Package evaluation of SDDP on Julia 1.13.0-DEV.745 (a23ce4bcbb*) started at 2025-06-15T19:38:51.335 ################################################################################ # Set-up # Installing PkgEval dependencies (TestEnv)... Set-up completed after 9.7s ################################################################################ # Installation # Installing SDDP... Resolving package versions... Installed Bzip2_jll ──────────── v1.0.9+0 Installed DiffResults ────────── v1.1.0 Installed MacroTools ─────────── v0.5.16 Installed CodecZlib ──────────── v0.7.8 Installed ConcurrentUtilities ── v2.5.0 Installed URIs ───────────────── v1.5.2 Installed DataStructures ─────── v0.18.22 Installed ForwardDiff ────────── v1.0.1 Installed ExprTools ──────────── v0.1.10 Installed RecipesBase ────────── v1.3.4 Installed ExceptionUnwrapping ── v0.1.11 Installed Compat ─────────────── v4.16.0 Installed OrderedCollections ─── v1.8.1 Installed Statistics ─────────── v1.11.1 Installed TranscodingStreams ─── v0.11.3 Installed PrecompileTools ────── v1.3.2 Installed CommonSubexpressions ─ v0.3.1 Installed TimerOutputs ───────── v0.5.29 Installed LoggingExtras ──────── v1.1.0 Installed OpenSSL ────────────── v1.5.0 Installed IrrationalConstants ── v0.2.4 Installed StaticArraysCore ───── v1.4.3 Installed CodecBzip2 ─────────── v0.8.5 Installed OpenSpecFun_jll ────── v0.5.6+0 Installed NaNMath ────────────── v1.1.3 Installed MbedTLS ────────────── v1.1.9 Installed JSON3 ──────────────── v1.14.3 Installed HTTP ───────────────── v1.10.16 Installed BitFlags ───────────── v0.1.9 Installed DiffRules ──────────── v1.15.1 Installed LogExpFunctions ────── v0.3.29 Installed JSON ───────────────── v0.21.4 Installed Parsers ────────────── v2.8.3 Installed JuMP ───────────────── v1.26.0 Installed Reexport ───────────── v1.2.2 Installed SimpleBufferStream ─── v1.2.0 Installed SpecialFunctions ───── v2.5.1 Installed JLLWrappers ────────── v1.7.0 Installed Preferences ────────── v1.4.3 Installed BenchmarkTools ─────── v1.6.0 Installed MutableArithmetics ─── v1.6.4 Installed SDDP ───────────────── v1.12.0 Installed MbedTLS_jll ────────── v2.28.6+2 Installed StructTypes ────────── v1.11.0 Installed DocStringExtensions ── v0.9.5 Installed MathOptInterface ───── v1.41.0 Installing 3 artifacts Installed artifact OpenSpecFun 194.9 KiB Installed artifact Bzip2 503.5 KiB Installed artifact MbedTLS 2.1 MiB Updating `~/.julia/environments/v1.13/Project.toml` [f4570300] + SDDP v1.12.0 Updating `~/.julia/environments/v1.13/Manifest.toml` [6e4b80f9] + BenchmarkTools v1.6.0 [d1d4a3ce] + BitFlags v0.1.9 [523fee87] + CodecBzip2 v0.8.5 [944b1d66] + CodecZlib v0.7.8 [bbf7d656] + CommonSubexpressions v0.3.1 [34da2185] + Compat v4.16.0 [f0e56b4a] + ConcurrentUtilities v2.5.0 [864edb3b] + DataStructures v0.18.22 [163ba53b] + DiffResults v1.1.0 [b552c78f] + DiffRules v1.15.1 [ffbed154] + DocStringExtensions v0.9.5 [460bff9d] + ExceptionUnwrapping v0.1.11 [e2ba6199] + ExprTools v0.1.10 [f6369f11] + ForwardDiff v1.0.1 [cd3eb016] + HTTP v1.10.16 [92d709cd] + IrrationalConstants v0.2.4 [692b3bcd] + JLLWrappers v1.7.0 [682c06a0] + JSON v0.21.4 [0f8b85d8] + JSON3 v1.14.3 [4076af6c] + JuMP v1.26.0 [2ab3a3ac] + LogExpFunctions v0.3.29 [e6f89c97] + LoggingExtras v1.1.0 [1914dd2f] + MacroTools v0.5.16 [b8f27783] + MathOptInterface v1.41.0 [739be429] + MbedTLS v1.1.9 [d8a4904e] + MutableArithmetics v1.6.4 [77ba4419] + NaNMath v1.1.3 [4d8831e6] + OpenSSL v1.5.0 [bac558e1] + OrderedCollections v1.8.1 [69de0a69] + Parsers v2.8.3 [aea7be01] + PrecompileTools v1.3.2 [21216c6a] + Preferences v1.4.3 [3cdcf5f2] + RecipesBase v1.3.4 [189a3867] + Reexport v1.2.2 [f4570300] + SDDP v1.12.0 [777ac1f9] + SimpleBufferStream v1.2.0 [276daf66] + SpecialFunctions v2.5.1 [1e83bf80] + StaticArraysCore v1.4.3 [10745b16] + Statistics v1.11.1 [856f2bd8] + StructTypes v1.11.0 [a759f4b9] + TimerOutputs v0.5.29 [3bb67fe8] + TranscodingStreams v0.11.3 [5c2747f8] + URIs v1.5.2 [6e34b625] + Bzip2_jll v1.0.9+0 [c8ffd9c3] + MbedTLS_jll v2.28.6+2 [efe28fd5] + OpenSpecFun_jll v0.5.6+0 [56f22d72] + Artifacts v1.11.0 [2a0f44e3] + Base64 v1.11.0 [ade2ca70] + Dates v1.11.0 [8ba89e20] + Distributed v1.11.0 [b77e0a4c] + InteractiveUtils v1.11.0 [ac6e5ff7] + JuliaSyntaxHighlighting v1.12.0 [8f399da3] + Libdl v1.11.0 [37e2e46d] + LinearAlgebra v1.12.0 [56ddb016] + Logging v1.11.0 [d6f4376e] + Markdown v1.11.0 [a63ad114] + Mmap v1.11.0 [ca575930] + NetworkOptions v1.3.0 [de0858da] + Printf v1.11.0 [9abbd945] + Profile v1.11.0 [9a3f8284] + Random v1.11.0 [ea8e919c] + SHA v0.7.0 [9e88b42a] + Serialization v1.11.0 [6462fe0b] + Sockets v1.11.0 [2f01184e] + SparseArrays v1.12.0 [f489334b] + StyledStrings v1.11.0 [fa267f1f] + TOML v1.0.3 [8dfed614] + Test v1.11.0 [cf7118a7] + UUIDs v1.11.0 [4ec0a83e] + Unicode v1.11.0 [e66e0078] + CompilerSupportLibraries_jll v1.3.0+1 [14a3606d] + MozillaCACerts_jll v2025.5.20 [4536629a] + OpenBLAS_jll v0.3.29+0 [05823500] + OpenLibm_jll v0.8.5+0 [458c3c95] + OpenSSL_jll v3.5.0+0 [bea87d4a] + SuiteSparse_jll v7.10.1+0 [83775a58] + Zlib_jll v1.3.1+2 [8e850b90] + libblastrampoline_jll v5.12.0+0 Installation completed after 8.44s ################################################################################ # Precompilation # Precompiling PkgEval dependencies... Precompiling packages... 5106.0 ms ✓ TestEnv 1 dependency successfully precompiled in 5 seconds. 25 already precompiled. Precompiling package dependencies... Precompilation completed after 871.75s ################################################################################ # Testing # Testing SDDP Status `/tmp/jl_PeqGIA/Project.toml` [87dc4568] HiGHS v1.18.1 [b6b21f68] Ipopt v1.10.6 [682c06a0] JSON v0.21.4 [7d188eb4] JSONSchema v1.4.1 [91a5bcdd] Plots v1.40.13 [f4570300] SDDP v1.12.0 [10745b16] Statistics v1.11.1 [8ba89e20] Distributed v1.11.0 [f43a241f] Downloads v1.7.0 [44cfe95a] Pkg v1.13.0 [9a3f8284] Random v1.11.0 [8dfed614] Test v1.11.0 Status `/tmp/jl_PeqGIA/Manifest.toml` [66dad0bd] AliasTables v1.1.3 [6e4b80f9] BenchmarkTools v1.6.0 [d1d4a3ce] BitFlags v0.1.9 [523fee87] CodecBzip2 v0.8.5 [944b1d66] CodecZlib v0.7.8 [35d6a980] ColorSchemes v3.29.0 [3da002f7] ColorTypes v0.12.1 [c3611d14] ColorVectorSpace v0.11.0 [5ae59095] Colors v0.13.1 [bbf7d656] CommonSubexpressions v0.3.1 [34da2185] Compat v4.16.0 [f0e56b4a] ConcurrentUtilities v2.5.0 [d38c429a] Contour v0.6.3 [9a962f9c] DataAPI v1.16.0 [864edb3b] DataStructures v0.18.22 [8bb1440f] DelimitedFiles v1.9.1 [163ba53b] DiffResults v1.1.0 [b552c78f] DiffRules v1.15.1 [ffbed154] DocStringExtensions v0.9.5 [460bff9d] ExceptionUnwrapping v0.1.11 [e2ba6199] ExprTools v0.1.10 [c87230d0] FFMPEG v0.4.2 [53c48c17] FixedPointNumbers v0.8.5 [1fa38f19] Format v1.3.7 [f6369f11] ForwardDiff v1.0.1 [28b8d3ca] GR v0.73.16 [42e2da0e] Grisu v1.0.2 [cd3eb016] HTTP v1.10.16 [87dc4568] HiGHS v1.18.1 [b6b21f68] Ipopt v1.10.6 [92d709cd] IrrationalConstants v0.2.4 [1019f520] JLFzf v0.1.11 [692b3bcd] JLLWrappers v1.7.0 [682c06a0] JSON v0.21.4 [0f8b85d8] JSON3 v1.14.3 [7d188eb4] JSONSchema v1.4.1 [4076af6c] JuMP v1.26.0 [b964fa9f] LaTeXStrings v1.4.0 [23fbe1c1] Latexify v0.16.8 [2ab3a3ac] LogExpFunctions v0.3.29 [e6f89c97] LoggingExtras v1.1.0 [1914dd2f] MacroTools v0.5.16 [b8f27783] MathOptInterface v1.41.0 [739be429] MbedTLS v1.1.9 [442fdcdd] Measures v0.3.2 [e1d29d7a] Missings v1.2.0 [d8a4904e] MutableArithmetics v1.6.4 [77ba4419] NaNMath v1.1.3 [4d8831e6] OpenSSL v1.5.0 [bac558e1] OrderedCollections v1.8.1 [69de0a69] Parsers v2.8.3 [ccf2f8ad] PlotThemes v3.3.0 [995b91a9] PlotUtils v1.4.3 [91a5bcdd] Plots v1.40.13 [aea7be01] PrecompileTools v1.3.2 [21216c6a] Preferences v1.4.3 [43287f4e] PtrArrays v1.3.0 [3cdcf5f2] RecipesBase v1.3.4 [01d81517] RecipesPipeline v0.6.12 [189a3867] Reexport v1.2.2 [05181044] RelocatableFolders v1.0.1 [ae029012] Requires v1.3.1 [f4570300] SDDP v1.12.0 [6c6a2e73] Scratch v1.2.1 [992d4aef] Showoff v1.0.3 [777ac1f9] SimpleBufferStream v1.2.0 [a2af1166] SortingAlgorithms v1.2.1 [276daf66] SpecialFunctions v2.5.1 [860ef19b] StableRNGs v1.0.3 [1e83bf80] StaticArraysCore v1.4.3 [10745b16] Statistics v1.11.1 [82ae8749] StatsAPI v1.7.1 [2913bbd2] StatsBase v0.34.5 [856f2bd8] StructTypes v1.11.0 [62fd8b95] TensorCore v0.1.1 [a759f4b9] TimerOutputs v0.5.29 [3bb67fe8] TranscodingStreams v0.11.3 [5c2747f8] URIs v1.5.2 [1cfade01] UnicodeFun v0.4.1 [1986cc42] Unitful v1.23.1 [45397f5d] UnitfulLatexify v1.7.0 [41fe7b60] Unzip v0.2.0 [ae81ac8f] ASL_jll v0.1.3+0 [6e34b625] Bzip2_jll v1.0.9+0 [83423d85] Cairo_jll v1.18.5+0 [ee1fde0b] Dbus_jll v1.16.2+0 [2702e6a9] EpollShim_jll v0.0.20230411+1 [2e619515] Expat_jll v2.6.5+0 ⌅ [b22a6f82] FFMPEG_jll v4.4.4+1 [a3f928ae] Fontconfig_jll v2.16.0+0 [d7e528f0] FreeType2_jll v2.13.4+0 [559328eb] FriBidi_jll v1.0.17+0 [0656b61e] GLFW_jll v3.4.0+2 [d2c73de3] GR_jll v0.73.16+0 [78b55507] Gettext_jll v0.21.0+0 [7746bdde] Glib_jll v2.84.0+0 [3b182d85] Graphite2_jll v1.3.15+0 [2e76f6c2] HarfBuzz_jll v8.5.1+0 [8fd58aa0] HiGHS_jll v1.11.0+1 [e33a78d0] Hwloc_jll v2.12.1+0 [9cc047cb] Ipopt_jll v300.1400.1701+0 [aacddb02] JpegTurbo_jll v3.1.1+0 [c1c5ebd0] LAME_jll v3.100.2+0 [88015f11] LERC_jll v4.0.1+0 [1d63c593] LLVMOpenMP_jll v18.1.8+0 [dd4b983a] LZO_jll v2.10.3+0 [e9f186c6] Libffi_jll v3.4.7+0 [7e76a0d4] Libglvnd_jll v1.7.1+1 [94ce4f54] Libiconv_jll v1.18.0+0 [4b2f31a3] Libmount_jll v2.41.0+0 [89763e89] Libtiff_jll v4.7.1+0 [38a345b3] Libuuid_jll v2.41.0+0 [d00139f3] METIS_jll v5.1.3+0 [d7ed1dd3] MUMPS_seq_jll v500.800.0+0 [c8ffd9c3] MbedTLS_jll v2.28.6+2 [e7412a2a] Ogg_jll v1.3.5+1 [656ef2d0] OpenBLAS32_jll v0.3.29+0 [efe28fd5] OpenSpecFun_jll v0.5.6+0 [91d4177d] Opus_jll v1.3.3+0 [36c8627f] Pango_jll v1.56.3+0 ⌅ [30392449] Pixman_jll v0.44.2+0 [c0090381] Qt6Base_jll v6.8.2+1 [629bc702] Qt6Declarative_jll v6.8.2+1 [ce943373] Qt6ShaderTools_jll v6.8.2+1 [e99dba38] Qt6Wayland_jll v6.8.2+0 [319450e9] SPRAL_jll v2025.5.20+0 [a44049a8] Vulkan_Loader_jll v1.3.243+0 [a2964d1f] Wayland_jll v1.23.1+0 [2381bf8a] Wayland_protocols_jll v1.44.0+0 ⌅ [02c8fc9c] XML2_jll v2.13.6+1 [ffd25f8a] XZ_jll v5.8.1+0 [f67eecfb] Xorg_libICE_jll v1.1.2+0 [c834827a] Xorg_libSM_jll v1.2.6+0 [4f6342f7] Xorg_libX11_jll v1.8.12+0 [0c0b7dd1] Xorg_libXau_jll v1.0.13+0 [935fb764] Xorg_libXcursor_jll v1.2.4+0 [a3789734] Xorg_libXdmcp_jll v1.1.6+0 [1082639a] Xorg_libXext_jll v1.3.7+0 [d091e8ba] Xorg_libXfixes_jll v6.0.1+0 [a51aa0fd] Xorg_libXi_jll v1.8.3+0 [d1454406] Xorg_libXinerama_jll v1.1.6+0 [ec84b674] Xorg_libXrandr_jll v1.5.5+0 [ea2f1a96] Xorg_libXrender_jll v0.9.12+0 [c7cfdc94] Xorg_libxcb_jll v1.17.1+0 [cc61e674] Xorg_libxkbfile_jll v1.1.3+0 [e920d4aa] Xorg_xcb_util_cursor_jll v0.1.4+0 [12413925] Xorg_xcb_util_image_jll v0.4.1+0 [2def613f] Xorg_xcb_util_jll v0.4.1+0 [975044d2] Xorg_xcb_util_keysyms_jll v0.4.1+0 [0d47668e] Xorg_xcb_util_renderutil_jll v0.3.10+0 [c22f9ab0] Xorg_xcb_util_wm_jll v0.4.2+0 [35661453] Xorg_xkbcomp_jll v1.4.7+0 [33bec58e] Xorg_xkeyboard_config_jll v2.44.0+0 [c5fb5394] Xorg_xtrans_jll v1.6.0+0 [35ca27e7] eudev_jll v3.2.14+0 [214eeab7] fzf_jll v0.61.1+0 [a4ae2306] libaom_jll v3.11.0+0 [0ac62f75] libass_jll v0.15.2+0 [1183f4f0] libdecor_jll v0.2.2+0 [2db6ffa8] libevdev_jll v1.13.4+0 [f638f0a6] libfdk_aac_jll v2.0.3+0 [36db933b] libinput_jll v1.28.1+0 [b53b4c65] libpng_jll v1.6.49+0 [f27f6e37] libvorbis_jll v1.3.7+2 [009596ad] mtdev_jll v1.1.7+0 ⌅ [1270edf5] x264_jll v2021.5.5+0 ⌅ [dfaa095f] x265_jll v3.5.0+0 [d8fb68d0] xkbcommon_jll v1.8.1+0 [0dad84c5] ArgTools v1.1.2 [56f22d72] Artifacts v1.11.0 [2a0f44e3] Base64 v1.11.0 [ade2ca70] Dates v1.11.0 [8ba89e20] Distributed v1.11.0 [f43a241f] Downloads v1.7.0 [7b1f6079] FileWatching v1.11.0 [b77e0a4c] InteractiveUtils v1.11.0 [ac6e5ff7] JuliaSyntaxHighlighting v1.12.0 [b27032c2] LibCURL v0.6.4 [76f85450] LibGit2 v1.11.0 [8f399da3] Libdl v1.11.0 [37e2e46d] LinearAlgebra v1.12.0 [56ddb016] Logging v1.11.0 [d6f4376e] Markdown v1.11.0 [a63ad114] Mmap v1.11.0 [ca575930] NetworkOptions v1.3.0 [44cfe95a] Pkg v1.13.0 [de0858da] Printf v1.11.0 [9abbd945] Profile v1.11.0 [3fa0cd96] REPL v1.11.0 [9a3f8284] Random v1.11.0 [ea8e919c] SHA v0.7.0 [9e88b42a] Serialization v1.11.0 [6462fe0b] Sockets v1.11.0 [2f01184e] SparseArrays v1.12.0 [f489334b] StyledStrings v1.11.0 [fa267f1f] TOML v1.0.3 [a4e569a6] Tar v1.10.0 [8dfed614] Test v1.11.0 [cf7118a7] UUIDs v1.11.0 [4ec0a83e] Unicode v1.11.0 [e66e0078] CompilerSupportLibraries_jll v1.3.0+1 [deac9b47] LibCURL_jll v8.14.1+1 [e37daf67] LibGit2_jll v1.9.0+0 [29816b5a] LibSSH2_jll v1.11.3+1 [14a3606d] MozillaCACerts_jll v2025.5.20 [4536629a] OpenBLAS_jll v0.3.29+0 [05823500] OpenLibm_jll v0.8.5+0 [458c3c95] OpenSSL_jll v3.5.0+0 [efcefdf7] PCRE2_jll v10.45.0+0 [bea87d4a] SuiteSparse_jll v7.10.1+0 [83775a58] Zlib_jll v1.3.1+2 [3161d3a3] Zstd_jll v1.5.7+1 [8e850b90] libblastrampoline_jll v5.12.0+0 [8e850ede] nghttp2_jll v1.65.0+0 [3f19e933] p7zip_jll v17.5.0+2 Info Packages marked with ⌅ have new versions available but compatibility constraints restrict them from upgrading. Testing Running tests... [ Info: Experimental.jl [ Info: fetching remote ref https://jump.dev/MathOptFormat/schemas/mof.1.schema.json [ Info: MSPFormat.jl [ Info: algorithm.jl ┌ Warning: Unable to recover in direct mode! Remove `direct = true` when creating the policy graph. └ @ SDDP ~/.julia/packages/SDDP/She2h/src/algorithm.jl:391 [ Info: Writing cuts to the file `model_infeasible_node_1.cuts.json` [ Info: Writing cuts to the file `model_infeasible_node_1.cuts.json` ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 2 state variables : 1 scenarios : 1.00000e+00 existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [3, 3] JuMP.AffExpr in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [1, 1] JuMP.VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [2, 2] JuMP.VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [1, 1] numerical stability report matrix range [1e+00, 1e+00] objective range [1e+00, 1e+00] bounds range [0e+00, 0e+00] rhs range [2e+00, 2e+00] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- † 1 0.000000e+00 0.000000e+00 3.710589e-01 4 1 3 0.000000e+00 0.000000e+00 9.033439e-01 12 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : iteration_limit total time (s) : 9.033439e-01 total solves : 12 best bound : 0.000000e+00 simulation ci : 0.000000e+00 ± 0.000000e+00 numeric issues : 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 3 state variables : 1 scenarios : 8.00000e+00 existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [6, 6] JuMP.AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [1, 1] JuMP.VariableRef in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [1, 1] JuMP.VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [4, 4] JuMP.VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [2, 3] numerical stability report matrix range [1e+00, 1e+00] objective range [1e+00, 3e+02] bounds range [1e+02, 2e+02] rhs range [0e+00, 0e+00] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 1.100000e+05 1.075000e+05 2.450585e-02 9 1 20 7.500000e+04 1.075000e+05 6.956730e-01 204 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : simulation_stopping total time (s) : 6.956730e-01 total solves : 204 best bound : 1.075000e+05 simulation ci : 8.268750e+04 ± 1.084410e+04 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- ┌ Warning: Re-training a model with existing cuts! │ │ Are you sure you want to do this? The output from this training may be │ misleading because the policy is already partially trained. │ │ If you meant to train a new policy with different settings, you must │ build a new model. │ │ If you meant to refine a previously trained policy, turn off this │ warning by passing `add_to_existing_cuts = true` as a keyword argument │ to `SDDP.train`. │ │ In a future release, this warning may turn into an error. └ @ SDDP ~/.julia/packages/SDDP/She2h/src/algorithm.jl:1170 ┌ Warning: Re-training a model with existing cuts! │ │ Are you sure you want to do this? The output from this training may be │ misleading because the policy is already partially trained. │ │ If you meant to train a new policy with different settings, you must │ build a new model. │ │ If you meant to refine a previously trained policy, turn off this │ warning by passing `add_to_existing_cuts = true` as a keyword argument │ to `SDDP.train`. │ │ In a future release, this warning may turn into an error. └ @ SDDP ~/.julia/packages/SDDP/She2h/src/algorithm.jl:1170 [ Info: binary_expansion.jl [ Info: deterministic_equivalent.jl [ Info: modeling_aids.jl ┌ Warning: Budget for nodes is less than the number of stages. Using one node per stage. └ @ SDDP ~/.julia/packages/SDDP/She2h/src/modeling_aids.jl:125 [ Info: user_interface.jl [ Info: backward_sampling_schemes.jl [ Info: bellman_functions.jl ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 3 state variables : 1 scenarios : 2.70000e+01 existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [6, 6] JuMP.AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [2, 2] JuMP.VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [5, 5] JuMP.VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [1, 2] numerical stability report matrix range [1e+00, 1e+00] objective range [1e+00, 1e+01] bounds range [5e+00, 2e+01] rhs range [2e+00, 1e+01] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 2.500000e+01 2.138889e+01 1.179295e+00 12 1 10 2.500000e+00 3.361111e+01 1.206375e+00 120 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : iteration_limit total time (s) : 1.206375e+00 total solves : 120 best bound : 3.361111e+01 simulation ci : 2.775000e+01 ± 3.280073e+01 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 3 state variables : 1 scenarios : 2.70000e+01 existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [6, 6] JuMP.AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [2, 2] JuMP.VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [5, 5] JuMP.VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [1, 2] numerical stability report matrix range [1e+00, 1e+00] objective range [1e+00, 1e+01] bounds range [5e+00, 2e+01] rhs range [2e+00, 1e+01] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 2.500000e+01 2.083333e+01 1.280904e-02 12 1 10 2.500000e+00 3.361111e+01 3.614116e-02 120 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : iteration_limit total time (s) : 3.614116e-02 total solves : 120 best bound : 3.361111e+01 simulation ci : 2.775000e+01 ± 3.280073e+01 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 1 state variables : 1 scenarios : Inf existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [8, 8] JuMP.AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [2, 2] JuMP.VariableRef in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [3, 3] JuMP.VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [5, 5] JuMP.VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [1, 1] numerical stability report matrix range [1e+00, 1e+00] objective range [1e+00, 1e+01] bounds range [5e+00, 2e+01] rhs range [0e+00, 0e+00] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 9.250000e+01 5.268631e+01 1.039791e-02 46 1 50 0.000000e+00 1.191663e+02 4.733379e-01 1625 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : iteration_limit total time (s) : 4.733379e-01 total solves : 1625 best bound : 1.191663e+02 simulation ci : 7.795000e+01 ± 2.885518e+01 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 1 state variables : 1 scenarios : Inf existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [8, 8] JuMP.AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [2, 2] JuMP.VariableRef in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [3, 3] JuMP.VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [5, 5] JuMP.VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [1, 1] numerical stability report matrix range [1e+00, 1e+00] objective range [1e+00, 1e+01] bounds range [5e+00, 2e+01] rhs range [0e+00, 