function, mod::Module, _path::String) @ Base ./Base.jl:310 [36] top-level scope @ none:6 [37] eval(m::Module, e::Any) @ Core ./boot.jl:489 [38] exec_options(opts::Base.JLOptions) @ Base ./client.jl:310 [39] _start() @ Base ./client.jl:577 test_linear_SOS1_integration: Error During Test at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Test/Test.jl:264 Got exception outside of a @test MathOptInterface.Bridges.BridgeRequiresFiniteDomainError{MathOptInterface.Bridges.Constraint.SOS1ToMILPBridge{Float64, MathOptInterface.VectorOfVariables}, MathOptInterface.VariableIndex}: There was an error reformulating your model into a form supported by the solver because one of the bridges requires that all variables have a finite domain. To fix this error, add a lower and upper bound to all variables in your model. If you have double checked that all variables have finite bounds and you are still encountering this issue, please open a GitHub issue at https://github.com/jump-dev/MathOptInterface.jl ## Common mistakes A common mistake is to add the variable bounds as affine constraints. For example, if you are using JuMP, do not use `@constraint` to add variable bounds: ```julia using JuMP model = Model() @variable(model, x) @constraint(model, x >= 0) @constraint(model, x <= 1) ``` do instead: ```julia using JuMP model = Model() @variable(model, 0 <= x <= 1) ``` ## Large bound values Do not add arbitrarily large variable bounds to fix this error. Doing so will likely result in a reformulation that takes a long time to build and solve. Use domain knowledge to find the tightest valid bounds. Alternatively, use a solver that has native support for the constraint types you are using so that you do not need to use the bridging system. Stacktrace: [1] final_touch(bridge::MathOptInterface.Bridges.Constraint.SOS1ToMILPBridge{Float64, MathOptInterface.VectorOfVariables}, model::MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{GLPK.Optimizer}) @ MathOptInterface.Bridges.Constraint ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/Constraint/bridges/SOS1ToMILPBridge.jl:206 [2] _final_touch(bridges::OrderedCollections.OrderedSet{MathOptInterface.Bridges.Constraint.SOS1ToMILPBridge{Float64, MathOptInterface.VectorOfVariables}}, model::MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{GLPK.Optimizer}) @ MathOptInterface.Bridges.Constraint ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/Constraint/map.jl:340 [3] final_touch(map::MathOptInterface.Bridges.Constraint.Map, model::MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{GLPK.Optimizer}) @ MathOptInterface.Bridges.Constraint ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/Constraint/map.jl:347 [4] final_touch @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/bridge_optimizer.jl:456 [inlined] [5] final_touch @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/bridge_optimizer.jl:461 [inlined] [6] final_touch @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/bridge_optimizer.jl:462 [inlined] [7] default_copy_to(dest::MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{GLPK.Optimizer}}, src::MathOptInterface.Utilities.UniversalFallback{MathOptInterface.Utilities.Model{Float64}}) @ MathOptInterface.Utilities ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Utilities/copy.jl:394 [8] copy_to @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/bridge_optimizer.jl:448 [inlined] [9] optimize! @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/MathOptInterface.jl:121 [inlined] [10] optimize!(m::MathOptInterface.Utilities.CachingOptimizer{MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{GLPK.Optimizer}}, MathOptInterface.Utilities.UniversalFallback{MathOptInterface.Utilities.Model{Float64}}}) @ MathOptInterface.Utilities ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Utilities/cachingoptimizer.jl:370 [11] optimize!(model::JuMP.Model; ignore_optimize_hook::Bool, _differentiation_backend::MathOptInterface.Nonlinear.SparseReverseMode, kwargs::@Kwargs{}) @ JuMP ~/.julia/packages/JuMP/vfM5V/src/optimizer_interface.jl:609 [12] optimize! @ ~/.julia/packages/JuMP/vfM5V/src/optimizer_interface.jl:560 [inlined] [13] setup_models(opt::Pajarito.Optimizer) @ Pajarito ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/src/models.jl:138 [14] optimize(opt::Pajarito.Optimizer) @ Pajarito ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/src/algorithms.jl:12 [15] optimize! @ ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/src/MOI_wrapper.jl:109 [inlined] [16] optimize! @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/MathOptInterface.jl:122 [inlined] [17] optimize!(m::MathOptInterface.Utilities.CachingOptimizer{Pajarito.Optimizer, MathOptInterface.Utilities.UniversalFallback{MathOptInterface.Utilities.Model{Float64}}}) @ MathOptInterface.Utilities ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Utilities/cachingoptimizer.jl:370 [18] optimize! @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/bridge_optimizer.jl:367 [inlined] [19] test_linear_SOS1_integration(model::MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{MathOptInterface.Utilities.CachingOptimizer{Pajarito.Optimizer, MathOptInterface.Utilities.UniversalFallback{MathOptInterface.Utilities.Model{Float64}}}}, config::MathOptInterface.Test.Config{Float64}) @ MathOptInterface.Test ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Test/test_linear.jl:2855 [20] macro expansion @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Test/Test.jl:270 [inlined] [21] macro expansion @ /opt/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.14/Test/src/Test.jl:1961 [inlined] [22] runtests(model::MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{MathOptInterface.Utilities.CachingOptimizer{Pajarito.Optimizer, MathOptInterface.Utilities.UniversalFallback{MathOptInterface.Utilities.Model{Float64}}}}, config::MathOptInterface.Test.Config{Float64}; include::Vector{String}, exclude::Vector{String}, warn_unsupported::Bool, verbose::Bool, exclude_tests_after::VersionNumber, test_module::Module) @ MathOptInterface.Test ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Test/Test.jl:265 [23] runtests @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Test/Test.jl:223 [inlined] [24] run_moi_tests(use_iter::Bool, solve_subp::Bool, oa_solver::MathOptInterface.OptimizerWithAttributes, conic_solver::MathOptInterface.OptimizerWithAttributes) @ Main.TestMOI ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/MOI_tests.jl:52 [25] macro expansion @ ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/MOI_tests.jl:24 [inlined] [26] macro expansion @ /opt/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.14/Test/src/Test.jl:1961 [inlined] [27] macro expansion @ ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/MOI_tests.jl:24 [inlined] [28] macro expansion @ /opt/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.14/Test/src/Test.jl:1961 [inlined] [29] runtests(oa_solver::MathOptInterface.OptimizerWithAttributes, conic_solver::MathOptInterface.OptimizerWithAttributes) @ Main.TestMOI ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/MOI_tests.jl:23 [30] top-level scope @ ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/runtests.jl:33 [31] macro expansion @ /opt/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.14/Test/src/Test.jl:1961 [inlined] [32] macro expansion @ ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/runtests.jl:36 [inlined] [33] macro expansion @ /opt/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.14/Test/src/Test.jl:1961 [inlined] [34] macro expansion @ ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/runtests.jl:36 [inlined] [35] include(mapexpr::Function, mod::Module, _path::String) @ Base ./Base.jl:310 [36] top-level scope @ none:6 [37] eval(m::Module, e::Any) @ Core ./boot.jl:489 [38] exec_options(opts::Base.JLOptions) @ Base ./client.jl:310 [39] _start() @ Base ./client.jl:577 test_linear_SOS2_integration: Error During Test at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Test/Test.jl:264 Got exception outside of a @test MathOptInterface.Bridges.BridgeRequiresFiniteDomainError{MathOptInterface.Bridges.Constraint.SOS1ToMILPBridge{Float64, MathOptInterface.VectorOfVariables}, MathOptInterface.VariableIndex}: There was an error reformulating your model into a form supported by the solver because one of the bridges requires that all variables have a finite domain. To fix this error, add a lower and upper bound to all variables in your model. If you have double checked that all variables have finite bounds and you are still encountering this issue, please open a GitHub issue at https://github.com/jump-dev/MathOptInterface.jl ## Common mistakes A common mistake is to add the variable bounds as affine constraints. For example, if you are using JuMP, do not use `@constraint` to add variable bounds: ```julia using JuMP model = Model() @variable(model, x) @constraint(model, x >= 0) @constraint(model, x <= 1) ``` do instead: ```julia using JuMP model = Model() @variable(model, 0 <= x <= 1) ``` ## Large bound values Do not add arbitrarily large variable bounds to fix this error. Doing so will likely result in a reformulation that takes a long time to build and solve. Use domain knowledge to find the tightest valid bounds. Alternatively, use a solver that has native support for the constraint types you are using so that you do not need to use the bridging system. Stacktrace: [1] final_touch(bridge::MathOptInterface.Bridges.Constraint.SOS1ToMILPBridge{Float64, MathOptInterface.VectorOfVariables}, model::MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{GLPK.Optimizer}) @ MathOptInterface.Bridges.Constraint ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/Constraint/bridges/SOS1ToMILPBridge.jl:206 [2] _final_touch(bridges::OrderedCollections.OrderedSet{MathOptInterface.Bridges.Constraint.SOS1ToMILPBridge{Float64, MathOptInterface.VectorOfVariables}}, model::MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{GLPK.Optimizer}) @ MathOptInterface.Bridges.Constraint ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/Constraint/map.jl:340 [3] final_touch(map::MathOptInterface.Bridges.Constraint.Map, model::MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{GLPK.Optimizer}) @ MathOptInterface.Bridges.Constraint ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/Constraint/map.jl:347 [4] final_touch @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/bridge_optimizer.jl:456 [inlined] [5] final_touch @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/bridge_optimizer.jl:461 [inlined] [6] final_touch @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/bridge_optimizer.jl:462 [inlined] [7] default_copy_to(dest::MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{GLPK.Optimizer}}, src::MathOptInterface.Utilities.UniversalFallback{MathOptInterface.Utilities.Model{Float64}}) @ MathOptInterface.Utilities ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Utilities/copy.jl:394 [8] copy_to @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/bridge_optimizer.jl:448 [inlined] [9] optimize! @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/MathOptInterface.jl:121 [inlined] [10] optimize!(m::MathOptInterface.Utilities.CachingOptimizer{MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{GLPK.Optimizer}}, MathOptInterface.Utilities.UniversalFallback{MathOptInterface.Utilities.Model{Float64}}}) @ MathOptInterface.Utilities ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Utilities/cachingoptimizer.jl:370 [11] optimize!(model::JuMP.Model; ignore_optimize_hook::Bool, _differentiation_backend::MathOptInterface.Nonlinear.SparseReverseMode, kwargs::@Kwargs{}) @ JuMP ~/.julia/packages/JuMP/vfM5V/src/optimizer_interface.jl:609 [12] optimize! @ ~/.julia/packages/JuMP/vfM5V/src/optimizer_interface.jl:560 [inlined] [13] setup_models(opt::Pajarito.Optimizer) @ Pajarito ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/src/models.jl:138 [14] optimize(opt::Pajarito.Optimizer) @ Pajarito ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/src/algorithms.jl:12 [15] optimize! @ ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/src/MOI_wrapper.jl:109 [inlined] [16] optimize! @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/MathOptInterface.jl:122 [inlined] [17] optimize!(m::MathOptInterface.Utilities.CachingOptimizer{Pajarito.Optimizer, MathOptInterface.Utilities.UniversalFallback{MathOptInterface.Utilities.Model{Float64}}}) @ MathOptInterface.Utilities ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Utilities/cachingoptimizer.jl:370 [18] optimize! @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/bridge_optimizer.jl:367 [inlined] [19] test_linear_SOS2_integration(model::MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{MathOptInterface.Utilities.CachingOptimizer{Pajarito.Optimizer, MathOptInterface.Utilities.UniversalFallback{MathOptInterface.Utilities.Model{Float64}}}}, config::MathOptInterface.Test.Config{Float64}) @ MathOptInterface.Test ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Test/test_linear.jl:2962 [20] macro expansion @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Test/Test.jl:270 [inlined] [21] macro expansion @ /opt/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.14/Test/src/Test.jl:1961 [inlined] [22] runtests(model::MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{MathOptInterface.Utilities.CachingOptimizer{Pajarito.Optimizer, MathOptInterface.Utilities.UniversalFallback{MathOptInterface.Utilities.Model{Float64}}}}, config::MathOptInterface.Test.Config{Float64}; include::Vector{String}, exclude::Vector{String}, warn_unsupported::Bool, verbose::Bool, exclude_tests_after::VersionNumber, test_module::Module) @ MathOptInterface.Test ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Test/Test.jl:265 [23] runtests @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Test/Test.jl:223 [inlined] [24] run_moi_tests(use_iter::Bool, solve_subp::Bool, oa_solver::MathOptInterface.OptimizerWithAttributes, conic_solver::MathOptInterface.OptimizerWithAttributes) @ Main.TestMOI ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/MOI_tests.jl:52 [25] macro expansion @ ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/MOI_tests.jl:24 [inlined] [26] macro expansion @ /opt/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.14/Test/src/Test.jl:1961 [inlined] [27] macro expansion @ ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/MOI_tests.jl:24 [inlined] [28] macro expansion @ /opt/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.14/Test/src/Test.jl:1961 [inlined] [29] runtests(oa_solver::MathOptInterface.OptimizerWithAttributes, conic_solver::MathOptInterface.OptimizerWithAttributes) @ Main.TestMOI ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/MOI_tests.jl:23 [30] top-level scope @ ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/runtests.jl:33 [31] macro expansion @ /opt/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.14/Test/src/Test.jl:1961 [inlined] [32] macro expansion @ ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/runtests.jl:36 [inlined] [33] macro expansion @ /opt/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.14/Test/src/Test.jl:1961 [inlined] [34] macro expansion @ ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/runtests.jl:36 [inlined] [35] include(mapexpr::Function, mod::Module, _path::String) @ Base ./Base.jl:310 [36] top-level scope @ none:6 [37] eval(m::Module, e::Any) @ Core ./boot.jl:489 [38] exec_options(opts::Base.JLOptions) @ Base ./client.jl:310 [39] _start() @ Base ./client.jl:577 new incumbent test_solve_SOS2_add_and_delete: Error During Test at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Test/Test.jl:264 Got exception outside of a @test MathOptInterface.Bridges.BridgeRequiresFiniteDomainError{MathOptInterface.Bridges.Constraint.SOS2ToMILPBridge{Float64, MathOptInterface.VectorOfVariables}, MathOptInterface.VariableIndex}: There was an error reformulating your model into a form supported by the solver because one of the bridges requires that all variables have a finite domain. To fix this error, add a lower and upper bound to all variables in your model. If you have double checked that all variables have finite bounds and you are still encountering this issue, please open a GitHub issue at https://github.com/jump-dev/MathOptInterface.jl ## Common mistakes A common mistake is to add the variable bounds as affine constraints. For example, if you are using JuMP, do not use `@constraint` to add variable bounds: ```julia using JuMP model = Model() @variable(model, x) @constraint(model, x >= 0) @constraint(model, x <= 1) ``` do instead: ```julia using JuMP model = Model() @variable(model, 0 <= x <= 1) ``` ## Large bound values Do not add arbitrarily large variable bounds to fix this error. Doing so will likely result in a reformulation that takes a long time to build and solve. Use domain knowledge to find the tightest valid bounds. Alternatively, use a solver that has native support for the constraint types you are using so that you do not need to use the bridging system. Stacktrace: [1] final_touch(bridge::MathOptInterface.Bridges.Constraint.SOS2ToMILPBridge{Float64, MathOptInterface.VectorOfVariables}, model::MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{GLPK.Optimizer}) @ MathOptInterface.Bridges.Constraint ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/Constraint/bridges/SOS2ToMILPBridge.jl:206 [2] _final_touch(bridges::OrderedCollections.OrderedSet{MathOptInterface.Bridges.Constraint.SOS2ToMILPBridge{Float64, MathOptInterface.VectorOfVariables}}, model::MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{GLPK.Optimizer}) @ MathOptInterface.Bridges.Constraint ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/Constraint/map.jl:340 [3] final_touch(map::MathOptInterface.Bridges.Constraint.Map, model::MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{GLPK.Optimizer}) @ MathOptInterface.Bridges.Constraint ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/Constraint/map.jl:347 [4] final_touch @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/bridge_optimizer.jl:456 [inlined] [5] final_touch @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/bridge_optimizer.jl:461 [inlined] [6] final_touch @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/bridge_optimizer.jl:462 [inlined] [7] default_copy_to(dest::MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{GLPK.Optimizer}}, src::MathOptInterface.Utilities.UniversalFallback{MathOptInterface.Utilities.Model{Float64}}) @ MathOptInterface.Utilities ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Utilities/copy.jl:394 [8] copy_to @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/bridge_optimizer.jl:448 [inlined] [9] optimize! @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/MathOptInterface.jl:121 [inlined] [10] optimize!