Package evaluation of SDDP on Julia 1.13.0-DEV.1141 (aecb173ae6*) started at 2025-09-17T03:35:32.448 ################################################################################ # Set-up # Installing PkgEval dependencies (TestEnv)... Set-up completed after 9.66s ################################################################################ # Installation # Installing SDDP... Resolving package versions... Updating `~/.julia/environments/v1.13/Project.toml` [f4570300] + SDDP v1.13.0 Updating `~/.julia/environments/v1.13/Manifest.toml` [6e4b80f9] + BenchmarkTools v1.6.0 [d1d4a3ce] + BitFlags v0.1.9 [523fee87] + CodecBzip2 v0.8.5 [944b1d66] + CodecZlib v0.7.8 [bbf7d656] + CommonSubexpressions v0.3.1 [34da2185] + Compat v4.18.0 [f0e56b4a] + ConcurrentUtilities v2.5.0 [864edb3b] + DataStructures v0.19.1 [163ba53b] + DiffResults v1.1.0 [b552c78f] + DiffRules v1.15.1 [ffbed154] + DocStringExtensions v0.9.5 [460bff9d] + ExceptionUnwrapping v0.1.11 [e2ba6199] + ExprTools v0.1.10 [f6369f11] + ForwardDiff v1.2.1 [cd3eb016] + HTTP v1.10.17 [92d709cd] + IrrationalConstants v0.2.4 [692b3bcd] + JLLWrappers v1.7.1 [682c06a0] + JSON v0.21.4 [0f8b85d8] + JSON3 v1.14.3 [4076af6c] + JuMP v1.29.1 [2ab3a3ac] + LogExpFunctions v0.3.29 [e6f89c97] + LoggingExtras v1.1.0 [1914dd2f] + MacroTools v0.5.16 [b8f27783] + MathOptInterface v1.44.0 [739be429] + MbedTLS v1.1.9 [d8a4904e] + MutableArithmetics v1.6.4 [77ba4419] + NaNMath v1.1.3 [4d8831e6] + OpenSSL v1.5.0 [bac558e1] + OrderedCollections v1.8.1 [69de0a69] + Parsers v2.8.3 [aea7be01] + PrecompileTools v1.3.3 [21216c6a] + Preferences v1.5.0 [3cdcf5f2] + RecipesBase v1.3.4 [189a3867] + Reexport v1.2.2 [f4570300] + SDDP v1.13.0 [777ac1f9] + SimpleBufferStream v1.2.0 [276daf66] + SpecialFunctions v2.5.1 [1e83bf80] + StaticArraysCore v1.4.3 [10745b16] + Statistics v1.11.1 [856f2bd8] + StructTypes v1.11.0 [a759f4b9] + TimerOutputs v0.5.29 [3bb67fe8] + TranscodingStreams v0.11.3 [5c2747f8] + URIs v1.6.1 [6e34b625] + Bzip2_jll v1.0.9+0 [c8ffd9c3] + MbedTLS_jll v2.28.6+2 [efe28fd5] + OpenSpecFun_jll v0.5.6+0 [56f22d72] + Artifacts v1.11.0 [2a0f44e3] + Base64 v1.11.0 [ade2ca70] + Dates v1.11.0 [8ba89e20] + Distributed v1.11.0 [b77e0a4c] + InteractiveUtils v1.11.0 [ac6e5ff7] + JuliaSyntaxHighlighting v1.12.0 [8f399da3] + Libdl v1.11.0 [37e2e46d] + LinearAlgebra v1.13.0 [56ddb016] + Logging v1.11.0 [d6f4376e] + Markdown v1.11.0 [a63ad114] + Mmap v1.11.0 [ca575930] + NetworkOptions v1.3.0 [de0858da] + Printf v1.11.0 [9abbd945] + Profile v1.11.0 [9a3f8284] + Random v1.11.0 [ea8e919c] + SHA v0.7.0 [9e88b42a] + Serialization v1.11.0 [6462fe0b] + Sockets v1.11.0 [2f01184e] + SparseArrays v1.13.0 [f489334b] + StyledStrings v1.11.0 [fa267f1f] + TOML v1.0.3 [8dfed614] + Test v1.11.0 [cf7118a7] + UUIDs v1.11.0 [4ec0a83e] + Unicode v1.11.0 [e66e0078] + CompilerSupportLibraries_jll v1.3.0+1 [14a3606d] + MozillaCACerts_jll v2025.9.9 [4536629a] + OpenBLAS_jll v0.3.29+0 [05823500] + OpenLibm_jll v0.8.7+0 [458c3c95] + OpenSSL_jll v3.5.2+0 [bea87d4a] + SuiteSparse_jll v7.10.1+0 [83775a58] + Zlib_jll v1.3.1+2 [8e850b90] + libblastrampoline_jll v5.13.1+0 Installation completed after 4.64s ################################################################################ # Precompilation # Precompiling PkgEval dependencies... Precompiling package dependencies... Precompilation completed after 100.49s ################################################################################ # Testing # Testing SDDP Status `/tmp/jl_5l0GUk/Project.toml` [87dc4568] HiGHS v1.19.0 [b6b21f68] Ipopt v1.11.0 [682c06a0] JSON v0.21.4 [7d188eb4] JSONSchema v1.4.1 [91a5bcdd] Plots v1.40.20 [f4570300] SDDP v1.13.0 [10745b16] Statistics v1.11.1 [8ba89e20] Distributed v1.11.0 [f43a241f] Downloads v1.7.0 [44cfe95a] Pkg v1.13.0 [9a3f8284] Random v1.11.0 [8dfed614] Test v1.11.0 Status `/tmp/jl_5l0GUk/Manifest.toml` [66dad0bd] AliasTables v1.1.3 [6e4b80f9] BenchmarkTools v1.6.0 [d1d4a3ce] BitFlags v0.1.9 [523fee87] CodecBzip2 v0.8.5 [944b1d66] CodecZlib v0.7.8 [35d6a980] ColorSchemes v3.31.0 [3da002f7] ColorTypes v0.12.1 [c3611d14] ColorVectorSpace v0.11.0 [5ae59095] Colors v0.13.1 [bbf7d656] CommonSubexpressions v0.3.1 [34da2185] Compat v4.18.0 [f0e56b4a] ConcurrentUtilities v2.5.0 [d38c429a] Contour v0.6.3 [9a962f9c] DataAPI v1.16.0 [864edb3b] DataStructures v0.19.1 [8bb1440f] DelimitedFiles v1.9.1 [163ba53b] DiffResults v1.1.0 [b552c78f] DiffRules v1.15.1 [ffbed154] DocStringExtensions v0.9.5 [460bff9d] ExceptionUnwrapping v0.1.11 [e2ba6199] ExprTools v0.1.10 [c87230d0] FFMPEG v0.4.4 [53c48c17] FixedPointNumbers v0.8.5 [1fa38f19] Format v1.3.7 [f6369f11] ForwardDiff v1.2.1 [28b8d3ca] GR v0.73.17 [42e2da0e] Grisu v1.0.2 [cd3eb016] HTTP v1.10.17 [87dc4568] HiGHS v1.19.0 [b6b21f68] Ipopt v1.11.0 [92d709cd] IrrationalConstants v0.2.4 [1019f520] JLFzf v0.1.11 [692b3bcd] JLLWrappers v1.7.1 [682c06a0] JSON v0.21.4 [0f8b85d8] JSON3 v1.14.3 [7d188eb4] JSONSchema v1.4.1 [4076af6c] JuMP v1.29.1 [b964fa9f] LaTeXStrings v1.4.0 [23fbe1c1] Latexify v0.16.10 [2ab3a3ac] LogExpFunctions v0.3.29 [e6f89c97] LoggingExtras v1.1.0 [1914dd2f] MacroTools v0.5.16 [8c4f8055] MathOptIIS v0.1.1 [b8f27783] MathOptInterface v1.44.0 [739be429] MbedTLS v1.1.9 [442fdcdd] Measures v0.3.2 [e1d29d7a] Missings v1.2.0 [d8a4904e] MutableArithmetics v1.6.4 [77ba4419] NaNMath v1.1.3 [4d8831e6] OpenSSL v1.5.0 [bac558e1] OrderedCollections v1.8.1 [69de0a69] Parsers v2.8.3 [ccf2f8ad] PlotThemes v3.3.0 [995b91a9] PlotUtils v1.4.3 [91a5bcdd] Plots v1.40.20 [aea7be01] PrecompileTools v1.3.3 [21216c6a] Preferences v1.5.0 [43287f4e] PtrArrays v1.3.0 [3cdcf5f2] RecipesBase v1.3.4 [01d81517] RecipesPipeline v0.6.12 [189a3867] Reexport v1.2.2 [05181044] RelocatableFolders v1.0.1 [ae029012] Requires v1.3.1 [f4570300] SDDP v1.13.0 [6c6a2e73] Scratch v1.3.0 [992d4aef] Showoff v1.0.3 [777ac1f9] SimpleBufferStream v1.2.0 [a2af1166] SortingAlgorithms v1.2.2 [276daf66] SpecialFunctions v2.5.1 [860ef19b] StableRNGs v1.0.3 [1e83bf80] StaticArraysCore v1.4.3 [10745b16] Statistics v1.11.1 [82ae8749] StatsAPI v1.7.1 [2913bbd2] StatsBase v0.34.6 [856f2bd8] StructTypes v1.11.0 [62fd8b95] TensorCore v0.1.1 [a759f4b9] TimerOutputs v0.5.29 [3bb67fe8] TranscodingStreams v0.11.3 [5c2747f8] URIs v1.6.1 [1cfade01] UnicodeFun v0.4.1 [1986cc42] Unitful v1.25.0 [45397f5d] UnitfulLatexify v1.7.0 [41fe7b60] Unzip v0.2.0 [ae81ac8f] ASL_jll v0.1.3+0 [6e34b625] Bzip2_jll v1.0.9+0 [83423d85] Cairo_jll v1.18.5+0 [ee1fde0b] Dbus_jll v1.16.2+0 [2702e6a9] EpollShim_jll v0.0.20230411+1 [2e619515] Expat_jll v2.7.1+0 [b22a6f82] FFMPEG_jll v7.1.1+0 [a3f928ae] Fontconfig_jll v2.17.1+0 [d7e528f0] FreeType2_jll v2.13.4+0 [559328eb] FriBidi_jll v1.0.17+0 [0656b61e] GLFW_jll v3.4.0+2 [d2c73de3] GR_jll v0.73.17+0 [b0724c58] GettextRuntime_jll v0.22.4+0 [61579ee1] Ghostscript_jll v9.55.1+0 [7746bdde] Glib_jll v2.86.0+0 [3b182d85] Graphite2_jll v1.3.15+0 [2e76f6c2] HarfBuzz_jll v8.5.1+0 [8fd58aa0] HiGHS_jll v1.11.0+1 [e33a78d0] Hwloc_jll v2.12.2+0 [9cc047cb] Ipopt_jll v300.1400.1900+0 [aacddb02] JpegTurbo_jll v3.1.3+0 [c1c5ebd0] LAME_jll v3.100.3+0 [88015f11] LERC_jll v4.0.1+0 [1d63c593] LLVMOpenMP_jll v18.1.8+0 [dd4b983a] LZO_jll v2.10.3+0 [e9f186c6] Libffi_jll v3.4.7+0 [7e76a0d4] Libglvnd_jll v1.7.1+1 [94ce4f54] Libiconv_jll v1.18.0+0 [4b2f31a3] Libmount_jll v2.41.1+0 [89763e89] Libtiff_jll v4.7.1+0 [38a345b3] Libuuid_jll v2.41.1+0 [d00139f3] METIS_jll v5.1.3+0 [d7ed1dd3] MUMPS_seq_jll v500.800.100+0 [c8ffd9c3] MbedTLS_jll v2.28.6+2 [e7412a2a] Ogg_jll v1.3.6+0 [656ef2d0] OpenBLAS32_jll v0.3.29+0 [efe28fd5] OpenSpecFun_jll v0.5.6+0 [91d4177d] Opus_jll v1.5.2+0 [36c8627f] Pango_jll v1.56.4+0 ⌅ [30392449] Pixman_jll v0.44.2+0 [c0090381] Qt6Base_jll v6.8.2+1 [629bc702] Qt6Declarative_jll v6.8.2+1 [ce943373] Qt6ShaderTools_jll v6.8.2+1 [e99dba38] Qt6Wayland_jll v6.8.2+1 [319450e9] SPRAL_jll v2025.5.20+0 [a44049a8] Vulkan_Loader_jll v1.3.243+0 [a2964d1f] Wayland_jll v1.24.0+0 ⌅ [02c8fc9c] XML2_jll v2.13.8+0 [ffd25f8a] XZ_jll v5.8.1+0 [f67eecfb] Xorg_libICE_jll v1.1.2+0 [c834827a] Xorg_libSM_jll v1.2.6+0 [4f6342f7] Xorg_libX11_jll v1.8.12+0 [0c0b7dd1] Xorg_libXau_jll v1.0.13+0 [935fb764] Xorg_libXcursor_jll v1.2.4+0 [a3789734] Xorg_libXdmcp_jll v1.1.6+0 [1082639a] Xorg_libXext_jll v1.3.7+0 [d091e8ba] Xorg_libXfixes_jll v6.0.1+0 [a51aa0fd] Xorg_libXi_jll v1.8.3+0 [d1454406] Xorg_libXinerama_jll v1.1.6+0 [ec84b674] Xorg_libXrandr_jll v1.5.5+0 [ea2f1a96] Xorg_libXrender_jll v0.9.12+0 [a65dc6b1] Xorg_libpciaccess_jll v0.18.1+0 [c7cfdc94] Xorg_libxcb_jll v1.17.1+0 [cc61e674] Xorg_libxkbfile_jll v1.1.3+0 [e920d4aa] Xorg_xcb_util_cursor_jll v0.1.5+0 [12413925] Xorg_xcb_util_image_jll v0.4.1+0 [2def613f] Xorg_xcb_util_jll v0.4.1+0 [975044d2] Xorg_xcb_util_keysyms_jll v0.4.1+0 [0d47668e] Xorg_xcb_util_renderutil_jll v0.3.10+0 [c22f9ab0] Xorg_xcb_util_wm_jll v0.4.2+0 [35661453] Xorg_xkbcomp_jll v1.4.7+0 [33bec58e] Xorg_xkeyboard_config_jll v2.44.0+0 [c5fb5394] Xorg_xtrans_jll v1.6.0+0 [35ca27e7] eudev_jll v3.2.14+0 [214eeab7] fzf_jll v0.61.1+0 [a4ae2306] libaom_jll v3.12.1+0 [0ac62f75] libass_jll v0.17.4+0 [1183f4f0] libdecor_jll v0.2.2+0 [2db6ffa8] libevdev_jll v1.13.4+0 [f638f0a6] libfdk_aac_jll v2.0.4+0 [36db933b] libinput_jll v1.28.1+0 [b53b4c65] libpng_jll v1.6.50+0 [f27f6e37] libvorbis_jll v1.3.8+0 [009596ad] mtdev_jll v1.1.7+0 [1270edf5] x264_jll v10164.0.1+0 [dfaa095f] x265_jll v4.1.0+0 [d8fb68d0] xkbcommon_jll v1.9.2+0 [0dad84c5] ArgTools v1.1.2 [56f22d72] Artifacts v1.11.0 [2a0f44e3] Base64 v1.11.0 [ade2ca70] Dates v1.11.0 [8ba89e20] Distributed v1.11.0 [f43a241f] Downloads v1.7.0 [7b1f6079] FileWatching v1.11.0 [b77e0a4c] InteractiveUtils v1.11.0 [ac6e5ff7] JuliaSyntaxHighlighting v1.12.0 [b27032c2] LibCURL v0.6.4 [76f85450] LibGit2 v1.11.0 [8f399da3] Libdl v1.11.0 [37e2e46d] LinearAlgebra v1.13.0 [56ddb016] Logging v1.11.0 [d6f4376e] Markdown v1.11.0 [a63ad114] Mmap v1.11.0 [ca575930] NetworkOptions v1.3.0 [44cfe95a] Pkg v1.13.0 [de0858da] Printf v1.11.0 [9abbd945] Profile v1.11.0 [3fa0cd96] REPL v1.11.0 [9a3f8284] Random v1.11.0 [ea8e919c] SHA v0.7.0 [9e88b42a] Serialization v1.11.0 [6462fe0b] Sockets v1.11.0 [2f01184e] SparseArrays v1.13.0 [f489334b] StyledStrings v1.11.0 [fa267f1f] TOML v1.0.3 [a4e569a6] Tar v1.10.0 [8dfed614] Test v1.11.0 [cf7118a7] UUIDs v1.11.0 [4ec0a83e] Unicode v1.11.0 [e66e0078] CompilerSupportLibraries_jll v1.3.0+1 [deac9b47] LibCURL_jll v8.16.0+0 [e37daf67] LibGit2_jll v1.9.1+0 [29816b5a] LibSSH2_jll v1.11.3+1 [14a3606d] MozillaCACerts_jll v2025.9.9 [4536629a] OpenBLAS_jll v0.3.29+0 [05823500] OpenLibm_jll v0.8.7+0 [458c3c95] OpenSSL_jll v3.5.2+0 [efcefdf7] PCRE2_jll v10.46.0+0 [bea87d4a] SuiteSparse_jll v7.10.1+0 [83775a58] Zlib_jll v1.3.1+2 [3161d3a3] Zstd_jll v1.5.7+1 [8e850b90] libblastrampoline_jll v5.13.1+0 [8e850ede] nghttp2_jll v1.67.0+0 [3f19e933] p7zip_jll v17.6.0+0 Info Packages marked with ⌅ have new versions available but compatibility constraints restrict them from upgrading. Testing Running tests... [ Info: Experimental.jl Precompiling packages... 11264.7 ms ✓ MathOptIIS 37795.1 ms ✓ HiGHS 2 dependencies successfully precompiled in 50 seconds. 52 already precompiled. [ Info: fetching remote ref https://jump.dev/MathOptFormat/schemas/mof.1.schema.json [ Info: Inner.jl Node: 3 - elapsed time: 0.13 plus 3.63 for vertex selection. Node: 2 - elapsed time: 0.04 plus 0.01 for vertex selection. Node: 1 - elapsed time: 0.04 plus 0.01 for vertex selection. First-stage upper bound: 45.83333333333332 Total time for upper bound: 3.863831939 ┌ Warning: You must select an optimizer for performing vertex selection. └ @ SDDP.Inner ~/.julia/packages/SDDP/39RYL/src/Inner.jl:1048 Node: 19 - elapsed time: 0.1 plus 0.06 for vertex selection. Node: 18 - elapsed time: 0.2 plus 0.06 for vertex selection. Node: 17 - elapsed time: 0.2 plus 0.06 for vertex selection. Node: 16 - elapsed time: 0.19 plus 0.05 for vertex selection. Node: 15 - elapsed time: 0.19 plus 0.06 for vertex selection. Node: 14 - elapsed time: 0.19 plus 0.06 for vertex selection. Node: 13 - elapsed time: 0.2 plus 0.06 for vertex selection. Node: 12 - elapsed time: 0.19 plus 0.06 for vertex selection. Node: 11 - elapsed time: 0.19 plus 0.05 for vertex selection. Node: 10 - elapsed time: 0.18 plus 0.06 for vertex selection. Node: 9 - elapsed time: 0.19 plus 0.06 for vertex selection. Node: 8 - elapsed time: 0.2 plus 0.06 for vertex selection. Node: 7 - elapsed time: 0.2 plus 0.05 for vertex selection. Node: 6 - elapsed time: 0.2 plus 0.06 for vertex selection. Node: 5 - elapsed time: 0.19 plus 0.06 for vertex selection. Node: 4 - elapsed time: 0.19 plus 0.06 for vertex selection. Node: 3 - elapsed time: 0.21 plus 0.06 for vertex selection. Node: 2 - elapsed time: 0.21 plus 0.06 for vertex selection. Node: 1 - elapsed time: 0.2 plus 0.05 for vertex selection. Selection removed 500 vertices [ Info: MSPFormat.jl [ Info: algorithm.jl ┌ Warning: Unable to recover in direct mode! Remove `direct = true` when creating the policy graph. └ @ SDDP ~/.julia/packages/SDDP/39RYL/src/algorithm.jl:401 [ Info: Writing cuts to the file `model_infeasible_node_1.cuts.json` [ Info: Writing cuts to the file `model_infeasible_node_1.cuts.json` ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 2 state variables : 1 scenarios : 1.00000e+00 existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [3, 3] JuMP.AffExpr in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [1, 1] JuMP.VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [2, 2] JuMP.VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [1, 1] numerical stability report matrix range [1e+00, 1e+00] objective range [1e+00, 1e+00] bounds range [0e+00, 0e+00] rhs range [2e+00, 2e+00] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- † 1 0.000000e+00 0.000000e+00 5.951500e-02 4 1 3 0.000000e+00 0.000000e+00 5.592849e-01 12 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : iteration_limit total time (s) : 5.592849e-01 total solves : 12 best bound : 0.000000e+00 simulation ci : 0.000000e+00 ± 0.000000e+00 numeric issues : 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 3 state variables : 1 scenarios : 8.00000e+00 existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [6, 6] JuMP.AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [1, 1] JuMP.VariableRef in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [1, 1] JuMP.VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [4, 4] JuMP.VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [2, 3] numerical stability report matrix range [1e+00, 1e+00] objective range [1e+00, 3e+02] bounds range [1e+02, 2e+02] rhs range [0e+00, 0e+00] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 1.100000e+05 1.075000e+05 2.226400e-02 9 1 20 7.500000e+04 1.075000e+05 5.937171e-01 204 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : simulation_stopping total time (s) : 5.937171e-01 total solves : 204 best bound : 1.075000e+05 simulation ci : 8.268750e+04 ± 1.084410e+04 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- ┌ Warning: Re-training a model with existing cuts! │ │ Are you sure you want to do this? The output from this training may be │ misleading because the policy is already partially trained. │ │ If you meant to train a new policy with different settings, you must │ build a new model. │ │ If you meant to refine a previously trained policy, turn off this │ warning by passing `add_to_existing_cuts = true` as a keyword argument │ to `SDDP.train`. │ │ In a future release, this warning may turn into an error. └ @ SDDP ~/.julia/packages/SDDP/39RYL/src/algorithm.jl:1181 ┌ Warning: Re-training a model with existing cuts! │ │ Are you sure you want to do this? The output from this training may be │ misleading because the policy is already partially trained. │ │ If you meant to train a new policy with different settings, you must │ build a new model. │ │ If you meant to refine a previously trained policy, turn off this │ warning by passing `add_to_existing_cuts = true` as a keyword argument │ to `SDDP.train`. │ │ In a future release, this warning may turn into an error. └ @ SDDP ~/.julia/packages/SDDP/39RYL/src/algorithm.jl:1181 [ Info: binary_expansion.jl [ Info: deterministic_equivalent.jl [ Info: modeling_aids.jl ┌ Warning: Budget for nodes is less than the number of stages. Using one node per stage. └ @ SDDP ~/.julia/packages/SDDP/39RYL/src/modeling_aids.jl:125 [ Info: user_interface.jl [ Info: backward_sampling_schemes.jl [ Info: bellman_functions.jl ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 3 state variables : 1 scenarios : 2.70000e+01 existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [6, 6] JuMP.AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [2, 2] JuMP.VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [5, 5] JuMP.VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [1, 2] numerical stability report matrix range [1e+00, 1e+00] objective range [1e+00, 1e+01] bounds range [5e+00, 2e+01] rhs range [2e+00, 1e+01] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 2.500000e+01 2.138889e+01 1.046165e+00 12 1 10 2.500000e+00 3.361111e+01 1.072868e+00 120 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : iteration_limit total time (s) : 1.072868e+00 total solves : 120 best bound : 3.361111e+01 simulation ci : 2.775000e+01 ± 3.280073e+01 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 3 state variables : 1 scenarios : 2.70000e+01 existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [6, 6] JuMP.AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [2, 2] JuMP.VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [5, 5] JuMP.VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [1, 2] numerical stability report matrix range [1e+00, 1e+00] objective range [1e+00, 1e+01] bounds range [5e+00, 2e+01] rhs range [2e+00, 1e+01] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 2.500000e+01 2.083333e+01 1.257110e-02 12 1 10 2.500000e+00 3.361111e+01 3.553820e-02 120 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : iteration_limit total time (s) : 3.553820e-02 total solves : 120 best bound : 3.361111e+01 simulation ci : 2.775000e+01 ± 3.280073e+01 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 1 state variables : 1 scenarios : Inf existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [8, 8] JuMP.AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [2, 2] JuMP.VariableRef in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [3, 3] JuMP.VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [5, 5] JuMP.VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [1, 1] numerical stability report matrix range [1e+00, 1e+00] objective range [1e+00, 1e+01] bounds range [5e+00, 2e+01] rhs range [0e+00, 0e+00] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 9.250000e+01 5.268631e+01 1.404595e-02 46 1 50 0.000000e+00 1.191663e+02 4.983749e-01 1625 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : iteration_limit total time (s) : 4.983749e-01 total solves : 1625 best bound : 1.191663e+02 simulation ci : 7.795000e+01 ± 2.885518e+01 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 1 state variables : 1 scenarios : Inf existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [8, 8] JuMP.AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [2, 2] JuMP.VariableRef in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [3, 3] JuMP.VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [5, 