0e+00] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 9.250000e+01 5.268631e+01 1.034594e-02 46 1 50 0.000000e+00 1.191663e+02 5.313480e-01 1625 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : iteration_limit total time (s) : 5.313480e-01 total solves : 1625 best bound : 1.191663e+02 simulation ci : 7.795000e+01 ± 2.885518e+01 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- [ Info: duality_handlers.jl ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 2 state variables : 2 scenarios : 1.00000e+02 existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [5, 11] JuMP.AffExpr in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [2, 2] JuMP.VariableRef in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [2, 2] JuMP.VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [3, 7] JuMP.VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [2, 7] JuMP.VariableRef in MOI.ZeroOne : [4, 4] numerical stability report matrix range [1e+00, 6e+00] objective range [1e+00, 3e+01] bounds range [1e+00, 1e+02] rhs range [0e+00, 0e+00] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 -4.650000e+01 -7.053967e+01 3.992621e+00 103 1 3S -5.785826e+01 -6.755367e+01 6.602020e+00 309 1 11S -8.368889e+01 -6.677644e+01 7.999924e+00 1133 1 13S -3.268889e+01 -6.677644e+01 9.175239e+00 1339 1 23S -3.268889e+01 -6.677644e+01 1.511296e+01 2369 1 33S -8.368889e+01 -6.677644e+01 2.103606e+01 3399 1 43S -8.368889e+01 -6.677644e+01 2.682773e+01 4429 1 53S -4.868889e+01 -6.677644e+01 3.267679e+01 5459 1 63S -8.068889e+01 -6.677644e+01 3.851284e+01 6489 1 73S -7.168889e+01 -6.677644e+01 4.455397e+01 7519 1 82 -4.168889e+01 -6.677644e+01 4.956042e+01 8446 1 91S -6.068889e+01 -6.677644e+01 5.551568e+01 9373 1 100 -8.368889e+01 -6.677644e+01 6.026915e+01 10300 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : iteration_limit total time (s) : 6.026915e+01 total solves : 10300 best bound : -6.677644e+01 simulation ci : -5.960112e+01 ± 3.154656e+00 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- ****************************************************************************** This program contains Ipopt, a library for large-scale nonlinear optimization. Ipopt is released as open source code under the Eclipse Public License (EPL). For more information visit https://github.com/coin-or/Ipopt ****************************************************************************** [ Info: forward_passes.jl ┌ Warning: Re-training a model with existing cuts! │ │ Are you sure you want to do this? The output from this training may be │ misleading because the policy is already partially trained. │ │ If you meant to train a new policy with different settings, you must │ build a new model. │ │ If you meant to refine a previously trained policy, turn off this │ warning by passing `add_to_existing_cuts = true` as a keyword argument │ to `SDDP.train`. │ │ In a future release, this warning may turn into an error. └ @ SDDP ~/.julia/packages/SDDP/She2h/src/algorithm.jl:1170 [ Info: local_improvement_search.jl [ Info: exp = 15 [ Info: OA(exp) = 220 [ Info: piecewise = 7 [ Info: OA(piecewise) = 6 [ Info: squared = 3 [ Info: OA(squared) = 16 [ Info: parallel_schemes.jl ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 2 state variables : 1 scenarios : 4.00000e+00 existing cuts : false options solver : Asynchronous mode with 4 workers. risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [3, 3] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [2, 2] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [1, 1] numerical stability report matrix range [0e+00, 0e+00] objective range [1e+00, 1e+00] bounds range [1e+00, 6e+00] rhs range [0e+00, 0e+00] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 7.000000e+00 6.000000e+00 3.318377e+02 2 2 20 7.000000e+00 6.000000e+00 3.379335e+02 40 2 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : iteration_limit total time (s) : 3.379335e+02 total solves : 40 best bound : 6.000000e+00 simulation ci : 5.700000e+00 ± 1.036159e+00 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- ┌ Warning: Re-training a model with existing cuts! │ │ Are you sure you want to do this? The output from this training may be │ misleading because the policy is already partially trained. │ │ If you meant to train a new policy with different settings, you must │ build a new model. │ │ If you meant to refine a previously trained policy, turn off this │ warning by passing `add_to_existing_cuts = true` as a keyword argument │ to `SDDP.train`. │ │ In a future release, this warning may turn into an error. └ @ SDDP ~/.julia/packages/SDDP/She2h/src/algorithm.jl:1170 ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 2 state variables : 1 scenarios : 4.00000e+00 existing cuts : true options solver : Asynchronous mode with 4 workers. risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [3, 3] AffExpr in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [2, 2] VariableRef in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [1, 1] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [2, 2] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [1, 1] numerical stability report matrix range [1e+00, 1e+00] objective range [1e+00, 1e+00] bounds range [1e+00, 6e+00] rhs range [4e+00, 4e+00] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 5.000000e+00 6.000000e+00 2.616911e-01 48 1 20 9.000000e+00 6.000000e+00 5.534520e-01 162 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : iteration_limit total time (s) : 5.534520e-01 total solves : 162 best bound : 6.000000e+00 simulation ci : 5.900000e+00 ± 9.633534e-01 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- [ Info: risk_measures.jl ┌ Warning: Radius is very small. You should probably use `SDDP.Expectation()` instead. └ @ SDDP ~/.julia/packages/SDDP/She2h/src/plugins/risk_measures.jl:528 ┌ Warning: Radius is very small. You should probably use `SDDP.Expectation()` instead. └ @ SDDP ~/.julia/packages/SDDP/She2h/src/plugins/risk_measures.jl:528 ┌ Warning: Radius is very small. You should probably use `SDDP.Expectation()` instead. └ @ SDDP ~/.julia/packages/SDDP/She2h/src/plugins/risk_measures.jl:528 [ Info: sampling_schemes.jl [ Info: stopping_rules.jl ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 2 state variables : 1 scenarios : 1.00000e+00 existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [3, 3] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [2, 2] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [1, 1] numerical stability report matrix range [0e+00, 0e+00] objective range [1e+00, 1e+00] bounds range [0e+00, 0e+00] rhs range [0e+00, 0e+00] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 0.000000e+00 0.000000e+00 4.132986e-03 4 1 50 0.000000e+00 0.000000e+00 2.578759e-01 200 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : first_stage_stopping total time (s) : 2.578759e-01 total solves : 200 best bound : 0.000000e+00 simulation ci : 0.000000e+00 ± 0.000000e+00 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- ┌ Warning: Are you really sure you want to use this stopping rule? Read why we don't recommend it by typing `? SDDP.Statistical` into the REPL to read the docstring. │ │ If you understand what you are doing, you can disable this warning with `SDDP.Statistical(; disable_warning = true)` └ @ SDDP ~/.julia/packages/SDDP/She2h/src/plugins/stopping_rules.jl:132 Simulated policy value: [ 5.035598e+00, 6.964402e+00] Simulated policy value: [ 5.282880e+00, 7.117120e+00] Simulated policy value: [ 5.606329e+00, 7.393671e+00] ┌ Warning: Are you really sure you want to use this stopping rule? Read why we don't recommend it by typing `? SDDP.Statistical` into the REPL to read the docstring. │ │ If you understand what you are doing, you can disable this warning with `SDDP.Statistical(; disable_warning = true)` └ @ SDDP ~/.julia/packages/SDDP/She2h/src/plugins/stopping_rules.jl:132 Simulated policy value: [ 5.035598e+00, 6.964402e+00] Simulated policy value: [ 5.282880e+00, 7.117120e+00] Simulated policy value: [ 5.606329e+00, 7.393671e+00] ┌ Warning: Are you really sure you want to use this stopping rule? Read why we don't recommend it by typing `? SDDP.Statistical` into the REPL to read the docstring. │ │ If you understand what you are doing, you can disable this warning with `SDDP.Statistical(; disable_warning = true)` └ @ SDDP ~/.julia/packages/SDDP/She2h/src/plugins/stopping_rules.jl:132 [ Info: threaded.jl [ Info: value_functions.jl [ Info: visualization.jl test_SpaghettiPlot: Test Failed at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/SDDP/She2h/test/visualization/visualization.jl:49 Expression: read("test.html", String) == read(control, String) Evaluated: "\n\n\n\n