(m::MathOptInterface.Utilities.CachingOptimizer{MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{GLPK.Optimizer}}, MathOptInterface.Utilities.UniversalFallback{MathOptInterface.Utilities.Model{Float64}}}) @ MathOptInterface.Utilities ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Utilities/cachingoptimizer.jl:370 [11] optimize!(model::JuMP.Model; ignore_optimize_hook::Bool, _differentiation_backend::MathOptInterface.Nonlinear.SparseReverseMode, kwargs::@Kwargs{}) @ JuMP ~/.julia/packages/JuMP/vfM5V/src/optimizer_interface.jl:609 [12] optimize! @ ~/.julia/packages/JuMP/vfM5V/src/optimizer_interface.jl:560 [inlined] [13] setup_models(opt::Pajarito.Optimizer) @ Pajarito ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/src/models.jl:138 [14] optimize(opt::Pajarito.Optimizer) @ Pajarito ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/src/algorithms.jl:12 [15] optimize! @ ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/src/MOI_wrapper.jl:109 [inlined] [16] optimize! @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/MathOptInterface.jl:122 [inlined] [17] optimize!(m::MathOptInterface.Utilities.CachingOptimizer{Pajarito.Optimizer, MathOptInterface.Utilities.UniversalFallback{MathOptInterface.Utilities.Model{Float64}}}) @ MathOptInterface.Utilities ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Utilities/cachingoptimizer.jl:370 [18] optimize! @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/bridge_optimizer.jl:367 [inlined] [19] test_solve_SOS2_add_and_delete(model::MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{MathOptInterface.Utilities.CachingOptimizer{Pajarito.Optimizer, MathOptInterface.Utilities.UniversalFallback{MathOptInterface.Utilities.Model{Float64}}}}, config::MathOptInterface.Test.Config{Float64}) @ MathOptInterface.Test ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Test/test_solve.jl:1446 [20] macro expansion @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Test/Test.jl:270 [inlined] [21] macro expansion @ /opt/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.14/Test/src/Test.jl:1961 [inlined] [22] runtests(model::MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{MathOptInterface.Utilities.CachingOptimizer{Pajarito.Optimizer, MathOptInterface.Utilities.UniversalFallback{MathOptInterface.Utilities.Model{Float64}}}}, config::MathOptInterface.Test.Config{Float64}; include::Vector{String}, exclude::Vector{String}, warn_unsupported::Bool, verbose::Bool, exclude_tests_after::VersionNumber, test_module::Module) @ MathOptInterface.Test ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Test/Test.jl:265 [23] runtests @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Test/Test.jl:223 [inlined] [24] run_moi_tests(use_iter::Bool, solve_subp::Bool, oa_solver::MathOptInterface.OptimizerWithAttributes, conic_solver::MathOptInterface.OptimizerWithAttributes) @ Main.TestMOI ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/MOI_tests.jl:52 [25] macro expansion @ ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/MOI_tests.jl:24 [inlined] [26] macro expansion @ /opt/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.14/Test/src/Test.jl:1961 [inlined] [27] macro expansion @ ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/MOI_tests.jl:24 [inlined] [28] macro expansion @ /opt/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.14/Test/src/Test.jl:1961 [inlined] [29] runtests(oa_solver::MathOptInterface.OptimizerWithAttributes, conic_solver::MathOptInterface.OptimizerWithAttributes) @ Main.TestMOI ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/MOI_tests.jl:23 [30] top-level scope @ ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/runtests.jl:33 [31] macro expansion @ /opt/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.14/Test/src/Test.jl:1961 [inlined] [32] macro expansion @ ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/runtests.jl:36 [inlined] [33] macro expansion @ /opt/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.14/Test/src/Test.jl:1961 [inlined] [34] macro expansion @ ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/runtests.jl:36 [inlined] [35] include(mapexpr::Function, mod::Module, _path::String) @ Base ./Base.jl:310 [36] top-level scope @ none:6 [37] eval(m::Module, e::Any) @ Core ./boot.jl:489 [38] exec_options(opts::Base.JLOptions) @ Base ./client.jl:310 [39] _start() @ Base ./client.jl:577 ┌ Warning: cannot step in centering direction └ @ Hypatia.Solvers ~/.julia/packages/Hypatia/O8Y4K/src/Solvers/steppers/combined.jl:111 ┌ Warning: cannot step in centering direction └ @ Hypatia.Solvers ~/.julia/packages/Hypatia/O8Y4K/src/Solvers/steppers/combined.jl:111 test_linear_Indicator_ON_ONE: Error During Test at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Test/Test.jl:264 Got exception outside of a @test MathOptInterface.Bridges.BridgeRequiresFiniteDomainError{MathOptInterface.Bridges.Constraint.SOS1ToMILPBridge{Float64, MathOptInterface.VectorOfVariables}, MathOptInterface.VariableIndex}: There was an error reformulating your model into a form supported by the solver because one of the bridges requires that all variables have a finite domain. To fix this error, add a lower and upper bound to all variables in your model. If you have double checked that all variables have finite bounds and you are still encountering this issue, please open a GitHub issue at https://github.com/jump-dev/MathOptInterface.jl ## Common mistakes A common mistake is to add the variable bounds as affine constraints. For example, if you are using JuMP, do not use `@constraint` to add variable bounds: ```julia using JuMP model = Model() @variable(model, x) @constraint(model, x >= 0) @constraint(model, x <= 1) ``` do instead: ```julia using JuMP model = Model() @variable(model, 0 <= x <= 1) ``` ## Large bound values Do not add arbitrarily large variable bounds to fix this error. Doing so will likely result in a reformulation that takes a long time to build and solve. Use domain knowledge to find the tightest valid bounds. Alternatively, use a solver that has native support for the constraint types you are using so that you do not need to use the bridging system. Stacktrace: [1] final_touch(bridge::MathOptInterface.Bridges.Constraint.SOS1ToMILPBridge{Float64, MathOptInterface.VectorOfVariables}, model::MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{GLPK.Optimizer}) @ MathOptInterface.Bridges.Constraint ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/Constraint/bridges/SOS1ToMILPBridge.jl:206 [2] _final_touch(bridges::OrderedCollections.OrderedSet{MathOptInterface.Bridges.Constraint.SOS1ToMILPBridge{Float64, MathOptInterface.VectorOfVariables}}, model::MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{GLPK.Optimizer}) @ MathOptInterface.Bridges.Constraint ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/Constraint/map.jl:340 [3] final_touch(map::MathOptInterface.Bridges.Constraint.Map, model::MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{GLPK.Optimizer}) @ MathOptInterface.Bridges.Constraint ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/Constraint/map.jl:347 [4] final_touch @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/bridge_optimizer.jl:456 [inlined] [5] final_touch @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/bridge_optimizer.jl:461 [inlined] [6] final_touch @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/bridge_optimizer.jl:462 [inlined] [7] default_copy_to(dest::MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{GLPK.Optimizer}}, src::MathOptInterface.Utilities.UniversalFallback{MathOptInterface.Utilities.Model{Float64}}) @ MathOptInterface.Utilities ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Utilities/copy.jl:394 [8] copy_to @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/bridge_optimizer.jl:448 [inlined] [9] optimize! @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/MathOptInterface.jl:121 [inlined] [10] optimize!(m::MathOptInterface.Utilities.CachingOptimizer{MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{GLPK.Optimizer}}, MathOptInterface.Utilities.UniversalFallback{MathOptInterface.Utilities.Model{Float64}}}) @ MathOptInterface.Utilities ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Utilities/cachingoptimizer.jl:370 [11] optimize!(model::JuMP.Model; ignore_optimize_hook::Bool, _differentiation_backend::MathOptInterface.Nonlinear.SparseReverseMode, kwargs::@Kwargs{}) @ JuMP ~/.julia/packages/JuMP/vfM5V/src/optimizer_interface.jl:609 [12] optimize! @ ~/.julia/packages/JuMP/vfM5V/src/optimizer_interface.jl:560 [inlined] [13] setup_models(opt::Pajarito.Optimizer) @ Pajarito ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/src/models.jl:138 [14] optimize(opt::Pajarito.Optimizer) @ Pajarito ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/src/algorithms.jl:12 [15] optimize! @ ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/src/MOI_wrapper.jl:109 [inlined] [16] optimize! @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/MathOptInterface.jl:122 [inlined] [17] optimize!(m::MathOptInterface.Utilities.CachingOptimizer{Pajarito.Optimizer, MathOptInterface.Utilities.UniversalFallback{MathOptInterface.Utilities.Model{Float64}}}) @ MathOptInterface.Utilities ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Utilities/cachingoptimizer.jl:370 [18] optimize! @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/bridge_optimizer.jl:367 [inlined] [19] test_linear_Indicator_ON_ONE(model::MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{MathOptInterface.Utilities.CachingOptimizer{Pajarito.Optimizer, MathOptInterface.Utilities.UniversalFallback{MathOptInterface.Utilities.Model{Float64}}}}, config::MathOptInterface.Test.Config{Float64}) @ MathOptInterface.Test ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Test/test_linear.jl:3393 [20] macro expansion @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Test/Test.jl:270 [inlined] [21] macro expansion @ /opt/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.14/Test/src/Test.jl:1961 [inlined] [22] runtests(model::MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{MathOptInterface.Utilities.CachingOptimizer{Pajarito.Optimizer, MathOptInterface.Utilities.UniversalFallback{MathOptInterface.Utilities.Model{Float64}}}}, config::MathOptInterface.Test.Config{Float64}; include::Vector{String}, exclude::Vector{String}, warn_unsupported::Bool, verbose::Bool, exclude_tests_after::VersionNumber, test_module::Module) @ MathOptInterface.Test ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Test/Test.jl:265 [23] runtests @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Test/Test.jl:223 [inlined] [24] run_moi_tests(use_iter::Bool, solve_subp::Bool, oa_solver::MathOptInterface.OptimizerWithAttributes, conic_solver::MathOptInterface.OptimizerWithAttributes) @ Main.TestMOI ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/MOI_tests.jl:52 [25] macro expansion @ ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/MOI_tests.jl:27 [inlined] [26] macro expansion @ /opt/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.14/Test/src/Test.jl:1961 [inlined] [27] macro expansion @ ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/MOI_tests.jl:27 [inlined] [28] macro expansion @ /opt/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.14/Test/src/Test.jl:1961 [inlined] [29] runtests(oa_solver::MathOptInterface.OptimizerWithAttributes, conic_solver::MathOptInterface.OptimizerWithAttributes) @ Main.TestMOI ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/MOI_tests.jl:23 [30] top-level scope @ ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/runtests.jl:33 [31] macro expansion @ /opt/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.14/Test/src/Test.jl:1961 [inlined] [32] macro expansion @ ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/runtests.jl:36 [inlined] [33] macro expansion @ /opt/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.14/Test/src/Test.jl:1961 [inlined] [34] macro expansion @ ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/runtests.jl:36 [inlined] [35] include(mapexpr::Function, mod::Module, _path::String) @ Base ./Base.jl:310 [36] top-level scope @ none:6 [37] eval(m::Module, e::Any) @ Core ./boot.jl:489 [38] exec_options(opts::Base.JLOptions) @ Base ./client.jl:310 [39] _start() @ Base ./client.jl:577 test_linear_Indicator_ON_ZERO: Error During Test at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Test/Test.jl:264 Got exception outside of a @test MathOptInterface.Bridges.BridgeRequiresFiniteDomainError{MathOptInterface.Bridges.Constraint.SOS1ToMILPBridge{Float64, MathOptInterface.VectorOfVariables}, MathOptInterface.VariableIndex}: There was an error reformulating your model into a form supported by the solver because one of the bridges requires that all variables have a finite domain. To fix this error, add a lower and upper bound to all variables in your model. If you have double checked that all variables have finite bounds and you are still encountering this issue, please open a GitHub issue at https://github.com/jump-dev/MathOptInterface.jl ## Common mistakes A common mistake is to add the variable bounds as affine constraints. For example, if you are using JuMP, do not use `@constraint` to add variable bounds: ```julia using JuMP model = Model() @variable(model, x) @constraint(model, x >= 0) @constraint(model, x <= 1) ``` do instead: ```julia using JuMP model = Model() @variable(model, 0 <= x <= 1) ``` ## Large bound values Do not add arbitrarily large variable bounds to fix this error. Doing so will likely result in a reformulation that takes a long time to build and solve. Use domain knowledge to find the tightest valid bounds. Alternatively, use a solver that has native support for the constraint types you are using so that you do not need to use the bridging system. Stacktrace: [1] final_touch(bridge::MathOptInterface.Bridges.Constraint.SOS1ToMILPBridge{Float64, MathOptInterface.VectorOfVariables}, model::MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{GLPK.Optimizer}) @ MathOptInterface.Bridges.Constraint ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/Constraint/bridges/SOS1ToMILPBridge.jl:206 [2] _final_touch(bridges::OrderedCollections.OrderedSet{MathOptInterface.Bridges.Constraint.SOS1ToMILPBridge{Float64, MathOptInterface.VectorOfVariables}}, model::MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{GLPK.Optimizer}) @ MathOptInterface.Bridges.Constraint ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/Constraint/map.jl:340 [3] final_touch(map::MathOptInterface.Bridges.Constraint.Map, model::MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{GLPK.Optimizer}) @ MathOptInterface.Bridges.Constraint ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/Constraint/map.jl:347 [4] final_touch @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/bridge_optimizer.jl:456 [inlined] [5] final_touch @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/bridge_optimizer.jl:461 [inlined] [6] final_touch @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/bridge_optimizer.jl:462 [inlined] [7] default_copy_to(dest::MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{GLPK.Optimizer}}, src::MathOptInterface.Utilities.UniversalFallback{MathOptInterface.Utilities.Model{Float64}}) @ MathOptInterface.Utilities ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Utilities/copy.jl:394 [8] copy_to @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/bridge_optimizer.jl:448 [inlined] [9] optimize! @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/MathOptInterface.jl:121 [inlined] [10] optimize!(m::MathOptInterface.Utilities.CachingOptimizer{MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{GLPK.Optimizer}}, MathOptInterface.Utilities.UniversalFallback{MathOptInterface.Utilities.Model{Float64}}}) @ MathOptInterface.Utilities ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Utilities/cachingoptimizer.jl:370 [11] optimize!(model::JuMP.Model; ignore_optimize_hook::Bool, _differentiation_backend::MathOptInterface.Nonlinear.SparseReverseMode, kwargs::@Kwargs{}) @ JuMP ~/.julia/packages/JuMP/vfM5V/src/optimizer_interface.jl:609 [12] optimize! @ ~/.julia/packages/JuMP/vfM5V/src/optimizer_interface.jl:560 [inlined] [13] setup_models(opt::Pajarito.Optimizer) @ Pajarito ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/src/models.jl:138 [14] optimize(opt::Pajarito.Optimizer) @ Pajarito ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/src/algorithms.jl:12 [15] optimize! @ ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/src/MOI_wrapper.jl:109 [inlined] [16] optimize! @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/MathOptInterface.jl:122 [inlined] [17] optimize!