5] JuMP.VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [1, 1] numerical stability report matrix range [1e+00, 1e+00] objective range [1e+00, 1e+01] bounds range [5e+00, 2e+01] rhs range [0e+00, 0e+00] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 9.250000e+01 5.268631e+01 1.139617e-02 46 1 50 0.000000e+00 1.191663e+02 5.040820e-01 1625 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : iteration_limit total time (s) : 5.040820e-01 total solves : 1625 best bound : 1.191663e+02 simulation ci : 7.795000e+01 ± 2.885518e+01 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- [ Info: duality_handlers.jl ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 2 state variables : 2 scenarios : 1.00000e+02 existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [5, 11] JuMP.AffExpr in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [2, 2] JuMP.VariableRef in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [2, 2] JuMP.VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [3, 7] JuMP.VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [2, 7] JuMP.VariableRef in MOI.ZeroOne : [4, 4] numerical stability report matrix range [1e+00, 6e+00] objective range [1e+00, 3e+01] bounds range [1e+00, 1e+02] rhs range [0e+00, 0e+00] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 -4.650000e+01 -7.053967e+01 4.076258e+00 103 1 3S -5.785826e+01 -6.755367e+01 6.532537e+00 309 1 6S -6.064080e+01 -6.678327e+01 8.612980e+00 618 1 15S -4.168889e+01 -6.677644e+01 1.411670e+01 1545 1 25S -4.168889e+01 -6.677644e+01 1.982508e+01 2575 1 35S -3.268889e+01 -6.677644e+01 2.570944e+01 3605 1 45S -4.168889e+01 -6.677644e+01 3.149463e+01 4635 1 55S -4.868889e+01 -6.677644e+01 3.731139e+01 5665 1 65S -4.168889e+01 -6.677644e+01 4.312263e+01 6695 1 75S -8.368889e+01 -6.677644e+01 4.892370e+01 7725 1 85S -6.068889e+01 -6.677644e+01 5.477958e+01 8755 1 95S -6.468889e+01 -6.677644e+01 6.060899e+01 9785 1 100 -8.368889e+01 -6.677644e+01 6.291938e+01 10300 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : iteration_limit total time (s) : 6.291938e+01 total solves : 10300 best bound : -6.677644e+01 simulation ci : -5.960112e+01 ± 3.154656e+00 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- ****************************************************************************** This program contains Ipopt, a library for large-scale nonlinear optimization. Ipopt is released as open source code under the Eclipse Public License (EPL). For more information visit https://github.com/coin-or/Ipopt ****************************************************************************** [ Info: forward_passes.jl ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 2 state variables : 1 scenarios : 4.00000e+00 existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [3, 3] JuMP.VariableRef in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [1, 1] JuMP.VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [1, 1] JuMP.VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [2, 2] numerical stability report matrix range [0e+00, 0e+00] objective range [1e+00, 1e+00] bounds range [1e+00, 1e+02] rhs range [0e+00, 0e+00] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 3.000000e+00 6.000000e+00 1.573086e-03 8 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : iteration_limit total time (s) : 1.573086e-03 total solves : 8 best bound : 6.000000e+00 simulation ci : 3.000000e+00 ± NaN numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- ┌ Warning: Re-training a model with existing cuts! │ │ Are you sure you want to do this? The output from this training may be │ misleading because the policy is already partially trained. │ │ If you meant to train a new policy with different settings, you must │ build a new model. │ │ If you meant to refine a previously trained policy, turn off this │ warning by passing `add_to_existing_cuts = true` as a keyword argument │ to `SDDP.train`. │ │ In a future release, this warning may turn into an error. └ @ SDDP ~/.julia/packages/SDDP/39RYL/src/algorithm.jl:1181 [ Info: local_improvement_search.jl [ Info: exp = 15 [ Info: OA(exp) = 220 [ Info: piecewise = 7 [ Info: OA(piecewise) = 6 [ Info: squared = 3 [ Info: OA(squared) = 16 [ Info: parallel_schemes.jl From worker 2: Precompiling packages... From worker 5: Precompiling packages... From worker 3: Precompiling packages... From worker 4: Precompiling packages... From worker 5: HTTP Being precompiled by another process (pid: 179, pidfile: /home/pkgeval/.julia/compiled/v1.13/HTTP/zXWya_eJM3J.ji.pidfile) From worker 3: HTTP Being precompiled by another process (pid: 179, pidfile: /home/pkgeval/.julia/compiled/v1.13/HTTP/zXWya_eJM3J.ji.pidfile) From worker 4: HTTP Being precompiled by another process (pid: 179, pidfile: /home/pkgeval/.julia/compiled/v1.13/HTTP/zXWya_eJM3J.ji.pidfile) From worker 2: 36207.3 ms ✓ HTTP From worker 5: 35855.3 ms ✓ HTTP From worker 5: SDDP Being precompiled by another process (pid: 179, pidfile: /home/pkgeval/.julia/compiled/v1.13/SDDP/rTTnU_eJM3J.ji.pidfile) From worker 4: 35932.6 ms ✓ HTTP From worker 4: SDDP Being precompiled by another process (pid: 179, pidfile: /home/pkgeval/.julia/compiled/v1.13/SDDP/rTTnU_eJM3J.ji.pidfile) From worker 3: 36214.6 ms ✓ HTTP From worker 3: SDDP Being precompiled by another process (pid: 179, pidfile: /home/pkgeval/.julia/compiled/v1.13/SDDP/rTTnU_eJM3J.ji.pidfile) From worker 2: 22905.0 ms ✓ SDDP From worker 2: 2 dependencies successfully precompiled in 65 seconds. 69 already precompiled. From worker 2: 1 dependency had output during precompilation: From worker 2: ┌ HTTP From worker 2: │ ┌ Info: Ignoring an error that occurred during the precompilation workload From worker 2: │ │ exception = From worker 2: │ │ HTTP.ConnectError for url = `https://localhost:57813`: IOError: connect: connection refused (ECONNREFUSED) From worker 2: │ │ Stacktrace: From worker 2: │ │ [1] getconnection(::Type{Sockets.TCPSocket}, host::SubString{String}, port::SubString{String}; keepalive::Bool, readtimeout::Int64, kw::@Kwargs{require_ssl_verification::Bool, iofunction::Nothing, decompress::Nothing, verbose::Int64}) From worker 2: │ │ @ HTTP.Connections ~/.julia/packages/HTTP/JcAHX/src/Connections.jl:531 From worker 2: │ │ [2] getconnection From worker 2: │ │ @ ~/.julia/packages/HTTP/JcAHX/src/Connections.jl:508 [inlined] From worker 2: │ │ [3] getconnection(::Type{OpenSSL.SSLStream}, host::SubString{String}, port::SubString{String}; kw::@Kwargs{require_ssl_verification::Bool, keepalive::Bool, readtimeout::Int64, iofunction::Nothing, decompress::Nothing, verbose::Int64}) From worker 2: │ │ @ HTTP.Connections ~/.julia/packages/HTTP/JcAHX/src/Connections.jl:585 From worker 2: │ │ [4] getconnection From worker 2: │ │ @ ~/.julia/packages/HTTP/JcAHX/src/Connections.jl:578 [inlined] From worker 2: │ │ [5] #13 From worker 2: │ │ @ ~/.julia/packages/HTTP/JcAHX/src/Connections.jl:467 [inlined] From worker 2: │ │ [6] macro expansion From worker 2: │ │ @ ~/.julia/packages/ConcurrentUtilities/ofY4K/src/try_with_timeout.jl:92 [inlined] From worker 2: │ │ [7] (::ConcurrentUtilities.var"#try_with_timeout##2#try_with_timeout##3"{Any, Channel{Any}, HTTP.Connections.var"#13#14"{OpenSSL.SSLStream, Bool, Bool, @Kwargs{readtimeout::Int64, iofunction::Nothing, decompress::Nothing, verbose::Int64}, SubString{String}, SubString{String}}, Timer})() From worker 2: │ │ @ ConcurrentUtilities ~/.julia/packages/ConcurrentUtilities/ofY4K/src/ConcurrentUtilities.jl:10 From worker 2: │ │ Stacktrace: From worker 2: │ │ [1] (::HTTP.ConnectionRequest.var"#connections#connectionlayer##0"{HTTP.ConnectionRequest.var"#connections#1#connectionlayer##1"{HTTP.TimeoutRequest.var"#timeouts#timeoutlayer##0"{HTTP.TimeoutRequest.var"#timeouts#1#timeoutlayer##1"{HTTP.ExceptionRequest.var"#exceptions#exceptionlayer##0"{HTTP.ExceptionRequest.var"#exceptions#1#exceptionlayer##1"{typeof(HTTP.StreamRequest.streamlayer)}}}}}})(req::HTTP.Messages.Request; proxy::Nothing, socket_type::Type, socket_type_tls::Nothing, readtimeout::Int64, connect_timeout::Int64, logerrors::Bool, logtag::Nothing, closeimmediately::Bool, kw::@Kwargs{iofunction::Nothing, decompress::Nothing, verbose::Int64}) From worker 2: │ │ @ HTTP.ConnectionRequest ~/.julia/packages/HTTP/JcAHX/src/clientlayers/ConnectionRequest.jl:88 From worker 2: │ │ [2] connections From worker 2: │ │ @ ~/.julia/packages/HTTP/JcAHX/src/clientlayers/ConnectionRequest.jl:60 [inlined] From worker 2: │ │ [3] (::Base.var"#47#48"{Base.var"#49#50"{ExponentialBackOff, HTTP.RetryRequest.var"#retrylayer##2#retrylayer##3"{Int64, typeof(HTTP.RetryRequest.FALSE), HTTP.Messages.Request, Base.RefValue{Int64}}, HTTP.ConnectionRequest.var"#connections#connectionlayer##0"{HTTP.ConnectionRequest.var"#connections#1#connectionlayer##1"{HTTP.TimeoutRequest.var"#timeouts#timeoutlayer##0"{HTTP.TimeoutRequest.var"#timeouts#1#timeoutlayer##1"{HTTP.ExceptionRequest.var"#exceptions#exceptionlayer##0"{HTTP.ExceptionRequest.var"#exceptions#1#exceptionlayer##1"{typeof(HTTP.StreamRequest.streamlayer)}}}}}}}})(args::HTTP.Messages.Request; kwargs::@Kwargs{iofunction::Nothing, decompress::Nothing, verbose::Int64}) From worker 2: │ │ @ Base ./error.jl:321 From worker 2: │ │ [4] kwcall(::@NamedTuple{iofunction::Nothing, decompress::Nothing, verbose::Int64}, ::Base.var"#47#48"{Base.var"#49#50"{ExponentialBackOff, HTTP.RetryRequest.var"#retrylayer##2#retrylayer##3"{Int64, typeof(HTTP.RetryRequest.FALSE), HTTP.Messages.Request, Base.RefValue{Int64}}, HTTP.ConnectionRequest.var"#connections#connectionlayer##0"{HTTP.ConnectionRequest.var"#connections#1#connectionlayer##1"{HTTP.TimeoutRequest.var"#timeouts#timeoutlayer##0"{HTTP.TimeoutRequest.var"#timeouts#1#timeoutlayer##1"{HTTP.ExceptionRequest.var"#exceptions#exceptionlayer##0"{HTTP.ExceptionRequest.var"#exceptions#1#exceptionlayer##1"{typeof(HTTP.StreamRequest.streamlayer)}}}}}}}}, args::HTTP.Messages.Request) From worker 2: │ │ @ Base ./error.jl:304 From worker 2: │ │ [5] (::HTTP.RetryRequest.var"#manageretries#retrylayer##0"{HTTP.RetryRequest.var"#manageretries#1#retrylayer##1"{HTTP.ConnectionRequest.var"#connections#connectionlayer##0"{HTTP.ConnectionRequest.var"#connections#1#connectionlayer##1"{HTTP.TimeoutRequest.var"#timeouts#timeoutlayer##0"{HTTP.TimeoutRequest.var"#timeouts#1#timeoutlayer##1"{HTTP.ExceptionRequest.var"#exceptions#exceptionlayer##0"{HTTP.ExceptionRequest.var"#exceptions#1#exceptionlayer##1"{typeof(HTTP.StreamRequest.streamlayer)}}}}}}}})(req::HTTP.Messages.Request; retry::Bool, retries::Int64, retry_delays::ExponentialBackOff, retry_check::Function, retry_non_idempotent::Bool, kw::@Kwargs{iofunction::Nothing, decompress::Nothing, verbose::Int64}) From worker 2: │ │ @ HTTP.RetryRequest ~/.julia/packages/HTTP/JcAHX/src/clientlayers/RetryRequest.jl:75 From worker 2: │ │ [6] manageretries From worker 2: │ │ @ ~/.julia/packages/HTTP/JcAHX/src/clientlayers/RetryRequest.jl:30 [inlined] From worker 2: │ │ [7] (::HTTP.CookieRequest.var"#managecookies#cookielayer##0"{HTTP.CookieRequest.var"#managecookies#1#cookielayer##1"{HTTP.RetryRequest.var"#manageretries#retrylayer##0"{HTTP.RetryRequest.var"#manageretries#1#retrylayer##1"{HTTP.ConnectionRequest.var"#connections#connectionlayer##0"{HTTP.ConnectionRequest.var"#connections#1#connectionlayer##1"{HTTP.TimeoutRequest.var"#timeouts#timeoutlayer##0"{HTTP.TimeoutRequest.var"#timeouts#1#timeoutlayer##1"{HTTP.ExceptionRequest.var"#exceptions#exceptionlayer##0"{HTTP.ExceptionRequest.var"#exceptions#1#exceptionlayer##1"{typeof(HTTP.StreamRequest.streamlayer)}}}}}}}}}})(req::HTTP.Messages.Request; cookies::Bool, cookiejar::HTTP.Cookies.CookieJar, kw::@Kwargs{iofunction::Nothing, decompress::Nothing, verbose::Int64}) From worker 2: │ │ @ HTTP.CookieRequest ~/.julia/packages/HTTP/JcAHX/src/clientlayers/CookieRequest.jl:42 From worker 2: │ │ [8] managecookies From worker 2: │ │ @ ~/.julia/packages/HTTP/JcAHX/src/clientlayers/CookieRequest.jl:19 [inlined] From worker 2: │ │ [9] (::HTTP.HeadersRequest.var"#defaultheaders#headerslayer##0"{HTTP.HeadersRequest.var"#defaultheaders#1#headerslayer##1"{HTTP.CookieRequest.var"#managecookies#cookielayer##0"{HTTP.CookieRequest.var"#managecookies#1#cookielayer##1"{HTTP.RetryRequest.var"#manageretries#retrylayer##0"{HTTP.RetryRequest.var"#manageretries#1#retrylayer##1"{HTTP.ConnectionRequest.var"#connections#connectionlayer##0"{HTTP.ConnectionRequest.var"#connections#1#connectionlayer##1"{HTTP.TimeoutRequest.var"#timeouts#timeoutlayer##0"{HTTP.TimeoutRequest.var"#timeouts#1#timeoutlayer##1"{HTTP.ExceptionRequest.var"#exceptions#exceptionlayer##0"{HTTP.ExceptionRequest.var"#exceptions#1#exceptionlayer##1"{typeof(HTTP.StreamRequest.streamlayer)}}}}}}}}}}}})(req::HTTP.Messages.Request; iofunction::Nothing, decompress::Nothing, basicauth::Bool, detect_content_type::Bool, canonicalize_headers::Bool, kw::@Kwargs{verbose::Int64}) From worker 2: │ │ @ HTTP.HeadersRequest ~/.julia/packages/HTTP/JcAHX/src/clientlayers/HeadersRequest.jl:71 From worker 2: │ │ [10] defaultheaders From worker 2: │ │ @ ~/.julia/packages/HTTP/JcAHX/src/clientlayers/HeadersRequest.jl:14 [inlined] From worker 2: │ │ [11] (::HTTP.RedirectRequest.var"#redirects#redirectlayer##0"{HTTP.RedirectRequest.var"#redirects#1#redirectlayer##1"{HTTP.HeadersRequest.var"#defaultheaders#headerslayer##0"{HTTP.HeadersRequest.var"#defaultheaders#1#headerslayer##1"{HTTP.CookieRequest.var"#managecookies#cookielayer##0"{HTTP.CookieRequest.var"#managecookies#1#cookielayer##1"{HTTP.RetryRequest.var"#manageretries#retrylayer##0"{HTTP.RetryRequest.var"#manageretries#1#retrylayer##1"{HTTP.ConnectionRequest.var"#connections#connectionlayer##0"{HTTP.ConnectionRequest.var"#connections#1#connectionlayer##1"{HTTP.TimeoutRequest.var"#timeouts#timeoutlayer##0"{HTTP.TimeoutRequest.var"#timeouts#1#timeoutlayer##1"{HTTP.ExceptionRequest.var"#exceptions#exceptionlayer##0"{HTTP.ExceptionRequest.var"#exceptions#1#exceptionlayer##1"{typeof(HTTP.StreamRequest.streamlayer)}}}}}}}}}}}}}})(req::HTTP.Messages.Request; redirect::Bool, redirect_limit::Int64, redirect_method::Nothing, forwardheaders::Bool, response_stream::Nothing, kw::@Kwargs{verbose::Int64}) From worker 2: │ │ @ HTTP.RedirectRequest ~/.julia/packages/HTTP/JcAHX/src/clientlayers/RedirectRequest.jl:25 From worker 2: │ │ [12] redirects From worker 2: │ │ @ ~/.julia/packages/HTTP/JcAHX/src/clientlayers/RedirectRequest.jl:14 [inlined] From worker 2: │ │ [13] (::HTTP.MessageRequest.var"#makerequest#messagelayer##0"{HTTP.MessageRequest.var"#makerequest#1#messagelayer##1"{HTTP.RedirectRequest.var"#redirects#redirectlayer##0"{HTTP.RedirectRequest.var"#redirects#1#redirectlayer##1"{HTTP.HeadersRequest.var"#defaultheaders#headerslayer##0"{HTTP.HeadersRequest.var"#defaultheaders#1#headerslayer##1"{HTTP.CookieRequest.var"#managecookies#cookielayer##0"{HTTP.CookieRequest.var"#managecookies#1#cookielayer##1"{HTTP.RetryRequest.var"#manageretries#retrylayer##0"{HTTP.RetryRequest.var"#manageretries#1#retrylayer##1"{HTTP.ConnectionRequest.var"#connections#connectionlayer##0"{HTTP.ConnectionRequest.var"#connections#1#connectionlayer##1"{HTTP.TimeoutRequest.var"#timeouts#timeoutlayer##0"{HTTP.TimeoutRequest.var"#timeouts#1#timeoutlayer##1"{HTTP.ExceptionRequest.var"#exceptions#exceptionlayer##0"{HTTP.ExceptionRequest.var"#exceptions#1#exceptionlayer##1"{typeof(HTTP.StreamRequest.streamlayer)}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}})(method::String, url::URIs.URI, headers::Nothing, body::Vector{UInt8}; copyheaders::Bool, response_stream::Nothing, http_version::HTTP.Strings.HTTPVersion, verbose::Int64, kw::@Kwargs{}) From worker 2: │ │ @ HTTP.MessageRequest ~/.julia/packages/HTTP/JcAHX/src/clientlayers/MessageRequest.jl:35 From worker 2: │ │ [14] makerequest From worker 2: │ │ @ ~/.julia/packages/HTTP/JcAHX/src/clientlayers/MessageRequest.jl:24 [inlined] From worker 2: │ │ [15] request(stack::HTTP.MessageRequest.var"#makerequest#messagelayer##0"{HTTP.MessageRequest.var"#makerequest#1#messagelayer##1"{HTTP.RedirectRequest.var"#redirects#redirectlayer##0"{HTTP.RedirectRequest.var"#redirects#1#redirectlayer##1"{HTTP.HeadersRequest.var"#defaultheaders#headerslayer##0"{HTTP.HeadersRequest.var"#defaultheaders#1#headerslayer##1"{HTTP.CookieRequest.var"#managecookies#cookielayer##0"{HTTP.CookieRequest.var"#managecookies#1#cookielayer##1"{HTTP.RetryRequest.var"#manageretries#retrylayer##0"{HTTP.RetryRequest.var"#manageretries#1#retrylayer##1"{HTTP.ConnectionRequest.var"#connections#connectionlayer##0"{HTTP.ConnectionRequest.var"#connections#1#connectionlayer##1"{HTTP.TimeoutRequest.var"#timeouts#timeoutlayer##0"{HTTP.TimeoutRequest.var"#timeouts#1#timeoutlayer##1"{HTTP.ExceptionRequest.var"#exceptions#exceptionlayer##0"{HTTP.ExceptionRequest.var"#exceptions#1#exceptionlayer##1"{typeof(HTTP.StreamRequest.streamlayer)}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}, method::String, url::String, h::Nothing, b::Vector{UInt8}, q::Nothing; headers::Nothing, body::Vector{UInt8}, query::Nothing, kw::@Kwargs{}) From worker 2: │ │ @ HTTP ~/.julia/packages/HTTP/JcAHX/src/HTTP.jl:457 From worker 2: │ │ [16] request(stack::Function, method::String, url::String, h::Nothing, b::Vector{UInt8}, q::Nothing) From worker 2: │ │ @ HTTP ~/.julia/packages/HTTP/JcAHX/src/HTTP.jl:455 From worker 2: │ │ [17] #request#21 From worker 2: │ │ @ ~/.julia/packages/HTTP/JcAHX/src/HTTP.jl:315 [inlined] From worker 2: │ │ ┌[18] request From worker 2: │ │ │ @ ~/.julia/packages/HTTP/JcAHX/src/HTTP.jl:313 [inlined] From worker 2: │ │ ╰──── repeated 2 times From worker 2: │ │ [20] get From worker 2: │ │ @ ~/.julia/packages/HTTP/JcAHX/src/HTTP.jl:518 [inlined] From worker 2: │ │ [21] #51 From worker 2: │ │ @ ~/.julia/packages/HTTP/JcAHX/src/precompile.jl:36 [inlined] From worker 2: │ │ [22] withenv(::HTTP.var"#51#52"{String}, ::Pair{String, Union{Nothing, String}}, ::Vararg{Pair{String, Union{Nothing, String}}}) From worker 2: │ │ @ Base ./env.jl:265 From worker 2: │ │ [23] macro expansion From worker 2: │ │ @ ~/.julia/packages/HTTP/JcAHX/src/precompile.jl:35 [inlined] From worker 2: │ │ [24] macro expansion From worker 2: │ │ @ ~/.julia/packages/PrecompileTools/gn08A/src/workloads.jl:73 [inlined] From worker 2: │ │ [25] macro expansion From worker 2: │ │ @ ~/.julia/packages/HTTP/JcAHX/src/precompile.jl:34 [inlined] From worker 2: │ │ [26] macro expansion From worker 2: │ │ @ ~/.julia/packages/PrecompileTools/gn08A/src/workloads.jl:121 [inlined] From worker 2: │ │ [27] top-level scope From worker 2: │ │ @ ~/.julia/packages/HTTP/JcAHX/src/precompile.jl:4 From worker 2: │ │ [28] include(mapexpr::Function, mod::Module, _path::String) From worker 2: │ │ @ Base ./Base.jl:309 From worker 2: │ │ [29] top-level scope From worker 2: │ │ @ ~/.julia/packages/HTTP/JcAHX/src/HTTP.jl:643 From worker 2: │ │ [30] include(mod::Module, _path::String) From worker 2: │ │ @ Base ./Base.jl:308 From worker 2: │ │ [31] include_package_for_output(pkg::Base.PkgId, input::String, depot_path::Vector{String}, dl_load_path::Vector{String}, load_path::Vector{String}, concrete_deps::Vector{Pair{Base.PkgId, UInt128}}, source::Nothing) From worker 2: │ │ @ Base ./loading.jl:3069 From worker 2: │ │ [32] top-level scope From worker 2: │ │ @ stdin:5 From worker 2: │ │ [33] eval(m::Module, e::Any) From worker 2: │ │ @ Core ./boot.jl:489 From worker 2: │ │ [34] include_string(mapexpr::typeof(identity), mod::Module, code::String, filename::String) From worker 2: │ │ @ Base ./loading.jl:2915 From worker 2: │ │ [35] include_string From worker 2: │ │ @ ./loading.jl:2925 [inlined] From worker 2: │ │ [36] exec_options(opts::Base.JLOptions) From worker 2: │ │ @ Base ./client.jl:328 From worker 2: │ │ [37] _start() From worker 2: │ └ @ Base ./client.jl:563 From worker 2: └ From worker 5: 22976.7 ms ✓ SDDP From worker 5: 2 dependencies successfully precompiled in 65 seconds. 