\n \n \n \n\n\n\n \n \n\n\n\n\n" == "\n\n\n\n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n \n \n\n\n\n\n" Stacktrace: [1] macro expansion @ /opt/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.13/Test/src/Test.jl:730 [inlined] [2] test_SpaghettiPlot() @ Main.TestVisualization ~/.julia/packages/SDDP/She2h/test/visualization/visualization.jl:49 [3] macro expansion @ ~/.julia/packages/SDDP/She2h/test/visualization/visualization.jl:17 [inlined] [4] macro expansion @ /opt/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.13/Test/src/Test.jl:1837 [inlined] [5] runtests() @ Main.TestVisualization ~/.julia/packages/SDDP/She2h/test/visualization/visualization.jl:17 ┌ Warning: `SDDP.save` is deprecated. Use `SDDP.plot` instead. │ caller = test_SpaghettiPlot() at visualization.jl:51 └ @ Core ~/.julia/packages/SDDP/She2h/test/visualization/visualization.jl:51 test_SpaghettiPlot: Test Failed at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/SDDP/She2h/test/visualization/visualization.jl:55 Expression: read("test.html", String) == read(control, String) Evaluated: "\n\n\n\n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n \n \n\n\n\n\n" == "\n\n\n\n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n \n \n\n\n\n\n" Stacktrace: [1] macro expansion @ /opt/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.13/Test/src/Test.jl:730 [inlined] [2] test_SpaghettiPlot() @ Main.TestVisualization ~/.julia/packages/SDDP/She2h/test/visualization/visualization.jl:55 [3] macro expansion @ ~/.julia/packages/SDDP/She2h/test/visualization/visualization.jl:17 [inlined] [4] macro expansion @ /opt/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.13/Test/src/Test.jl:1837 [inlined] [5] runtests() @ Main.TestVisualization ~/.julia/packages/SDDP/She2h/test/visualization/visualization.jl:17 [ Info: FAST_hydro_thermal.jl ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 2 state variables : 1 scenarios : 2.00000e+00 existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [6, 6] AffExpr in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [1, 1] AffExpr in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [1, 1] VariableRef in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [1, 1] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [3, 4] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [2, 2] numerical stability report matrix range [1e+00, 1e+00] objective range [1e+00, 5e+00] bounds range [8e+00, 8e+00] rhs range [6e+00, 6e+00] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 -2.000000e+01 -1.000000e+01 6.535704e+00 5 1 20 0.000000e+00 -1.000000e+01 7.117556e+00 104 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : simulation_stopping total time (s) : 7.117556e+00 total solves : 104 best bound : -1.000000e+01 simulation ci : -1.100000e+01 ± 4.474009e+00 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- [ Info: FAST_production_management.jl ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 3 state variables : 2 scenarios : 4.00000e+00 existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [8, 8] AffExpr in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [3, 3] VariableRef in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [1, 1] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [5, 5] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [1, 1] numerical stability report matrix range [1e+00, 1e+00] objective range [2e-01, 3e+00] bounds range [5e+01, 5e+01] rhs range [0e+00, 0e+00] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 5 -5.320000e+00 -2.396000e+01 1.961880e-01 52 1 10 -2.396000e+01 -2.396000e+01 2.030389e-01 92 1 15 -4.260000e+01 -2.396000e+01 2.110870e-01 132 1 20 -2.396000e+01 -2.396000e+01 2.201340e-01 172 1 25 -5.320000e+00 -2.396000e+01 2.316360e-01 224 1 30 -5.320000e+00 -2.396000e+01 2.410231e-01 264 1 35 -2.396000e+01 -2.396000e+01 2.515540e-01 304 1 40 -2.396000e+01 -2.396000e+01 2.635119e-01 344 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : simulation_stopping total time (s) : 2.635119e-01 total solves : 344 best bound : -2.396000e+01 simulation ci : -1.868714e+01 ± 3.990349e+00 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── Time Allocations ─────────────────────── ──────────────────────── Tot / % measured: 559ms / 44.8% 12.8MiB / 61.8% Section ncalls time %tot avg alloc %tot avg ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── forward_pass 40 194ms 77.6% 4.85ms 1.78MiB 22.4% 45.5KiB solve_subproblem 120 192ms 76.6% 1.60ms 1.60MiB 20.2% 13.7KiB get_dual_solution 120 80.2μs 0.0% 668ns 13.1KiB 0.2% 112B sample_scenario 40 400μs 0.2% 10.0μs 24.2KiB 0.3% 620B backward_pass 40 46.3ms 18.5% 1.16ms 5.87MiB 74.0% 150KiB solve_subproblem 160 24.9ms 10.0% 156μs 944KiB 11.6% 5.90KiB get_dual_solution 160 1.17ms 0.5% 7.32μs 190KiB 2.3% 1.19KiB prepare_backward_pass 160 48.6μs 0.0% 304ns 0.00B 0.0% 0.00B calculate_bound 40 9.73ms 3.9% 243μs 289KiB 3.6% 7.24KiB get_dual_solution 40 36.0μs 0.0% 901ns 4.38KiB 0.1% 112B get_dual_solution 36 22.4μs 0.0% 621ns 3.94KiB 0.0% 112B ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 3 state variables : 2 scenarios : 4.00000e+00 existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [8, 8] AffExpr in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [3, 3] VariableRef in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [1, 1] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [5, 5] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [1, 1] numerical stability report matrix range [1e+00, 1e+00] objective range [2e-01, 3e+00] bounds range [5e+01, 5e+01] rhs range [0e+00, 0e+00] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 5 -2.396000e+01 -2.396000e+01 5.922103e-02 52 1 10 -2.396000e+01 -2.396000e+01 6.723094e-02 92 1 15 -2.396000e+01 -2.396000e+01 7.749295e-02 132 1 20 -4.260000e+01 -2.396000e+01 8.968902e-02 172 1 25 -5.320000e+00 -2.396000e+01 1.044500e-01 224 1 30 -2.396000e+01 -2.396000e+01 1.188219e-01 264 1 35 -2.396000e+01 -2.396000e+01 1.346569e-01 304 1 40 -5.320000e+00 -2.396000e+01 1.534848e-01 344 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : simulation_stopping total time (s) : 1.534848e-01 total solves : 344 best bound : -2.396000e+01 simulation ci : -2.237170e+01 ± 4.300524e+00 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── Time Allocations ─────────────────────── ──────────────────────── Tot / % measured: 161ms / 89.3% 15.4MiB / 94.1% Section ncalls time %tot avg alloc %tot avg ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── backward_pass 40 105ms 73.1% 2.62ms 12.4MiB 85.6% 317KiB solve_subproblem 160 26.5ms 18.5% 166μs 950KiB 6.4% 5.94KiB get_dual_solution 160 1.23ms 0.9% 7.69μs 190KiB 1.3% 1.19KiB prepare_backward_pass 160 58.9μs 0.0% 368ns 0.00B 0.0% 0.00B forward_pass 40 27.4ms 19.1% 684μs 1.78MiB 12.3% 45.5KiB solve_subproblem 120 25.1ms 17.5% 210μs 1.60MiB 11.1% 13.7KiB get_dual_solution 120 73.5μs 0.1% 612ns 13.1KiB 0.1% 112B sample_scenario 40 439μs 0.3% 11.0μs 24.3KiB 0.2% 623B calculate_bound 40 11.3ms 7.9% 283μs 301KiB 2.0% 7.52KiB get_dual_solution 40 39.0μs 0.0% 974ns 4.38KiB 0.0% 112B get_dual_solution 36 21.7μs 0.0% 604ns 3.94KiB 0.0% 112B ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── [ Info: FAST_quickstart.jl ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 2 state variables : 1 scenarios : 2.00000e+00 existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [3, 4] AffExpr in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [1, 1] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [2, 3] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [2, 2] numerical stability report matrix range [1e+00, 1e+00] objective range [1e+00, 2e+00] bounds range [2e+00, 5e+00] rhs range [0e+00, 0e+00] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 0.000000e+00 -2.500000e+00 1.780851e-01 5 1 2 -2.500000e+00 -2.000000e+00 1.798370e-01 14 1 3 -1.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 1.806309e-01 19 1 4 -1.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 1.813130e-01 24 1 5 -1.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 1.819770e-01 29 1 6 -3.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 1.826401e-01 34 1 7 -1.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 1.833041e-01 39 1 8 -1.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 1.839609e-01 44 1 9 -3.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 1.846490e-01 49 1 10 -1.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 1.853681e-01 54 1 11 -3.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 1.860940e-01 59 1 12 -3.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 1.868761e-01 64 1 13 -1.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 1.876390e-01 69 1 14 -1.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 1.884151e-01 74 1 15 -3.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 1.891711e-01 79 1 16 -1.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 1.899691e-01 84 1 17 -3.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 1.907361e-01 89 1 18 -3.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 1.915519e-01 94 1 19 -1.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 1.923640e-01 99 1 20 -3.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 1.932030e-01 104 1 21 -1.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 1.947050e-01 113 1 22 -1.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 1.955681e-01 118 1 23 -3.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 1.964340e-01 123 1 24 -3.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 1.973209e-01 128 1 25 -1.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 1.982081e-01 133 1 26 -3.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 1.991141e-01 138 1 27 -3.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 2.001591e-01 143 1 28 -1.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 2.013941e-01 148 1 29 -3.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 2.026010e-01 153 1 30 -3.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 2.037640e-01 158 1 31 -1.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 2.049961e-01 163 1 32 -1.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 2.062631e-01 168 1 33 -1.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 2.075269e-01 173 1 34 -3.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 2.086670e-01 178 1 35 -1.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 2.097440e-01 183 1 36 -3.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 2.107980e-01 188 1 37 -1.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 2.119341e-01 193 1 38 -1.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 2.130311e-01 198 1 39 -1.