(m::MathOptInterface.Utilities.CachingOptimizer{Pajarito.Optimizer, MathOptInterface.Utilities.UniversalFallback{MathOptInterface.Utilities.Model{Float64}}}) @ MathOptInterface.Utilities ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Utilities/cachingoptimizer.jl:370 [18] optimize! @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/bridge_optimizer.jl:367 [inlined] [19] test_linear_Indicator_ON_ZERO(model::MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{MathOptInterface.Utilities.CachingOptimizer{Pajarito.Optimizer, MathOptInterface.Utilities.UniversalFallback{MathOptInterface.Utilities.Model{Float64}}}}, config::MathOptInterface.Test.Config{Float64}) @ MathOptInterface.Test ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Test/test_linear.jl:3511 [20] macro expansion @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Test/Test.jl:270 [inlined] [21] macro expansion @ /opt/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.14/Test/src/Test.jl:1961 [inlined] [22] runtests(model::MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{MathOptInterface.Utilities.CachingOptimizer{Pajarito.Optimizer, MathOptInterface.Utilities.UniversalFallback{MathOptInterface.Utilities.Model{Float64}}}}, config::MathOptInterface.Test.Config{Float64}; include::Vector{String}, exclude::Vector{String}, warn_unsupported::Bool, verbose::Bool, exclude_tests_after::VersionNumber, test_module::Module) @ MathOptInterface.Test ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Test/Test.jl:265 [23] runtests @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Test/Test.jl:223 [inlined] [24] run_moi_tests(use_iter::Bool, solve_subp::Bool, oa_solver::MathOptInterface.OptimizerWithAttributes, conic_solver::MathOptInterface.OptimizerWithAttributes) @ Main.TestMOI ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/MOI_tests.jl:52 [25] macro expansion @ ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/MOI_tests.jl:27 [inlined] [26] macro expansion @ /opt/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.14/Test/src/Test.jl:1961 [inlined] [27] macro expansion @ ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/MOI_tests.jl:27 [inlined] [28] macro expansion @ /opt/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.14/Test/src/Test.jl:1961 [inlined] [29] runtests(oa_solver::MathOptInterface.OptimizerWithAttributes, conic_solver::MathOptInterface.OptimizerWithAttributes) @ Main.TestMOI ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/MOI_tests.jl:23 [30] top-level scope @ ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/runtests.jl:33 [31] macro expansion @ /opt/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.14/Test/src/Test.jl:1961 [inlined] [32] macro expansion @ ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/runtests.jl:36 [inlined] [33] macro expansion @ /opt/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.14/Test/src/Test.jl:1961 [inlined] [34] macro expansion @ ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/runtests.jl:36 [inlined] [35] include(mapexpr::Function, mod::Module, _path::String) @ Base ./Base.jl:310 [36] top-level scope @ none:6 [37] eval(m::Module, e::Any) @ Core ./boot.jl:489 [38] exec_options(opts::Base.JLOptions) @ Base ./client.jl:310 [39] _start() @ Base ./client.jl:577 test_linear_Indicator_integration: Error During Test at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Test/Test.jl:264 Got exception outside of a @test MathOptInterface.Bridges.BridgeRequiresFiniteDomainError{MathOptInterface.Bridges.Constraint.SOS1ToMILPBridge{Float64, MathOptInterface.VectorOfVariables}, MathOptInterface.VariableIndex}: There was an error reformulating your model into a form supported by the solver because one of the bridges requires that all variables have a finite domain. To fix this error, add a lower and upper bound to all variables in your model. If you have double checked that all variables have finite bounds and you are still encountering this issue, please open a GitHub issue at https://github.com/jump-dev/MathOptInterface.jl ## Common mistakes A common mistake is to add the variable bounds as affine constraints. For example, if you are using JuMP, do not use `@constraint` to add variable bounds: ```julia using JuMP model = Model() @variable(model, x) @constraint(model, x >= 0) @constraint(model, x <= 1) ``` do instead: ```julia using JuMP model = Model() @variable(model, 0 <= x <= 1) ``` ## Large bound values Do not add arbitrarily large variable bounds to fix this error. Doing so will likely result in a reformulation that takes a long time to build and solve. Use domain knowledge to find the tightest valid bounds. Alternatively, use a solver that has native support for the constraint types you are using so that you do not need to use the bridging system. Stacktrace: [1] final_touch(bridge::MathOptInterface.Bridges.Constraint.SOS1ToMILPBridge{Float64, MathOptInterface.VectorOfVariables}, model::MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{GLPK.Optimizer}) @ MathOptInterface.Bridges.Constraint ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/Constraint/bridges/SOS1ToMILPBridge.jl:206 [2] _final_touch(bridges::OrderedCollections.OrderedSet{MathOptInterface.Bridges.Constraint.SOS1ToMILPBridge{Float64, MathOptInterface.VectorOfVariables}}, model::MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{GLPK.Optimizer}) @ MathOptInterface.Bridges.Constraint ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/Constraint/map.jl:340 [3] final_touch(map::MathOptInterface.Bridges.Constraint.Map, model::MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{GLPK.Optimizer}) @ MathOptInterface.Bridges.Constraint ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/Constraint/map.jl:347 [4] final_touch @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/bridge_optimizer.jl:456 [inlined] [5] final_touch @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/bridge_optimizer.jl:461 [inlined] [6] final_touch @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/bridge_optimizer.jl:462 [inlined] [7] default_copy_to(dest::MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{GLPK.Optimizer}}, src::MathOptInterface.Utilities.UniversalFallback{MathOptInterface.Utilities.Model{Float64}}) @ MathOptInterface.Utilities ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Utilities/copy.jl:394 [8] copy_to @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/bridge_optimizer.jl:448 [inlined] [9] optimize! @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/MathOptInterface.jl:121 [inlined] [10] optimize!(m::MathOptInterface.Utilities.CachingOptimizer{MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{GLPK.Optimizer}}, MathOptInterface.Utilities.UniversalFallback{MathOptInterface.Utilities.Model{Float64}}}) @ MathOptInterface.Utilities ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Utilities/cachingoptimizer.jl:370 [11] optimize!(model::JuMP.Model; ignore_optimize_hook::Bool, _differentiation_backend::MathOptInterface.Nonlinear.SparseReverseMode, kwargs::@Kwargs{}) @ JuMP ~/.julia/packages/JuMP/vfM5V/src/optimizer_interface.jl:609 [12] optimize! @ ~/.julia/packages/JuMP/vfM5V/src/optimizer_interface.jl:560 [inlined] [13] setup_models(opt::Pajarito.Optimizer) @ Pajarito ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/src/models.jl:138 [14] optimize(opt::Pajarito.Optimizer) @ Pajarito ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/src/algorithms.jl:12 [15] optimize! @ ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/src/MOI_wrapper.jl:109 [inlined] [16] optimize! @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/MathOptInterface.jl:122 [inlined] [17] optimize!(m::MathOptInterface.Utilities.CachingOptimizer{Pajarito.Optimizer, MathOptInterface.Utilities.UniversalFallback{MathOptInterface.Utilities.Model{Float64}}}) @ MathOptInterface.Utilities ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Utilities/cachingoptimizer.jl:370 [18] optimize! @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/bridge_optimizer.jl:367 [inlined] [19] test_linear_Indicator_integration(model::MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{MathOptInterface.Utilities.CachingOptimizer{Pajarito.Optimizer, MathOptInterface.Utilities.UniversalFallback{MathOptInterface.Utilities.Model{Float64}}}}, config::MathOptInterface.Test.Config{Float64}) @ MathOptInterface.Test ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Test/test_linear.jl:3292 [20] macro expansion @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Test/Test.jl:270 [inlined] [21] macro expansion @ /opt/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.14/Test/src/Test.jl:1961 [inlined] [22] runtests(model::MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{MathOptInterface.Utilities.CachingOptimizer{Pajarito.Optimizer, MathOptInterface.Utilities.UniversalFallback{MathOptInterface.Utilities.Model{Float64}}}}, config::MathOptInterface.Test.Config{Float64}; include::Vector{String}, exclude::Vector{String}, warn_unsupported::Bool, verbose::Bool, exclude_tests_after::VersionNumber, test_module::Module) @ MathOptInterface.Test ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Test/Test.jl:265 [23] runtests @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Test/Test.jl:223 [inlined] [24] run_moi_tests(use_iter::Bool, solve_subp::Bool, oa_solver::MathOptInterface.OptimizerWithAttributes, conic_solver::MathOptInterface.OptimizerWithAttributes) @ Main.TestMOI ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/MOI_tests.jl:52 [25] macro expansion @ ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/MOI_tests.jl:27 [inlined] [26] macro expansion @ /opt/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.14/Test/src/Test.jl:1961 [inlined] [27] macro expansion @ ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/MOI_tests.jl:27 [inlined] [28] macro expansion @ /opt/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.14/Test/src/Test.jl:1961 [inlined] [29] runtests(oa_solver::MathOptInterface.OptimizerWithAttributes, conic_solver::MathOptInterface.OptimizerWithAttributes) @ Main.TestMOI ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/MOI_tests.jl:23 [30] top-level scope @ ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/runtests.jl:33 [31] macro expansion @ /opt/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.14/Test/src/Test.jl:1961 [inlined] [32] macro expansion @ ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/runtests.jl:36 [inlined] [33] macro expansion @ /opt/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.14/Test/src/Test.jl:1961 [inlined] [34] macro expansion @ ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/runtests.jl:36 [inlined] [35] include(mapexpr::Function, mod::Module, _path::String) @ Base ./Base.jl:310 [36] top-level scope @ none:6 [37] eval(m::Module, e::Any) @ Core ./boot.jl:489 [38] exec_options(opts::Base.JLOptions) @ Base ./client.jl:310 [39] _start() @ Base ./client.jl:577 test_linear_SOS1_integration: Error During Test at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Test/Test.jl:264 Got exception outside of a @test MathOptInterface.Bridges.BridgeRequiresFiniteDomainError{MathOptInterface.Bridges.Constraint.SOS1ToMILPBridge{Float64, MathOptInterface.VectorOfVariables}, MathOptInterface.VariableIndex}: There was an error reformulating your model into a form supported by the solver because one of the bridges requires that all variables have a finite domain. To fix this error, add a lower and upper bound to all variables in your model. If you have double checked that all variables have finite bounds and you are still encountering this issue, please open a GitHub issue at https://github.com/jump-dev/MathOptInterface.jl ## Common mistakes A common mistake is to add the variable bounds as affine constraints. For example, if you are using JuMP, do not use `@constraint` to add variable bounds: ```julia using JuMP model = Model() @variable(model, x) @constraint(model, x >= 0) @constraint(model, x <= 1) ``` do instead: ```julia using JuMP model = Model() @variable(model, 0 <= x <= 1) ``` ## Large bound values Do not add arbitrarily large variable bounds to fix this error. Doing so will likely result in a reformulation that takes a long time to build and solve. Use domain knowledge to find the tightest valid bounds. Alternatively, use a solver that has native support for the constraint types you are using so that you do not need to use the bridging system. Stacktrace: [1] final_touch(bridge::MathOptInterface.Bridges.Constraint.SOS1ToMILPBridge{Float64, MathOptInterface.VectorOfVariables}, model::MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{GLPK.Optimizer}) @ MathOptInterface.Bridges.Constraint ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/Constraint/bridges/SOS1ToMILPBridge.jl:206 [2] _final_touch(bridges::OrderedCollections.OrderedSet{MathOptInterface.Bridges.Constraint.SOS1ToMILPBridge{Float64, MathOptInterface.VectorOfVariables}}, model::MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{GLPK.Optimizer}) @ MathOptInterface.Bridges.Constraint ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/Constraint/map.jl:340 [3] final_touch(map::MathOptInterface.Bridges.Constraint.Map, model::MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{GLPK.Optimizer}) @ MathOptInterface.Bridges.Constraint ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/Constraint/map.jl:347 [4] final_touch @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/bridge_optimizer.jl:456 [inlined] [5] final_touch @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/bridge_optimizer.jl:461 [inlined] [6] final_touch @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/bridge_optimizer.jl:462 [inlined] [7] default_copy_to(dest::MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{GLPK.Optimizer}}, src::MathOptInterface.Utilities.UniversalFallback{MathOptInterface.Utilities.Model{Float64}}) @ MathOptInterface.Utilities ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Utilities/copy.jl:394 [8] copy_to @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/bridge_optimizer.jl:448 [inlined] [9] optimize! @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/MathOptInterface.jl:121 [inlined] [10] optimize!(m::MathOptInterface.Utilities.CachingOptimizer{MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{GLPK.Optimizer}}, MathOptInterface.Utilities.UniversalFallback{MathOptInterface.Utilities.Model{Float64}}}) @ MathOptInterface.Utilities ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Utilities/cachingoptimizer.jl:370 [11] optimize!(model::JuMP.Model; ignore_optimize_hook::Bool, _differentiation_backend::MathOptInterface.Nonlinear.SparseReverseMode, kwargs::@Kwargs{}) @ JuMP ~/.julia/packages/JuMP/vfM5V/src/optimizer_interface.jl:609 [12] optimize! @ ~/.julia/packages/JuMP/vfM5V/src/optimizer_interface.jl:560 [inlined] [13] setup_models(opt::Pajarito.Optimizer) @ Pajarito ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/src/models.jl:138 [14] optimize(opt::Pajarito.Optimizer) @ Pajarito ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/src/algorithms.jl:12 [15] optimize! @ ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/src/MOI_wrapper.jl:109 [inlined] [16] optimize! @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/MathOptInterface.jl:122 [inlined] [17] optimize!(m::MathOptInterface.Utilities.CachingOptimizer{Pajarito.Optimizer, MathOptInterface.Utilities.UniversalFallback{MathOptInterface.Utilities.Model{Float64}}}) @ MathOptInterface.Utilities ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Utilities/cachingoptimizer.jl:370 [18] optimize! @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/bridge_optimizer.jl:367 [inlined] [19] test_linear_SOS1_integration(model::MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{MathOptInterface.Utilities.CachingOptimizer{Pajarito.Optimizer, MathOptInterface.Utilities.UniversalFallback{MathOptInterface.Utilities.Model{Float64}}}}, config::MathOptInterface.Test.Config{Float64}) @ MathOptInterface.Test ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Test/test_linear.jl:2855 [20] macro expansion @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Test/Test.jl:270 [inlined] [21] macro expansion @ /opt/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.14/Test/src/Test.jl:1961 [inlined] [22] runtests(model::MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{MathOptInterface.Utilities.CachingOptimizer{Pajarito.Optimizer, MathOptInterface.Utilities.UniversalFallback{MathOptInterface.Utilities.Model{Float64}}}}, config::MathOptInterface.Test.Config{Float64}; include::Vector{String}, exclude::Vector{String}, warn_unsupported::Bool, verbose::Bool, exclude_tests_after::VersionNumber, test_module::Module) @ MathOptInterface.Test ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Test/Test.jl:265 [23] runtests @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Test/Test.jl:223 [inlined] [24] run_moi_tests(use_iter::Bool, solve_subp::Bool, oa_solver::MathOptInterface.OptimizerWithAttributes, conic_solver::MathOptInterface.OptimizerWithAttributes) @ Main.TestMOI ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/MOI_tests.jl:52 [25] macro expansion @ ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/MOI_tests.jl:27 [inlined] [26] macro expansion @ /opt/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.14/Test/src/Test.jl:1961 [inlined] [27] macro expansion @ ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/MOI_tests.jl:27 [inlined] [28] macro expansion @ /opt/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.14/Test/src/Test.jl:1961 [inlined] [29] runtests(oa_solver::MathOptInterface.OptimizerWithAttributes, conic_solver::MathOptInterface.OptimizerWithAttributes) @ Main.TestMOI ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/MOI_tests.jl:23 [30] top-level scope @ ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/runtests.jl:33 [31] macro expansion @ /opt/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.14/Test/src/Test.jl:1961 [inlined] [32] macro expansion @ ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/runtests.jl:36 [inlined] [33] macro expansion @ /opt/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.14/Test/src/Test.jl:1961 [inlined] [34] macro expansion @ ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/runtests.jl:36 [inlined] [35] include(mapexpr::Function, mod::Module, _path::String) @ Base ./Base.jl:310 [36] top-level scope @ none:6 [37] eval(m::Module, e::Any) @ Core ./boot.jl:489 [38] exec_options(opts::Base.JLOptions) @ Base ./client.jl:310 [39] _start() @ Base ./client.jl:577 test_linear_SOS2_integration: Error During Test at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Test/Test.jl:264 Got exception outside of a @test MathOptInterface.Bridges.BridgeRequiresFiniteDomainError{MathOptInterface.Bridges.Constraint.SOS1ToMILPBridge{Float64, MathOptInterface.VectorOfVariables}, MathOptInterface.VariableIndex}: There was an error reformulating your model into a form supported by the solver because one of the bridges requires that all variables have a finite domain. To fix this error, add a lower and upper bound to all variables in your model. If you have double checked that all variables have finite bounds and you are still encountering this issue, please open a GitHub issue at https://github.com/jump-dev/MathOptInterface.jl ## Common mistakes A common mistake is to add the variable bounds as affine constraints. For example, if you are using JuMP, do not use `@constraint` to add variable bounds: ```julia using JuMP model = Model() @variable(model, x) @constraint(model, x >= 0) @constraint(model, x <= 1) ``` do instead: ```julia using JuMP model = Model() @variable(model, 0 <= x <= 1) ``` ## Large bound values Do not add arbitrarily large variable bounds to fix this error. Doing so will likely result in a reformulation that takes a long time to build and solve. Use domain knowledge to find the tightest valid bounds. Alternatively, use a solver that has native support for the constraint types you are using so that you do not need to use the bridging system. Stacktrace: [1] final_touch(bridge::MathOptInterface.Bridges.Constraint.SOS1ToMILPBridge{Float64, MathOptInterface.VectorOfVariables}, model::MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{GLPK.Optimizer}) @ MathOptInterface.Bridges.Constraint ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/Constraint/bridges/SOS1ToMILPBridge.jl:206 [2] _final_touch(bridges::OrderedCollections.OrderedSet{MathOptInterface.Bridges.Constraint.SOS1ToMILPBridge{Float64, MathOptInterface.VectorOfVariables}}, model::MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{GLPK.Optimizer}) @ MathOptInterface.Bridges.Constraint ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/Constraint/map.jl:340 [3] final_touch(map::MathOptInterface.Bridges.Constraint.Map, model::MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{GLPK.Optimizer}) @ MathOptInterface.Bridges.Constraint ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/Constraint/map.jl:347 [4] final_touch @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/bridge_optimizer.jl:456 [inlined] [5] final_touch @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/bridge_optimizer.jl:461 [inlined] [6] final_touch @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/bridge_optimizer.jl:462 [inlined] [7] default_copy_to(dest::MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{GLPK.Optimizer}}, src::MathOptInterface.Utilities.UniversalFallback{MathOptInterface.Utilities.Model{Float64}}) @ MathOptInterface.Utilities ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Utilities/copy.jl:394 [8] copy_to @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/bridge_optimizer.jl:448 [inlined] [9] optimize! @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/MathOptInterface.jl:121 [inlined] [10] optimize!