69 already precompiled. From worker 4: 23195.6 ms ✓ SDDP From worker 4: 2 dependencies successfully precompiled in 65 seconds. 69 already precompiled. From worker 3: 23646.4 ms ✓ SDDP From worker 3: 2 dependencies successfully precompiled in 66 seconds. 69 already precompiled. ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 2 state variables : 1 scenarios : 4.00000e+00 existing cuts : false options solver : Asynchronous mode with 4 workers. risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [3, 3] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [2, 2] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [1, 1] numerical stability report matrix range [0e+00, 0e+00] objective range [1e+00, 1e+00] bounds range [1e+00, 6e+00] rhs range [0e+00, 0e+00] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 3.000000e+00 6.000000e+00 2.624180e+02 2 2 20 5.000000e+00 6.000000e+00 2.665034e+02 40 2 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : iteration_limit total time (s) : 2.665034e+02 total solves : 40 best bound : 6.000000e+00 simulation ci : 5.200000e+00 ± 9.389069e-01 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- ┌ Warning: Re-training a model with existing cuts! │ │ Are you sure you want to do this? The output from this training may be │ misleading because the policy is already partially trained. │ │ If you meant to train a new policy with different settings, you must │ build a new model. │ │ If you meant to refine a previously trained policy, turn off this │ warning by passing `add_to_existing_cuts = true` as a keyword argument │ to `SDDP.train`. │ │ In a future release, this warning may turn into an error. └ @ SDDP ~/.julia/packages/SDDP/39RYL/src/algorithm.jl:1181 ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 2 state variables : 1 scenarios : 4.00000e+00 existing cuts : true options solver : Asynchronous mode with 4 workers. risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [3, 3] AffExpr in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [2, 2] VariableRef in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [1, 1] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [2, 2] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [1, 1] numerical stability report matrix range [1e+00, 1e+00] objective range [1e+00, 1e+00] bounds range [1e+00, 6e+00] rhs range [4e+00, 4e+00] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 5.000000e+00 6.000000e+00 2.549090e-01 48 1 parallel_schemes.jl: Error During Test at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/SDDP/39RYL/test/runtests.jl:13 Got exception outside of a @test LoadError: On worker 2: The index MathOptInterface.ConstraintIndex{MathOptInterface.ScalarAffineFunction{Float64}, MathOptInterface.GreaterThan{Float64}}(157) is invalid. Note that an index becomes invalid after it has been deleted. Stacktrace: [1] trap_error @ ~/.julia/packages/SDDP/39RYL/src/plugins/parallel_schemes.jl:208 [2] slave_loop @ ~/.julia/packages/SDDP/39RYL/src/plugins/parallel_schemes.jl:203 [3] #handle_msg##0 @ /opt/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.13/Distributed/src/process_messages.jl:283 [4] run_work_thunk @ /opt/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.13/Distributed/src/process_messages.jl:70 [5] run_work_thunk @ /opt/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.13/Distributed/src/process_messages.jl:79 [6] #schedule_call##2 @ /opt/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.13/Distributed/src/process_messages.jl:88 Stacktrace: [1] train(model::SDDP.PolicyGraph{Int64}; iteration_limit::Nothing, time_limit::Nothing, print_level::Int64, log_file::String, log_frequency::Nothing, log_every_seconds::Float64, log_every_iteration::Bool, run_numerical_stability_report::Bool, stopping_rules::Vector{SDDP.IterationLimit}, risk_measure::SDDP.Expectation, root_node_risk_measure::SDDP.Expectation, sampling_scheme::SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo, cut_type::SDDP.CutType, cycle_discretization_delta::Float64, refine_at_similar_nodes::Bool, cut_deletion_minimum::Int64, backward_sampling_scheme::SDDP.CompleteSampler, dashboard::Bool, parallel_scheme::SDDP.Asynchronous, forward_pass::SDDP.DefaultForwardPass, forward_pass_resampling_probability::Nothing, add_to_existing_cuts::Bool, duality_handler::SDDP.ContinuousConicDuality{Nothing}, forward_pass_callback::SDDP.var"#train##4#train##5", post_iteration_callback::SDDP.var"#train##6#train##7") @ SDDP ~/.julia/packages/SDDP/39RYL/src/algorithm.jl:1306 [2] train @ ~/.julia/packages/SDDP/39RYL/src/algorithm.jl:1116 [inlined] [3] test_async_solve() @ Main ~/.julia/packages/SDDP/39RYL/test/plugins/parallel_schemes.jl:176 [4] top-level scope @ ~/.julia/packages/SDDP/39RYL/test/plugins/parallel_schemes.jl:233 [5] include(mapexpr::Function, mod::Module, _path::String) @ Base ./Base.jl:309 [6] IncludeInto @ ./Base.jl:310 [inlined] [7] macro expansion @ ~/.julia/packages/SDDP/39RYL/test/runtests.jl:16 [inlined] [8] macro expansion @ /opt/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.13/Test/src/Test.jl:1952 [inlined] [9] util_test_directory(dir::String, exclude::Vector{String}) @ Main ~/.julia/packages/SDDP/39RYL/test/runtests.jl:14 [10] top-level scope @ ~/.julia/packages/SDDP/39RYL/test/runtests.jl:25 [11] macro expansion @ /opt/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.13/Test/src/Test.jl:1952 [inlined] [12] macro expansion @ ~/.julia/packages/SDDP/39RYL/test/runtests.jl:25 [inlined] [13] include(mapexpr::Function, mod::Module, _path::String) @ Base ./Base.jl:309 [14] top-level scope @ none:6 [15] eval(m::Module, e::Any) @ Core ./boot.jl:489 [16] exec_options(opts::Base.JLOptions) @ Base ./client.jl:296 [17] _start() @ Base ./client.jl:563 in expression starting at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/SDDP/39RYL/test/plugins/parallel_schemes.jl:233 caused by: On worker 2: The index MathOptInterface.ConstraintIndex{MathOptInterface.ScalarAffineFunction{Float64}, MathOptInterface.GreaterThan{Float64}}(157) is invalid. Note that an index becomes invalid after it has been deleted. Stacktrace: [1] trap_error @ ~/.julia/packages/SDDP/39RYL/src/plugins/parallel_schemes.jl:208 [2] slave_loop @ ~/.julia/packages/SDDP/39RYL/src/plugins/parallel_schemes.jl:203 [3] #handle_msg##0 @ /opt/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.13/Distributed/src/process_messages.jl:283 [4] run_work_thunk @ /opt/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.13/Distributed/src/process_messages.jl:70 [5] run_work_thunk @ /opt/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.13/Distributed/src/process_messages.jl:79 [6] #schedule_call##2 @ /opt/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.13/Distributed/src/process_messages.jl:88 Stacktrace: [1] remotecall_fetch(::Function, ::Distributed.Worker, ::Distributed.RRID, ::Vararg{Any}; kwargs::@Kwargs{}) @ Distributed /opt/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.13/Distributed/src/remotecall.jl:465 [2] remotecall_fetch(::Function, ::Distributed.Worker, ::Distributed.RRID, ::Vararg{Any}) @ Distributed /opt/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.13/Distributed/src/remotecall.jl:454 [3] remotecall_fetch @ /opt/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.13/Distributed/src/remotecall.jl:492 [inlined] [4] call_on_owner @ /opt/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.13/Distributed/src/remotecall.jl:565 [inlined] [5] wait @ /opt/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.13/Distributed/src/remotecall.jl:586 [inlined] [6] _broadcast_getindex_evalf @ ./broadcast.jl:701 [inlined] [7] _broadcast_getindex @ ./broadcast.jl:674 [inlined] [8] _getindex @ ./broadcast.jl:622 [inlined] [9] getindex @ ./broadcast.jl:618 [inlined] [10] macro expansion @ ./broadcast.jl:997 [inlined] [11] macro expansion @ ./simdloop.jl:77 [inlined] [12] copyto! @ ./broadcast.jl:996 [inlined] [13] copyto! @ ./broadcast.jl:949 [inlined] [14] copy @ ./broadcast.jl:921 [inlined] [15] materialize @ ./broadcast.jl:896 [inlined] [16] master_loop(async::SDDP.Asynchronous, model::SDDP.PolicyGraph{Int64}, options::SDDP.Options{Int64}) @ SDDP ~/.julia/packages/SDDP/39RYL/src/plugins/parallel_schemes.jl:265 [17] train(model::SDDP.PolicyGraph{Int64}; iteration_limit::Nothing, time_limit::Nothing, print_level::Int64, log_file::String, log_frequency::Nothing, log_every_seconds::Float64, log_every_iteration::Bool, run_numerical_stability_report::Bool, stopping_rules::Vector{SDDP.IterationLimit}, risk_measure::SDDP.Expectation, root_node_risk_measure::SDDP.Expectation, sampling_scheme::SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo, cut_type::SDDP.CutType, cycle_discretization_delta::Float64, refine_at_similar_nodes::Bool, cut_deletion_minimum::Int64, backward_sampling_scheme::SDDP.CompleteSampler, dashboard::Bool, parallel_scheme::SDDP.Asynchronous, forward_pass::SDDP.DefaultForwardPass, forward_pass_resampling_probability::Nothing, add_to_existing_cuts::Bool, duality_handler::SDDP.ContinuousConicDuality{Nothing}, forward_pass_callback::SDDP.var"#train##4#train##5", post_iteration_callback::SDDP.var"#train##6#train##7") @ SDDP ~/.julia/packages/SDDP/39RYL/src/algorithm.jl:1291 [18] train @ ~/.julia/packages/SDDP/39RYL/src/algorithm.jl:1116 [inlined] [19] test_async_solve() @ Main ~/.julia/packages/SDDP/39RYL/test/plugins/parallel_schemes.jl:176 [20] top-level scope @ ~/.julia/packages/SDDP/39RYL/test/plugins/parallel_schemes.jl:233 [21] include(mapexpr::Function, mod::Module, _path::String) @ Base ./Base.jl:309 [22] IncludeInto @ ./Base.jl:310 [inlined] [23] macro expansion @ ~/.julia/packages/SDDP/39RYL/test/runtests.jl:16 [inlined] [24] macro expansion @ /opt/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.13/Test/src/Test.jl:1952 [inlined] [25] util_test_directory(dir::String, exclude::Vector{String}) @ Main ~/.julia/packages/SDDP/39RYL/test/runtests.jl:14 [26] top-level scope @ ~/.julia/packages/SDDP/39RYL/test/runtests.jl:25 [27] macro expansion @ /opt/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.13/Test/src/Test.jl:1952 [inlined] [28] macro expansion @ ~/.julia/packages/SDDP/39RYL/test/runtests.jl:25 [inlined] [29] include(mapexpr::Function, mod::Module, _path::String) @ Base ./Base.jl:309 [30] top-level scope @ none:6 [31] eval(m::Module, e::Any) @ Core ./boot.jl:489 [32] exec_options(opts::Base.JLOptions) @ Base ./client.jl:296 [33] _start() @ Base ./client.jl:563 [ Info: risk_measures.jl ┌ Warning: Radius is very small. You should probably use `SDDP.Expectation()` instead. └ @ SDDP ~/.julia/packages/SDDP/39RYL/src/plugins/risk_measures.jl:528 ┌ Warning: Radius is very small. You should probably use `SDDP.Expectation()` instead. └ @ SDDP ~/.julia/packages/SDDP/39RYL/src/plugins/risk_measures.jl:528 ┌ Warning: Radius is very small. You should probably use `SDDP.Expectation()` instead. └ @ SDDP ~/.julia/packages/SDDP/39RYL/src/plugins/risk_measures.jl:528 [ Info: sampling_schemes.jl [ Info: stopping_rules.jl ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 2 state variables : 1 scenarios : 1.00000e+00 existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [3, 3] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [2, 2] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [1, 1] numerical stability report matrix range [0e+00, 0e+00] objective range [1e+00, 1e+00] bounds range [0e+00, 0e+00] rhs range [0e+00, 0e+00] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 0.000000e+00 0.000000e+00 5.532026e-03 4 1 50 0.000000e+00 0.000000e+00 2.138991e-01 200 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : first_stage_stopping total time (s) : 2.138991e-01 total solves : 200 best bound : 0.000000e+00 simulation ci : 0.000000e+00 ± 0.000000e+00 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- ┌ Warning: Are you really sure you want to use this stopping rule? Read why we don't recommend it by typing `? SDDP.Statistical` into the REPL to read the docstring. │ │ If you understand what you are doing, you can disable this warning with `SDDP.Statistical(; disable_warning = true)` └ @ SDDP ~/.julia/packages/SDDP/39RYL/src/plugins/stopping_rules.jl:132 Simulated policy value: [ 5.035598e+00, 6.964402e+00] Simulated policy value: [ 5.282880e+00, 7.117120e+00] Simulated policy value: [ 5.606329e+00, 7.393671e+00] ┌ Warning: Are you really sure you want to use this stopping rule? Read why we don't recommend it by typing `? SDDP.Statistical` into the REPL to read the docstring. │ │ If you understand what you are doing, you can disable this warning with `SDDP.Statistical(; disable_warning = true)` └ @ SDDP ~/.julia/packages/SDDP/39RYL/src/plugins/stopping_rules.jl:132 Simulated policy value: [ 5.035598e+00, 6.964402e+00] Simulated policy value: [ 5.282880e+00, 7.117120e+00] Simulated policy value: [ 5.606329e+00, 7.393671e+00] ┌ Warning: Are you really sure you want to use this stopping rule? Read why we don't recommend it by typing `? SDDP.Statistical` into the REPL to read the docstring. │ │ If you understand what you are doing, you can disable this warning with `SDDP.Statistical(; disable_warning = true)` └ @ SDDP ~/.julia/packages/SDDP/39RYL/src/plugins/stopping_rules.jl:132 [ Info: threaded.jl [ Info: value_functions.jl [ Info: visualization.jl Precompiling packages... 1212.9 ms ✓ GettextRuntime_jll 7105.7 ms ✓ RecipesPipeline 3223.4 ms ? UnitfulLatexify 1171.4 ms ✓ Glib_jll 1363.2 ms ✓ Qt6Base_jll 1248.5 ms ✓ Cairo_jll 1315.5 ms ✓ Qt6ShaderTools_jll 1392.2 ms ✓ HarfBuzz_jll 1458.7 ms ✓ Qt6Declarative_jll 1258.3 ms ✓ libass_jll 1289.2 ms ✓ Pango_jll 1377.0 ms ✓ Qt6Wayland_jll 1373.2 ms ✓ FFMPEG_jll 1369.4 ms ✓ libdecor_jll 1361.7 ms ✓ FFMPEG 1475.8 ms ✓ GLFW_jll 1761.6 ms ✓ GR_jll 5408.5 ms ✓ GR 88219.7 ms ✓ Plots 16886.9 ms ? Plots → UnitfulExt 18 dependencies successfully precompiled in 143 seconds. 160 already precompiled. 2 dependencies failed but may be precompilable after restarting julia 2 dependencies had output during precompilation: ┌ UnitfulLatexify │ WARNING: Method definition apply_recipe(Unitful.Unit{U, D} where D where U) in module LatexifyExt at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/Latexify/IJYMW/src/recipes.jl:168 overwritten in module UnitfulLatexify on the same line (check for duplicate calls to `include`). │ ERROR: Method overwriting is not permitted during Module precompilation. Use `__precompile__(false)` to opt-out of precompilation. └ ┌ Plots → UnitfulExt │ WARNING: Method definition apply_recipe(Unitful.Unit{U, D} where D where U) in module LatexifyExt at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/Latexify/IJYMW/src/recipes.jl:168 overwritten in module UnitfulLatexify on the same line (check for duplicate calls to `include`). │ ERROR: Method overwriting is not permitted during Module precompilation. Use `__precompile__(false)` to opt-out of precompilation. └ Precompiling packages... 2217.1 ms ✓ ColorVectorSpace → SpecialFunctionsExt 1 dependency successfully precompiled in 3 seconds. 19 already precompiled. From worker 2: Precompiling packages... From worker 3: Precompiling packages... From worker 5: Precompiling packages... From worker 4: Precompiling packages... From worker 3: Latexify Being precompiled by another process (pid: 179, pidfile: /home/pkgeval/.julia/compiled/v1.13/Latexify/AItXo_eJM3J.ji.pidfile) From worker 5: Latexify Being precompiled by another process (pid: 179, pidfile: /home/pkgeval/.julia/compiled/v1.13/Latexify/AItXo_eJM3J.ji.pidfile) From worker 4: Latexify Being precompiled by another process (pid: 179, pidfile: /home/pkgeval/.julia/compiled/v1.13/Latexify/AItXo_eJM3J.ji.pidfile) From worker 2: 21384.1 ms ✓ Latexify From worker 3: 21171.3 ms ✓ Latexify From worker 3: SparseArraysExt Being precompiled by another process (pid: 179, pidfile: /home/pkgeval/.julia/compiled/v1.13/SparseArraysExt/FqfzH_eJM3J.ji.pidfile) From worker 5: 21342.8 ms ✓ Latexify From worker 5: SparseArraysExt Being precompiled by another process (pid: 179, pidfile: /home/pkgeval/.julia/compiled/v1.13/SparseArraysExt/FqfzH_eJM3J.ji.pidfile) From worker 5: LatexifyExt Being precompiled by another process (pid: 183, pidfile: /home/pkgeval/.julia/compiled/v1.13/LatexifyExt/FAf4M_eJM3J.ji.pidfile) From worker 4: 21533.0 ms ✓ Latexify From worker 4: SparseArraysExt Being precompiled by another process (pid: 179, pidfile: /home/pkgeval/.julia/compiled/v1.13/SparseArraysExt/FqfzH_eJM3J.ji.pidfile) From worker 4: LatexifyExt Being precompiled by another process (pid: 183, pidfile: /home/pkgeval/.julia/compiled/v1.13/LatexifyExt/FAf4M_eJM3J.ji.pidfile) From worker 2: 4959.5 ms ✓ Latexify → SparseArraysExt From worker 2: LatexifyExt Being precompiled by another process (pid: 183, pidfile: /home/pkgeval/.julia/compiled/v1.13/LatexifyExt/FAf4M_eJM3J.ji.pidfile) From worker 4: 4876.3 ms ✓ Latexify → SparseArraysExt From worker 5: 5249.4 ms ✓ Latexify → SparseArraysExt From worker 3: 7155.9 ms ✓ Unitful → LatexifyExt From worker 3: 7234.1 ms ✓ Latexify → SparseArraysExt From worker 5: 7162.2 ms ✓ Unitful → LatexifyExt From worker 5: UnitfulLatexify Being precompiled by another process (pid: 183, pidfile: /home/pkgeval/.julia/compiled/v1.13/UnitfulLatexify/trCzg_eJM3J.ji.pidfile) From worker 4: 7174.7 ms ✓ Unitful → LatexifyExt From worker 4: UnitfulLatexify Being precompiled by another process (pid: 183, pidfile: /home/pkgeval/.julia/compiled/v1.13/UnitfulLatexify/trCzg_eJM3J.ji.pidfile) From worker 2: 2987.8 ms ✓ Unitful → LatexifyExt From worker 2: UnitfulLatexify Being precompiled by another process (pid: 183, pidfile: /home/pkgeval/.julia/compiled/v1.13/UnitfulLatexify/trCzg_eJM3J.ji.pidfile) From worker 3: 3328.3 ms ? UnitfulLatexify From worker 4: 10374.9 ms ✓ UnitfulLatexify From worker 4: Plots Being precompiled by another process (pid: 183, pidfile: /home/pkgeval/.julia/compiled/v1.13/Plots/ld3vC_eJM3J.ji.pidfile) From worker 5: 18095.5 ms ✓ UnitfulLatexify From worker 5: Plots Being precompiled by another process (pid: 183, pidfile: /home/pkgeval/.julia/compiled/v1.13/Plots/ld3vC_eJM3J.ji.pidfile) From worker 2: 24881.9 ms ✓ UnitfulLatexify From worker 2: Plots Being precompiled by another process (pid: 183, pidfile: /home/pkgeval/.julia/compiled/v1.13/Plots/ld3vC_eJM3J.ji.pidfile) From worker 3: 98666.7 ms ✓ Plots From worker 2: 78099.4 ms ✓ Plots From worker 2: UnitfulExt Being precompiled by another process (pid: 183, pidfile: /home/pkgeval/.julia/compiled/v1.13/UnitfulExt/nmz2a_eJM3J.ji.pidfile) From worker 5: 86729.1 ms ✓ Plots From worker 5: UnitfulExt Being precompiled by another process (pid: 183, pidfile: /home/pkgeval/.julia/compiled/v1.13/UnitfulExt/nmz2a_eJM3J.ji.pidfile) From worker 4: 95865.3 ms ✓ Plots From worker 4: UnitfulExt Being precompiled by another process (pid: 183, pidfile: /home/pkgeval/.julia/compiled/v1.13/UnitfulExt/nmz2a_eJM3J.ji.pidfile) From worker 3: 22396.5 ms ? Plots → UnitfulExt From worker 3: 4 dependencies successfully precompiled in 160 seconds. 