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 2.141731e-01 203 1 40 -1.000000e+00 -2.000000e+00 2.154591e-01 208 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : simulation_stopping total time (s) : 2.154591e-01 total solves : 208 best bound : -2.000000e+00 simulation ci : -1.812500e+00 ± 3.171441e-01 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- [ Info: Hydro_thermal.jl ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 3 state variables : 1 scenarios : Inf existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [6, 6] AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [2, 2] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [5, 5] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [1, 1] numerical stability report matrix range [1e+00, 1e+00] objective range [1e+00, 3e+00] bounds range [5e+00, 2e+01] rhs range [2e+00, 1e+01] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 4.000000e+01 1.882708e+01 2.600670e-01 51 1 25 1.560330e+02 2.260386e+02 1.288434e+00 4203 1 30 2.138334e+03 2.336430e+02 2.524333e+00 7674 1 38 8.025312e+02 2.352957e+02 3.783737e+00 10194 1 46 1.737622e+02 2.358930e+02 4.891281e+00 12054 1 58 4.114170e+01 2.360915e+02 5.929155e+00 13734 1 63 1.493193e+03 2.362190e+02 7.618180e+00 15909 1 72 1.044387e+02 2.362973e+02 8.720178e+00 17364 1 76 3.050305e+02 2.363467e+02 9.993348e+00 18936 1 100 4.969839e+02 2.364135e+02 1.473747e+01 23928 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : iteration_limit total time (s) : 1.473747e+01 total solves : 23928 best bound : 2.364135e+02 simulation ci : 2.345669e+02 ± 6.032770e+01 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- On average, 2.1 units of thermal are used in the first stage. [ Info: StochDynamicProgramming.jl_multistock.jl ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 5 state variables : 3 scenarios : 1.43489e+07 existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [13, 13] AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [3, 3] AffExpr in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [1, 1] VariableRef in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [3, 3] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [7, 7] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [6, 7] numerical stability report matrix range [1e+00, 1e+00] objective range [3e-01, 2e+00] bounds range [5e-01, 5e+00] rhs range [2e+00, 2e+00] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 10 -4.977586e+00 -4.446713e+00 8.183842e-01 1400 1 20 -4.764789e+00 -4.394789e+00 1.116239e+00 2800 1 30 -4.672487e+00 -4.377000e+00 1.401803e+00 4200 1 40 -4.483495e+00 -4.370632e+00 1.690355e+00 5600 1 50 -4.167321e+00 -4.364999e+00 1.995057e+00 7000 1 60 -4.362455e+00 -4.358864e+00 2.311869e+00 8400 1 70 -4.849916e+00 -4.355337e+00 2.637944e+00 9800 1 80 -4.861568e+00 -4.353006e+00 2.990891e+00 11200 1 90 -4.268264e+00 -4.350407e+00 3.351999e+00 12600 1 100 -4.539897e+00 -4.348641e+00 3.713909e+00 14000 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : iteration_limit total time (s) : 3.713909e+00 total solves : 14000 best bound : -4.348641e+00 simulation ci : -4.325070e+00 ± 8.068871e-02 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- [ Info: StochDynamicProgramming.jl_stock.jl ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 5 state variables : 1 scenarios : 1.00000e+05 existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [5, 5] AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [1, 1] VariableRef in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [1, 1] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [3, 3] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [2, 3] numerical stability report matrix range [1e+00, 1e+00] objective range [3e-01, 2e+00] bounds range [5e-01, 2e+00] rhs range [0e+00, 0e+00] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 10 -1.671715e+00 -1.476962e+00 4.192810e-01 1050 1 20 -1.529197e+00 -1.471817e+00 5.000250e-01 1600 1 30 -1.410768e+00 -1.471408e+00 6.762249e-01 2650 1 40 -1.596461e+00 -1.471258e+00 9.019299e-01 3200 1 50 -1.002277e+00 -1.471216e+00 1.088664e+00 4250 1 60 -1.085156e+00 -1.471164e+00 1.182561e+00 4800 1 70 -1.391746e+00 -1.471164e+00 1.376860e+00 5850 1 80 -1.448703e+00 -1.471132e+00 1.477986e+00 6400 1 90 -1.488989e+00 -1.471087e+00 1.677590e+00 7450 1 100 -1.564260e+00 -1.471075e+00 1.786707e+00 8000 1 110 -1.738157e+00 -1.471075e+00 1.899993e+00 8550 1 120 -1.591292e+00 -1.471075e+00 2.014202e+00 9100 1 130 -1.271481e+00 -1.471075e+00 2.125864e+00 9650 1 140 -1.249746e+00 -1.471075e+00 2.245963e+00 10200 1 150 -1.536222e+00 -1.471075e+00 2.365694e+00 10750 1 160 -1.565422e+00 -1.471075e+00 2.495072e+00 11300 1 170 -1.631076e+00 -1.471075e+00 2.616116e+00 11850 1 180 -1.494909e+00 -1.471075e+00 2.736503e+00 12400 1 182 -9.083563e-01 -1.471075e+00 2.758900e+00 12510 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : simulation_stopping total time (s) : 2.758900e+00 total solves : 12510 best bound : -1.471075e+00 simulation ci : -1.462065e+00 ± 2.699238e-02 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- [ Info: StructDualDynProg.jl_prob5.2_2stages.jl ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 2 state variables : 4 scenarios : 2.00000e+00 existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [29, 29] AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [4, 5] AffExpr in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [3, 3] AffExpr in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [4, 4] VariableRef in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [3, 3] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [22, 22] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [1, 1] numerical stability report matrix range [1e+00, 1e+00] objective range [1e+00, 1e+06] bounds range [0e+00, 0e+00] rhs range [0e+00, 0e+00] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 10 3.455904e+05 3.147347e+05 2.376390e-02 54 1 20 3.336455e+05 3.402383e+05 1.218770e-01 104 1 30 3.993519e+05 3.403155e+05 1.343999e-01 158 1 40 3.337559e+05 3.403155e+05 1.460869e-01 208 1 48 3.337559e+05 3.403155e+05 1.571438e-01 248 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : simulation_stopping total time (s) : 1.571438e-01 total solves : 248 best bound : 3.403155e+05 simulation ci : 1.298444e+08 ± 1.785864e+08 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- [ Info: StructDualDynProg.jl_prob5.2_3stages.jl ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 3 state variables : 4 scenarios : 4.00000e+00 existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [29, 29] AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [4, 5] AffExpr in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [3, 3] AffExpr in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [4, 4] VariableRef in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [3, 3] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [22, 22] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [1, 1] numerical stability report matrix range [1e+00, 1e+00] objective range [1e+00, 1e+05] bounds range [0e+00, 0e+00] rhs range [0e+00, 0e+00] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 10 4.403329e+05 3.509666e+05 3.637004e-02 92 1 20 4.506600e+05 4.054833e+05 6.042290e-02 172 1 30 3.959476e+05 4.067125e+05 8.581996e-02 264 1 40 4.497721e+05 4.067125e+05 1.099100e-01 344 1 47 3.959476e+05 4.067125e+05 1.286459e-01 400 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : simulation_stopping total time (s) : 1.286459e-01 total solves : 400 best bound : 4.067125e+05 simulation ci : 2.696242e+07 ± 3.645299e+07 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- [ Info: agriculture_mccardle_farm.jl ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 10 state variables : 4 scenarios : 2.70000e+01 existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [24, 24] AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [3, 3] AffExpr in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [1, 1] AffExpr in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [1, 6] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [20, 20] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [1, 2] numerical stability report matrix range [1e+00, 8e+01] objective range [1e+00, 1e+03] bounds range [6e+01, 6e+01] rhs range [2e+02, 3e+03] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 8.316000e+03 0.000000e+00 5.990010e+00 14 1 40 2.308500e+03 4.074139e+03 6.832658e+00 776 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : simulation_stopping total time (s) : 6.832658e+00 total solves : 776 best bound : 4.074139e+03 simulation ci : 4.224313e+03 ± 6.692189e+02 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- [ Info: air_conditioning.jl ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 3 state variables : 1 scenarios : 4.00000e+00 existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [6, 6] AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [1, 1] VariableRef in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [1, 1] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [4, 4] VariableRef in MOI.Integer : [3, 3] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [2, 3] numerical stability report matrix range [1e+00, 1e+00] objective range [1e+00, 3e+02] bounds range [1e+02, 2e+02] rhs range [0e+00, 0e+00] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1L 7.000000e+04 6.250000e+04 2.173118e+00 8 1 6L 4.000000e+04 6.250000e+04 3.202473e+00 60 1 16L 6.000000e+04 6.250000e+04 4.359430e+00 140 1 20L 6.000000e+04 6.250000e+04 5.039451e+00 172 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : simulation_stopping total time (s) : 5.039451e+00 total solves : 172 best bound : 6.250000e+04 simulation ci : 5.475000e+04 ± 7.336233e+03 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Lower bound is: 62500.0 With first stage solutions 200.0 (production) and 100.0 (stored_production). ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 3 state variables : 1 scenarios : 4.00000e+00 existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [6, 6] AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [1, 1] VariableRef in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [1, 1] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [4, 4] VariableRef in MOI.Integer : [3, 3] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [2, 3] numerical stability report matrix range [1e+00, 1e+00] objective range [1e+00, 3e+02] bounds range [1e+02, 2e+02] rhs range [0e+00, 0e+00] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 7.000000e+04 6.250000e+04 1.278186e-02 8 1 16 4.000000e+04 6.250000e+04 1.027521e+00 140 1 20 4.000000e+04 6.250000e+04 1.265565e+00 172 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : simulation_stopping total time (s) : 1.265565e+00 total solves : 172 best bound : 6.250000e+04 simulation ci : 5.950000e+04 ± 8.933885e+03 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Lower bound is: 62500.0 With first stage solutions 200.0 (production) and 100.0 (stored_production). [ Info: air_conditioning_forward.jl ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 3 state variables : 1 scenarios : 4.00000e+00 existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [5, 5] AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [1, 1] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [4, 4] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [2, 3] numerical stability report matrix range [1e+00, 1e+00] objective range [1e+00, 3e+02] bounds range [1e+02, 2e+02] rhs range [1e+02, 3e+02] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 7.000000e+04 6.250000e+04 5.544782e-02 5 1 10 4.000000e+04 6.250000e+04 6.979120e-01 50 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : iteration_limit total time (s) : 6.979120e-01 total solves : 50 best bound : 6.250000e+04 simulation ci : 5.450000e+04 ± 1.135842e+04 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- [ Info: all_blacks.jl ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 3 state variables : 2 scenarios : 1.00000e+00 existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [6, 6] AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [2, 2] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [2, 3] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [3, 3] VariableRef in MOI.ZeroOne : [3, 3] numerical stability report matrix range [1e+00, 1e+00] objective range [1e+00, 6e+00] bounds range [1e+00, 1e+02] rhs range [0e+00, 0e+00] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1L 6.000000e+00 9.000000e+00 2.878978e-01 6 1 20L 9.000000e+00 9.000000e+00 3.796909e-01 123 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : simulation_stopping total time (s) : 3.796909e-01 total solves : 123 best bound : 9.000000e+00 simulation ci : 8.850000e+00 ± 2.940000e-01 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- [ Info: asset_management_simple.jl ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 7 state variables : 2 scenarios : 8.00000e+00 existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [5, 7] AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [1, 1] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [3, 5] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [1, 1] numerical stability report matrix range [1e+00, 1e+00] objective range [1e+00, 4e+00] bounds range [1e+03, 1e+03] rhs range [6e+01, 8e+01] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 5 -1.109375e+01 2.605769e-01 9.283431e-01 87 1 10 -1.109375e+01 2.605769e-01 9.382670e-01 142 1 15 3.105797e+00 5.434132e-01 9.494250e-01 197 1 20 -2.463349e+01 1.503415e+00 9.615161e-01 252 1 25 -1.421085e-14 1.514085e+00 9.725940e-01 307 1 30 4.864000e+01 1.514085e+00 3.012461e+00 394 1 35 4.864000e+01 1.514085e+00 3.026924e+00 449 1 40 -8.870299e+00 1.514085e+00 3.041865e+00 504 1 45 -1.428571e+00 1.514085e+00 3.057088e+00 559 1 48 -1.428571e+00 1.514085e+00 3.067386e+00 592 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : simulation_stopping total time (s) : 3.067386e+00 total solves : 592 best bound : 1.514085e+00 simulation ci : 2.494033e+00 ± 5.472486e+00 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- [ Info: asset_management_stagewise.jl ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 7 state variables : 2 scenarios : 3.20000e+01 existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : #108 sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [5, 7] AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [1, 1] VariableRef in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [1, 1] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [2, 5] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [1, 1] numerical stability report matrix range [1e+00, 1e+00] objective range [2e-02, 4e+00] bounds range [1e+03, 1e+03] rhs range [6e+01, 8e+01] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 10 1.395796e+01 1.428818e+00 9.024611e-01 278 1 20 1.440356e+01 1.278425e+00 9.368701e-01 428 1 30 8.388546e+00 1.278425e+00 9.942610e-01 706 1 40 6.666667e-03 1.278410e+00 1.029948e+00 856 1 50 -5.614035e+00 1.278410e+00 1.089069e+00 1134 1 60 1.426676e+01 1.278410e+00 1.129167e+00 1284 1 64 1.261296e+01 1.278410e+00 1.146309e+00 1344 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : simulation_stopping total time (s) : 1.146309e+00 total solves : 1344 best bound : 1.278410e+00 simulation ci : 8.172580e-01 ± 5.385320e+00 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 7 state variables : 2 scenarios : 3.20000e+01 existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : #108 sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [5, 7] AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [1, 1] VariableRef in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [1, 1] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [2, 5] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [1, 1] numerical stability report matrix range [1e+00, 1e+00] objective range [2e-02, 4e+00] bounds range [1e+03, 1e+03] rhs range [6e+01, 8e+01] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 10 1.111809e+00 1.278488e+00 7.752490e-02 278 1 20 1.111084e+01 1.278410e+00 1.243379e-01 428 1 30 2.293779e+01 1.278410e+00 1.999500e-01 706 1 40 1.426676e+01 1.278410e+00 2.825580e-01 856 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : simulation_stopping total time (s) : 2.825580e-01 total solves : 856 best bound : 1.278410e+00 simulation ci : 3.654300e+00 ± 6.176856e+00 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- [ Info: belief.jl ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 4 state variables : 1 scenarios : Inf existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [7, 7] AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [1, 1] AffExpr in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [2, 2] VariableRef in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [1, 1] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [5, 5] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [3, 3] numerical stability report matrix range [1e+00, 1e+00] objective range [1e+00, 2e+00] bounds range [2e+00, 1e+02] rhs range [0e+00, 0e+00] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 10 4.787277e+00 9.346930e+00 5.283144e+00 900 1 20 6.374753e+00 1.361934e+01 5.609305e+00 1720 1 30 2.848217e+01 1.624016e+01 6.477040e+00 3036 1 40 1.973944e+01 1.776547e+01 7.433969e+00 4192 1 50 4.000000e+00 1.889360e+01 8.256310e+00 5020 1 60 1.142478e+01 1.907862e+01 9.154247e+00 5808 1 70 9.386421e+00 1.961295e+01 1.006400e+01 6540 1 80 5.667851e+01 1.890911e+01 1.081195e+01 7088 1 90 3.740597e+01 1.993139e+01 1.240871e+01 8180 1 100 9.867183e+00 2.001688e+01 1.313469e+01 8664 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : iteration_limit total time (s) : 1.313469e+01 total solves : 8664 best bound : 2.001688e+01 simulation ci : 2.301336e+01 ± 4.670816e+00 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- [ Info: biobjective_hydro.jl ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 3 state variables : 1 scenarios : 1.33100e+03 existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [9, 9] AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [2, 4] AffExpr in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [3, 5] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [8, 8] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [5, 6] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 0.000000e+00 0.000000e+00 2.864162e+00 36 1 10 0.000000e+00 0.000000e+00 2.901450e+00 360 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : iteration_limit total time (s) : 2.901450e+00 total solves : 360 best bound : 0.000000e+00 simulation ci : 0.000000e+00 ± 0.000000e+00 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 3 state variables : 1 scenarios : 1.33100e+03 existing cuts : true options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [9, 9] AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [2, 4] AffExpr in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [3, 7] VariableRef in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [1, 1] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [8, 8] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [5, 6] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 9.500000e+02 5.500000e+02 6.036043e-03 407 1 10 2.850000e+02 5.728212e+02 5.741215e-02 731 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : iteration_limit total time (s) : 5.741215e-02 total solves : 731 best bound : 5.728212e+02 simulation ci : 6.480000e+02 ± 1.400040e+02 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 3 state variables : 1 scenarios : 1.33100e+03 existing cuts : true options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [9, 9] AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [2, 4] AffExpr in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [3, 13] VariableRef in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [1, 1] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [8, 8] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [5, 6] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 4.150000e+02 3.347014e+02 5.661964e-03 778 1 10 2.825000e+02 3.465177e+02 5.766606e-02 1102 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : iteration_limit total time (s) : 5.766606e-02 total solves : 1102 best bound : 3.465177e+02 simulation ci : 3.598954e+02 ± 6.281469e+01 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 3 state variables : 1 scenarios : 1.33100e+03 existing cuts : true options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [9, 9] AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [2, 4] AffExpr in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [3, 20] VariableRef in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [1, 1] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [8, 8] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [5, 6] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 2.387500e+02 1.994007e+02 6.042004e-03 1149 1 10 2.587500e+02 2.052799e+02 6.300306e-02 1473 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : iteration_limit total time (s) : 6.300306e-02 total solves : 1473 best bound : 2.052799e+02 simulation ci : 2.206923e+02 ± 2.764045e+01 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 3 state variables : 1 scenarios : 1.33100e+03 existing cuts : true options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [9, 9] AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [2, 4] AffExpr in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [3, 24] VariableRef in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [1, 1] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [8, 8] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [5, 6] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 9.375000e+02 4.637735e+02 6.781101e-03 1520 1 10 2.875000e+02 4.661908e+02 6.464100e-02 1844 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : iteration_limit total time (s) : 6.464100e-02 total solves : 1844 best bound : 4.661908e+02 simulation ci : 5.075000e+02 ± 1.503394e+02 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 3 state variables : 1 scenarios : 1.33100e+03 existing cuts : true options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [9, 9] AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [2, 4] AffExpr in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [3, 30] VariableRef in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [1, 1] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [8, 8] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [5, 6] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 1.112500e+02 1.129545e+02 7.467031e-03 1891 1 10 1.000000e+02 1.129771e+02 6.606793e-02 2215 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : iteration_limit total time (s) : 6.606793e-02 total solves : 2215 best bound : 1.129771e+02 simulation ci : 1.068750e+02 ± 2.168477e+01 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 3 state variables : 1 scenarios : 1.33100e+03 existing cuts : true options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [9, 9] AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [2, 4] AffExpr in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [3, 34] VariableRef in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [1, 1] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [8, 8] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [5, 6] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 4.562500e+02 2.788383e+02 8.287907e-03 2262 1 10 1.625000e+02 2.794553e+02 7.593608e-02 2586 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : iteration_limit total time (s) : 7.593608e-02 total solves : 2586 best bound : 2.794553e+02 simulation ci : 2.690625e+02 ± 6.720434e+01 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 3 state variables : 1 scenarios : 1.33100e+03 existing cuts : true options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [9, 9] AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [2, 4] AffExpr in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [3, 37] VariableRef in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [1, 1] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [8, 8] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [5, 6] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 4.810804e+02 4.073537e+02 7.879019e-03 2633 1 10 5.487500e+02 4.077574e+02 7.332206e-02 2957 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : iteration_limit total time (s) : 7.332206e-02 total solves : 2957 best bound : 4.077574e+02 simulation ci : 3.863418e+02 ± 9.936379e+01 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 3 state variables : 1 scenarios : 1.33100e+03 existing cuts : true options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [9, 9] AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [2, 4] AffExpr in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [3, 43] VariableRef in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [1, 1] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [8, 8] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [5, 6] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 2.718750e+02 5.198033e+02 8.181095e-03 3004 1 10 6.771875e+02 5.210100e+02 7.499409e-02 3328 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : iteration_limit total time (s) : 7.499409e-02 total solves : 3328 best bound : 5.210100e+02 simulation ci : 5.831217e+02 ± 1.295425e+02 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 3 state variables : 1 scenarios : 1.33100e+03 existing cuts : true options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [9, 9] AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [2, 4] AffExpr in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [3, 50] VariableRef in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [1, 1] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [8, 8] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [5, 6] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 7.812500e+01 5.720558e+01 7.504940e-03 3375 1 10 5.312500e+01 5.938345e+01 6.600785e-02 3699 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : iteration_limit total time (s) : 6.600785e-02 total solves : 3699 best bound : 5.938345e+01 simulation ci : 6.187500e+01 ± 1.306667e+01 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- [ Info: booking_management.jl ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 5 state variables : 2 scenarios : 3.20000e+01 existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [10, 10] AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [2, 2] AffExpr in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [2, 2] AffExpr in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [6, 6] VariableRef in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [2, 2] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [5, 6] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [6, 6] VariableRef in MOI.ZeroOne : [5, 5] numerical stability report matrix range [1e+00, 1e+00] objective range [1e+00, 6e+00] bounds range [1e+00, 1e+01] rhs range [1e+00, 1e+00] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 5 8.000000e+00 9.440450e+00 1.255323e+00 235 1 10 1.000000e+01 9.159200e+00 1.753811e+00 310 1 15 1.000000e+01 9.159200e+00 2.287299e+00 385 1 20 1.000000e+01 9.159200e+00 2.790273e+00 460 1 25 1.000000e+01 9.159200e+00 5.633306e+00 695 1 30 4.000000e+00 9.159200e+00 6.105279e+00 770 1 35 1.000000e+01 9.159200e+00 6.576860e+00 845 1 40 1.000000e+01 9.159200e+00 7.126797e+00 920 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : simulation_stopping total time (s) : 7.126797e+00 total solves : 920 best bound : 9.159200e+00 simulation ci : 7.200000e+00 ± 8.485598e-01 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 3 state variables : 4 scenarios : 2.16000e+02 existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [18, 18] AffExpr in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [4, 4] AffExpr in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [4, 4] AffExpr in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [12, 12] VariableRef in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [4, 4] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [9, 10] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [10, 10] VariableRef in MOI.ZeroOne : [9, 9] numerical stability report matrix range [1e+00, 1e+00] objective range [1e+00, 4e+00] bounds range [1e+00, 2e+01] rhs range [1e+00, 1e+00] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 10 5.000000e+00 6.959189e+00 1.338842e+00 510 1 20 1.000000e+01 6.834387e+00 2.983838e+00 720 1 30 7.000000e+00 6.834387e+00 6.928838e+00 1230 1 40 1.000000e+01 6.823805e+00 8.530793e+00 1440 1 50 3.000000e+00 6.823805e+00 1.255681e+01 1950 1 60 2.000000e+00 6.823805e+00 1.421275e+01 2160 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : simulation_stopping total time (s) : 1.421275e+01 total solves : 2160 best bound : 6.823805e+00 simulation ci : 6.183333e+00 ± 6.694539e-01 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- [ Info: generation_expansion.jl ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 5 state variables : 5 scenarios : 3.27680e+04 existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [14, 14] AffExpr in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [7, 7] AffExpr in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [4, 4] VariableRef in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [1, 1] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [8, 8] VariableRef in MOI.Integer : [5, 5] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [5, 6] numerical stability report matrix range [1e+00, 1e+00] objective range [1e+00, 5e+05] bounds range [1e+00, 1e+00] rhs range [0e+00, 0e+00] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 10 5.299676e+06 2.074407e+06 1.382914e+01 920 1 20 6.049875e+06 2.075240e+06 1.664030e+01 1340 1 30 5.496647e+05 2.078257e+06 2.985099e+01 2260 1 40 3.985383e+04 2.078257e+06 3.267694e+01 2680 1 50 2.994548e+05 2.078257e+06 4.594116e+01 3600 1 60 3.799457e+06 2.078257e+06 4.879447e+01 4020 1 61 3.549665e+06 2.078257e+06 4.907609e+01 4062 