(m::MathOptInterface.Utilities.CachingOptimizer{MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{GLPK.Optimizer}}, MathOptInterface.Utilities.UniversalFallback{MathOptInterface.Utilities.Model{Float64}}}) @ MathOptInterface.Utilities ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Utilities/cachingoptimizer.jl:370 [11] optimize!(model::JuMP.Model; ignore_optimize_hook::Bool, _differentiation_backend::MathOptInterface.Nonlinear.SparseReverseMode, kwargs::@Kwargs{}) @ JuMP ~/.julia/packages/JuMP/vfM5V/src/optimizer_interface.jl:609 [12] optimize! @ ~/.julia/packages/JuMP/vfM5V/src/optimizer_interface.jl:560 [inlined] [13] setup_models(opt::Pajarito.Optimizer) @ Pajarito ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/src/models.jl:138 [14] optimize(opt::Pajarito.Optimizer) @ Pajarito ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/src/algorithms.jl:12 [15] optimize! @ ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/src/MOI_wrapper.jl:109 [inlined] [16] optimize! @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/MathOptInterface.jl:122 [inlined] [17] optimize!(m::MathOptInterface.Utilities.CachingOptimizer{Pajarito.Optimizer, MathOptInterface.Utilities.UniversalFallback{MathOptInterface.Utilities.Model{Float64}}}) @ MathOptInterface.Utilities ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Utilities/cachingoptimizer.jl:370 [18] optimize! @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/bridge_optimizer.jl:367 [inlined] [19] test_linear_SOS2_integration(model::MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{MathOptInterface.Utilities.CachingOptimizer{Pajarito.Optimizer, MathOptInterface.Utilities.UniversalFallback{MathOptInterface.Utilities.Model{Float64}}}}, config::MathOptInterface.Test.Config{Float64}) @ MathOptInterface.Test ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Test/test_linear.jl:2962 [20] macro expansion @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Test/Test.jl:270 [inlined] [21] macro expansion @ /opt/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.14/Test/src/Test.jl:1961 [inlined] [22] runtests(model::MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{MathOptInterface.Utilities.CachingOptimizer{Pajarito.Optimizer, MathOptInterface.Utilities.UniversalFallback{MathOptInterface.Utilities.Model{Float64}}}}, config::MathOptInterface.Test.Config{Float64}; include::Vector{String}, exclude::Vector{String}, warn_unsupported::Bool, verbose::Bool, exclude_tests_after::VersionNumber, test_module::Module) @ MathOptInterface.Test ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Test/Test.jl:265 [23] runtests @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Test/Test.jl:223 [inlined] [24] run_moi_tests(use_iter::Bool, solve_subp::Bool, oa_solver::MathOptInterface.OptimizerWithAttributes, conic_solver::MathOptInterface.OptimizerWithAttributes) @ Main.TestMOI ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/MOI_tests.jl:52 [25] macro expansion @ ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/MOI_tests.jl:27 [inlined] [26] macro expansion @ /opt/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.14/Test/src/Test.jl:1961 [inlined] [27] macro expansion @ ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/MOI_tests.jl:27 [inlined] [28] macro expansion @ /opt/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.14/Test/src/Test.jl:1961 [inlined] [29] runtests(oa_solver::MathOptInterface.OptimizerWithAttributes, conic_solver::MathOptInterface.OptimizerWithAttributes) @ Main.TestMOI ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/MOI_tests.jl:23 [30] top-level scope @ ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/runtests.jl:33 [31] macro expansion @ /opt/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.14/Test/src/Test.jl:1961 [inlined] [32] macro expansion @ ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/runtests.jl:36 [inlined] [33] macro expansion @ /opt/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.14/Test/src/Test.jl:1961 [inlined] [34] macro expansion @ ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/runtests.jl:36 [inlined] [35] include(mapexpr::Function, mod::Module, _path::String) @ Base ./Base.jl:310 [36] top-level scope @ none:6 [37] eval(m::Module, e::Any) @ Core ./boot.jl:489 [38] exec_options(opts::Base.JLOptions) @ Base ./client.jl:310 [39] _start() @ Base ./client.jl:577 new incumbent new incumbent test_solve_SOS2_add_and_delete: Error During Test at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Test/Test.jl:264 Got exception outside of a @test MathOptInterface.Bridges.BridgeRequiresFiniteDomainError{MathOptInterface.Bridges.Constraint.SOS2ToMILPBridge{Float64, MathOptInterface.VectorOfVariables}, MathOptInterface.VariableIndex}: There was an error reformulating your model into a form supported by the solver because one of the bridges requires that all variables have a finite domain. To fix this error, add a lower and upper bound to all variables in your model. If you have double checked that all variables have finite bounds and you are still encountering this issue, please open a GitHub issue at https://github.com/jump-dev/MathOptInterface.jl ## Common mistakes A common mistake is to add the variable bounds as affine constraints. For example, if you are using JuMP, do not use `@constraint` to add variable bounds: ```julia using JuMP model = Model() @variable(model, x) @constraint(model, x >= 0) @constraint(model, x <= 1) ``` do instead: ```julia using JuMP model = Model() @variable(model, 0 <= x <= 1) ``` ## Large bound values Do not add arbitrarily large variable bounds to fix this error. Doing so will likely result in a reformulation that takes a long time to build and solve. Use domain knowledge to find the tightest valid bounds. Alternatively, use a solver that has native support for the constraint types you are using so that you do not need to use the bridging system. Stacktrace: [1] final_touch(bridge::MathOptInterface.Bridges.Constraint.SOS2ToMILPBridge{Float64, MathOptInterface.VectorOfVariables}, model::MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{GLPK.Optimizer}) @ MathOptInterface.Bridges.Constraint ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/Constraint/bridges/SOS2ToMILPBridge.jl:206 [2] _final_touch(bridges::OrderedCollections.OrderedSet{MathOptInterface.Bridges.Constraint.SOS2ToMILPBridge{Float64, MathOptInterface.VectorOfVariables}}, model::MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{GLPK.Optimizer}) @ MathOptInterface.Bridges.Constraint ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/Constraint/map.jl:340 [3] final_touch(map::MathOptInterface.Bridges.Constraint.Map, model::MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{GLPK.Optimizer}) @ MathOptInterface.Bridges.Constraint ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/Constraint/map.jl:347 [4] final_touch @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/bridge_optimizer.jl:456 [inlined] [5] final_touch @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/bridge_optimizer.jl:461 [inlined] [6] final_touch @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/bridge_optimizer.jl:462 [inlined] [7] default_copy_to(dest::MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{GLPK.Optimizer}}, src::MathOptInterface.Utilities.UniversalFallback{MathOptInterface.Utilities.Model{Float64}}) @ MathOptInterface.Utilities ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Utilities/copy.jl:394 [8] copy_to @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/bridge_optimizer.jl:448 [inlined] [9] optimize! @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/MathOptInterface.jl:121 [inlined] [10] optimize!(m::MathOptInterface.Utilities.CachingOptimizer{MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{GLPK.Optimizer}}, MathOptInterface.Utilities.UniversalFallback{MathOptInterface.Utilities.Model{Float64}}}) @ MathOptInterface.Utilities ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Utilities/cachingoptimizer.jl:370 [11] optimize!(model::JuMP.Model; ignore_optimize_hook::Bool, _differentiation_backend::MathOptInterface.Nonlinear.SparseReverseMode, kwargs::@Kwargs{}) @ JuMP ~/.julia/packages/JuMP/vfM5V/src/optimizer_interface.jl:609 [12] optimize! @ ~/.julia/packages/JuMP/vfM5V/src/optimizer_interface.jl:560 [inlined] [13] setup_models(opt::Pajarito.Optimizer) @ Pajarito ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/src/models.jl:138 [14] optimize(opt::Pajarito.Optimizer) @ Pajarito ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/src/algorithms.jl:12 [15] optimize! @ ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/src/MOI_wrapper.jl:109 [inlined] [16] optimize! @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/MathOptInterface.jl:122 [inlined] [17] optimize!(m::MathOptInterface.Utilities.CachingOptimizer{Pajarito.Optimizer, MathOptInterface.Utilities.UniversalFallback{MathOptInterface.Utilities.Model{Float64}}}) @ MathOptInterface.Utilities ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Utilities/cachingoptimizer.jl:370 [18] optimize! @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/bridge_optimizer.jl:367 [inlined] [19] test_solve_SOS2_add_and_delete(model::MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{MathOptInterface.Utilities.CachingOptimizer{Pajarito.Optimizer, MathOptInterface.Utilities.UniversalFallback{MathOptInterface.Utilities.Model{Float64}}}}, config::MathOptInterface.Test.Config{Float64}) @ MathOptInterface.Test ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Test/test_solve.jl:1446 [20] macro expansion @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Test/Test.jl:270 [inlined] [21] macro expansion @ /opt/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.14/Test/src/Test.jl:1961 [inlined] [22] runtests(model::MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{MathOptInterface.Utilities.CachingOptimizer{Pajarito.Optimizer, MathOptInterface.Utilities.UniversalFallback{MathOptInterface.Utilities.Model{Float64}}}}, config::MathOptInterface.Test.Config{Float64}; include::Vector{String}, exclude::Vector{String}, warn_unsupported::Bool, verbose::Bool, exclude_tests_after::VersionNumber, test_module::Module) @ MathOptInterface.Test ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Test/Test.jl:265 [23] runtests @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Test/Test.jl:223 [inlined] [24] run_moi_tests(use_iter::Bool, solve_subp::Bool, oa_solver::MathOptInterface.OptimizerWithAttributes, conic_solver::MathOptInterface.OptimizerWithAttributes) @ Main.TestMOI ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/MOI_tests.jl:52 [25] macro expansion @ ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/MOI_tests.jl:27 [inlined] [26] macro expansion @ /opt/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.14/Test/src/Test.jl:1961 [inlined] [27] macro expansion @ ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/MOI_tests.jl:27 [inlined] [28] macro expansion @ /opt/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.14/Test/src/Test.jl:1961 [inlined] [29] runtests(oa_solver::MathOptInterface.OptimizerWithAttributes, conic_solver::MathOptInterface.OptimizerWithAttributes) @ Main.TestMOI ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/MOI_tests.jl:23 [30] top-level scope @ ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/runtests.jl:33 [31] macro expansion @ /opt/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.14/Test/src/Test.jl:1961 [inlined] [32] macro expansion @ ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/runtests.jl:36 [inlined] [33] macro expansion @ /opt/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.14/Test/src/Test.jl:1961 [inlined] [34] macro expansion @ ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/runtests.jl:36 [inlined] [35] include(mapexpr::Function, mod::Module, _path::String) @ Base ./Base.jl:310 [36] top-level scope @ none:6 [37] eval(m::Module, e::Any) @ Core ./boot.jl:489 [38] exec_options(opts::Base.JLOptions) @ Base ./client.jl:310 [39] _start() @ Base ./client.jl:577 starting JuMP tests _soc1 solving continuous relaxation continuous relaxation status is ALMOST_INFEASIBLE infeasibility detected from continuous relaxation; terminating solving continuous relaxation continuous relaxation status is OPTIMAL problem is continuous; terminating relaxation solution satisfies discrete constraints; terminating solving continuous relaxation continuous relaxation status is OPTIMAL separated 0 rays before imposing integrality iter cuts obj bound gap infeasibility detected while iterating; terminating OA solver finished with status INFEASIBLE, after 1.541273832321167 seconds and 4 cuts iterative method used 1 iterations solving continuous relaxation continuous relaxation status is OPTIMAL separated 0 rays before imposing integrality iter cuts obj bound gap continuous subproblem status is ALMOST_OPTIMAL 1 5 -3.0000e+00 -3.0000e+00 0.0000e+00 objective relative gap 0.0 reached; terminating OA solver finished with status OPTIMAL, after 2.298301935195923 seconds and 5 cuts iterative method used 1 iterations solving continuous relaxation continuous relaxation status is ALMOST_OPTIMAL separated 0 rays before imposing integrality iter cuts obj bound gap continuous subproblem status is ALMOST_OPTIMAL 1 5 3.0000e+00 3.0000e+00 0.0000e+00 objective relative gap 0.0 reached; terminating OA solver finished with status OPTIMAL, after 0.07189297676086426 seconds and 5 cuts iterative method used 1 iterations solving continuous relaxation continuous relaxation status is ALMOST_OPTIMAL separated 0 rays before imposing integrality iter cuts obj bound gap continuous subproblem status is ALMOST_OPTIMAL 1 5 3.0000e+00 3.0000e+00 0.0000e+00 objective relative gap 0.0 reached; terminating OA solver finished with status OPTIMAL, after 0.07566094398498535 seconds and 5 cuts iterative method used 1 iterations _soc2 solving continuous relaxation continuous relaxation status is OPTIMAL separated 0 rays before imposing integrality iter cuts obj bound gap continuous subproblem status is OPTIMAL 1 9 -4.4641e+00 -4.4721e+00 1.7998e-03 ┌ Warning: integral solution repeated └ @ Pajarito ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/src/algorithms.jl:103 separation cuts could not be added new incumbent 2 9 -4.4641e+00 -4.4641e+00 0.0000e+00 objective relative gap 0.0 reached; terminating OA solver finished with status OPTIMAL, after 0.06216907501220703 seconds and 9 cuts iterative method used 2 iterations solving continuous relaxation continuous relaxation status is OPTIMAL separated 0 rays before imposing integrality iter cuts obj bound gap continuous subproblem status is OPTIMAL 1 9 -4.4721e+00 -4.4721e+00 6.0846e-09 objective relative gap 6.084614286749403e-9 reached; terminating OA solver finished with status OPTIMAL, after 0.057940006256103516 seconds and 9 cuts iterative method used 1 iterations _soc3 solving continuous relaxation continuous relaxation status is ALMOST_OPTIMAL continuous relaxation cuts could not be added separated 0 rays before imposing integrality iter cuts obj bound gap infeasibility detected while iterating; terminating OA solver finished with status INFEASIBLE, after 0.04170584678649902 seconds and 7 cuts iterative method used 1 iterations solving continuous relaxation continuous relaxation status is OPTIMAL separated 0 rays before imposing integrality iter cuts obj bound gap continuous subproblem status is OPTIMAL 1 12 1.0000e+00 1.0000e+00 0.0000e+00 objective relative gap 0.0 reached; terminating OA solver finished with status OPTIMAL, after 0.08310890197753906 seconds and 12 cuts iterative method used 1 iterations _exp1 solving continuous relaxation continuous relaxation status is OPTIMAL separated 0 rays before imposing integrality iter cuts obj bound gap continuous subproblem status is OPTIMAL 1 7 6.2579e-07 -2.8820e-02 2.7123e+03 ┌ Warning: integral solution repeated └ @ Pajarito ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/src/algorithms.jl:103 separation cuts could not be added new incumbent 2 7 -2.2103e-51 -2.2103e-51 0.0000e+00 objective relative gap 0.0 reached; terminating OA solver finished with status OPTIMAL, after 2.8884899616241455 seconds and 7 cuts iterative method used 2 iterations solving continuous relaxation continuous relaxation