174 already precompiled. From worker 3: 2 dependencies failed but may be precompilable after restarting julia From worker 3: 2 dependencies had output during precompilation: From worker 3: ┌ UnitfulLatexify From worker 3: │ WARNING: Method definition apply_recipe(Unitful.Unit{U, D} where D where U) in module LatexifyExt at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/Latexify/IJYMW/src/recipes.jl:168 overwritten in module UnitfulLatexify on the same line (check for duplicate calls to `include`). From worker 3: │ ERROR: Method overwriting is not permitted during Module precompilation. Use `__precompile__(false)` to opt-out of precompilation. From worker 3: └ From worker 3: ┌ Plots → UnitfulExt From worker 3: │ WARNING: Method definition apply_recipe(Unitful.Unit{U, D} where D where U) in module LatexifyExt at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/Latexify/IJYMW/src/recipes.jl:168 overwritten in module UnitfulLatexify on the same line (check for duplicate calls to `include`). From worker 3: │ ERROR: Method overwriting is not permitted during Module precompilation. Use `__precompile__(false)` to opt-out of precompilation. From worker 3: └ From worker 4: 64833.4 ms ✓ Plots → UnitfulExt From worker 4: 6 dependencies successfully precompiled in 207 seconds. 174 already precompiled. From worker 4: 2 dependencies had output during precompilation: From worker 4: ┌ UnitfulLatexify From worker 4: │ WARNING: Method definition apply_recipe(Unitful.Unit{U, D} where D where U) in module LatexifyExt at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/Latexify/IJYMW/src/recipes.jl:168 overwritten in module UnitfulLatexify on the same line (check for duplicate calls to `include`). From worker 4: │ ERROR: Method overwriting is not permitted during Module precompilation. Use `__precompile__(false)` to opt-out of precompilation. From worker 4: └ From worker 4: ┌ Plots → UnitfulExt From worker 4: │ WARNING: Method definition apply_recipe(Unitful.Unit{U, D} where D where U) in module LatexifyExt at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/Latexify/IJYMW/src/recipes.jl:168 overwritten in module UnitfulLatexify on the same line (check for duplicate calls to `include`). From worker 4: │ ERROR: Method overwriting is not permitted during Module precompilation. Use `__precompile__(false)` to opt-out of precompilation. From worker 4: └ From worker 3: Precompiling packages... From worker 3: 4485.2 ms ✓ ColorVectorSpace → SpecialFunctionsExt From worker 3: 1 dependency successfully precompiled in 5 seconds. 19 already precompiled. From worker 2: 116441.3 ms ✓ Plots → UnitfulExt From worker 2: 6 dependencies successfully precompiled in 256 seconds. 174 already precompiled. From worker 2: 2 dependencies had output during precompilation: From worker 2: ┌ UnitfulLatexify From worker 2: │ WARNING: Method definition apply_recipe(Unitful.Unit{U, D} where D where U) in module LatexifyExt at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/Latexify/IJYMW/src/recipes.jl:168 overwritten in module UnitfulLatexify on the same line (check for duplicate calls to `include`). From worker 2: │ ERROR: Method overwriting is not permitted during Module precompilation. Use `__precompile__(false)` to opt-out of precompilation. From worker 2: └ From worker 2: ┌ Plots → UnitfulExt From worker 2: │ WARNING: Method definition apply_recipe(Unitful.Unit{U, D} where D where U) in module LatexifyExt at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/Latexify/IJYMW/src/recipes.jl:168 overwritten in module UnitfulLatexify on the same line (check for duplicate calls to `include`). From worker 2: │ ERROR: Method overwriting is not permitted during Module precompilation. Use `__precompile__(false)` to opt-out of precompilation. From worker 2: └ From worker 5: 160599.6 ms ✓ Plots → UnitfulExt From worker 5: 6 dependencies successfully precompiled in 302 seconds. 174 already precompiled. From worker 5: 2 dependencies had output during precompilation: From worker 5: ┌ UnitfulLatexify From worker 5: │ WARNING: Method definition apply_recipe(Unitful.Unit{U, D} where D where U) in module LatexifyExt at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/Latexify/IJYMW/src/recipes.jl:168 overwritten in module UnitfulLatexify on the same line (check for duplicate calls to `include`). From worker 5: │ ERROR: Method overwriting is not permitted during Module precompilation. Use `__precompile__(false)` to opt-out of precompilation. From worker 5: └ From worker 5: ┌ Plots → UnitfulExt From worker 5: │ WARNING: Method definition apply_recipe(Unitful.Unit{U, D} where D where U) in module LatexifyExt at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/Latexify/IJYMW/src/recipes.jl:168 overwritten in module UnitfulLatexify on the same line (check for duplicate calls to `include`). From worker 5: │ ERROR: Method overwriting is not permitted during Module precompilation. Use `__precompile__(false)` to opt-out of precompilation. From worker 5: └ test_SpaghettiPlot: Test Failed at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/SDDP/39RYL/test/visualization/visualization.jl:49 Expression: read("test.html", String) == read(control, String) Evaluated: "\n\n\n\n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n \n\n\n\n\n" == "\n\n\n\n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n \n\n\n\n\n" Stacktrace: [1] macro expansion @ /opt/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.13/Test/src/Test.jl:751 [inlined] [2] test_SpaghettiPlot() @ Main.TestVisualization ~/.julia/packages/SDDP/39RYL/test/visualization/visualization.jl:49 [3] macro expansion @ ~/.julia/packages/SDDP/39RYL/test/visualization/visualization.jl:17 [inlined] [4] macro expansion @ /opt/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.13/Test/src/Test.jl:1952 [inlined] [5] runtests() @ Main.TestVisualization ~/.julia/packages/SDDP/39RYL/test/visualization/visualization.jl:17 ┌ Warning: `SDDP.save` is deprecated. Use `SDDP.plot` instead. │ caller = test_SpaghettiPlot() at visualization.jl:51 └ @ Core ~/.julia/packages/SDDP/39RYL/test/visualization/visualization.jl:51 test_SpaghettiPlot: Test Failed at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/SDDP/39RYL/test/visualization/visualization.jl:55 Expression: read("test.html", String) == read(control, String) Evaluated: "\n\n\n\n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n \n\n\n\n\n" == "\n\n\n\n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n
\n \n\n\n\n\n" Stacktrace: [1] macro expansion @ /opt/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.13/Test/src/Test.jl:751 [inlined] [2] test_SpaghettiPlot() @ Main.TestVisualization ~/.julia/packages/SDDP/39RYL/test/visualization/visualization.jl:55 [3] macro expansion @ ~/.julia/packages/SDDP/39RYL/test/visualization/visualization.jl:17 [inlined] [4] macro expansion @ /opt/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.13/Test/src/Test.jl:1952 [inlined] [5] runtests() @ Main.TestVisualization ~/.julia/packages/SDDP/39RYL/test/visualization/visualization.jl:17 [ Info: FAST_hydro_thermal.jl ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 2 state variables : 1 scenarios : 2.00000e+00 existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [6, 6] AffExpr in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [1, 1] AffExpr in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [1, 1] VariableRef in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [1, 1] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [3, 4] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [2, 2] numerical stability report matrix range [1e+00, 1e+00] objective range [1e+00, 5e+00] bounds range [8e+00, 8e+00] rhs range [6e+00, 6e+00] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 -2.000000e+01 -1.000000e+01 6.372681e+00 5 1 20 0.000000e+00 -1.000000e+01 6.925764e+00 104 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : simulation_stopping total time (s) : 6.925764e+00 total solves : 104 best bound : -1.000000e+01 simulation ci : -1.100000e+01 ± 4.474009e+00 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- [ Info: FAST_production_management.jl ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 3 state variables : 2 scenarios : 4.00000e+00 existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [8, 8] AffExpr in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [3, 3] VariableRef in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [1, 1] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [5, 5] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [1, 1] numerical stability report matrix range [1e+00, 1e+00] objective range [2e-01, 3e+00] bounds range [5e+01, 5e+01] rhs range [0e+00, 0e+00] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 5 -5.320000e+00 -2.396000e+01 2.138591e-02 52 1 10 -2.396000e+01 -2.396000e+01 2.918601e-02 92 1 15 -4.260000e+01 -2.396000e+01 3.748488e-02 132 1 20 -2.396000e+01 -2.396000e+01 4.637003e-02 172 1 25 -5.320000e+00 -2.396000e+01 5.718398e-02 224 1 30 -5.320000e+00 -2.396000e+01 6.779099e-02 264 1 35 -2.396000e+01 -2.396000e+01 7.895398e-02 304 1 40 -2.396000e+01 -2.396000e+01 9.071803e-02 344 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : simulation_stopping total time (s) : 9.071803e-02 total solves : 344 best bound : -2.396000e+01 simulation ci : -1.868714e+01 ± 3.990349e+00 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── Time Allocations ─────────────────────── ──────────────────────── Tot / % measured: 397ms / 18.9% 12.6MiB / 59.5% Section ncalls time %tot avg alloc %tot avg ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── backward_pass 40 44.8ms 59.6% 1.12ms 5.63MiB 75.4% 144KiB solve_subproblem 160 23.0ms 30.7% 144μs 698KiB 9.1% 4.36KiB get_dual_solution 160 1.16ms 1.5% 7.23μs 180KiB 2.4% 1.12KiB prepare_backward_pass 160 52.6μs 0.1% 329ns 0.00B 0.0% 0.00B forward_pass 40 21.7ms 28.8% 541μs 1.66MiB 22.2% 42.5KiB solve_subproblem 120 19.8ms 26.3% 165μs 1.49MiB 19.9% 12.7KiB get_dual_solution 120 37.3μs 0.0% 311ns 13.1KiB 0.2% 112B sample_scenario 40 365μs 0.5% 9.12μs 24.2KiB 0.3% 620B calculate_bound 40 8.73ms 11.6% 218μs 183KiB 2.4% 4.56KiB get_dual_solution 40 13.8μs 0.0% 345ns 4.38KiB 0.1% 112B get_dual_solution 36 10.4μs 0.0% 288ns 3.94KiB 0.1% 112B ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 3 state variables : 2 scenarios : 4.00000e+00 existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [8, 8] AffExpr in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [3, 3] VariableRef in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [1, 1] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [5, 5] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [1, 1] numerical stability report matrix range [1e+00, 1e+00] objective range [2e-01, 3e+00] bounds range [5e+01, 5e+01] rhs range [0e+00, 0e+00] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 5 -2.396000e+01 -2.396000e+01 5.438900e-02 52 1 10 -2.396000e+01 -2.396000e+01 6.262994e-02 92 1 15 -2.396000e+01 -2.396000e+01 7.271385e-02 132 1 20 -4.260000e+01 -2.396000e+01 8.443379e-02 172 1 25 -5.320000e+00 -2.396000e+01 9.944582e-02 224 1 30 -2.396000e+01 -2.396000e+01 1.136348e-01 264 1 35 -2.396000e+01 -2.396000e+01 1.299908e-01 304 1 40 -5.320000e+00 -2.396000e+01 1.478388e-01 344 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : simulation_stopping total time (s) : 1.478388e-01 total solves : 344 best bound : -2.396000e+01 simulation ci : -2.237170e+01 ± 4.300524e+00 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── Time Allocations ─────────────────────── ──────────────────────── Tot / % measured: 156ms / 85.1% 14.6MiB / 94.0% Section ncalls time %tot avg alloc %tot avg ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── backward_pass 40 100ms 75.3% 2.50ms 11.9MiB 86.6% 305KiB solve_subproblem 160 24.4ms 18.4% 153μs 700KiB 5.0% 4.37KiB get_dual_solution 160 1.20ms 0.9% 7.48μs 180KiB 1.3% 1.12KiB prepare_backward_pass 160 59.2μs 0.0% 370ns 0.00B 0.0% 0.00B forward_pass 40 23.0ms 17.3% 575μs 1.66MiB 12.1% 42.5KiB solve_subproblem 120 20.8ms 15.7% 174μs 1.49MiB 10.8% 12.7KiB get_dual_solution 120 45.2μs 0.0% 376ns 13.1KiB 0.1% 112B sample_scenario 40 429μs 0.3% 10.7μs 24.3KiB 0.2% 623B calculate_bound 40 9.74ms 7.3% 244μs 184KiB 1.3% 4.61KiB get_dual_solution 40 14.4μs 0.0% 359ns 4.38KiB 0.0% 112B get_dual_solution 36 13.8μs 0.0% 382ns 3.94KiB 0.0% 112B ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── [ Info: FAST_quickstart.jl ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 2 state variables : 1 scenarios : 2.00000e+00 existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [3, 4] AffExpr in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [1, 1] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [2, 3] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [2, 2] numerical stability report matrix range [1e+00, 1e+00] objective range [1e+00, 2e+00] bounds range [2e+00, 5e+00] rhs range [0e+00, 0e+00] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 0.000000e+00 -2.500000e+00 1.634269e-01 5 1 2 -2.500000e+00 -2.000000e+00 1.655750e-01 14 1 3 -1.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 1.665730e-01 19 1 4 -1.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 1.676331e-01 24 1 5 -1.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 1.683519e-01 29 1 6 -3.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 1.690359e-01 34 1 7 -1.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 1.697440e-01 39 1 8 -1.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 1.706281e-01 44 1 9 -3.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 1.720889e-01 49 1 10 -1.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 1.732490e-01 54 1 11 -3.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 1.740079e-01 59 1 12 -3.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 1.749210e-01 64 1 13 -1.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 1.763561e-01 69 1 14 -1.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 1.771629e-01 74 1 15 -3.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 1.779931e-01 79 1 16 -1.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 1.796269e-01 84 1 17 -3.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 1.804810e-01 89 1 18 -3.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 1.813109e-01 94 1 19 -1.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 1.821620e-01 99 1 20 -3.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 1.832120e-01 104 1 21 -1.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 1.856000e-01 113 1 22 -1.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 1.869929e-01 118 1 23 -3.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 1.880260e-01 123 1 24 -3.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 1.894190e-01 128 1 25 -1.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 1.903470e-01 133 1 26 -3.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 1.912599e-01 138 1 27 -3.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 1.925108e-01 143 1 28 -1.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 1.942430e-01 148 1 29 -3.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 1.958508e-01 153 1 30 -3.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 1.970000e-01 158 1 31 -1.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 1.988630e-01 163 1 32 -1.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 1.999729e-01 168 1 33 -1.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 2.010710e-01 173 1 34 -3.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 2.027640e-01 178 1 35 -1.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 2.039120e-01 183 1 36 -3.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 2.051830e-01 188 1 37 -1.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 2.089341e-01 193 1 38 -1.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 2.101600e-01 198 1 39 -1.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 2.112899e-01 203 1 40 -1.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 2.124450e-01 208 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : simulation_stopping total time (s) : 2.124450e-01 total solves : 208 best bound : -2.000000e+00 simulation ci : -1.812500e+00 ± 3.171441e-01 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- [ Info: Hydro_thermal.jl ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 3 state variables : 1 scenarios : Inf existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [6, 6] AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [2, 2] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [5, 5] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [1, 1] numerical stability report matrix range [1e+00, 1e+00] objective range [1e+00, 3e+00] bounds range [5e+00, 2e+01] rhs range [2e+00, 1e+01] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 4.000000e+01 1.882708e+01 2.610831e-01 51 1 26 3.830773e+02 2.282913e+02 1.298890e+00 4602 1 30 2.138334e+03 2.336430e+02 2.360131e+00 7674 1 38 8.025312e+02 2.352957e+02 3.417876e+00 10194 1 47 3.025787e+02 2.359215e+02 4.500538e+00 12321 1 61 1.400364e+02 2.361624e+02 5.573279e+00 14283 1 63 1.493193e+03 2.362190e+02 6.583688e+00 15909 1 73 3.670177e+02 2.363045e+02 7.773393e+00 17655 1 77 1.654348e+02 2.363524e+02 8.931164e+00 19191 1 86 3.635265e+02 2.363807e+02 9.943198e+00 20490 1 100 4.969839e+02 2.364135e+02 1.290437e+01 23928 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : iteration_limit total time (s) : 1.290437e+01 total solves : 23928 best bound : 2.364135e+02 simulation ci : 2.345669e+02 ± 6.032770e+01 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- On average, 2.1 units of thermal are used in the first stage. [ Info: StochDynamicProgramming.jl_multistock.jl ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 5 state variables : 3 scenarios : 1.43489e+07 existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [13, 13] AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [3, 3] AffExpr in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [1, 1] VariableRef in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [3, 3] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [7, 7] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [6, 7] numerical stability report matrix range [1e+00, 1e+00] objective range [3e-01, 2e+00] bounds range [5e-01, 5e+00] rhs range [2e+00, 2e+00] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 10 -4.977586e+00 -4.446713e+00 7.244680e-01 1400 1 20 -4.764789e+00 -4.394789e+00 9.714611e-01 2800 1 30 -4.672487e+00 -4.377000e+00 1.236831e+00 4200 1 40 -4.483495e+00 -4.370632e+00 1.500127e+00 5600 1 50 -4.167321e+00 -4.364999e+00 1.777767e+00 7000 1 60 -4.362455e+00 -4.358864e+00 2.061142e+00 8400 1 70 -4.849916e+00 -4.355337e+00 2.349555e+00 9800 1 80 -4.861568e+00 -4.353006e+00 2.652060e+00 11200 1 90 -4.268264e+00 -4.350407e+00 2.957381e+00 12600 1 100 -4.539897e+00 -4.348641e+00 3.266180e+00 14000 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : iteration_limit total time (s) : 3.266180e+00 total solves : 14000 best bound : -4.348641e+00 simulation ci : -4.325070e+00 ± 8.068871e-02 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- [ Info: StochDynamicProgramming.jl_stock.jl ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 5 state variables : 1 scenarios : 1.00000e+05 existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [5, 5] AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [1, 1] VariableRef in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [1, 1] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [3, 3] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [2, 3] numerical stability report matrix range [1e+00, 1e+00] objective range [3e-01, 2e+00] bounds range [5e-01, 2e+00] rhs range [0e+00, 0e+00] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 10 -1.671715e+00 -1.476962e+00 3.793719e-01 1050 1 20 -1.529197e+00 -1.471817e+00 4.481039e-01 1600 1 30 -1.410768e+00 -1.471408e+00 6.025069e-01 2650 1 40 -1.596461e+00 -1.471258e+00 6.765139e-01 3200 1 50 -1.002277e+00 -1.471216e+00 8.348329e-01 4250 1 60 -1.085156e+00 -1.471164e+00 9.157650e-01 4800 1 70 -1.391746e+00 -1.471164e+00 1.084790e+00 5850 1 80 -1.448703e+00 -1.471132e+00 1.168739e+00 6400 1 90 -1.488989e+00 -1.471087e+00 1.348621e+00 7450 1 100 -1.564260e+00 -1.471075e+00 1.440148e+00 8000 1 110 -1.738157e+00 -1.471075e+00 1.531760e+00 8550 1 120 -1.591292e+00 -1.471075e+00 1.626935e+00 9100 1 130 -1.271481e+00 -1.471075e+00 1.719887e+00 9650 1 140 -1.249746e+00 -1.471075e+00 1.824162e+00 10200 1 150 -1.536222e+00 -1.471075e+00 1.928298e+00 10750 1 160 -1.565422e+00 -1.471075e+00 2.042178e+00 11300 1 170 -1.631076e+00 -1.471075e+00 2.150759e+00 11850 1 180 -1.494909e+00 -1.471075e+00 2.262147e+00 12400 1 182 -9.083563e-01 -1.471075e+00 2.360266e+00 12510 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : simulation_stopping total time (s) : 2.360266e+00 total solves : 12510 best bound : -1.471075e+00 simulation ci : -1.462065e+00 ± 2.699238e-02 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- [ Info: StructDualDynProg.jl_prob5.2_2stages.jl ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 2 state variables : 4 scenarios : 2.00000e+00 existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [29, 29] AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [4, 5] AffExpr in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [3, 3] AffExpr in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [4, 4] VariableRef in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [3, 3] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [22, 22] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [1, 1] numerical stability report matrix range [1e+00, 1e+00] objective range [1e+00, 1e+06] bounds range [0e+00, 0e+00] rhs range [0e+00, 0e+00] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 10 3.455904e+05 3.147347e+05 2.073216e-02 54 1 20 3.336455e+05 3.402383e+05 3.257704e-02 104 1 30 3.993519e+05 3.403155e+05 4.341316e-02 158 1 40 3.337559e+05 3.403155e+05 5.317903e-02 208 1 48 3.337559e+05 3.403155e+05 6.178117e-02 248 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : simulation_stopping total time (s) : 6.178117e-02 total solves : 248 best bound : 3.403155e+05 simulation ci : 1.298444e+08 ± 1.785864e+08 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- [ Info: StructDualDynProg.jl_prob5.2_3stages.jl ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 3 state variables : 4 scenarios : 4.00000e+00 existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [29, 29] AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [4, 5] AffExpr in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [3, 3] AffExpr in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [4, 4] VariableRef in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [3, 3] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [22, 22] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [1, 1] numerical stability report matrix range [1e+00, 1e+00] objective range [1e+00, 1e+05] bounds range [0e+00, 0e+00] rhs range [0e+00, 0e+00] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 10 4.403329e+05 3.509666e+05 3.420401e-02 92 1 20 4.506600e+05 4.054833e+05 5.266809e-02 172 1 30 3.959476e+05 4.067125e+05 6.905198e-02 264 1 40 4.497721e+05 4.067125e+05 8.401704e-02 344 1 47 3.959476e+05 4.067125e+05 9.702706e-02 400 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : simulation_stopping total time (s) : 9.702706e-02 total solves : 400 best bound : 4.067125e+05 simulation ci : 2.696242e+07 ± 3.645299e+07 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- [ Info: agriculture_mccardle_farm.jl ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 10 state variables : 4 scenarios : 2.70000e+01 existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [24, 24] AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [3, 3] AffExpr in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [1, 1] AffExpr in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [1, 6] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [20, 20] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [1, 2] numerical stability report matrix range [1e+00, 8e+01] objective range [1e+00, 1e+03] bounds range [6e+01, 6e+01] rhs range [2e+02, 3e+03] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 8.316000e+03 0.000000e+00 5.408727e+00 14 1 40 2.308500e+03 4.074139e+03 6.158276e+00 776 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : simulation_stopping total time (s) : 6.158276e+00 total solves : 776 best bound : 4.074139e+03 simulation ci : 4.224313e+03 ± 6.692189e+02 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- [ Info: air_conditioning.jl ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 3 state variables : 1 scenarios : 4.00000e+00 existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [6, 6] AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [1, 1] VariableRef in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [1, 1] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [4, 4] VariableRef in MOI.Integer : [3, 3] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [2, 3] numerical stability report matrix range [1e+00, 1e+00] objective range [1e+00, 3e+02] bounds range [1e+02, 2e+02] rhs range [0e+00, 0e+00] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1L 7.000000e+04 6.250000e+04 2.198050e+00 8 1 6L 4.000000e+04 6.250000e+04 3.316433e+00 60 1 16L 6.000000e+04 6.250000e+04 4.422474e+00 140 1 20L 6.000000e+04 6.250000e+04 5.089992e+00 172 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : simulation_stopping total time (s) : 5.089992e+00 total solves : 172 best bound : 6.250000e+04 simulation ci : 5.475000e+04 ± 7.336233e+03 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Lower bound is: 62500.0 With first stage solutions 200.0 (production) and 100.0 (stored_production). ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 3 state variables : 1 scenarios : 4.00000e+00 existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [6, 6] AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [1, 1] VariableRef in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [1, 1] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [4, 4] VariableRef in MOI.Integer : [3, 3] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [2, 3] numerical stability report matrix range [1e+00, 1e+00] objective range [1e+00, 3e+02] bounds range [1e+02, 2e+02] rhs range [0e+00, 0e+00] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 7.000000e+04 6.250000e+04 1.346684e-02 8 1 16 4.000000e+04 6.250000e+04 1.067109e+00 140 1 20 4.000000e+04 6.250000e+04 1.317098e+00 172 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : simulation_stopping total time (s) : 1.317098e+00 total solves : 172 best bound : 6.250000e+04 simulation ci : 5.950000e+04 ± 8.933885e+03 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Lower bound is: 62500.0 With first stage solutions 200.0 (production) and 100.0 (stored_production). [ Info: air_conditioning_forward.jl ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 3 state variables : 1 scenarios : 4.00000e+00 existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [5, 5] AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [1, 1] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [4, 4] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [2, 3] numerical stability report matrix range [1e+00, 1e+00] objective range [1e+00, 3e+02] bounds range [1e+02, 2e+02] rhs range [1e+02, 3e+02] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 7.000000e+04 6.250000e+04 6.341505e-02 5 1 10 4.000000e+04 6.250000e+04 6.954069e-01 50 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : iteration_limit total time (s) : 6.954069e-01 total solves : 50 best bound : 6.250000e+04 simulation ci : 5.450000e+04 ± 1.135842e+04 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- [ Info: all_blacks.jl ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 3 state variables : 2 scenarios : 1.00000e+00 existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [6, 6] AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [2, 2] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [2, 3] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [3, 3] VariableRef in MOI.ZeroOne : [3, 3] numerical stability report matrix range [1e+00, 1e+00] objective range [1e+00, 6e+00] bounds range [1e+00, 1e+02] rhs range [0e+00, 0e+00] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1L 6.000000e+00 9.000000e+00 2.969790e-01 6 1 20L 9.000000e+00 9.000000e+00 3.838811e-01 123 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : simulation_stopping total time (s) : 3.838811e-01 total solves : 123 best bound : 9.000000e+00 simulation ci : 8.850000e+00 ± 2.940000e-01 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- [ Info: asset_management_simple.jl ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 7 state variables : 2 scenarios : 8.00000e+00 existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [5, 7] AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [1, 1] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [3, 5] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [1, 1] numerical stability report matrix range [1e+00, 1e+00] objective range [1e+00, 4e+00] bounds range [1e+03, 1e+03] rhs range [6e+01, 8e+01] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 5 -1.109375e+01 2.605769e-01 9.332139e-01 87 1 10 -1.109375e+01 2.605769e-01 9.434049e-01 142 1 15 3.105797e+00 5.434132e-01 9.546959e-01 197 1 20 -2.463349e+01 1.503415e+00 9.667659e-01 252 1 25 -1.421085e-14 1.514085e+00 9.777839e-01 307 1 30 4.864000e+01 1.514085e+00 2.842549e+00 394 1 35 4.864000e+01 1.514085e+00 2.855570e+00 449 1 40 -8.870299e+00 1.514085e+00 2.868222e+00 504 1 45 -1.428571e+00 1.514085e+00 2.880869e+00 559 1 48 -1.428571e+00 1.514085e+00 2.889776e+00 592 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : simulation_stopping total time (s) : 2.889776e+00 total solves : 592 best bound : 1.514085e+00 simulation ci : 2.494033e+00 ± 5.472486e+00 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- [ Info: asset_management_stagewise.jl ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 7 state variables : 2 scenarios : 3.20000e+01 existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : #108 sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [5, 7] AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [1, 1] VariableRef in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [1, 1] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [2, 5] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [1, 1] numerical stability report matrix range [1e+00, 1e+00] objective range [2e-02, 4e+00] bounds range [1e+03, 1e+03] rhs range [6e+01, 8e+01] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 10 1.395796e+01 1.428818e+00 1.063731e+00 278 1 20 1.440356e+01 1.278425e+00 1.096280e+00 428 1 30 8.388546e+00 1.278425e+00 1.155424e+00 706 1 40 6.666667e-03 1.278410e+00 1.194117e+00 856 1 50 -5.614035e+00 1.278410e+00 1.255414e+00 1134 1 60 1.426676e+01 1.278410e+00 1.295396e+00 1284 1 64 1.261296e+01 1.278410e+00 1.312347e+00 1344 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : simulation_stopping total time (s) : 1.312347e+00 total solves : 1344 best bound : 1.278410e+00 simulation ci : 8.172580e-01 ± 5.385320e+00 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 7 state variables : 2 scenarios : 3.20000e+01 existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : #108 sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [5, 7] AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [1, 1] VariableRef in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [1, 1] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [2, 5] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [1, 1] numerical stability report matrix range [1e+00, 1e+00] objective range [2e-02, 4e+00] bounds range [1e+03, 1e+03] rhs range [6e+01, 8e+01] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 10 1.111809e+00 1.278488e+00 7.715321e-02 278 1 20 1.111084e+01 1.278410e+00 1.213281e-01 428 1 30 2.293779e+01 1.278410e+00 1.970410e-01 706 1 40 1.426676e+01 1.278410e+00 2.708881e-01 856 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : simulation_stopping total time (s) : 2.708881e-01 total solves : 856 best bound : 1.278410e+00 simulation ci : 3.654300e+00 ± 6.176856e+00 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- [ Info: belief.jl ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 4 state variables : 1 scenarios : Inf existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [7, 7] AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [1, 1] AffExpr in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [2, 2] VariableRef in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [1, 1] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [5, 5] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [3, 3] numerical stability report matrix range [1e+00, 1e+00] objective range [1e+00, 2e+00] bounds range [2e+00, 1e+02] rhs range [0e+00, 0e+00] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 10 4.787277e+00 9.346930e+00 4.925996e+00 900 1 20 6.374753e+00 1.361934e+01 5.364954e+00 1720 1 30 2.848217e+01 1.624016e+01 6.042188e+00 3036 1 40 1.973944e+01 1.776547e+01 6.874419e+00 4192 1 50 4.000000e+00 1.889360e+01 7.531227e+00 5020 1 60 1.142478e+01 1.907862e+01 8.315669e+00 5808 1 70 9.386421e+00 1.961295e+01 9.041211e+00 6540 1 80 5.667851e+01 1.890911e+01 9.627751e+00 7088 1 90 3.740597e+01 1.993139e+01 1.094534e+01 8180 1 100 9.867183e+00 2.001688e+01 1.154746e+01 8664 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : iteration_limit total time (s) : 1.154746e+01 total solves : 8664 best bound : 2.001688e+01 simulation ci : 2.301336e+01 ± 4.670816e+00 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- [ Info: biobjective_hydro.jl ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 3 state variables : 1 scenarios : 1.33100e+03 existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [9, 9] AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [2, 4] AffExpr in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [3, 5] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [8, 8] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [5, 6] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 0.000000e+00 0.000000e+00 2.662906e+00 36 1 10 0.000000e+00 0.000000e+00 2.695731e+00 360 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : iteration_limit total time (s) : 2.695731e+00 total solves : 360 best bound : 0.000000e+00 simulation ci : 0.000000e+00 ± 0.000000e+00 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 3 state variables : 1 scenarios : 1.33100e+03 existing cuts : true options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [9, 9] AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [2, 4] AffExpr in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [3, 7] VariableRef in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [1, 1] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [8, 8] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [5, 6] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 9.500000e+02 5.500000e+02 5.539179e-03 407 1 10 2.850000e+02 5.728212e+02 5.197310e-02 731 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : iteration_limit total time (s) : 5.197310e-02 total solves : 731 best bound : 5.728212e+02 simulation ci : 6.480000e+02 ± 1.400040e+02 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 3 state variables : 1 scenarios : 1.33100e+03 existing cuts : true options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [9, 9] AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [2, 4] AffExpr in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [3, 13] VariableRef in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [1, 1] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [8, 8] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [5, 6] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 4.150000e+02 3.347014e+02 5.537987e-03 778 1 10 2.825000e+02 3.465177e+02 5.502701e-02 1102 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : iteration_limit total time (s) : 5.502701e-02 total solves : 1102 best bound : 3.465177e+02 simulation ci : 3.598954e+02 ± 6.281469e+01 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 3 state variables : 1 scenarios : 1.33100e+03 existing cuts : true options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [9, 9] AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [2, 4] AffExpr in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [3, 20] VariableRef in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [1, 1] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [8, 8] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [5, 6] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 2.387500e+02 1.994007e+02 5.655050e-03 1149 1 10 2.587500e+02 2.052799e+02 5.181003e-02 1473 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : iteration_limit total time (s) : 5.181003e-02 total solves : 1473 best bound : 2.052799e+02 simulation ci : 2.206923e+02 ± 2.764045e+01 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 3 state variables : 1 scenarios : 1.33100e+03 existing cuts : true options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [9, 9] AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [2, 4] AffExpr in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [3, 24] VariableRef in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [1, 1] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [8, 8] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [5, 6] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 9.375000e+02 4.637735e+02 6.493092e-03 1520 1 10 2.875000e+02 4.661908e+02 6.107712e-02 1844 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : iteration_limit total time (s) : 6.107712e-02 total solves : 1844 best bound : 4.661908e+02 simulation ci : 5.075000e+02 ± 1.503394e+02 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 3 state variables : 1 scenarios : 1.33100e+03 existing cuts : true options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [9, 9] AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [2, 4] AffExpr in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [3, 30] VariableRef