status is OPTIMAL relaxation solution satisfies discrete constraints; terminating _exp2 solving continuous relaxation continuous relaxation status is OPTIMAL separated 0 rays before imposing integrality iter cuts obj bound gap continuous subproblem status is OPTIMAL 1 7 -8.0000e+00 -8.0000e+00 2.9467e-10 objective relative gap 2.9466991991952637e-10 reached; terminating OA solver finished with status OPTIMAL, after 0.057456016540527344 seconds and 7 cuts iterative method used 1 iterations solving continuous relaxation continuous relaxation status is INFEASIBLE infeasibility detected from continuous relaxation; terminating _pow1 solving continuous relaxation continuous relaxation status is OPTIMAL problem is continuous; terminating relaxation solution satisfies discrete constraints; terminating solving continuous relaxation continuous relaxation status is OPTIMAL separated 0 rays before imposing integrality iter cuts obj bound gap continuous subproblem status is OPTIMAL 1 6 1.5000e+00 1.4142e+00 5.7191e-02 ┌ Warning: integral solution repeated └ @ Pajarito ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/src/algorithms.jl:103 separation cuts could not be added new incumbent 2 6 1.5000e+00 1.5000e+00 0.0000e+00 objective relative gap 0.0 reached; terminating OA solver finished with status OPTIMAL, after 2.555712938308716 seconds and 6 cuts iterative method used 2 iterations solving continuous relaxation continuous relaxation status is OPTIMAL separated 0 rays before imposing integrality iter cuts obj bound gap continuous subproblem status is OPTIMAL 1 6 3.5000e+00 3.4641e+00 1.0257e-02 ┌ Warning: integral solution repeated └ @ Pajarito ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/src/algorithms.jl:103 separation cuts could not be added new incumbent 2 6 3.5000e+00 3.5000e+00 0.0000e+00 objective relative gap 0.0 reached; terminating OA solver finished with status OPTIMAL, after 0.07330203056335449 seconds and 6 cuts iterative method used 2 iterations _pow2 solving continuous relaxation continuous relaxation status is ALMOST_OPTIMAL separated 0 rays before imposing integrality iter cuts obj bound gap continuous subproblem status is INFEASIBLE 1 18 Inf 0.0000e+00 NaN continuous subproblem status is ALMOST_INFEASIBLE 2 21 Inf 0.0000e+00 NaN continuous subproblem status is INFEASIBLE 3 24 Inf 0.0000e+00 NaN continuous subproblem status is ALMOST_INFEASIBLE 4 27 Inf 0.0000e+00 NaN infeasibility detected while iterating; terminating OA solver finished with status INFEASIBLE, after 0.09047603607177734 seconds and 27 cuts iterative method used 5 iterations solving continuous relaxation continuous relaxation status is OPTIMAL separated 0 rays before imposing integrality iter cuts obj bound gap continuous subproblem status is OPTIMAL 1 18 1.1250e+00 0.0000e+00 9.9999e-01 continuous subproblem status is OPTIMAL 2 21 1.1250e+00 6.0374e-06 9.9999e-01 ┌ Warning: integral solution repeated └ @ Pajarito ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/src/algorithms.jl:103 separation cuts could not be added new incumbent 3 21 1.1250e+00 1.1250e+00 0.0000e+00 objective relative gap 0.0 reached; terminating OA solver finished with status OPTIMAL, after 0.0792388916015625 seconds and 21 cuts iterative method used 3 iterations _psd1 solving continuous relaxation continuous relaxation status is OPTIMAL relaxation solution satisfies discrete constraints; terminating solving continuous relaxation continuous relaxation status is INFEASIBLE infeasibility detected from continuous relaxation; terminating _psd2 solving continuous relaxation continuous relaxation status is OPTIMAL problem is continuous; terminating relaxation solution satisfies discrete constraints; terminating solving continuous relaxation continuous relaxation status is OPTIMAL separated 0 rays before imposing integrality iter cuts obj bound gap continuous subproblem status is OPTIMAL 1 15 -9.0000e+00 -9.0000e+00 0.0000e+00 objective relative gap 0.0 reached; terminating OA solver finished with status OPTIMAL, after 4.34950590133667 seconds and 15 cuts iterative method used 1 iterations _expdesign solving continuous relaxation continuous relaxation status is OPTIMAL separated 0 rays before imposing integrality iter cuts obj bound gap continuous subproblem status is OPTIMAL 1 24 5.7143e-01 2.5000e-01 5.6249e-01 continuous subproblem status is OPTIMAL 2 26 3.3333e-01 2.5000e-01 2.4999e-01 continuous subproblem status is OPTIMAL 3 28 2.6667e-01 2.5000e-01 6.2498e-02 continuous subproblem status is OPTIMAL 4 30 2.5000e-01 2.5000e-01 1.0841e-07 objective relative gap 1.0841058629755464e-7 reached; terminating OA solver finished with status OPTIMAL, after 0.07794308662414551 seconds and 30 cuts iterative method used 4 iterations solving continuous relaxation continuous relaxation status is OPTIMAL relaxation solution satisfies discrete constraints; terminating solving continuous relaxation continuous relaxation status is OPTIMAL separated 0 rays before imposing integrality iter cuts obj bound gap continuous subproblem status is OPTIMAL 1 35 -3.3322e+00 -4.1589e+00 2.4809e-01 continuous subproblem status is OPTIMAL 2 41 -3.3322e+00 -4.1589e+00 2.4809e-01 continuous subproblem status is OPTIMAL 3 47 -4.0943e+00 -4.1589e+00 1.5771e-02 continuous subproblem status is OPTIMAL 4 53 -4.1589e+00 -4.1589e+00 2.7635e-06 objective relative gap 2.7634815700325385e-6 reached; terminating OA solver finished with status OPTIMAL, after 0.09717798233032227 seconds and 53 cuts iterative method used 4 iterations solving continuous relaxation continuous relaxation status is OPTIMAL separated 0 rays before imposing integrality iter cuts obj bound gap continuous subproblem status is OPTIMAL 1 30 -5.2915e+00 -8.0000e+00 5.1186e-01 continuous subproblem status is OPTIMAL 2 35 -7.7460e+00 -8.0000e+00 3.2796e-02 continuous subproblem status is OPTIMAL 3 40 -8.0000e+00 -8.0000e+00 1.3082e-08 objective relative gap 1.3082149835597637e-8 reached; terminating OA solver finished with status OPTIMAL, after 0.34079980850219727 seconds and 40 cuts iterative method used 3 iterations _specialorderedset _soc1_ncuts solving continuous relaxation continuous relaxation status is ALMOST_INFEASIBLE infeasibility detected from continuous relaxation; terminating solving continuous relaxation continuous relaxation status is OPTIMAL problem is continuous; terminating relaxation solution satisfies discrete constraints; terminating solving continuous relaxation continuous relaxation status is OPTIMAL separated 0 rays before imposing integrality iter cuts obj bound gap infeasibility detected while iterating; terminating OA solver finished with status INFEASIBLE, after 0.039270877838134766 seconds and 4 cuts iterative method used 1 iterations solving continuous relaxation continuous relaxation status is OPTIMAL separated 0 rays before imposing integrality iter cuts obj bound gap continuous subproblem status is ALMOST_OPTIMAL 1 5 -3.0000e+00 -3.0000e+00 0.0000e+00 objective relative gap 0.0 reached; terminating OA solver finished with status OPTIMAL, after 0.07484197616577148 seconds and 5 cuts iterative method used 1 iterations solving continuous relaxation continuous relaxation status is ALMOST_OPTIMAL separated 0 rays before imposing integrality iter cuts obj bound gap continuous subproblem status is ALMOST_OPTIMAL 1 5 3.0000e+00 3.0000e+00 0.0000e+00 objective relative gap 0.0 reached; terminating OA solver finished with status OPTIMAL, after 0.07394194602966309 seconds and 5 cuts iterative method used 1 iterations solving continuous relaxation continuous relaxation status is ALMOST_OPTIMAL separated 0 rays before imposing integrality iter cuts obj bound gap continuous subproblem status is ALMOST_OPTIMAL 1 5 3.0000e+00 3.0000e+00 0.0000e+00 objective relative gap 0.0 reached; terminating OA solver finished with status OPTIMAL, after 0.07973790168762207 seconds and 5 cuts iterative method used 1 iterations _soc1 solving continuous relaxation continuous relaxation status is ALMOST_INFEASIBLE infeasibility detected from continuous relaxation; terminating solving continuous relaxation continuous relaxation status is OPTIMAL problem is continuous; terminating relaxation solution satisfies discrete constraints; terminating solving continuous relaxation continuous relaxation status is OPTIMAL separated 0 rays before imposing integrality starting one tree method OA solver finished with status INFEASIBLE, after 0.04552292823791504 seconds and 4 cuts one tree method used 0 lazy callbacks and 0 heuristic callbacks solving continuous relaxation continuous relaxation status is OPTIMAL separated 0 rays before imposing integrality starting one tree method continuous subproblem status is ALMOST_OPTIMAL subproblem cuts could not be added separation cuts could not be added OA solver finished with status OPTIMAL, after 0.1447610855102539 seconds and 4 cuts one tree method used 1 lazy callbacks and 0 heuristic callbacks solving continuous relaxation continuous relaxation status is ALMOST_OPTIMAL separated 0 rays before imposing integrality starting one tree method continuous subproblem status is ALMOST_OPTIMAL subproblem cuts could not be added separation cuts could not be added OA solver finished with status OPTIMAL, after 0.07755303382873535 seconds and 4 cuts one tree method used 1 lazy callbacks and 0 heuristic callbacks solving continuous relaxation continuous relaxation status is ALMOST_OPTIMAL separated 0 rays before imposing integrality starting one tree method continuous subproblem status is ALMOST_OPTIMAL subproblem cuts could not be added separation cuts could not be added OA solver finished with status OPTIMAL, after 0.07226896286010742 seconds and 4 cuts one tree method used 1 lazy callbacks and 0 heuristic callbacks _soc2 solving continuous relaxation continuous relaxation status is OPTIMAL separated 0 rays before imposing integrality starting one tree method continuous subproblem status is OPTIMAL cached subproblem cuts could not be added separation cuts could not be added new incumbent OA solver finished with status OPTIMAL, after 0.11162304878234863 seconds and 9 cuts one tree method used 3 lazy callbacks and 1 heuristic callbacks solving continuous relaxation continuous relaxation status is OPTIMAL separated 0 rays before imposing integrality starting one tree method continuous subproblem status is OPTIMAL subproblem cuts could not be added cached subproblem cuts could not be added cached subproblem cuts could not be added cached subproblem cuts could not be added cached subproblem cuts could not be added cached subproblem cuts could not be added cached subproblem cuts could not be added cached subproblem cuts could not be added cached subproblem cuts could not be added cached subproblem cuts could not be added separation cuts could not be added new incumbent OA solver finished with status OPTIMAL, after 0.07268190383911133 seconds and 24 cuts one tree method used 10 lazy callbacks and 0 heuristic callbacks _soc3 solving continuous relaxation continuous relaxation status is ALMOST_OPTIMAL continuous relaxation cuts could not be added separated 0 rays before imposing integrality starting one tree method OA solver finished with status INFEASIBLE, after 0.03827500343322754 seconds and 7 cuts one tree method used 7 lazy callbacks and 7 heuristic callbacks solving continuous relaxation continuous relaxation status is OPTIMAL separated 0 rays before imposing integrality starting one tree method continuous subproblem status is OPTIMAL subproblem cuts could not be added separation cuts could not be added OA solver finished with status OPTIMAL, after 0.07532811164855957 seconds and 10 cuts one tree method used 4 lazy callbacks and 3 heuristic callbacks _exp1 solving continuous relaxation continuous relaxation status is OPTIMAL separated 0 rays before imposing integrality starting one tree method continuous subproblem status is OPTIMAL cached subproblem cuts could not be added separation cuts could not be added new incumbent OA solver finished with status OPTIMAL, after 0.0735929012298584 seconds and 7 cuts one tree method used 3 lazy callbacks and 1 heuristic callbacks solving continuous relaxation continuous relaxation status is OPTIMAL relaxation solution satisfies discrete constraints; terminating _exp2 solving continuous relaxation continuous relaxation status is OPTIMAL separated 0 rays before imposing integrality starting one tree method continuous subproblem status is OPTIMAL subproblem cuts could not be added separation cuts could not be added new incumbent OA solver finished with status OPTIMAL, after 0.06737399101257324 seconds and 6 cuts one tree method used 1 lazy callbacks and 0 heuristic callbacks solving continuous relaxation continuous relaxation status is INFEASIBLE infeasibility detected from continuous relaxation; terminating _pow1 solving continuous relaxation continuous relaxation status is OPTIMAL problem is continuous; terminating relaxation solution satisfies discrete constraints; terminating solving continuous relaxation continuous relaxation status is OPTIMAL separated 0 rays before imposing integrality starting one tree method continuous subproblem status is OPTIMAL cached subproblem cuts could not be added separation cuts could not be added new incumbent OA solver finished with status OPTIMAL, after 0.2651522159576416 seconds and 6 cuts one tree method used 3 lazy callbacks and 1 heuristic callbacks solving continuous relaxation continuous relaxation status is OPTIMAL separated 0 rays before imposing integrality starting one tree method continuous subproblem status is OPTIMAL cached subproblem cuts could not be added separation cuts could not be added new incumbent OA solver finished with status OPTIMAL, after 0.06924295425415039 seconds and 6 cuts one tree method used 3 lazy callbacks and 1 heuristic callbacks _pow2 solving continuous relaxation continuous relaxation status is ALMOST_OPTIMAL separated 0 rays before imposing integrality starting one tree method continuous subproblem status is INFEASIBLE continuous subproblem status is ALMOST_INFEASIBLE OA solver finished with status INFEASIBLE, after 0.07460999488830566 seconds and 21 cuts one tree method used 9 lazy callbacks and 7 heuristic callbacks solving continuous relaxation continuous relaxation status is OPTIMAL separated 0 rays before imposing integrality starting one tree method continuous subproblem status is OPTIMAL cached subproblem cuts could not be added separation cuts could not be added new incumbent continuous subproblem status is OPTIMAL heuristic cb status was: HEURISTIC_SOLUTION_REJECTED continuous subproblem status is OPTIMAL continuous subproblem status is OPTIMAL continuous subproblem status is OPTIMAL continuous subproblem status is OPTIMAL continuous subproblem status is OPTIMAL continuous subproblem status is OPTIMAL OA solver finished with status OPTIMAL, after 0.9276230335235596 seconds and 39 cuts one tree method used 16 lazy callbacks and 7 heuristic callbacks _psd1 solving continuous relaxation continuous relaxation status is OPTIMAL relaxation solution satisfies discrete constraints; terminating solving continuous relaxation continuous relaxation status is INFEASIBLE infeasibility detected from continuous relaxation; terminating _psd2 solving continuous relaxation continuous relaxation status is OPTIMAL problem is continuous; terminating relaxation solution satisfies discrete constraints; terminating solving continuous relaxation continuous relaxation status is OPTIMAL separated 0 rays before imposing integrality starting one tree method ┌ Warning: taking OA solver solution, which may be infeasible └ @ Pajarito ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/src/algorithms.jl:261 new incumbent OA solver finished with status OPTIMAL, after 0.04262995719909668 seconds and 12 cuts one tree method used 2 lazy callbacks and 2 heuristic callbacks _expdesign solving continuous relaxation continuous relaxation status is OPTIMAL separated 0 rays before imposing integrality starting one tree method continuous subproblem status is OPTIMAL heuristic cb status was: HEURISTIC_SOLUTION_ACCEPTED continuous subproblem status is OPTIMAL heuristic cb status was: HEURISTIC_SOLUTION_ACCEPTED continuous subproblem status is OPTIMAL heuristic cb status was: HEURISTIC_SOLUTION_ACCEPTED continuous subproblem status is OPTIMAL subproblem cuts could not be added separation cuts could not be added new incumbent OA solver finished with status OPTIMAL, after 0.11445212364196777 seconds and 26 cuts one tree method used 7 lazy callbacks and 3 heuristic callbacks solving continuous relaxation continuous relaxation status is OPTIMAL relaxation solution satisfies discrete constraints; terminating solving continuous relaxation continuous relaxation status is OPTIMAL separated 0 rays before imposing integrality starting one tree method continuous subproblem status is OPTIMAL heuristic cb status was: HEURISTIC_SOLUTION_ACCEPTED continuous subproblem status is OPTIMAL heuristic cb status was: HEURISTIC_SOLUTION_ACCEPTED continuous subproblem status is OPTIMAL subproblem cuts could not be added separation cuts could not be added new incumbent OA solver finished with status OPTIMAL, after 0.08628988265991211 seconds and 34 cuts one tree method used 5 lazy callbacks and 2 heuristic callbacks solving continuous relaxation continuous relaxation status is OPTIMAL separated 0 rays before imposing integrality starting one tree method continuous subproblem status is OPTIMAL heuristic cb status was: HEURISTIC_SOLUTION_ACCEPTED continuous subproblem status is OPTIMAL heuristic cb status was: HEURISTIC_SOLUTION_ACCEPTED continuous subproblem status is OPTIMAL subproblem cuts could not be added separation cuts could not be added new incumbent OA solver finished with status OPTIMAL, after 0.08137321472167969 seconds and 29 cuts one tree method used 5 lazy callbacks and 2 heuristic callbacks _specialorderedset _soc1_ncuts solving continuous relaxation continuous relaxation status is ALMOST_INFEASIBLE infeasibility detected from continuous relaxation; terminating solving continuous relaxation continuous relaxation status is OPTIMAL problem is continuous; terminating relaxation solution satisfies discrete constraints; terminating solving continuous relaxation continuous relaxation status is OPTIMAL separated 0 rays before imposing integrality starting one tree method OA solver finished with status