in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [1, 1] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [8, 8] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [5, 6] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 1.112500e+02 1.129545e+02 6.386042e-03 1891 1 10 1.000000e+02 1.129771e+02 5.445600e-02 2215 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : iteration_limit total time (s) : 5.445600e-02 total solves : 2215 best bound : 1.129771e+02 simulation ci : 1.068750e+02 ± 2.168477e+01 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 3 state variables : 1 scenarios : 1.33100e+03 existing cuts : true options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [9, 9] AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [2, 4] AffExpr in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [3, 34] VariableRef in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [1, 1] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [8, 8] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [5, 6] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 4.562500e+02 2.788383e+02 6.851912e-03 2262 1 10 1.625000e+02 2.794553e+02 6.005788e-02 2586 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : iteration_limit total time (s) : 6.005788e-02 total solves : 2586 best bound : 2.794553e+02 simulation ci : 2.690625e+02 ± 6.720434e+01 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 3 state variables : 1 scenarios : 1.33100e+03 existing cuts : true options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [9, 9] AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [2, 4] AffExpr in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [3, 37] VariableRef in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [1, 1] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [8, 8] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [5, 6] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 4.810804e+02 4.073537e+02 6.916046e-03 2633 1 10 5.487500e+02 4.077574e+02 6.515098e-02 2957 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : iteration_limit total time (s) : 6.515098e-02 total solves : 2957 best bound : 4.077574e+02 simulation ci : 3.863418e+02 ± 9.936379e+01 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 3 state variables : 1 scenarios : 1.33100e+03 existing cuts : true options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [9, 9] AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [2, 4] AffExpr in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [3, 43] VariableRef in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [1, 1] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [8, 8] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [5, 6] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 2.718750e+02 5.198033e+02 7.520914e-03 3004 1 10 6.771875e+02 5.210100e+02 6.525183e-02 3328 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : iteration_limit total time (s) : 6.525183e-02 total solves : 3328 best bound : 5.210100e+02 simulation ci : 5.831217e+02 ± 1.295425e+02 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 3 state variables : 1 scenarios : 1.33100e+03 existing cuts : true options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [9, 9] AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [2, 4] AffExpr in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [3, 50] VariableRef in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [1, 1] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [8, 8] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [5, 6] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 7.812500e+01 5.720558e+01 6.614923e-03 3375 1 10 5.312500e+01 5.938345e+01 5.456614e-02 3699 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : iteration_limit total time (s) : 5.456614e-02 total solves : 3699 best bound : 5.938345e+01 simulation ci : 6.187500e+01 ± 1.306667e+01 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- [ Info: booking_management.jl ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 5 state variables : 2 scenarios : 3.20000e+01 existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [10, 10] AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [2, 2] AffExpr in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [2, 2] AffExpr in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [6, 6] VariableRef in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [2, 2] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [5, 6] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [6, 6] VariableRef in MOI.ZeroOne : [5, 5] numerical stability report matrix range [1e+00, 1e+00] objective range [1e+00, 6e+00] bounds range [1e+00, 1e+01] rhs range [1e+00, 1e+00] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 5 8.000000e+00 9.440450e+00 1.263791e+00 235 1 10 1.000000e+01 9.159200e+00 1.705766e+00 310 1 15 1.000000e+01 9.159200e+00 2.215372e+00 385 1 20 1.000000e+01 9.159200e+00 2.683772e+00 460 1 25 1.000000e+01 9.159200e+00 5.369761e+00 695 1 30 4.000000e+00 9.159200e+00 5.797788e+00 770 1 35 1.000000e+01 9.159200e+00 6.246767e+00 845 1 40 1.000000e+01 9.159200e+00 6.752360e+00 920 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : simulation_stopping total time (s) : 6.752360e+00 total solves : 920 best bound : 9.159200e+00 simulation ci : 7.200000e+00 ± 8.485598e-01 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 3 state variables : 4 scenarios : 2.16000e+02 existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [18, 18] AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [4, 4] AffExpr in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [4, 4] AffExpr in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [12, 12] VariableRef in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [4, 4] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [9, 10] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [10, 10] VariableRef in MOI.ZeroOne : [9, 9] numerical stability report matrix range [1e+00, 1e+00] objective range [1e+00, 4e+00] bounds range [1e+00, 2e+01] rhs range [1e+00, 1e+00] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 10 5.000000e+00 6.959189e+00 1.278800e+00 510 1 20 1.000000e+01 6.834387e+00 2.868775e+00 720 1 30 7.000000e+00 6.834387e+00 6.622409e+00 1230 1 40 1.000000e+01 6.823805e+00 8.179883e+00 1440 1 50 3.000000e+00 6.823805e+00 1.199885e+01 1950 1 60 2.000000e+00 6.823805e+00 1.356439e+01 2160 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : simulation_stopping total time (s) : 1.356439e+01 total solves : 2160 best bound : 6.823805e+00 simulation ci : 6.183333e+00 ± 6.694539e-01 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- [ Info: generation_expansion.jl ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 5 state variables : 5 scenarios : 3.27680e+04 existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [14, 14] AffExpr in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [7, 7] AffExpr in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [4, 4] VariableRef in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [1, 1] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [8, 8] VariableRef in MOI.Integer : [5, 5] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [5, 6] numerical stability report matrix range [1e+00, 1e+00] objective range [1e+00, 5e+05] bounds range [1e+00, 1e+00] rhs range [0e+00, 0e+00] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 10 5.299676e+06 2.074407e+06 1.332934e+01 920 1 20 6.049875e+06 2.075240e+06 1.603736e+01 1340 1 30 5.496647e+05 2.078257e+06 2.854264e+01 2260 1 40 3.985383e+04 2.078257e+06 3.120873e+01 2680 1 50 2.994548e+05 2.078257e+06 4.349734e+01 3600 1 60 3.799457e+06 2.078257e+06 4.615638e+01 4020 1 61 3.549665e+06 2.078257e+06 4.641775e+01 4062 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : simulation_stopping total time (s) : 4.641775e+01 total solves : 4062 best bound : 2.078257e+06 simulation ci : 2.437601e+06 ± 5.082681e+05 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 5 state variables : 5 scenarios : 3.27680e+04 existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [14, 14] AffExpr in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [7, 7] AffExpr in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [4, 4] VariableRef in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [1, 1] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [8, 8] VariableRef in MOI.Integer : [5, 5] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [5, 6] numerical stability report matrix range [1e+00, 1e+00] objective range [1e+00, 5e+05] bounds range [1e+00, 1e+00] rhs range [0e+00, 0e+00] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 10L 2.049870e+06 2.079457e+06 3.210018e+01 920 1 20L 2.799668e+06 2.079457e+06 5.266401e+01 1340 1 30L 3.799443e+06 2.079457e+06 8.419141e+01 2260 1 40L 4.299882e+06 2.079457e+06 1.049573e+02 2680 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : simulation_stopping total time (s) : 1.049573e+02 total solves : 2680 best bound : 2.079457e+06 simulation ci : 1.602238e+06 ± 4.944385e+05 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- [ Info: hydro_valley.jl [ Info: infinite_horizon_hydro_thermal.jl ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 1 state variables : 1 scenarios : Inf existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [8, 8] AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [2, 2] VariableRef in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [2, 2] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [5, 5] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [1, 1] numerical stability report matrix range [1e+00, 1e+00] objective range [1e+00, 1e+01] bounds range [5e+00, 2e+01] rhs range [0e+00, 0e+00] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 100 1.000000e+01 1.188534e+02 2.089033e+00 1914 1 200 0.000000e+00 1.191645e+02 2.423105e+00 3840 1 300 7.500000e+01 1.191666e+02 2.775267e+00 5738 1 328 2.500000e+00 1.191667e+02 2.842387e+00 6034 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : simulation_stopping total time (s) : 2.842387e+00 total solves : 6034 best bound : 1.191667e+02 simulation ci : 2.272866e+01 ± 3.596240e+00 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Confidence_interval = 128.14 ± 13.91 ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 1 state variables : 1 scenarios : Inf existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [8, 8] AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [2, 2] VariableRef in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [2, 2] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [5, 5] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [1, 1] numerical stability report matrix range [1e+00, 1e+00] objective range [1e+00, 1e+01] bounds range [5e+00, 2e+01] rhs range [0e+00, 0e+00] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 100 1.000000e+01 1.191232e+02 4.626040e-01 2806 1 200 0.000000e+00 1.191666e+02 8.764791e-01 4749 1 287 5.000000e+00 1.191667e+02 1.175009e+00 5662 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : simulation_stopping total time (s) : 1.175009e+00 total solves : 5662 best bound : 1.191667e+02 simulation ci : 2.112369e+01 ± 3.684376e+00 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Confidence_interval = 122.02 ± 14.06 [ Info: infinite_horizon_trivial.jl ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 1 state variables : 1 scenarios : Inf existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [3, 3] AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [1, 1] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [1, 1] numerical stability report matrix range [1e+00, 1e+00] objective range [1e+00, 1e+00] bounds range [0e+00, 0e+00] rhs range [0e+00, 0e+00] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 10 2.000000e+01 1.998872e+01 1.047478e-01 1033 1 20 8.000000e+00 2.000000e+01 1.255448e-01 1209 1 30 1.200000e+01 2.000000e+01 2.294769e-01 2304 1 40 3.000000e+01 2.000000e+01 3.066030e-01 2594 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : simulation_stopping total time (s) : 3.066030e-01 total solves : 2594 best bound : 2.000000e+01 simulation ci : 1.970000e+01 ± 4.721453e+00 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- [ Info: inner_hydro_1d.jl Building and solving primal outer model for lower bounds ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 4 state variables : 1 scenarios : 1.00000e+03 existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : A convex combination of 0.5 * SDDP.Expectation() + 0.5 * SDDP.AVaR(0.2) sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [9, 9] AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [2, 2] VariableRef in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [1, 1] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [7, 7] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [6, 7] numerical stability report matrix range [1e+00, 1e+00] objective range [1e+00, 5e+01] bounds range [2e+01, 2e+02] rhs range [8e+01, 8e+01] From worker 5: From worker 5: ====================================================================================== From worker 5: Information request received. A stacktrace will print followed by a 1.0 second profile. From worker 5: --trace-compile is enabled during profile collection. From worker 5: ====================================================================================== From worker 5: From worker 5: cmd: /opt/julia/bin/julia 185 running 0 of 1 From worker 5: From worker 5: signal (10): User defined signal 1 From worker 5: epoll_pwait at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (unknown line) From worker 5: uv__io_poll at /workspace/srcdir/libuv/src/unix/linux.c:1404 From worker 5: uv_run at /workspace/srcdir/libuv/src/unix/core.c:430 From worker 5: ijl_task_get_next at /source/src/scheduler.c:457 From worker 5: wait at ./task.jl:1200 From worker 5: wait_forever at ./task.jl:1137 From worker 5: jfptr_wait_forever_61470.1 at /opt/julia/lib/julia/sys.so (unknown line) From worker 5: _jl_invoke at /source/src/gf.c:4112 [inlined] From worker 5: ijl_apply_generic at /source/src/gf.c:4309 From worker 5: jl_apply at /source/src/julia.h:2266 [inlined] From worker 5: start_task at /source/src/task.c:1253 From worker 5: unknown function (ip: (nil)) at (unknown file) From worker 5: From worker 5: From worker 5: ============================================================== From worker 5: Profile collected. A report will print at the next yield point. From worker 5: Disabling --trace-compile From worker 5: ============================================================== From worker 5: ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 1.948878e+03 2.847167e+03 1.560659e-01 35 1 10 7.500000e+02 2.935390e+03 2.762818e-01 350 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : iteration_limit total time (s) : 2.762818e-01 total solves : 350 best bound : 2.935390e+03 simulation ci : 1.544902e+03 ± 5.533339e+02 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Building and solving inner model for upper bounds: Node: 3 - elapsed time: 0.51 plus 1.06 for vertex selection. Node: 2 - elapsed time: 0.05 plus 0.01 for vertex selection. Node: 1 - elapsed time: 0.05 plus 0.01 for vertex selection. First-stage upper bound: 2969.680973503913 Total time for upper bound: 1.690768107 From worker 4: From worker 4: ====================================================================================== From worker 4: Information request received. A stacktrace will print followed by a 1.0 second profile. From worker 4: --trace-compile is enabled during profile collection. From worker 4: ====================================================================================== From worker 4: From worker 4: cmd: /opt/julia/bin/julia 184 running 0 of 1 From worker 4: From worker 4: signal (10): User defined signal 1 From worker 4: epoll_pwait at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (unknown line) From worker 4: uv__io_poll at /workspace/srcdir/libuv/src/unix/linux.c:1404 From worker 4: uv_run at /workspace/srcdir/libuv/src/unix/core.c:430 From worker 4: ijl_task_get_next at /source/src/scheduler.c:457 From worker 4: wait at ./task.jl:1200 From worker 4: wait_forever at ./task.jl:1137 From worker 4: jfptr_wait_forever_61470.1 at /opt/julia/lib/julia/sys.so (unknown line) From worker 4: _jl_invoke at /source/src/gf.c:4112 [inlined] From worker 4: ijl_apply_generic at /source/src/gf.c:4309 From worker 4: jl_apply at /source/src/julia.h:2266 [inlined] From worker 4: start_task at /source/src/task.c:1253 From worker 4: unknown function (ip: (nil)) at (unknown file) From worker 4: From worker 4: From worker 4: ============================================================== From worker 4: Profile collected. A report will print at the next yield point. From worker 4: Disabling --trace-compile From worker 4: ============================================================== From worker 4: From worker 5: ┌ Warning: There were no samples collected in one or more groups. From worker 5: │ This may be due to idle threads, or you may need to run your From worker 5: │ program longer (perhaps by running it multiple times), From worker 5: │ or adjust the delay between samples with `Profile.init()`. From worker 5: └ @ Profile /opt/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.13/Profile/src/Profile.jl:1362 From worker 5: Overhead ╎ [+additional indent] Count File:Line Function From worker 5: ========================================================= From worker 5: Thread 1 (default) Task 0x00007074d4ffcf10 Total snapshots: 478. Utilization: 0% From worker 5: ╎478 @Base/task.jl:1137 wait_forever() From worker 5: 477╎ 478 @Base/task.jl:1200 wait() From worker 5: Bounds: Risk-neutral confidence interval: 1411.99 ± 82.02 Risk-adjusted lower bound: 2935.39 Risk-adjusted upper bound: 2969.68 [ Info: no_strong_duality.jl ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 1 state variables : 1 scenarios : Inf existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [3, 3] AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [1, 1] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [1, 1] numerical stability report matrix range [1e+00, 1e+00] objective range [1e+00, 1e+00] bounds range [0e+00, 0e+00] rhs range [0e+00, 0e+00] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 1.000000e+00 1.500000e+00 9.938002e-03 3 1 40 2.000000e+00 2.000000e+00 1.769121e-01 604 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : simulation_stopping total time (s) : 1.769121e-01 total solves : 604 best bound : 2.000000e+00 simulation ci : 2.150000e+00 ± 5.038753e-01 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- [ Info: objective_state_newsvendor.jl ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 3 state variables : 1 scenarios : 8.51840e+04 existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [6, 6] AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [1, 3] AffExpr in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [2, 2] VariableRef in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [1, 1] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [3, 4] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [3, 3] numerical stability report matrix range [8e-01, 2e+00] objective range [1e+00, 2e+00] bounds range [1e+00, 1e+02] rhs range [5e+01, 5e+01] From worker 4: ┌ Warning: There were no samples collected in one or more groups. From worker 4: │ This may be due to idle threads, or you may need to run your From worker 4: │ program longer (perhaps by running it multiple times), From worker 4: │ or adjust the delay between samples with `Profile.init()`. From worker 4: └ @ Profile /opt/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.13/Profile/src/Profile.jl:1362 From worker 4: Overhead ╎ [+additional indent] Count File:Line Function From worker 4: ========================================================= From worker 4: Thread 1 (default) Task 0x000074db7bbfcf10 Total snapshots: 214. Utilization: 0% From worker 4: ╎214 @Base/task.jl:1137 wait_forever() From worker 4: 213╎ 214 @Base/task.jl:1200 wait() From worker 4: From worker 3: From worker 3: ====================================================================================== From worker 3: Information request received. A stacktrace will print followed by a 1.0 second profile. From worker 3: --trace-compile is enabled during profile collection. From worker 3: ====================================================================================== From worker 3: From worker 3: cmd: /opt/julia/bin/julia 183 running 0 of 1 From worker 3: From worker 3: signal (10): User defined signal 1 From worker 3: epoll_pwait at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (unknown line) From worker 3: uv__io_poll at /workspace/srcdir/libuv/src/unix/linux.c:1404 From worker 3: uv_run at /workspace/srcdir/libuv/src/unix/core.c:430 From worker 3: ijl_task_get_next at /source/src/scheduler.c:457 From worker 3: wait at ./task.jl:1200 From worker 3: wait_forever at ./task.jl:1137 From worker 3: jfptr_wait_forever_61470.1 at /opt/julia/lib/julia/sys.so (unknown line) From worker 3: _jl_invoke at /source/src/gf.c:4112 [inlined] From worker 3: ijl_apply_generic at /source/src/gf.c:4309 From worker 3: jl_apply at /source/src/julia.h:2266 [inlined] From worker 3: start_task at /source/src/task.c:1253 From worker 3: unknown function (ip: (nil)) at (unknown file) From worker 3: From worker 3: From worker 3: ============================================================== From worker 3: Profile collected. A report will print at the next yield point. From worker 3: Disabling --trace-compile From worker 3: ============================================================== From worker 3: ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 10 3.675000e+00 4.115510e+00 1.713312e+00 1350 1 20 5.062500e+00 4.110713e+00 2.077297e+00 2700 1 30 4.500000e+00 4.104200e+00 2.462389e+00 4050 1 40 3.812500e+00 4.102669e+00 2.852934e+00 5400 1 50 4.725000e+00 4.095504e+00 3.272512e+00 6750 1 60 4.050000e+00 4.092999e+00 3.676116e+00 8100 1 70 4.606250e+00 4.091524e+00 4.087322e+00 9450 1 80 3.875000e+00 4.089694e+00 4.529079e+00 10800 1 90 3.750000e+00 4.089490e+00 4.971563e+00 12150 1 100 5.125000e+00 4.087894e+00 5.430243e+00 13500 1 110 4.500000e+00 4.087478e+00 5.890150e+00 14850 1 120 3.650000e+00 4.086704e+00 6.351876e+00 16200 1 130 From worker 3: ┌ Warning: There were no samples collected in one or more groups. From worker 3: │ This may be due to idle threads, or you may need to run your From worker 3: │ program longer (perhaps by running it multiple times), From worker 3: │ or adjust the delay between samples with `Profile.init()`. From worker 3: └ @ Profile /opt/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.13/Profile/src/Profile.jl:1362 From worker 3: Overhead ╎ [+additional indent] Count File:Line Function From worker 3: ========================================================= From worker 3: Thread 1 (default) Task 0x00007be0885fcf10 Total snapshots: 200. Utilization: 0% From worker 3: ╎200 @Base/task.jl:1137 wait_forever() From worker 3: 199╎ 200 @Base/task.jl:1200 wait() From worker 3: 4.406250e+00 4.086063e+00 6.721282e+00 17550 1 140 3.375000e+00 4.085981e+00 6.923544e+00 18900 1 150 3.000000e+00 4.085945e+00 7.137929e+00 20250 1 160 3.812500e+00 4.085838e+00 7.354431e+00 21600 1 170 4.250000e+00 4.085728e+00 7.578039e+00 22950 1 180 3.243750e+00 4.085593e+00 7.801676e+00 24300 1 190 4.306250e+00 4.085487e+00 8.024693e+00 25650 1 200 5.237500e+00 4.085446e+00 8.264682e+00 27000 1 210 4.500000e+00 4.085441e+00 8.499759e+00 28350 1 220 3.612500e+00 4.085405e+00 8.738827e+00 29700 1 230 3.700000e+00 4.085382e+00 8.985005e+00 31050 1 240 3.437500e+00 4.085254e+00 9.219820e+00 32400 1 250 4.100000e+00 4.085115e+00 9.457295e+00 33750 1 260 3.000000e+00 4.084973e+00 9.793995e+00 35100 1 270 4.918750e+00 4.084943e+00 1.004314e+01 36450 1 280 2.756250e+00 4.084920e+00 1.030436e+01 37800 1 290 3.737500e+00 4.084868e+00 1.056877e+01 39150 1 300 5.750000e+00 4.084868e+00 1.083386e+01 40500 1 310 5.156250e+00 4.084858e+00 1.110560e+01 41850 1 320 3.131250e+00 4.084855e+00 1.136081e+01 43200 1 330 4.125000e+00 4.084846e+00 1.161788e+01 44550 1 340 5.875000e+00 4.084820e+00 1.188135e+01 45900 1 350 4.587500e+00 4.084810e+00 1.214902e+01 47250 1 360 5.087500e+00 4.084805e+00 1.243034e+01 48600 1 370 4.393750e+00 4.084802e+00 1.270290e+01 49950 1 380 From worker 2: From worker 2: ====================================================================================== From worker 2: Information request received. A stacktrace will print followed by a 1.0 second profile. From worker 2: --trace-compile is enabled during profile collection. From worker 2: ====================================================================================== From worker 2: From worker 2: cmd: /opt/julia/bin/julia 179 running 0 of 1 From worker 2: From worker 2: signal (10): User defined signal 1 From worker 2: epoll_pwait at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (unknown line) From worker 2: uv__io_poll at /workspace/srcdir/libuv/src/unix/linux.c:1404 From worker 2: uv_run at /workspace/srcdir/libuv/src/unix/core.c:430 From worker 2: ijl_task_get_next at /source/src/scheduler.c:457 4.750000e+00 4.084792e+00 1.300215e+01 51300 1 390 From worker 2: wait at ./task.jl:1200 From worker 2: wait_forever at ./task.jl:1137 From worker 2: jfptr_wait_forever_61470.1 at /opt/julia/lib/julia/sys.so (unknown line) From worker 2: _jl_invoke at /source/src/gf.c:4112 [inlined] From worker 2: ijl_apply_generic at /source/src/gf.c:4309 From worker 2: jl_apply at /source/src/julia.h:2266 [inlined] From worker 2: start_task at /source/src/task.c:1253 From worker 2: unknown function (ip: (nil)) at (unknown file) From worker 2: 4.437500e+00 4.084785e+00 1.349055e+01 52650 1 400 4.181250e+00 4.084785e+00 1.378046e+01 54000 1 410 From worker 2: From worker 2: ============================================================== From worker 2: Profile collected. A report will print at the next yield point. From worker 2: Disabling --trace-compile From worker 2: ============================================================== From worker 2: 3.650000e+00 4.084777e+00 1.423918e+01 55350 1 420 3.750000e+00 4.084769e+00 1.488536e+01 56700 1 430 3.725000e+00 4.084762e+00 1.550905e+01 58050 1 440 4.218750e+00 4.084751e+00 1.612964e+01 59400 1 450 5.500000e+00 4.084751e+00 1.676376e+01 60750 1 460 3.637500e+00 4.084747e+00 1.740323e+01 62100 1 470 2.993750e+00 4.084743e+00 1.805140e+01 63450 1 480 5.237500e+00 4.084743e+00 1.874017e+01 64800 1 490 4.212500e+00 4.084743e+00 1.938793e+01 66150 1 500 3.843750e+00 4.084743e+00 2.003894e+01 67500 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : time_limit total time (s) : 2.003894e+01 total solves : 67500 best bound : 4.084743e+00 simulation ci : 4.079600e+00 ± 6.705012e-02 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 3 state variables : 1 scenarios : 8.51840e+04 existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [6, 6] AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [1, 3] AffExpr in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [2, 2] VariableRef in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [1, 1] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [3, 4] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [3, 3] numerical stability report matrix range [8e-01, 2e+00] objective range [1e+00, 2e+00] bounds range [1e+00, 1e+02] rhs range [5e+01, 5e+01] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 10 3.187500e+00 4.358470e+00 9.029441e-01 1350 1 ====================================================================================== Information request received. A stacktrace will print followed by a 1.0 second profile. --trace-compile is enabled during profile collection. ====================================================================================== cmd: /opt/julia/bin/julia 39 running 1 of 1 signal (10): User defined signal 1 _ZNK7HFactor7ftranFTER11HVectorBaseIdE at /home/pkgeval/.julia/artifacts/47a06bffdeda3b990d140fa738e56944ef478765/lib/libhighs.so (unknown line) _ZNK7HFactor6ftranUER11HVectorBaseIdEdP15HighsTimerClock at /home/pkgeval/.julia/artifacts/47a06bffdeda3b990d140fa738e56944ef478765/lib/libhighs.so (unknown line) _ZNK7HFactor9ftranCallER11HVectorBaseIdEdP15HighsTimerClock at /home/pkgeval/.julia/artifacts/47a06bffdeda3b990d140fa738e56944ef478765/lib/libhighs.so (unknown line) _ZNK11HSimplexNla5ftranER11HVectorBaseIdEdP15HighsTimerClock at /home/pkgeval/.julia/artifacts/47a06bffdeda3b990d140fa738e56944ef478765/lib/libhighs.so (unknown line) _ZN8HEkkDual11updateFtranEv at /home/pkgeval/.julia/artifacts/47a06bffdeda3b990d140fa738e56944ef478765/lib/libhighs.so (unknown line) _ZN8HEkkDual7iterateEv at /home/pkgeval/.julia/artifacts/47a06bffdeda3b990d140fa738e56944ef478765/lib/libhighs.so (unknown line) _ZN8HEkkDual11solvePhase2Ev at /home/pkgeval/.julia/artifacts/47a06bffdeda3b990d140fa738e56944ef478765/lib/libhighs.so (unknown line) _ZN8HEkkDual5solveEb at /home/pkgeval/.julia/artifacts/47a06bffdeda3b990d140fa738e56944ef478765/lib/libhighs.so (unknown line) _ZN4HEkk5solveEb at /home/pkgeval/.julia/artifacts/47a06bffdeda3b990d140fa738e56944ef478765/lib/libhighs.so (unknown line) _Z14solveLpSimplexR19HighsLpSolverObject at /home/pkgeval/.julia/artifacts/47a06bffdeda3b990d140fa738e56944ef478765/lib/libhighs.so (unknown line) _Z7solveLpR19HighsLpSolverObjectNSt7__cxx1112basic_stringIcSt11char_traitsIcESaIcEEE at /home/pkgeval/.julia/artifacts/47a06bffdeda3b990d140fa738e56944ef478765/lib/libhighs.so (unknown line) _ZN5Highs11callSolveLpER7HighsLpNSt7__cxx1112basic_stringIcSt11char_traitsIcESaIcEEE at /home/pkgeval/.julia/artifacts/47a06bffdeda3b990d140fa738e56944ef478765/lib/libhighs.so (unknown line) _ZZN5Highs13optimizeModelEvENKUlR7HighsLpRKNSt7__cxx1112basic_stringIcSt11char_traitsIcESaIcEEERdE_clES1_S9_SA_.isra.499.lto_priv.3713 at /home/pkgeval/.julia/artifacts/47a06bffdeda3b990d140fa738e56944ef478765/lib/libhighs.so (unknown line) _ZN5Highs13optimizeModelEv at /home/pkgeval/.julia/artifacts/47a06bffdeda3b990d140fa738e56944ef478765/lib/libhighs.so (unknown line) _ZN5Highs3runEv at /home/pkgeval/.julia/artifacts/47a06bffdeda3b990d140fa738e56944ef478765/lib/libhighs.so (unknown line) Highs_run at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/HiGHS/umjNf/src/gen/libhighs.jl:328 [inlined] #47 at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/HiGHS/umjNf/src/MOI_wrapper.jl:2236 [inlined] disable_sigint at ./c.jl:167 [inlined] optimize! at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/HiGHS/umjNf/src/MOI_wrapper.jl:2236 optimize! at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/ovA7l/src/Bridges/bridge_optimizer.jl:367 [inlined] optimize! at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/ovA7l/src/Utilities/cachingoptimizer.jl:379 unknown function (ip: 0x7dc97fca9d12) at (unknown file) _jl_invoke at /source/src/gf.c:4112 [inlined] ijl_apply_generic at /source/src/gf.c:4309 #optimize!#96 at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/JuMP/N7h14/src/optimizer_interface.jl:609 optimize! at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/JuMP/N7h14/src/optimizer_interface.jl:560 [inlined] #solve_subproblem#78 at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/SDDP/39RYL/src/algorithm.jl:517 solve_subproblem at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/SDDP/39RYL/src/algorithm.jl:491 unknown function (ip: 0x7dc97f2a9137) at (unknown file) _jl_invoke at /source/src/gf.c:4112 [inlined] ijl_apply_generic at /source/src/gf.c:4309 #calculate_bound#84 at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/SDDP/39RYL/src/algorithm.jl:920 calculate_bound at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/SDDP/39RYL/src/algorithm.jl:880 [inlined] calculate_bound at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/SDDP/39RYL/src/algorithm.jl:880 unknown function (ip: 0x7dc97fccd277) at (unknown file) _jl_invoke at /source/src/gf.c:4112 [inlined] ijl_apply_generic at /source/src/gf.c:4309 iteration at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/SDDP/39RYL/src/algorithm.jl:979 #master_loop##0 at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/SDDP/39RYL/src/plugins/parallel_schemes.jl:50 disable_sigint at ./c.jl:167 [inlined] master_loop at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/SDDP/39RYL/src/plugins/parallel_schemes.jl:49 unknown function (ip: 0x7dc97fcaffd1) at (unknown file) _jl_invoke at /source/src/gf.c:4112 [inlined] ijl_apply_generic at /source/src/gf.c:4309 #train#91 at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/SDDP/39RYL/src/algorithm.jl:1291 train at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/SDDP/39RYL/src/algorithm.jl:1116 [inlined] #newsvendor_example#210 at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/SDDP/39RYL/docs/src/examples/objective_state_newsvendor.jl:66 newsvendor_example at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/SDDP/39RYL/docs/src/examples/objective_state_newsvendor.jl:34 unknown function (ip: 0x7dc97f2a1c02) at (unknown file) _jl_invoke at /source/src/gf.c:4112 [inlined] ijl_apply_generic at /source/src/gf.c:4309 jl_apply at /source/src/julia.h:2266 [inlined] do_call at /source/src/interpreter.c:123 eval_value at /source/src/interpreter.c:243 eval_stmt_value at /source/src/interpreter.c:194 [inlined] eval_body at /source/src/interpreter.c:690 jl_interpret_toplevel_thunk at /source/src/interpreter.c:899 jl_toplevel_eval_flex at /source/src/toplevel.c:772 jl_toplevel_eval_flex at /source/src/toplevel.c:712 ijl_toplevel_eval at /source/src/toplevel.c:784 ijl_toplevel_eval_in at /source/src/toplevel.c:829 eval at ./boot.jl:489 include_string at ./loading.jl:2915 _jl_invoke at /source/src/gf.c:4112 [inlined] ijl_apply_generic at /source/src/gf.c:4309 _include at ./loading.jl:2975 include at ./Base.jl:309 IncludeInto at ./Base.jl:310 [inlined] macro expansion at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/SDDP/39RYL/test/runtests.jl:16 [inlined] macro expansion at /source/usr/share/julia/stdlib/v1.13/Test/src/Test.jl:1952 [inlined] util_test_directory at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/SDDP/39RYL/test/runtests.jl:14 util_test_directory at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/SDDP/39RYL/test/runtests.jl:10 unknown function (ip: 0x7dc995ff5162) at (unknown file) _jl_invoke at /source/src/gf.c:4112 [inlined] ijl_apply_generic at /source/src/gf.c:4309 jl_apply at /source/src/julia.h:2266 [inlined] do_call at /source/src/interpreter.c:123 eval_value at /source/src/interpreter.c:243 eval_stmt_value at /source/src/interpreter.c:194 [inlined] eval_body at /source/src/interpreter.c:690 eval_body at /source/src/interpreter.c:550 eval_body at /source/src/interpreter.c:558 eval_body at /source/src/interpreter.c:558 eval_body at /source/src/interpreter.c:558 jl_interpret_toplevel_thunk at /source/src/interpreter.c:899 jl_toplevel_eval_flex at /source/src/toplevel.c:772 jl_toplevel_eval_flex at /source/src/toplevel.c:712 ijl_toplevel_eval at /source/src/toplevel.c:784 ijl_toplevel_eval_in at /source/src/toplevel.c:829 eval at ./boot.jl:489 include_string at ./loading.jl:2915 _jl_invoke at /source/src/gf.c:4112 [inlined] ijl_apply_generic at /source/src/gf.c:4309 _include at ./loading.jl:2975 include at ./Base.jl:309 IncludeInto at ./Base.jl:310 jfptr_IncludeInto_48516.1 at /opt/julia/lib/julia/sys.so (unknown line) _jl_invoke at /source/src/gf.c:4112 [inlined] ijl_apply_generic at /source/src/gf.c:4309 jl_apply at /source/src/julia.h:2266 [inlined] do_call at /source/src/interpreter.c:123 eval_value at /source/src/interpreter.c:243 eval_stmt_value at /source/src/interpreter.c:194 [inlined] eval_body at /source/src/interpreter.c:690 jl_interpret_toplevel_thunk at /source/src/interpreter.c:899 jl_toplevel_eval_flex at /source/src/toplevel.c:772 jl_toplevel_eval_flex at /source/src/toplevel.c:712 ijl_toplevel_eval at /source/src/toplevel.c:784 ijl_toplevel_eval_in at /source/src/toplevel.c:829 eval at ./boot.jl:489 exec_options at ./client.jl:296 _start at ./client.jl:563 jfptr__start_39276.1 at /opt/julia/lib/julia/sys.so (unknown line) _jl_invoke at /source/src/gf.c:4112 [inlined] ijl_apply_generic at /source/src/gf.c:4309 jl_apply at /source/src/julia.h:2266 [inlined] true_main at /source/src/jlapi.c:971 jl_repl_entrypoint at /source/src/jlapi.c:1138 main at /source/cli/loader_exe.c:58 unknown function (ip: 0x7dc9b3940249) at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 __libc_start_main at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (unknown line) unknown function (ip: 0x4010b8) at /workspace/srcdir/glibc-2.17/csu/../sysdeps/x86_64/start.S unknown function (ip: (nil)) at (unknown file) ============================================================== Profile collected. A report will print at the next yield point. Disabling --trace-compile ============================================================== 20 From worker 2: ┌ Warning: There were no samples collected in one or more groups.