INFEASIBLE, after 0.0382990837097168 seconds and 4 cuts one tree method used 0 lazy callbacks and 0 heuristic callbacks solving continuous relaxation continuous relaxation status is OPTIMAL separated 0 rays before imposing integrality starting one tree method continuous subproblem status is ALMOST_OPTIMAL subproblem cuts could not be added separation cuts could not be added OA solver finished with status OPTIMAL, after 0.07422804832458496 seconds and 4 cuts one tree method used 1 lazy callbacks and 0 heuristic callbacks solving continuous relaxation continuous relaxation status is ALMOST_OPTIMAL separated 0 rays before imposing integrality starting one tree method continuous subproblem status is ALMOST_OPTIMAL subproblem cuts could not be added separation cuts could not be added OA solver finished with status OPTIMAL, after 0.06191515922546387 seconds and 4 cuts one tree method used 1 lazy callbacks and 0 heuristic callbacks solving continuous relaxation continuous relaxation status is ALMOST_OPTIMAL separated 0 rays before imposing integrality starting one tree method continuous subproblem status is ALMOST_OPTIMAL subproblem cuts could not be added separation cuts could not be added OA solver finished with status OPTIMAL, after 0.06531786918640137 seconds and 4 cuts one tree method used 1 lazy callbacks and 0 heuristic callbacks _soc1 separated 0 rays before imposing integrality iter cuts obj bound gap infeasibility detected while iterating; terminating OA solver finished with status INFEASIBLE, after 0.014709949493408203 seconds and 3 cuts iterative method used 1 iterations separated 0 rays before imposing integrality iter cuts obj bound gap separation cuts could not be added new incumbent 1 3 -3.5000e+00 -3.5000e+00 0.0000e+00 objective relative gap 0.0 reached; terminating OA solver finished with status OPTIMAL, after 0.003061056137084961 seconds and 3 cuts iterative method used 1 iterations separated 0 rays before imposing integrality iter cuts obj bound gap infeasibility detected while iterating; terminating OA solver finished with status INFEASIBLE, after 0.012881994247436523 seconds and 3 cuts iterative method used 1 iterations separated 0 rays before imposing integrality iter cuts obj bound gap separation cuts could not be added new incumbent 1 3 -3.0000e+00 -3.0000e+00 0.0000e+00 objective relative gap 0.0 reached; terminating OA solver finished with status OPTIMAL, after 0.008774995803833008 seconds and 3 cuts iterative method used 1 iterations separated 0 rays before imposing integrality iter cuts obj bound gap separation cuts could not be added new incumbent 1 3 3.0000e+00 3.0000e+00 0.0000e+00 objective relative gap 0.0 reached; terminating OA solver finished with status OPTIMAL, after 0.008211135864257812 seconds and 3 cuts iterative method used 1 iterations separated 0 rays before imposing integrality iter cuts obj bound gap separation cuts could not be added new incumbent 1 3 3.0000e+00 3.0000e+00 0.0000e+00 objective relative gap 0.0 reached; terminating OA solver finished with status OPTIMAL, after 0.00804281234741211 seconds and 3 cuts iterative method used 1 iterations _soc2 separated 0 rays before imposing integrality iter cuts obj bound gap 1 6 Inf -5.0000e+00 NaN 2 8 Inf -4.5056e+00 NaN 3 10 Inf -4.4642e+00 NaN separation cuts could not be added new incumbent 4 10 -4.4641e+00 -4.4641e+00 0.0000e+00 objective relative gap 0.0 reached; terminating OA solver finished with status OPTIMAL, after 0.015445947647094727 seconds and 10 cuts iterative method used 4 iterations separated 0 rays before imposing integrality iter cuts obj bound gap 1 6 Inf -5.0000e+00 NaN 2 8 Inf -4.5528e+00 NaN 3 10 Inf -4.5106e+00 NaN 4 12 Inf -4.4813e+00 NaN 5 14 Inf -4.4747e+00 NaN 6 16 Inf -4.4725e+00 NaN 7 18 Inf -4.4723e+00 NaN 8 20 Inf -4.4722e+00 NaN 9 22 Inf -4.4721e+00 NaN 10 23 Inf -4.4721e+00 NaN 11 25 Inf -4.4721e+00 NaN separation cuts could not be added new incumbent 12 25 -4.4721e+00 -4.4721e+00 0.0000e+00 objective relative gap 0.0 reached; terminating OA solver finished with status OPTIMAL, after 0.010888099670410156 seconds and 25 cuts iterative method used 12 iterations _soc3 separated 0 rays before imposing integrality iter cuts obj bound gap infeasibility detected while iterating; terminating OA solver finished with status INFEASIBLE, after 0.015007972717285156 seconds and 7 cuts iterative method used 1 iterations separated 0 rays before imposing integrality iter cuts obj bound gap 1 10 Inf 0.0000e+00 NaN separation cuts could not be added new incumbent 2 10 1.0000e+00 1.0000e+00 0.0000e+00 objective relative gap 0.0 reached; terminating OA solver finished with status OPTIMAL, after 0.008255958557128906 seconds and 10 cuts iterative method used 2 iterations _exp1 separated 0 rays before imposing integrality iter cuts obj bound gap 1 6 Inf -5.0000e-01 NaN 2 7 Inf -5.0000e-01 NaN 3 8 Inf -5.0000e-01 NaN 4 9 Inf -5.0000e-01 NaN 5 10 Inf -5.0000e-01 NaN 6 11 Inf -5.0000e-01 NaN 7 12 Inf -5.0000e-01 NaN 8 13 Inf -5.0000e-01 NaN 9 14 Inf -3.9062e-01 NaN 10 15 Inf -1.9531e-01 NaN 11 16 Inf -9.7656e-02 NaN 12 17 Inf -4.8828e-02 NaN 13 18 Inf -2.4414e-02 NaN 14 19 Inf -1.2207e-02 NaN 15 20 Inf -6.1035e-03 NaN 16 21 Inf -3.0518e-03 NaN 17 22 Inf -1.5259e-03 NaN 18 23 Inf -7.6294e-04 NaN 19 24 Inf -3.8147e-04 NaN 20 25 Inf -1.9073e-04 NaN 21 26 Inf -9.5367e-05 NaN 22 27 Inf -4.7684e-05 NaN 23 28 Inf -2.3842e-05 NaN 24 29 Inf -1.1921e-05 NaN 25 30 Inf -5.9605e-06 NaN 26 31 Inf -2.9802e-06 NaN 27 32 Inf -1.4901e-06 NaN 28 33 Inf -7.4506e-07 NaN 29 34 Inf -3.7253e-07 NaN separation cuts could not be added new incumbent 30 34 -1.8626e-07 -1.8626e-07 0.0000e+00 objective relative gap 0.0 reached; terminating OA solver finished with status OPTIMAL, after 0.01995110511779785 seconds and 34 cuts iterative method used 30 iterations separated 0 rays before imposing integrality iter cuts obj bound gap separation cuts could not be added new incumbent 1 5 0.0000e+00 0.0000e+00 0.0000e+00 objective relative gap 0.0 reached; terminating OA solver finished with status OPTIMAL, after 0.008422136306762695 seconds and 5 cuts iterative method used 1 iterations _exp2 separated 0 rays before imposing integrality iter cuts obj bound gap 1 6 Inf -9.5000e+00 NaN separation cuts could not be added new incumbent 2 6 -8.0000e+00 -8.0000e+00 0.0000e+00 objective relative gap 0.0 reached; terminating OA solver finished with status OPTIMAL, after 0.015305042266845703 seconds and 6 cuts iterative method used 2 iterations separated 0 rays before imposing integrality iter cuts obj bound gap infeasibility detected while iterating; terminating OA solver finished with status INFEASIBLE, after 0.008421182632446289 seconds and 5 cuts iterative method used 1 iterations _pow1 separated 0 rays before imposing integrality iter cuts obj bound gap 1 5 Inf 1.0000e+00 NaN 2 6 Inf 1.0001e+00 NaN 3 7 Inf 1.0099e+00 NaN 4 8 Inf 1.0909e+00 NaN 5 9 Inf 1.2403e+00 NaN 6 10 Inf 1.3599e+00 NaN 7 11 Inf 1.4048e+00 NaN 8 12 Inf 1.4107e+00 NaN 9 13 Inf 1.4137e+00 NaN 10 14 Inf 1.4140e+00 NaN 11 15 Inf 1.4142e+00 NaN 12 16 Inf 1.4142e+00 NaN 13 17 Inf 1.4142e+00 NaN 14 18 Inf 1.4142e+00 NaN separation cuts could not be added new incumbent 15 18 1.4142e+00 1.4142e+00 0.0000e+00 objective relative gap 0.0 reached; terminating OA solver finished with status OPTIMAL, after 0.015697002410888672 seconds and 18 cuts iterative method used 15 iterations separated 0 rays before imposing integrality iter cuts obj bound gap 1 5 Inf 1.0000e+00 NaN 2 6 Inf 1.0002e+00 NaN 3 7 Inf 1.0198e+00 NaN 4 8 Inf 1.1792e+00 NaN 5 9 Inf 1.4195e+00 NaN 6 10 Inf 1.4965e+00 NaN 7 11 Inf 1.5000e+00 NaN separation cuts could not be added new incumbent 8 11 1.5000e+00 1.5000e+00 0.0000e+00 objective relative gap 0.0 reached; terminating OA solver finished with status OPTIMAL, after 0.008531808853149414 seconds and 11 cuts iterative method used 8 iterations separated 0 rays before imposing integrality iter cuts obj bound gap 1 5 Inf 2.0000e+00 NaN 2 6 Inf 2.0004e+00 NaN 3 7 Inf 2.0500e+00 NaN 4 8 Inf 2.4978e+00 NaN 5 9 Inf 3.2305e+00 NaN 6 10 Inf 3.4867e+00 NaN 7 11 Inf 3.5000e+00 NaN separation cuts could not be added new incumbent 8 11 3.5000e+00 3.5000e+00 0.0000e+00 objective relative gap 0.0 reached; terminating OA solver finished with status OPTIMAL, after 0.009582996368408203 seconds and 11 cuts iterative method used 8 iterations _pow2 separated 0 rays before imposing integrality iter cuts obj bound gap 1 15 Inf 0.0000e+00 NaN 2 18 Inf 0.0000e+00 NaN 3 21 Inf 0.0000e+00 NaN 4 24 Inf 0.0000e+00 NaN 5 27 Inf 0.0000e+00 NaN 6 30 Inf 0.0000e+00 NaN 7 33 Inf 0.0000e+00 NaN 8 36 Inf 0.0000e+00 NaN 9 37 Inf 0.0000e+00 NaN 10 38 Inf 0.0000e+00 NaN 11 39 Inf 0.0000e+00 NaN 12 41 Inf 0.0000e+00 NaN 13 43 Inf 0.0000e+00 NaN 14 44 Inf 0.0000e+00 NaN 15 45 Inf 0.0000e+00 NaN 16 46 Inf 0.0000e+00 NaN 17 48 Inf 0.0000e+00 NaN 18 49 Inf 0.0000e+00 NaN 19 50 Inf 0.0000e+00 NaN 20 51 Inf 0.0000e+00 NaN 21 52 Inf 0.0000e+00 NaN 22 53 Inf 0.0000e+00 NaN infeasibility detected while iterating; terminating OA solver finished with status INFEASIBLE, after 0.022207021713256836 seconds and 53 cuts iterative method used 23 iterations separated 0 rays before imposing integrality iter cuts obj bound gap 1 15 Inf 0.0000e+00 NaN 2 18 Inf 0.0000e+00 NaN 3 21 Inf 6.2481e-05 NaN 4 24 Inf 6.2481e-05 NaN 5 27 Inf 4.7880e-03 NaN 6 30 Inf 4.7880e-03 NaN 7 33 Inf 7.9059e-02 NaN 8 36 Inf 7.9059e-02 NaN 9 39 Inf 4.1662e-01 NaN 10 42 Inf 4.1662e-01 NaN 11 45 Inf 9.0723e-01 NaN 12 48 Inf 9.0723e-01 NaN 13 51 Inf 1.1096e+00 NaN 14 54 Inf 1.1096e+00 NaN 15 57 Inf 1.1249e+00 NaN 16 60 Inf 1.1249e+00 NaN separation cuts could not be added new incumbent 17 60 1.1250e+00 1.1250e+00 0.0000e+00 objective relative gap 0.0 reached; terminating OA solver finished with status OPTIMAL, after 0.01822686195373535 seconds and 60 cuts iterative method used 17 iterations _psd1 separated 0 rays before imposing integrality iter cuts obj bound gap 1 9 Inf -8.0000e+00 NaN 2 10 Inf -7.5147e+00 NaN 3 11 Inf -7.5000e+00 NaN separation cuts could not be added new incumbent 4 11 -7.5000e+00 -7.5000e+00 0.0000e+00 objective relative gap 0.0 reached; terminating OA solver finished with status OPTIMAL, after 0.017147064208984375 seconds and 11 cuts iterative method used 4 iterations separated 0 rays before imposing integrality iter cuts obj bound gap infeasibility detected while iterating; terminating OA solver finished with status INFEASIBLE, after 0.23750996589660645 seconds and 8 cuts iterative method used 1 iterations _psd2 separated 0 rays before imposing integrality iter cuts obj bound gap 1 10 Inf -2.4000e+01 NaN 2 11 Inf -2.1041e+01 NaN 3 12 Inf -1.9872e+01 NaN 4 13 Inf -1.9261e+01 NaN 5 15 Inf -1.9221e+01 NaN 6 16 Inf -1.8935e+01 NaN 7 17 Inf -1.8908e+01 NaN 8 19 Inf -1.8851e+01 NaN 9 20 Inf -1.8835e+01 NaN 10 22 Inf -1.8833e+01 NaN 11 23 Inf -1.8832e+01 NaN 12 25 Inf -1.8831e+01 NaN 13 26 Inf -1.8831e+01 NaN 14 27 Inf -1.8830e+01 NaN 15 28 Inf -1.8830e+01 NaN 16 30 Inf -1.8830e+01 NaN 17 31 Inf -1.8830e+01 NaN 18 32 Inf -1.8830e+01 NaN 19 34 Inf -1.8830e+01 NaN 20 35 Inf -1.8830e+01 NaN separation cuts could not be added new incumbent 21 35 -1.8830e+01 -1.8830e+01 0.0000e+00 objective relative gap 0.0 reached; terminating OA solver finished with status OPTIMAL, after 0.01114797592163086 seconds and 35 cuts iterative method used 21 iterations separated 0 rays before imposing integrality iter cuts obj bound gap separation cuts could not be added new incumbent 1 9 -9.0000e+00 -9.0000e+00 0.0000e+00 objective relative gap 0.0 reached; terminating OA solver finished with status OPTIMAL, after 0.00849604606628418 seconds and 9 cuts iterative method used 1 iterations _expdesign separated 0 rays before imposing integrality iter cuts obj bound gap 1 20 Inf 0.0000e+00 NaN 2 22 Inf 0.0000e+00 NaN 3 24 Inf 0.0000e+00 NaN 4 26 Inf 7.5745e-02 NaN 5 28 Inf 1.9847e-01 NaN 6 30 Inf 2.3239e-01 NaN 7 32 Inf 2.5000e-01 NaN separation cuts could not be added new incumbent 8 32 2.5000e-01 2.5000e-01 0.0000e+00 objective relative gap 0.0 reached; terminating OA solver finished with status OPTIMAL, after 0.016614913940429688 seconds and 32 cuts iterative method used 8 iterations separated 0 rays before imposing integrality iter cuts obj bound gap separation cuts could not be added new incumbent 1 4 -8.0000e+00 -8.0000e+00 0.0000e+00 objective relative gap 0.0 reached; terminating OA solver finished with status OPTIMAL, after 0.014275074005126953 seconds and 4 cuts iterative method used 1 iterations separated 0 rays before imposing integrality iter cuts obj bound gap 1 29 Inf -1.1832e+01 NaN 2 30 Inf -4.1589e+00 NaN 3 31 Inf -4.1589e+00 NaN 4 32 Inf -4.1589e+00 NaN 5 33 Inf -4.1589e+00 NaN 6 34 Inf -4.1589e+00 NaN 7 35 Inf -4.1589e+00 NaN separation cuts could not be added new incumbent 8 35 -4.1589e+00 -4.1589e+00 0.0000e+00 objective relative gap 0.0 reached; terminating OA solver finished with status OPTIMAL, after 0.01775193214416504 seconds and 35 cuts iterative method used 8 iterations separated 0 rays before imposing integrality iter cuts obj bound gap 1 21 Inf -8.0000e+00 NaN 2 22 Inf -8.0000e+00 NaN 3 23 Inf -8.0000e+00 NaN 4 24 Inf -8.0000e+00 NaN 5 25 Inf -8.0000e+00 NaN 6 26 Inf -8.0000e+00 NaN 7 27 Inf -8.0000e+00 NaN separation cuts could not be added new incumbent 8 27 -8.0000e+00 -8.0000e+00 0.0000e+00 objective relative gap 0.0 reached; terminating OA solver finished with status OPTIMAL, after 0.0164339542388916 seconds and 27 cuts iterative method used 8 iterations _specialorderedset separated 0 rays before imposing integrality iter cuts obj bound gap _specialorderedset: Error During Test at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/JuMP_tests.jl:67 Got exception outside of a @test MathOptInterface.Bridges.BridgeRequiresFiniteDomainError{MathOptInterface.Bridges.Constraint.SOS1ToMILPBridge{Float64, MathOptInterface.VectorOfVariables}, MathOptInterface.VariableIndex}: There was an error reformulating your model into a form supported by the solver because one of the bridges requires that all variables have a finite domain. To fix this error, add a lower and upper bound to all variables in your model. If you have double checked that all variables have finite bounds and you are still encountering this issue, please open a GitHub issue at https://github.com/jump-dev/MathOptInterface.jl ## Common mistakes A common mistake is to add the variable bounds as affine constraints. For example, if you are using JuMP, do not use `@constraint` to add variable bounds: ```julia using JuMP model = Model() @variable(model, x) @constraint(model, x >= 0) @constraint(model, x <= 1) ``` do instead: ```julia using JuMP model = Model() @variable(model, 0 <= x <= 1) ``` ## Large bound values Do not add arbitrarily large variable bounds to fix this error. Doing so will likely result in a reformulation that takes a long time to build and solve. Use domain knowledge to find the tightest valid bounds. Alternatively, use a solver that has native support for the constraint types you are using so that you do not need to use the bridging system. Stacktrace: [1] final_touch(bridge::MathOptInterface.Bridges.Constraint.SOS1ToMILPBridge{Float64, MathOptInterface.VectorOfVariables}, model::MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{GLPK.Optimizer}) @ MathOptInterface.Bridges.Constraint ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/Constraint/bridges/SOS1ToMILPBridge.jl:206 [2] _final_touch(bridges::OrderedCollections.OrderedSet{MathOptInterface.Bridges.Constraint.SOS1ToMILPBridge{Float64, MathOptInterface.VectorOfVariables}}, model::MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{GLPK.Optimizer}) @ MathOptInterface.Bridges.Constraint ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/Constraint/map.jl:340 [3] final_touch(map::MathOptInterface.Bridges.Constraint.Map, model::MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{GLPK.Optimizer}) @ MathOptInterface.Bridges.Constraint ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/Constraint/map.jl:347 [4] final_touch @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/bridge_optimizer.jl:456 [inlined] [5] optimize! @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/bridge_optimizer.jl:366 [inlined] [6] optimize! @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/bridge_optimizer.jl:367 [inlined] [7] optimize!(m::MathOptInterface.Utilities.CachingOptimizer{MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{GLPK.Optimizer}}, MathOptInterface.Utilities.UniversalFallback{MathOptInterface.Utilities.Model{Float64}}}) @ MathOptInterface.Utilities ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Utilities/cachingoptimizer.jl:379 [8] optimize!(model::JuMP.Model; ignore_optimize_hook::Bool, _differentiation_backend::MathOptInterface.Nonlinear.SparseReverseMode, kwargs::@Kwargs{}) @ JuMP ~/.julia/packages/JuMP/vfM5V/src/optimizer_interface.jl:609 [9] optimize! @ ~/.julia/packages/JuMP/vfM5V/src/optimizer_interface.jl:560 [inlined] [10] run_iterative_method(opt::Pajarito.Optimizer) @ Pajarito ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/src/algorithms.jl:68 [11] optimize(opt::Pajarito.Optimizer) @ Pajarito ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/src/algorithms.jl:52 [12] optimize! @ ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/src/MOI_wrapper.jl:109 [inlined] [13] optimize! @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/MathOptInterface.jl:122 [inlined] [14] optimize!(m::MathOptInterface.Utilities.CachingOptimizer{Pajarito.Optimizer, MathOptInterface.Utilities.UniversalFallback{MathOptInterface.Utilities.Model{Float64}}}) @ MathOptInterface.Utilities ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Utilities/cachingoptimizer.jl:370 [15] optimize! @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/bridge_optimizer.jl:367 [inlined] [16] optimize! @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/MathOptInterface.jl:122 [inlined] [17] optimize!(m::MathOptInterface.Utilities.CachingOptimizer{MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{MathOptInterface.Utilities.CachingOptimizer{Pajarito.Optimizer, MathOptInterface.Utilities.UniversalFallback{MathOptInterface.Utilities.Model{Float64}}}}, MathOptInterface.Utilities.UniversalFallback{MathOptInterface.Utilities.Model{Float64}}}) @ MathOptInterface.Utilities ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Utilities/cachingoptimizer.jl:370 [18] optimize!