┌ Warning: There were no samples collected in one or more groups. │ This may be due to idle threads, or you may need to run your │ program longer (perhaps by running it multiple times), │ or adjust the delay between samples with `Profile.init()`. └ @ Profile /opt/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.13/Profile/src/Profile.jl:1362 Overhead ╎ [+additional indent] Count File:Line Function ========================================================= Thread 1 (default) Task 0x00007dc9999fc010 Total snapshots: 30. Utilization: 100% ╎29 @Base/client.jl:563 _start() ╎ 29 @Base/client.jl:296 exec_options(opts::Base.JLOptions) ╎ 29 @Base/boot.jl:489 eval(m::Module, e::Any) ╎ 29 @Base/Base.jl:310 (::Base.IncludeInto)(fname::String) ╎ 29 @Base/Base.jl:309 include(mapexpr::Function, mod::Module, _path::Str… ╎ 29 @Base/loading.jl:2975 _include(mapexpr::Function, mod::Module, _pat… ╎ ╎ 29 @Base/loading.jl:2915 include_string(mapexpr::typeof(identity), mo… ╎ ╎ 29 @Base/boot.jl:489 eval(m::Module, e::Any) ╎ ╎ 29 …YL/test/runtests.jl:10 util_test_directory(dir::String) ╎ ╎ 29 …YL/test/runtests.jl:14 util_test_directory(dir::String, exclud… ╎ ╎ 29 @Test/src/Test.jl:1952 macro expansion ╎ ╎ ╎ 29 …L/test/runtests.jl:16 macro expansion ╎ ╎ ╎ 29 @Base/Base.jl:310 IncludeInto ╎ ╎ ╎ 29 @Base/Base.jl:309 include(mapexpr::Function, mod::Module, _… ╎ ╎ ╎ 29 @Base/loading.jl:2975 _include(mapexpr::Function, mod::Mod… ╎ ╎ ╎ 29 @Base/loading.jl:2915 include_string(mapexpr::typeof(iden… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 29 @Base/boot.jl:489 eval(m::Module, e::Any) ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 29 …te_newsvendor.jl:34 kwcall(::@NamedTuple{cut_type::SDD… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 29 …e_newsvendor.jl:66 newsvendor_example(; cut_type::SDD… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 29 @SDDP/…orithm.jl:1116 train ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 29 @SDDP/…orithm.jl:1291 train(model::SDDP.PolicyGraph{… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 29 @SDDP/…chemes.jl:49 master_loop(::SDDP.Serial, mode… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 29 @Base/c.jl:167 disable_sigint ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 29 @SDDP/…hemes.jl:50 (::SDDP.var"#master_loop##0#ma… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 1 @SDDP/…ithm.jl:965 iteration(model::SDDP.PolicyG… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 1 @SDDP/…sses.jl:99 forward_pass(model::SDDP.Poli… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 1 @SDDP/…ithm.jl:11 macro expansion ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 1 @SDDP/…ses.jl:100 macro expansion ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 1 @SDDP/…thm.jl:491 kwcall(::@NamedTuple{duali… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 1 @SDDP/…hm.jl:517 solve_subproblem(model::SD… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 1 @JuMP/…ce.jl:560 optimize! ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 1 @JuMP/…ce.jl:609 optimize!(model::Model; … ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 1 @MathOptInterface/…:379 optimize!(m::Mat… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 1 @MathOptInterface/…:367 optimize! ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 1 @HiGHS/…r.jl:2236 optimize!(model::HiG… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 1 @Base/c.jl:167 disable_sigint ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 1 @HiGHS/…r.jl:2236 #47 1╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 1 @HiGHS/…s.jl:328 Highs_run ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 18 @SDDP/…ithm.jl:969 iteration(model::SDDP.PolicyG… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 15 @SDDP/…ithm.jl:675 backward_pass(model::SDDP.Po… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 15 @SDDP/…ithm.jl:831 solve_all_children(model::S… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 15 @SDDP/…thm.jl:491 kwcall(::@NamedTuple{dualit… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 14 @SDDP/…thm.jl:517 solve_subproblem(model::SD… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 14 @JuMP/…ce.jl:560 optimize! ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 14 @JuMP/…ce.jl:609 optimize!(model::Model; i… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 14 @MathOptInterface/…:379 optimize!(m::Math… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 14 @MathOptInterface/…:367 optimize! ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 13 @HiGHS/…r.jl:2236 optimize!(model::HiGH… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 13 @Base/c.jl:167 disable_sigint ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 13 @HiGHS/…r.jl:2236 #47 13╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 13 @HiGHS/…s.jl:328 Highs_run ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 1 @HiGHS/…r.jl:2243 optimize!(model::HiGH… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 1 @HiGHS/…r.jl:2087 _store_solution(mode… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 1 @HiGHS/…s.jl:879 Highs_getIntInfoValue ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 1 @SDDP/…thm.jl:540 solve_subproblem(model::SD… 1╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 1 @Base/…ot.jl:843 NamedTuple ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 3 @SDDP/…ithm.jl:688 backward_pass(model::SDDP.Po… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 3 @SDDP/…ions.jl:415 refine_bellman_function(mod… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 3 @SDDP/…ons.jl:470 _refine_bellman_function_no… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 3 @SDDP/…ons.jl:539 _add_multi_cut(node::SDDP.… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 3 @SDDP/…ons.jl:86 _add_cut(V::SDDP.ConvexApp… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 3 @SDDP/…ns.jl:102 _add_cut(V::SDDP.ConvexAp… 1╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 1 @SDDP/…ns.jl:164 _cut_selection_update(V:… 1╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 1 @SDDP/…ns.jl:180 _cut_selection_update(V:… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 1 @SDDP/…ns.jl:210 _cut_selection_update(V:… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 1 @JuMP/…ts.jl:570 delete(model::Model, co… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 1 @MathOptInterface/…:724 delete(m::MathO… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 1 @MathOptInterface/…:768 delete ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 1 @HiGHS/…r.jl:1797 delete(model::HiGHS… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 1 @Base/…ct.jl:66 iterate ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 1 @MathOptInterface/…:264 iterate ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 1 @OrderedCollections/…:455 iterate ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 1 @OrderedCollections/…:126 rehash! ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 1 @OrderedCollections/…:162 rehash… 1╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ +1 1 @Base/int.jl:522 <= ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 10 @SDDP/…ithm.jl:979 iteration(model::SDDP.PolicyG… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 10 @SDDP/…ithm.jl:880 kwcall(::@NamedTuple{risk_me… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 10 @SDDP/…ithm.jl:880 calculate_bound ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 10 @SDDP/…thm.jl:920 calculate_bound(model::SDDP… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 10 @SDDP/…thm.jl:491 kwcall(::@NamedTuple{duali… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 10 @SDDP/…hm.jl:517 solve_subproblem(model::SD… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 10 @JuMP/…ce.jl:560 optimize! ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 10 @JuMP/…ce.jl:609 optimize!(model::Model; … ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 10 @MathOptInterface/…:379 optimize!(m::Mat… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 10 @MathOptInterface/…:367 optimize! ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 10 @HiGHS/…r.jl:2236 optimize!(model::HiG… ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 10 @Base/c.jl:167 disable_sigint ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 10 @HiGHS/…r.jl:2236 #47 10╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ ╎ 10 @HiGHS/…s.jl:328 Highs_run From worker 2: │ This may be due to idle threads, or you may need to run your From worker 2: │ program longer (perhaps by running it multiple times), From worker 2: │ or adjust the delay between samples with `Profile.init()`. From worker 2: └ @ Profile /opt/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.13/Profile/src/Profile.jl:1362 From worker 2: Overhead ╎ [+additional indent] Count File:Line Function From worker 2: ========================================================= From worker 2: Thread 1 (default) Task 0x000070ece67fcf10 Total snapshots: 470. Utilization: 0% From worker 2: ╎470 @Base/task.jl:1137 wait_forever() From worker 2: 469╎ 470 @Base/task.jl:1200 wait() From worker 2: 3.587500e+00 4.342376e+00 3.477275e+00 2700 1 30 5.131250e+00 4.338720e+00 9.674501e+00 4050 1 40 4.800000e+00 4.051779e+00 1.097012e+01 5400 1 ====================================================================================== Information request received. A stacktrace will print followed by a 1.0 second profile. --trace-compile is enabled during profile collection. ====================================================================================== cmd: /opt/julia/bin/julia 1 running 0 of 1 signal (10): User defined signal 1 epoll_pwait at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (unknown line) uv__io_poll at /workspace/srcdir/libuv/src/unix/linux.c:1404 uv_run at /workspace/srcdir/libuv/src/unix/core.c:430 ijl_task_get_next at /source/src/scheduler.c:457 wait at ./task.jl:1200 wait_forever at ./task.jl:1137 jfptr_wait_forever_61470.1 at /opt/julia/lib/julia/sys.so (unknown line) _jl_invoke at /source/src/gf.c:4112 [inlined] ijl_apply_generic at /source/src/gf.c:4309 jl_apply at /source/src/julia.h:2266 [inlined] start_task at /source/src/task.c:1253 unknown function (ip: (nil)) at (unknown file) ============================================================== Profile collected. A report will print at the next yield point. Disabling --trace-compile ============================================================== 50 4.387500e+00 4.050158e+00 1.281241e+01 6750 1 ┌ Warning: There were no samples collected in one or more groups. │ This may be due to idle threads, or you may need to run your │ program longer (perhaps by running it multiple times), │ or adjust the delay between samples with `Profile.init()`. └ @ Profile /opt/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.13/Profile/src/Profile.jl:1362 Overhead ╎ [+additional indent] Count File:Line Function ========================================================= Thread 1 (default) Task 0x00007cf77389c1f0 Total snapshots: 457. Utilization: 0% ╎457 @Base/task.jl:1137 wait_forever() 456╎ 457 @Base/task.jl:1200 wait() 60 4.031250e+00 4.046688e+00 1.616835e+01 8100 1 70 3.837500e+00 4.040562e+00 1.810370e+01 9450 1 79 5.550000e+00 4.038826e+00 2.005509e+01 10665 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : time_limit total time (s) : 2.005509e+01 total solves : 10665 best bound : 4.038826e+00 simulation ci : 4.106514e+00 ± 1.513586e-01 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- [1] signal 15: Terminated in expression starting at /PkgEval.jl/scripts/evaluate.jl:210 epoll_pwait at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (unknown line) uv__io_poll at /workspace/srcdir/libuv/src/unix/linux.c:1404 uv_run at /workspace/srcdir/libuv/src/unix/core.c:430 ijl_task_get_next at /source/src/scheduler.c:457 wait at ./task.jl:1200 wait_forever at ./task.jl:1137 jfptr_wait_forever_61470.1 at /opt/julia/lib/julia/sys.so (unknown line) _jl_invoke at /source/src/gf.c:4112 [inlined] ijl_apply_generic at /source/src/gf.c:4309 jl_apply at /source/src/julia.h:2266 [inlined] start_task at /source/src/task.c:1253 unknown function (ip: (nil)) at (unknown file) Allocations: 22655264 (Pool: 22654628; Big: 636); GC: 19 [39] signal 15: Terminated in expression starting at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/SDDP/39RYL/docs/src/examples/objective_state_newsvendor.jl:81 _ZN11HEkkDualRHS34createArrayOfPrimalInfeasibilitiesEv at /home/pkgeval/.julia/artifacts/47a06bffdeda3b990d140fa738e56944ef478765/lib/libhighs.so (unknown line) _ZN8HEkkDual7rebuildEv at /home/pkgeval/.julia/artifacts/47a06bffdeda3b990d140fa738e56944ef478765/lib/libhighs.so (unknown line) _ZN8HEkkDual11solvePhase2Ev at /home/pkgeval/.julia/artifacts/47a06bffdeda3b990d140fa738e56944ef478765/lib/libhighs.so (unknown line) _ZN8HEkkDual5solveEb at /home/pkgeval/.julia/artifacts/47a06bffdeda3b990d140fa738e56944ef478765/lib/libhighs.so (unknown line) _ZN4HEkk5solveEb at /home/pkgeval/.julia/artifacts/47a06bffdeda3b990d140fa738e56944ef478765/lib/libhighs.so (unknown line) _Z14solveLpSimplexR19HighsLpSolverObject at /home/pkgeval/.julia/artifacts/47a06bffdeda3b990d140fa738e56944ef478765/lib/libhighs.so (unknown line) _Z7solveLpR19HighsLpSolverObjectNSt7__cxx1112basic_stringIcSt11char_traitsIcESaIcEEE at /home/pkgeval/.julia/artifacts/47a06bffdeda3b990d140fa738e56944ef478765/lib/libhighs.so (unknown line) _ZN5Highs11callSolveLpER7HighsLpNSt7__cxx1112basic_stringIcSt11char_traitsIcESaIcEEE at /home/pkgeval/.julia/artifacts/47a06bffdeda3b990d140fa738e56944ef478765/lib/libhighs.so (unknown line) _ZZN5Highs13optimizeModelEvENKUlR7HighsLpRKNSt7__cxx1112basic_stringIcSt11char_traitsIcESaIcEEERdE_clES1_S9_SA_.isra.499.lto_priv.3713 at /home/pkgeval/.julia/artifacts/47a06bffdeda3b990d140fa738e56944ef478765/lib/libhighs.so (unknown line) _ZN5Highs13optimizeModelEv at /home/pkgeval/.julia/artifacts/47a06bffdeda3b990d140fa738e56944ef478765/lib/libhighs.so (unknown line) _ZN5Highs3runEv at /home/pkgeval/.julia/artifacts/47a06bffdeda3b990d140fa738e56944ef478765/lib/libhighs.so (unknown line) Highs_run at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/HiGHS/umjNf/src/gen/libhighs.jl:328 [inlined] #47 at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/HiGHS/umjNf/src/MOI_wrapper.jl:2236 [inlined] disable_sigint at ./c.jl:167 [inlined] optimize! at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/HiGHS/umjNf/src/MOI_wrapper.jl:2236 optimize! at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/ovA7l/src/Bridges/bridge_optimizer.jl:367 [inlined] optimize! at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/ovA7l/src/Utilities/cachingoptimizer.jl:379 unknown function (ip: 0x7dc97fca9d12) at (unknown file) _jl_invoke at /source/src/gf.c:4112 [inlined] ijl_apply_generic at /source/src/gf.c:4309 #optimize!#96 at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/JuMP/N7h14/src/optimizer_interface.jl:609 optimize! at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/JuMP/N7h14/src/optimizer_interface.jl:560 [inlined] #solve_subproblem#78 at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/SDDP/39RYL/src/algorithm.jl:517 solve_subproblem at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/SDDP/39RYL/src/algorithm.jl:491 unknown function (ip: 0x7dc97f2a9137) at (unknown file) _jl_invoke at /source/src/gf.c:4112 [inlined] ijl_apply_generic at /source/src/gf.c:4309 #_simulate#106 at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/SDDP/39RYL/src/algorithm.jl:1382 _simulate at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/SDDP/39RYL/src/algorithm.jl:1334 [inlined] #226 at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/SDDP/39RYL/src/plugins/parallel_schemes.jl:71 [inlined] iterate at ./generator.jl:48 [inlined] collect_to! at ./array.jl:893 [inlined] collect_to_with_first! at ./array.jl:871 [inlined] _collect at ./array.jl:865 collect_similar at ./array.jl:770 [inlined] map at ./abstractarray.jl:3386 [inlined] #_simulate#224 at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/SDDP/39RYL/src/plugins/parallel_schemes.jl:70 [inlined] _simulate at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/SDDP/39RYL/src/plugins/parallel_schemes.jl:62 [inlined] #simulate#108 at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/SDDP/39RYL/src/algorithm.jl:1551 [inlined] simulate at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/SDDP/39RYL/src/algorithm.jl:1540 simulate at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/SDDP/39RYL/src/algorithm.jl:1540 [inlined] #newsvendor_example#210 at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/SDDP/39RYL/docs/src/examples/objective_state_newsvendor.jl:73 newsvendor_example at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/SDDP/39RYL/docs/src/examples/objective_state_newsvendor.jl:34 unknown function (ip: 0x7dc97f2a1c02) at (unknown file) _jl_invoke at /source/src/gf.c:4112 [inlined] ijl_apply_generic at /source/src/gf.c:4309 jl_apply at /source/src/julia.h:2266 [inlined] do_call at /source/src/interpreter.c:123 eval_value at /source/src/interpreter.c:243 eval_stmt_value at /source/src/interpreter.c:194 [inlined] eval_body at /source/src/interpreter.c:690 jl_interpret_toplevel_thunk at /source/src/interpreter.c:899 jl_toplevel_eval_flex at /source/src/toplevel.c:772 jl_toplevel_eval_flex at /source/src/toplevel.c:712 ijl_toplevel_eval at /source/src/toplevel.c:784 ijl_toplevel_eval_in at /source/src/toplevel.c:829 eval at ./boot.jl:489 include_string at ./loading.jl:2915 _jl_invoke at /source/src/gf.c:4112 [inlined] ijl_apply_generic at /source/src/gf.c:4309 _include at ./loading.jl:2975 include at ./Base.jl:309 IncludeInto at ./Base.jl:310 [inlined] macro expansion at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/SDDP/39RYL/test/runtests.jl:16 [inlined] macro expansion at /source/usr/share/julia/stdlib/v1.13/Test/src/Test.jl:1952 [inlined] util_test_directory at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/SDDP/39RYL/test/runtests.jl:14 util_test_directory at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/SDDP/39RYL/test/runtests.jl:10 unknown function (ip: 0x7dc995ff5162) at (unknown file) _jl_invoke at /source/src/gf.c:4112 [inlined] ijl_apply_generic at /source/src/gf.c:4309 jl_apply at /source/src/julia.h:2266 [inlined] do_call at /source/src/interpreter.c:123 eval_value at /source/src/interpreter.c:243 eval_stmt_value at /source/src/interpreter.c:194 [inlined] eval_body at /source/src/interpreter.c:690 eval_body at /source/src/interpreter.c:550 eval_body at /source/src/interpreter.c:558 eval_body at /source/src/interpreter.c:558 eval_body at /source/src/interpreter.c:558 jl_interpret_toplevel_thunk at /source/src/interpreter.c:899 jl_toplevel_eval_flex at /source/src/toplevel.c:772 jl_toplevel_eval_flex at /source/src/toplevel.c:712 ijl_toplevel_eval at /source/src/toplevel.c:784 ijl_toplevel_eval_in at /source/src/toplevel.c:829 eval at ./boot.jl:489 include_string at ./loading.jl:2915 _jl_invoke at /source/src/gf.c:4112 [inlined] ijl_apply_generic at /source/src/gf.c:4309 _include at ./loading.jl:2975 include at ./Base.jl:309 IncludeInto at ./Base.jl:310 jfptr_IncludeInto_48516.1 at /opt/julia/lib/julia/sys.so (unknown line) _jl_invoke at /source/src/gf.c:4112 [inlined] ijl_apply_generic at /source/src/gf.c:4309 jl_apply at /source/src/julia.h:2266 [inlined] do_call at /source/src/interpreter.c:123 eval_value at /source/src/interpreter.c:243 eval_stmt_value at /source/src/interpreter.c:194 [inlined] eval_body at /source/src/interpreter.c:690 jl_interpret_toplevel_thunk at /source/src/interpreter.c:899 jl_toplevel_eval_flex at /source/src/toplevel.c:772 jl_toplevel_eval_flex at /source/src/toplevel.c:712 ijl_toplevel_eval at /source/src/toplevel.c:784 ijl_toplevel_eval_in at /source/src/toplevel.c:829 eval at ./boot.jl:489 exec_options at ./client.jl:296 _start at ./client.jl:563 jfptr__start_39276.1 at /opt/julia/lib/julia/sys.so (unknown line) _jl_invoke at /source/src/gf.c:4112 [inlined] ijl_apply_generic at /source/src/gf.c:4309 jl_apply at /source/src/julia.h:2266 [inlined] true_main at /source/src/jlapi.c:971 jl_repl_entrypoint at /source/src/jlapi.c:1138 main at /source/cli/loader_exe.c:58 unknown function (ip: 0x7dc9b3940249) at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 __libc_start_main at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (unknown line) unknown function (ip: 0x4010b8) at /workspace/srcdir/glibc-2.17/csu/../sysdeps/x86_64/start.S unknown function (ip: (nil)) at (unknown file) Allocations: 589161109 (Pool: 589157464; Big: 3645); GC: 124 PkgEval terminated after 2777.41s: test duration exceeded the time limit