(model::JuMP.Model; ignore_optimize_hook::Bool, _differentiation_backend::MathOptInterface.Nonlinear.SparseReverseMode, kwargs::@Kwargs{}) @ JuMP ~/.julia/packages/JuMP/vfM5V/src/optimizer_interface.jl:609 [19] optimize! @ ~/.julia/packages/JuMP/vfM5V/src/optimizer_interface.jl:560 [inlined] [20] _specialorderedset(opt::MathOptInterface.OptimizerWithAttributes) @ Main.TestJuMP ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/JuMP_tests.jl:462 [21] macro expansion @ ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/JuMP_tests.jl:69 [inlined] [22] macro expansion @ /opt/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.14/Test/src/Test.jl:2042 [inlined] [23] run_jump_tests(use_iter::Bool, solve_relax_subp::Bool, oa_solver::MathOptInterface.OptimizerWithAttributes, conic_solver::MathOptInterface.OptimizerWithAttributes) @ Main.TestJuMP ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/JuMP_tests.jl:67 [24] macro expansion @ ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/JuMP_tests.jl:26 [inlined] [25] macro expansion @ /opt/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.14/Test/src/Test.jl:1961 [inlined] [26] macro expansion @ ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/JuMP_tests.jl:26 [inlined] [27] macro expansion @ /opt/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.14/Test/src/Test.jl:1961 [inlined] [28] runtests(oa_solver::MathOptInterface.OptimizerWithAttributes, conic_solver::MathOptInterface.OptimizerWithAttributes) @ Main.TestJuMP ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/JuMP_tests.jl:25 [29] top-level scope @ ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/runtests.jl:33 [30] macro expansion @ /opt/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.14/Test/src/Test.jl:1961 [inlined] [31] macro expansion @ ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/runtests.jl:42 [inlined] [32] macro expansion @ /opt/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.14/Test/src/Test.jl:1961 [inlined] [33] macro expansion @ ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/runtests.jl:42 [inlined] [34] include(mapexpr::Function, mod::Module, _path::String) @ Base ./Base.jl:310 [35] top-level scope @ none:6 [36] eval(m::Module, e::Any) @ Core ./boot.jl:489 [37] exec_options(opts::Base.JLOptions) @ Base ./client.jl:310 [38] _start() @ Base ./client.jl:577 _soc1_ncuts separated 0 rays before imposing integrality iter cuts obj bound gap infeasibility detected while iterating; terminating OA solver finished with status INFEASIBLE, after 0.013982057571411133 seconds and 3 cuts iterative method used 1 iterations separated 0 rays before imposing integrality iter cuts obj bound gap separation cuts could not be added new incumbent 1 3 -3.5000e+00 -3.5000e+00 0.0000e+00 objective relative gap 0.0 reached; terminating OA solver finished with status OPTIMAL, after 0.0029649734497070312 seconds and 3 cuts iterative method used 1 iterations separated 0 rays before imposing integrality iter cuts obj bound gap infeasibility detected while iterating; terminating OA solver finished with status INFEASIBLE, after 0.007650136947631836 seconds and 3 cuts iterative method used 1 iterations separated 0 rays before imposing integrality iter cuts obj bound gap separation cuts could not be added new incumbent 1 3 -3.0000e+00 -3.0000e+00 0.0000e+00 objective relative gap 0.0 reached; terminating OA solver finished with status OPTIMAL, after 0.008547067642211914 seconds and 3 cuts iterative method used 1 iterations separated 0 rays before imposing integrality iter cuts obj bound gap separation cuts could not be added new incumbent 1 3 3.0000e+00 3.0000e+00 0.0000e+00 objective relative gap 0.0 reached; terminating OA solver finished with status OPTIMAL, after 0.008080005645751953 seconds and 3 cuts iterative method used 1 iterations separated 0 rays before imposing integrality iter cuts obj bound gap separation cuts could not be added new incumbent 1 3 3.0000e+00 3.0000e+00 0.0000e+00 objective relative gap 0.0 reached; terminating OA solver finished with status OPTIMAL, after 0.008892059326171875 seconds and 3 cuts iterative method used 1 iterations _soc1 separated 0 rays before imposing integrality starting one tree method model has no discrete variables, so adding a dummy integer variable OA solver finished with status INFEASIBLE, after 1.101151943206787 seconds and 3 cuts one tree method used 0 lazy callbacks and 0 heuristic callbacks separated 0 rays before imposing integrality starting one tree method model has no discrete variables, so adding a dummy integer variable separation cuts could not be added new incumbent OA solver finished with status OPTIMAL, after 0.003056049346923828 seconds and 3 cuts one tree method used 1 lazy callbacks and 0 heuristic callbacks separated 0 rays before imposing integrality starting one tree method OA solver finished with status INFEASIBLE, after 0.008079051971435547 seconds and 3 cuts one tree method used 0 lazy callbacks and 0 heuristic callbacks separated 0 rays before imposing integrality starting one tree method separation cuts could not be added new incumbent OA solver finished with status OPTIMAL, after 0.00827789306640625 seconds and 3 cuts one tree method used 1 lazy callbacks and 0 heuristic callbacks separated 0 rays before imposing integrality starting one tree method separation cuts could not be added new incumbent OA solver finished with status OPTIMAL, after 0.008296966552734375 seconds and 3 cuts one tree method used 1 lazy callbacks and 0 heuristic callbacks separated 0 rays before imposing integrality starting one tree method separation cuts could not be added new incumbent OA solver finished with status OPTIMAL, after 0.008877038955688477 seconds and 3 cuts one tree method used 1 lazy callbacks and 0 heuristic callbacks _soc2 separated 0 rays before imposing integrality starting one tree method separation cuts could not be added separation cuts could not be added new incumbent OA solver finished with status OPTIMAL, after 0.016216039657592773 seconds and 29 cuts one tree method used 15 lazy callbacks and 0 heuristic callbacks separated 0 rays before imposing integrality starting one tree method separation cuts could not be added new incumbent OA solver finished with status OPTIMAL, after 0.009890079498291016 seconds and 27 cuts one tree method used 13 lazy callbacks and 0 heuristic callbacks _soc3 separated 0 rays before imposing integrality starting one tree method separation cuts could not be added separation cuts could not be added separation cuts could not be added OA solver finished with status INFEASIBLE, after 0.015867948532104492 seconds and 19 cuts one tree method used 7 lazy callbacks and 0 heuristic callbacks separated 0 rays before imposing integrality starting one tree method separation cuts could not be added separation cuts could not be added separation cuts could not be added new incumbent OA solver finished with status OPTIMAL, after 0.010803937911987305 seconds and 55 cuts one tree method used 23 lazy callbacks and 0 heuristic callbacks _exp1 separated 0 rays before imposing integrality starting one tree method separation cuts could not be added separation cuts could not be added new incumbent OA solver finished with status OPTIMAL, after 0.016915082931518555 seconds and 33 cuts one tree method used 30 lazy callbacks and 0 heuristic callbacks separated 0 rays before imposing integrality starting one tree method separation cuts could not be added new incumbent OA solver finished with status OPTIMAL, after 0.009161949157714844 seconds and 5 cuts one tree method used 1 lazy callbacks and 0 heuristic callbacks _exp2 separated 0 rays before imposing integrality starting one tree method separation cuts could not be added new incumbent OA solver finished with status OPTIMAL, after 0.01566290855407715 seconds and 6 cuts one tree method used 2 lazy callbacks and 0 heuristic callbacks separated 0 rays before imposing integrality starting one tree method OA solver finished with status INFEASIBLE, after 0.009061098098754883 seconds and 5 cuts one tree method used 0 lazy callbacks and 0 heuristic callbacks _pow1 separated 0 rays before imposing integrality starting one tree method model has no discrete variables, so adding a dummy integer variable separation cuts could not be added new incumbent OA solver finished with status OPTIMAL, after 0.015163183212280273 seconds and 18 cuts one tree method used 15 lazy callbacks and 0 heuristic callbacks separated 0 rays before imposing integrality starting one tree method separation cuts could not be added separation cuts could not be added new incumbent separation cuts could not be added new incumbent OA solver finished with status OPTIMAL, after 0.011240959167480469 seconds and 46 cuts one tree method used 45 lazy callbacks and 0 heuristic callbacks separated 0 rays before imposing integrality starting one tree method separation cuts could not be added separation cuts could not be added new incumbent OA solver finished with status OPTIMAL, after 0.009548187255859375 seconds and 21 cuts one tree method used 19 lazy callbacks and 0 heuristic callbacks _pow2 separated 0 rays before imposing integrality starting one tree method separation cuts could not be added separation cuts could not be added separation cuts could not be added separation cuts could not be added separation cuts could not be added separation cuts could not be added separation cuts could not be added OA solver finished with status INFEASIBLE, after 0.021481037139892578 seconds and 113 cuts one tree method used 90 lazy callbacks and 0 heuristic callbacks separated 0 rays before imposing integrality starting one tree method separation cuts could not be added separation cuts could not be added separation cuts could not be added separation cuts could not be added new incumbent separation cuts could not be added separation cuts could not be added separation cuts could not be added separation cuts could not be added OA solver finished with status OPTIMAL, after 0.017344951629638672 seconds and 120 cuts one tree method used 114 lazy callbacks and 0 heuristic callbacks _psd1 separated 0 rays before imposing integrality starting one tree method separation cuts could not be added new incumbent OA solver finished with status OPTIMAL, after 0.014672040939331055 seconds and 11 cuts one tree method used 4 lazy callbacks and 0 heuristic callbacks separated 0 rays before imposing integrality starting one tree method OA solver finished with status INFEASIBLE, after 0.008958816528320312 seconds and 8 cuts one tree method used 0 lazy callbacks and 0 heuristic callbacks _psd2 separated 0 rays before imposing integrality starting one tree method model has no discrete variables, so adding a dummy integer variable separation cuts could not be added new incumbent OA solver finished with status OPTIMAL, after 0.14329099655151367 seconds and 35 cuts one tree method used 21 lazy callbacks and 0 heuristic callbacks separated 0 rays before imposing integrality starting one tree method separation cuts could not be added separation cuts could not be added separation cuts could not be added ┌ Warning: taking OA solver solution, which may be infeasible └ @ Pajarito ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/src/algorithms.jl:261 new incumbent OA solver finished with status OPTIMAL, after 0.012774944305419922 seconds and 48 cuts one tree method used 36 lazy callbacks and 0 heuristic callbacks _expdesign separated 0 rays before imposing integrality starting one tree method separation cuts could not be added separation cuts could not be added new incumbent OA solver finished with status OPTIMAL, after 0.02010512351989746 seconds and 46 cuts one tree method used 16 lazy callbacks and 0 heuristic callbacks separated 0 rays before imposing integrality starting one tree method separation cuts could not be added new incumbent OA solver finished with status OPTIMAL, after 0.015396833419799805 seconds and 4 cuts one tree method used 1 lazy callbacks and 0 heuristic callbacks separated 0 rays before imposing integrality starting one tree method separation cuts could not be added separation cuts could not be added new incumbent OA solver finished with status OPTIMAL, after 0.01902008056640625 seconds and 51 cuts one tree method used 25 lazy callbacks and 0 heuristic callbacks separated 0 rays before imposing integrality starting one tree method separation cuts could not be added separation cuts could not be added new incumbent OA solver finished with status OPTIMAL, after 0.018585920333862305 seconds and 43 cuts one tree method used 25 lazy callbacks and 0 heuristic callbacks _specialorderedset separated 0 rays before imposing integrality starting one tree method _specialorderedset: Error During Test at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/JuMP_tests.jl:67 Got exception outside of a @test MathOptInterface.Bridges.BridgeRequiresFiniteDomainError{MathOptInterface.Bridges.Constraint.SOS1ToMILPBridge{Float64, MathOptInterface.VectorOfVariables}, MathOptInterface.VariableIndex}: There was an error reformulating your model into a form supported by the solver because one of the bridges requires that all variables have a finite domain. To fix this error, add a lower and upper bound to all variables in your model. If you have double checked that all variables have finite bounds and you are still encountering this issue, please open a GitHub issue at https://github.com/jump-dev/MathOptInterface.jl ## Common mistakes A common mistake is to add the variable bounds as affine constraints. For example, if you are using JuMP, do not use `@constraint` to add variable bounds: ```julia using JuMP model = Model() @variable(model, x) @constraint(model, x >= 0) @constraint(model, x <= 1) ``` do instead: ```julia using JuMP model = Model() @variable(model, 0 <= x <= 1) ``` ## Large bound values Do not add arbitrarily large variable bounds to fix this error. Doing so will likely result in a reformulation that takes a long time to build and solve. Use domain knowledge to find the tightest valid bounds. Alternatively, use a solver that has native support for the constraint types you are using so that you do not need to use the bridging system. Stacktrace: [1] final_touch(bridge::MathOptInterface.Bridges.Constraint.SOS1ToMILPBridge{Float64, MathOptInterface.VectorOfVariables}, model::MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{GLPK.Optimizer}) @ MathOptInterface.Bridges.Constraint ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/Constraint/bridges/SOS1ToMILPBridge.jl:206 [2] _final_touch(bridges::OrderedCollections.OrderedSet{MathOptInterface.Bridges.Constraint.SOS1ToMILPBridge{Float64, MathOptInterface.VectorOfVariables}}, model::MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{GLPK.Optimizer}) @ MathOptInterface.Bridges.Constraint ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/Constraint/map.jl:340 [3] final_touch(map::MathOptInterface.Bridges.Constraint.Map, model::MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{GLPK.Optimizer}) @ MathOptInterface.Bridges.Constraint ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/Constraint/map.jl:347 [4] final_touch @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/bridge_optimizer.jl:456 [inlined] [5] optimize! @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/bridge_optimizer.jl:366 [inlined] [6] optimize! @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/bridge_optimizer.jl:367 [inlined] [7] optimize!(m::MathOptInterface.Utilities.CachingOptimizer{MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{GLPK.Optimizer}}, MathOptInterface.Utilities.UniversalFallback{MathOptInterface.Utilities.Model{Float64}}}) @ MathOptInterface.Utilities ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Utilities/cachingoptimizer.jl:379 [8] optimize!(model::JuMP.Model; ignore_optimize_hook::Bool, _differentiation_backend::MathOptInterface.Nonlinear.SparseReverseMode, kwargs::@Kwargs{}) @ JuMP ~/.julia/packages/JuMP/vfM5V/src/optimizer_interface.jl:609 [9] optimize! @ ~/.julia/packages/JuMP/vfM5V/src/optimizer_interface.jl:560 [inlined] [10] run_one_tree_method(opt::Pajarito.Optimizer) @ Pajarito ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/src/algorithms.jl:251 [11] optimize(opt::Pajarito.Optimizer) @ Pajarito ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/src/algorithms.jl:56 [12] optimize! @ ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/src/MOI_wrapper.jl:109 [inlined] [13] optimize! @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/MathOptInterface.jl:122 [inlined] [14] optimize!(m::MathOptInterface.Utilities.CachingOptimizer{Pajarito.Optimizer, MathOptInterface.Utilities.UniversalFallback{MathOptInterface.Utilities.Model{Float64}}}) @ MathOptInterface.Utilities ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Utilities/cachingoptimizer.jl:370 [15] optimize! @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/bridge_optimizer.jl:367 [inlined] [16] optimize! @ ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/MathOptInterface.jl:122 [inlined] [17] optimize!(m::MathOptInterface.Utilities.CachingOptimizer{MathOptInterface.Bridges.LazyBridgeOptimizer{MathOptInterface.Utilities.CachingOptimizer{Pajarito.Optimizer, MathOptInterface.Utilities.UniversalFallback{MathOptInterface.Utilities.Model{Float64}}}}, MathOptInterface.Utilities.UniversalFallback{MathOptInterface.Utilities.Model{Float64}}}) @ MathOptInterface.Utilities ~/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Utilities/cachingoptimizer.jl:370 [18] optimize!(model::JuMP.Model; ignore_optimize_hook::Bool, _differentiation_backend::MathOptInterface.Nonlinear.SparseReverseMode, kwargs::@Kwargs{}) @ JuMP ~/.julia/packages/JuMP/vfM5V/src/optimizer_interface.jl:609 [19] optimize! @ ~/.julia/packages/JuMP/vfM5V/src/optimizer_interface.jl:560 [inlined] [20] _specialorderedset(opt::MathOptInterface.OptimizerWithAttributes) @ Main.TestJuMP ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/JuMP_tests.jl:462 [21] macro expansion @ ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/JuMP_tests.jl:69 [inlined] [22] macro expansion @ /opt/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.14/Test/src/Test.jl:2042 [inlined] [23] run_jump_tests(use_iter::Bool, solve_relax_subp::Bool, oa_solver::MathOptInterface.OptimizerWithAttributes, conic_solver::MathOptInterface.OptimizerWithAttributes) @ Main.TestJuMP ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/JuMP_tests.jl:67 [24] macro expansion @ ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/JuMP_tests.jl:29 [inlined] [25] macro expansion @ /opt/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.14/Test/src/Test.jl:1961 [inlined] [26] macro expansion @ ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/JuMP_tests.jl:29 [inlined] [27] macro expansion @ /opt/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.14/Test/src/Test.jl:1961 [inlined] [28] runtests(oa_solver::MathOptInterface.OptimizerWithAttributes, conic_solver::MathOptInterface.OptimizerWithAttributes) @ Main.TestJuMP ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/JuMP_tests.jl:25 [29] top-level scope @ ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/runtests.jl:33 [30] macro expansion @ /opt/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.14/Test/src/Test.jl:1961 [inlined] [31] macro expansion @ ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/runtests.jl:42 [inlined] [32] macro expansion @ /opt/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.14/Test/src/Test.jl:1961 [inlined] [33] macro expansion @ ~/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/runtests.jl:42 [inlined] [34] include(mapexpr::Function, mod::Module, _path::String) @ Base ./Base.jl:310 [35] top-level scope @ none:6 [36] eval(m::Module, e::Any) @ Core ./boot.jl:489 [37] exec_options(opts::Base.JLOptions) @ Base ./client.jl:310 [38] _start() @ Base ./client.jl:577 _soc1_ncuts separated 0 rays before imposing integrality starting one tree method model has no discrete variables, so adding a dummy integer variable OA solver finished with status INFEASIBLE, after 0.012959003448486328 seconds and 3 cuts one tree method used 0 lazy callbacks and 0 heuristic callbacks separated 0 rays before imposing integrality starting one tree method model has no discrete variables, so adding a dummy integer variable separation cuts could not be added new incumbent OA solver finished with status OPTIMAL, after 0.0034410953521728516 seconds and 3 cuts one tree method used 1 lazy callbacks and 0 heuristic callbacks separated 0 rays before imposing integrality starting one tree method OA solver finished with status INFEASIBLE, after 0.007375001907348633 seconds and 3 cuts one tree method used 0 lazy callbacks and 0 heuristic callbacks separated 0 rays before imposing integrality starting one tree method separation cuts could not be added new incumbent OA solver finished with status OPTIMAL, after 0.008285999298095703 seconds and 3 cuts one tree method used 1 lazy callbacks and 0 heuristic callbacks separated 0 rays before imposing integrality starting one tree method separation cuts could not be added new incumbent OA solver finished with status OPTIMAL, after 0.007877111434936523 seconds and 3 cuts one tree method used 1 lazy callbacks and 0 heuristic callbacks separated 0 rays before imposing integrality starting one tree method separation cuts could not be added new incumbent OA solver finished with status OPTIMAL, after 0.008340120315551758 seconds and 3 cuts one tree method used 1 lazy callbacks and 0 heuristic callbacks starting CBF tests ====================================================================================== Information request received. A stacktrace will print followed by a 1.0 second profile. --trace-compile is enabled during profile collection. ====================================================================================== cmd: /opt/julia/bin/julia 25 running 1 of 1 signal (10): User defined signal 1 _ZN4llvm12SelectionDAG15LegalizeVectorsEv at /opt/julia/bin/../lib/julia/libLLVM.so.20.1jl (unknown line) _ZN4llvm16SelectionDAGISel17CodeGenAndEmitDAGEv at /opt/julia/bin/../lib/julia/libLLVM.so.20.1jl (unknown line) _ZN4llvm16SelectionDAGISel20SelectAllBasicBlocksERKNS_8FunctionE at /opt/julia/bin/../lib/julia/libLLVM.so.20.1jl (unknown line) _ZN4llvm16SelectionDAGISel20runOnMachineFunctionERNS_15MachineFunctionE at /opt/julia/bin/../lib/julia/libLLVM.so.20.1jl (unknown line) _ZN4llvm22SelectionDAGISelLegacy20runOnMachineFunctionERNS_15MachineFunctionE at /opt/julia/bin/../lib/julia/libLLVM.so.20.1jl (unknown line) _ZN4llvm19MachineFunctionPass13runOnFunctionERNS_8FunctionE.part.0 at /opt/julia/bin/../lib/julia/libLLVM.so.20.1jl (unknown line) _ZN4llvm13FPPassManager13runOnFunctionERNS_8FunctionE at /opt/julia/bin/../lib/julia/libLLVM.so.20.1jl (unknown line) _ZN4llvm13FPPassManager11runOnModuleERNS_6ModuleE at /opt/julia/bin/../lib/julia/libLLVM.so.20.1jl (unknown line) _ZN4llvm6legacy15PassManagerImpl3runERNS_6ModuleE at /opt/julia/bin/../lib/julia/libLLVM.so.20.1jl (unknown line) operator() at /source/src/jitlayers.cpp:1628 addModule at /source/src/jitlayers.cpp:2119 jl_compile_codeinst_now at /source/src/jitlayers.cpp:682 jl_compile_codeinst_impl at /source/src/jitlayers.cpp:876 jl_compile_method_internal at /source/src/gf.c:3648 _jl_invoke at /source/src/gf.c:4108 [inlined] ijl_apply_generic at /source/src/gf.c:4313 jl_apply at /source/src/julia.h:2284 [inlined] do_call at /source/src/interpreter.c:123 eval_value at /source/src/interpreter.c:243 eval_stmt_value at /source/src/interpreter.c:194 [inlined] eval_body at /source/src/interpreter.c:679 eval_body at /source/src/interpreter.c:550 eval_body at /source/src/interpreter.c:558 eval_body at /source/src/interpreter.c:558 eval_body at /source/src/interpreter.c:558 eval_body at /source/src/interpreter.c:550 eval_body at /source/src/interpreter.c:558 eval_body at /source/src/interpreter.c:558 eval_body at /source/src/interpreter.c:558 jl_interpret_toplevel_thunk at /source/src/interpreter.c:884 jl_toplevel_eval_flex at /source/src/toplevel.c:742 jl_eval_toplevel_stmts at /source/src/toplevel.c:585 jl_toplevel_eval_flex at /source/src/toplevel.c:683 ijl_toplevel_eval at /source/src/toplevel.c:754 ijl_toplevel_eval_in at /source/src/toplevel.c:799 eval at ./boot.jl:489 include_string at ./loading.jl:2994 _jl_invoke at /source/src/gf.c:4116 [inlined] ijl_apply_generic at /source/src/gf.c:4313 _include at ./loading.jl:3054 include at ./Base.jl:310 IncludeInto at ./Base.jl:311 jfptr_IncludeInto_77374.1 at /opt/julia/lib/julia/sys.so (unknown line) _jl_invoke at /source/src/gf.c:4116 [inlined] ijl_apply_generic at /source/src/gf.c:4313 jl_apply at /source/src/julia.h:2284 [inlined] do_call at /source/src/interpreter.c:123 eval_value at /source/src/interpreter.c:243 eval_stmt_value at /source/src/interpreter.c:194 [inlined] eval_body at /source/src/interpreter.c:679 jl_interpret_toplevel_thunk at /source/src/interpreter.c:884 jl_toplevel_eval_flex at /source/src/toplevel.c:742 jl_eval_toplevel_stmts at /source/src/toplevel.c:585 jl_toplevel_eval_flex at /source/src/toplevel.c:683 ijl_toplevel_eval at /source/src/toplevel.c:754 ijl_toplevel_eval_in at /source/src/toplevel.c:799 eval at ./boot.jl:489 exec_options at ./client.jl:310 _start at ./client.jl:577 jfptr__start_48666.1 at /opt/julia/lib/julia/sys.so (unknown line) _jl_invoke at /source/src/gf.c:4116 [inlined] ijl_apply_generic at /source/src/gf.c:4313 jl_apply at /source/src/julia.h:2284 [inlined] true_main at /source/src/jlapi.c:971 jl_repl_entrypoint at /source/src/jlapi.c:1138 main at /source/cli/loader_exe.c:58 unknown function (ip: 0x77c9eed97249) at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 __libc_start_main at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (unknown line) unknown function (ip: 0x4010b8) at /workspace/srcdir/glibc-2.17/csu/../sysdeps/x86_64/start.S unknown function (ip: (nil)) at (unknown file) ============================================================== Profile collected. A report will print at the next yield point. Disabling --trace-compile ============================================================== sssd_strong_15_4 ====================================================================================== Information request received. A stacktrace will print followed by a 1.0 second profile. --trace-compile is enabled during profile collection. ====================================================================================== cmd: /opt/julia/bin/julia 1 running 0 of 1 signal (10): User defined signal 1 epoll_pwait at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (unknown line) uv__io_poll at /workspace/srcdir/libuv/src/unix/linux.c:1404 uv_run at /workspace/srcdir/libuv/src/unix/core.c:430 ijl_task_get_next at /source/src/scheduler.c:457 wait at ./task.jl:1223 wait_forever at ./task.jl:1145 jfptr_wait_forever_69311.1 at /opt/julia/lib/julia/sys.so (unknown line) _jl_invoke at /source/src/gf.c:4116 [inlined] ijl_apply_generic at /source/src/gf.c:4313 jl_apply at /source/src/julia.h:2284 [inlined] start_task at /source/src/task.c:1281 unknown function (ip: (nil)) at (unknown file) ============================================================== Profile collected. A report will print at the next yield point. Disabling --trace-compile ============================================================== ┌ Warning: There were no samples collected in one or more groups. │ This may be due to idle threads, or you may need to run your │ program longer (perhaps by running it multiple times), │ or adjust the delay between samples with `Profile.init()`. └ @ Profile /opt/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.14/Profile/src/Profile.jl:1362 Overhead ╎ [+additional indent] Count File:Line Function ========================================================= Thread 1 (default) Task 0x00007a9993db54b0 Total snapshots: 395. Utilization: 0% ╎395 @Base/task.jl:1145 wait_forever() 394╎ 395 @Base/task.jl:1223 wait() ┌ Warning: There were no samples collected in one or more groups. │ This may be due to idle threads, or you may need to run your │ program longer (perhaps by running it multiple times), │ or adjust the delay between samples with `Profile.init()`. └ @ Profile /opt/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.14/Profile/src/Profile.jl:1362 Overhead ╎ [+additional indent] Count File:Line Function ========================================================= Thread 1 (default) Task 0x000077c9d4dfc010 Total snapshots: 6. Utilization: 100% ╎4 @Base/client.jl:577 _start() ╎ 4 @Base/client.jl:310 exec_options(opts::Base.JLOptions) ╎ 4 @Base/boot.jl:489 eval(m::Module, e::Any) ╎ 4 @Base/Base.jl:311 (::Base.IncludeInto)(fname::String) ╎ 4 @Base/Base.jl:310 include(mapexpr::Function, mod::Module, _path::Strin… ╎ 4 @Base/loading.jl:3054 _include(mapexpr::Function, mod::Module, _path:… ╎ ╎ 4 @Base/loading.jl:2994 include_string(mapexpr::typeof(identity), mod:… 3╎ ╎ 4 @Base/boot.jl:489 eval(m::Module, e::Any) [1] signal 15: Terminated in expression starting at /PkgEval.jl/scripts/evaluate.jl:210 epoll_pwait at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (unknown line) uv__io_poll at /workspace/srcdir/libuv/src/unix/linux.c:1404 uv_run at /workspace/srcdir/libuv/src/unix/core.c:430 ijl_task_get_next at /source/src/scheduler.c:457 wait at ./task.jl:1223 wait_forever at ./task.jl:1145 jfptr_wait_forever_69311.1 at /opt/julia/lib/julia/sys.so (unknown line) _jl_invoke at /source/src/gf.c:4116 [inlined] ijl_apply_generic at /source/src/gf.c:4313 jl_apply at /source/src/julia.h:2284 [inlined] start_task at /source/src/task.c:1281 unknown function (ip: (nil)) at (unknown file) Allocations: 20770473 (Pool: 20769887; Big: 586); GC: 18 [25] signal 15: Terminated in expression starting at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/runtests.jl:32 _glp_spx_eval_pi at /workspace/srcdir/glpk-5.0/src/simplex/spxlp.c:208 _glp_spy_dual at /workspace/srcdir/glpk-5.0/src/simplex/spydual.c:2025 solve_lp at /workspace/srcdir/glpk-5.0/src/draft/glpapi06.c:247 glp_simplex at /workspace/srcdir/glpk-5.0/src/draft/glpapi06.c:475 _glp_ios_solve_node at /workspace/srcdir/glpk-5.0/src/draft/glpios01.c:1367 _glp_ios_driver at /workspace/srcdir/glpk-5.0/src/draft/glpios03.c:1124 solve_mip at /workspace/srcdir/glpk-5.0/src/draft/glpapi09.c:247 glp_intopt at /workspace/srcdir/glpk-5.0/src/draft/glpapi09.c:628 glp_intopt at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/GLPK/2y5V8/src/gen/libglpk_api.jl:342 [inlined] _solve_mip_problem at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/GLPK/2y5V8/src/MOI_wrapper/MOI_wrapper.jl:1399 optimize! at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/GLPK/2y5V8/src/MOI_wrapper/MOI_wrapper.jl:1457 optimize! at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/bridge_optimizer.jl:367 [inlined] optimize! at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/bridge_optimizer.jl:367 [inlined] optimize! at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Utilities/cachingoptimizer.jl:379 unknown function (ip: 0x77c9c4986bb2) at (unknown file) _jl_invoke at /source/src/gf.c:4116 [inlined] ijl_apply_generic at /source/src/gf.c:4313 #optimize!#96 at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/JuMP/vfM5V/src/optimizer_interface.jl:609 optimize! at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/JuMP/vfM5V/src/optimizer_interface.jl:560 [inlined] run_iterative_method at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/src/algorithms.jl:68 optimize at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/src/algorithms.jl:52 optimize! at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/src/MOI_wrapper.jl:109 [inlined] optimize! at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/MathOptInterface.jl:122 [inlined] optimize! at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Utilities/cachingoptimizer.jl:370 optimize! at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/tVdNJ/src/Bridges/bridge_optimizer.jl:367 [inlined] run_cbf at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/CBF_tests.jl:57 macro expansion at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/CBF_tests.jl:46 [inlined] macro expansion at /source/usr/share/julia/stdlib/v1.14/Test/src/Test.jl:2042 [inlined] run_cbf_tests at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/CBF_tests.jl:43 macro expansion at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/CBF_tests.jl:17 [inlined] macro expansion at /source/usr/share/julia/stdlib/v1.14/Test/src/Test.jl:1961 [inlined] runtests at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/CBF_tests.jl:17 unknown function (ip: 0x77c9b7a476d6) at (unknown file) _jl_invoke at /source/src/gf.c:4116 [inlined] ijl_apply_generic at /source/src/gf.c:4313 jl_apply at /source/src/julia.h:2284 [inlined] do_call at /source/src/interpreter.c:123 eval_value at /source/src/interpreter.c:243 eval_stmt_value at /source/src/interpreter.c:194 [inlined] eval_body at /source/src/interpreter.c:679 eval_body at /source/src/interpreter.c:550 eval_body at /source/src/interpreter.c:558 eval_body at /source/src/interpreter.c:558 eval_body at /source/src/interpreter.c:558 eval_body at /source/src/interpreter.c:550 eval_body at /source/src/interpreter.c:558 eval_body at /source/src/interpreter.c:558 eval_body at /source/src/interpreter.c:558 jl_interpret_toplevel_thunk at /source/src/interpreter.c:884 jl_toplevel_eval_flex at /source/src/toplevel.c:742 jl_eval_toplevel_stmts at /source/src/toplevel.c:585 jl_toplevel_eval_flex at /source/src/toplevel.c:683 ijl_toplevel_eval at /source/src/toplevel.c:754 ijl_toplevel_eval_in at /source/src/toplevel.c:799 eval at ./boot.jl:489 include_string at ./loading.jl:2994 _jl_invoke at /source/src/gf.c:4116 [inlined] ijl_apply_generic at /source/src/gf.c:4313 _include at ./loading.jl:3054 include at ./Base.jl:310 IncludeInto at ./Base.jl:311 jfptr_IncludeInto_77374.1 at /opt/julia/lib/julia/sys.so (unknown line) _jl_invoke at /source/src/gf.c:4116 [inlined] ijl_apply_generic at /source/src/gf.c:4313 jl_apply at /source/src/julia.h:2284 [inlined] do_call at /source/src/interpreter.c:123 eval_value at /source/src/interpreter.c:243 eval_stmt_value at /source/src/interpreter.c:194 [inlined] eval_body at /source/src/interpreter.c:679 jl_interpret_toplevel_thunk at /source/src/interpreter.c:884 jl_toplevel_eval_flex at /source/src/toplevel.c:742 jl_eval_toplevel_stmts at /source/src/toplevel.c:585 jl_toplevel_eval_flex at /source/src/toplevel.c:683 ijl_toplevel_eval at /source/src/toplevel.c:754 ijl_toplevel_eval_in at /source/src/toplevel.c:799 eval at ./boot.jl:489 exec_options at ./client.jl:310 _start at ./client.jl:577 jfptr__start_48666.1 at /opt/julia/lib/julia/sys.so (unknown line) _jl_invoke at /source/src/gf.c:4116 [inlined] ijl_apply_generic at /source/src/gf.c:4313 jl_apply at /source/src/julia.h:2284 [inlined] true_main at /source/src/jlapi.c:971 jl_repl_entrypoint at /source/src/jlapi.c:1138 main at /source/cli/loader_exe.c:58 unknown function (ip: 0x77c9eed97249) at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 __libc_start_main at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (unknown line) unknown function (ip: 0x4010b8) at /workspace/srcdir/glibc-2.17/csu/../sysdeps/x86_64/start.S unknown function (ip: (nil)) at (unknown file) Allocations: 1223852687 (Pool: 1223802812; Big: 49875); GC: 165 Assertion failed: lp->tree == NULL Error detected in file api/prob1.c at line 1561 [25] signal 6 (-6): Aborted in expression starting at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/Pajarito/gSNvz/test/runtests.jl:32 unknown function (ip: 0x77c9eedfaebc) at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 gsignal at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (unknown line) abort at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (unknown line) errfunc at /workspace/srcdir/glpk-5.0/src/env/error.c:53 delete_prob at /workspace/srcdir/glpk-5.0/src/api/prob1.c:1561 glp_delete_prob at /workspace/srcdir/glpk-5.0/src/api/prob1.c:1581 glp_delete_prob at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/GLPK/2y5V8/src/gen/libglpk_api.jl:98 [inlined] #4 at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/GLPK/2y5V8/src/MOI_wrapper/MOI_wrapper.jl:189 unknown function (ip: 0x77c9b7b49042) at (unknown file) _jl_invoke at /source/src/gf.c:4116 [inlined] ijl_apply_generic at /source/src/gf.c:4313 run_finalizer at /source/src/gc-common.c:180 jl_gc_run_finalizers_in_list at /source/src/gc-common.c:270 run_finalizers at /source/src/gc-common.c:316 ijl_atexit_hook at /source/src/init.c:295 jl_exit_thread0_cb at /source/src/signals-unix.c:557 Allocations: 1223852687 (Pool: 1223802812; Big: 49875); GC: 165 PkgEval terminated after 2722.65s: test duration exceeded the time limit