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- status : simulation_stopping total time (s) : 4.907609e+01 total solves : 4062 best bound : 2.078257e+06 simulation ci : 2.437601e+06 ± 5.082681e+05 numeric issues : 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------- SDDP.jl (c) Oscar Dowson and contributors, 2017-25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- problem nodes : 5 state variables : 5 scenarios : 3.27680e+04 existing cuts : false options solver : serial mode risk measure : SDDP.Expectation() sampling scheme : SDDP.InSampleMonteCarlo subproblem structure VariableRef : [14, 14] AffExpr in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [7, 7] AffExpr in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [4, 4] VariableRef in MOI.EqualTo{Float64} : [1, 1] VariableRef in MOI.GreaterThan{Float64} : [8, 8] VariableRef in MOI.Integer : [5, 5] VariableRef in MOI.LessThan{Float64} : [5, 6] numerical stability report matrix range [1e+00, 1e+00] objective range [1e+00, 5e+05] bounds range [1e+00, 1e+00] rhs range [0e+00, 0e+00] ------------------------------------------------------------------- iteration simulation bound time (s) solves pid ------------------------------------------------------------------- 10L 2.049870e+06 2.079457e+06 3.448479e+01 920 1 20L 2.799668e+06 2.079457e+06 5.609717e+01 1340 1 ====================================================================================== Information request received. A stacktrace will print followed by a 1.0 second profile ====================================================================================== cmd: /opt/julia/bin/julia 1054 running 1 of 1 signal (10): User defined signal 1 _ZN24external_feasibilityjump21FeasibilityJumpSolver10resetMovesEj at /home/pkgeval/.julia/artifacts/47a06bffdeda3b990d140fa738e56944ef478765/lib/libhighs.so (unknown line) _ZN18HighsMipSolverData15feasibilityJumpEv at /home/pkgeval/.julia/artifacts/47a06bffdeda3b990d140fa738e56944ef478765/lib/libhighs.so (unknown line) _ZN14HighsMipSolver3runEv at /home/pkgeval/.julia/artifacts/47a06bffdeda3b990d140fa738e56944ef478765/lib/libhighs.so (unknown line) _ZN5Highs12callSolveMipEv at /home/pkgeval/.julia/artifacts/47a06bffdeda3b990d140fa738e56944ef478765/lib/libhighs.so (unknown line) _ZN5Highs13optimizeModelEv at /home/pkgeval/.julia/artifacts/47a06bffdeda3b990d140fa738e56944ef478765/lib/libhighs.so (unknown line) _ZN5Highs3runEv at /home/pkgeval/.julia/artifacts/47a06bffdeda3b990d140fa738e56944ef478765/lib/libhighs.so (unknown line) Highs_run at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/HiGHS/2Rdhm/src/gen/libhighs.jl:328 [inlined] #47 at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/HiGHS/2Rdhm/src/MOI_wrapper.jl:2223 [inlined] disable_sigint at ./c.jl:167 [inlined] optimize! at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/HiGHS/2Rdhm/src/MOI_wrapper.jl:2223 optimize! at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/eRhCr/src/Bridges/bridge_optimizer.jl:367 [inlined] optimize! at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/eRhCr/src/Utilities/cachingoptimizer.jl:379 unknown function (ip: 0x761452b55722) at (unknown file) _jl_invoke at /source/src/gf.c:3692 [inlined] ijl_apply_generic at /source/src/gf.c:3892 #optimize!#95 at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/JuMP/LKjRR/src/optimizer_interface.jl:609 optimize! at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/JuMP/LKjRR/src/optimizer_interface.jl:560 [inlined] #solve_subproblem#78 at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/SDDP/She2h/src/algorithm.jl:507 solve_subproblem at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/SDDP/She2h/src/algorithm.jl:481 unknown function (ip: 0x76144cd4dd8c) at (unknown file) _jl_invoke at /source/src/gf.c:3692 [inlined] ijl_apply_generic at /source/src/gf.c:3892 macro expansion at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/SDDP/She2h/src/plugins/forward_passes.jl:100 [inlined] macro expansion at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/SDDP/She2h/src/algorithm.jl:11 [inlined] forward_pass at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/SDDP/She2h/src/plugins/forward_passes.jl:99 unknown function (ip: 0x761452b5e4d4) at (unknown file) _jl_invoke at /source/src/gf.c:3692 [inlined] ijl_apply_generic at /source/src/gf.c:3892 iteration at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/SDDP/She2h/src/algorithm.jl:955 #master_loop##0 at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/SDDP/She2h/src/plugins/parallel_schemes.jl:50 disable_sigint at ./c.jl:167 [inlined] master_loop at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/SDDP/She2h/src/plugins/parallel_schemes.jl:49 unknown function (ip: 0x761452b580f1) at (unknown file) _jl_invoke at /source/src/gf.c:3692 [inlined] ijl_apply_generic at /source/src/gf.c:3892 #train#91 at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/SDDP/She2h/src/algorithm.jl:1280 train at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/SDDP/She2h/src/algorithm.jl:1106 [inlined] generation_expansion at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/SDDP/She2h/docs/src/examples/generation_expansion.jl:87 unknown function (ip: 0x76144c97a452) at (unknown file) _jl_invoke at /source/src/gf.c:3692 [inlined] ijl_apply_generic at /source/src/gf.c:3892 jl_apply at /source/src/julia.h:2343 [inlined] do_call at /source/src/interpreter.c:123 eval_value at /source/src/interpreter.c:243 eval_stmt_value at /source/src/interpreter.c:194 [inlined] eval_body at /source/src/interpreter.c:708 jl_interpret_toplevel_thunk at /source/src/interpreter.c:899 jl_toplevel_eval_flex at /source/src/toplevel.c:773 jl_toplevel_eval_flex at /source/src/toplevel.c:713 ijl_toplevel_eval at /source/src/toplevel.c:785 ijl_toplevel_eval_in at /source/src/toplevel.c:830 eval at ./boot.jl:489 include_string at ./loading.jl:2846 _jl_invoke at /source/src/gf.c:3692 [inlined] ijl_apply_generic at /source/src/gf.c:3892 _include at ./loading.jl:2906 include at ./Base.jl:310 IncludeInto at ./Base.jl:311 [inlined] macro expansion at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/SDDP/She2h/test/runtests.jl:16 [inlined] macro expansion at /source/usr/share/julia/stdlib/v1.13/Test/src/Test.jl:1837 [inlined] util_test_directory at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/SDDP/She2h/test/runtests.jl:14 util_test_directory at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/SDDP/She2h/test/runtests.jl:10 unknown function (ip: 0x761452b30bd2) at (unknown file) _jl_invoke at /source/src/gf.c:3692 [inlined] ijl_apply_generic at /source/src/gf.c:3892 jl_apply at /source/src/julia.h:2343 [inlined] do_call at /source/src/interpreter.c:123 eval_value at /source/src/interpreter.c:243 eval_stmt_value at /source/src/interpreter.c:194 [inlined] eval_body at /source/src/interpreter.c:708 eval_body at /source/src/interpreter.c:558 eval_body at /source/src/interpreter.c:558 jl_interpret_toplevel_thunk at /source/src/interpreter.c:899 jl_toplevel_eval_flex at /source/src/toplevel.c:773 jl_toplevel_eval_flex at /source/src/toplevel.c:713 ijl_toplevel_eval at /source/src/toplevel.c:785 ijl_toplevel_eval_in at /source/src/toplevel.c:830 eval at ./boot.jl:489 include_string at ./loading.jl:2846 _jl_invoke at /source/src/gf.c:3692 [inlined] ijl_apply_generic at /source/src/gf.c:3892 _include at ./loading.jl:2906 include at ./Base.jl:310 IncludeInto at ./Base.jl:311 jfptr_IncludeInto_45343.1 at /opt/julia/lib/julia/sys.so (unknown line) _jl_invoke at /source/src/gf.c:3692 [inlined] ijl_apply_generic at /source/src/gf.c:3892 jl_apply at /source/src/julia.h:2343 [inlined] do_call at /source/src/interpreter.c:123 eval_value at /source/src/interpreter.c:243 eval_stmt_value at /source/src/interpreter.c:194 [inlined] eval_body at /source/src/interpreter.c:708 jl_interpret_toplevel_thunk at /source/src/interpreter.c:899 jl_toplevel_eval_flex at /source/src/toplevel.c:773 jl_toplevel_eval_flex at /source/src/toplevel.c:713 ijl_toplevel_eval at /source/src/toplevel.c:785 ijl_toplevel_eval_in at /source/src/toplevel.c:830 eval at ./boot.jl:489 exec_options at ./client.jl:290 _start at ./client.jl:557 jfptr__start_74220.1 at /opt/julia/lib/julia/sys.so (unknown line) _jl_invoke at /source/src/gf.c:3692 [inlined] ijl_apply_generic at /source/src/gf.c:3892 jl_apply at /source/src/julia.h:2343 [inlined] true_main at /source/src/jlapi.c:964 jl_repl_entrypoint at /source/src/jlapi.c:1132 main at /source/cli/loader_exe.c:58 unknown function (ip: 0x76147a234249) at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 __libc_start_main at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (unknown line) unknown function (ip: 0x4010b8) at /workspace/srcdir/glibc-2.17/csu/../sysdeps/x86_64/start.S unknown function (ip: (nil)) at (unknown file) ============================================================== Profile collected. A report will print at the next yield point ============================================================== ====================================================================================== Information request received. A stacktrace will print followed by a 1.0 second profile ====================================================================================== cmd: /opt/julia/bin/julia 1 running 0 of 1 signal (10): User defined signal 1 epoll_pwait at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (unknown line) uv__io_poll at /workspace/srcdir/libuv/src/unix/linux.c:1404 uv_run at /workspace/srcdir/libuv/src/unix/core.c:430 ijl_task_get_next at /source/src/scheduler.c:457 wait at ./task.jl:1213 wait_forever at ./task.jl:1150 jfptr_wait_forever_67471.1 at /opt/julia/lib/julia/sys.so (unknown line) _jl_invoke at /source/src/gf.c:3692 [inlined] ijl_apply_generic at /source/src/gf.c:3892 jl_apply at /source/src/julia.h:2343 [inlined] start_task at /source/src/task.c:1249 unknown function (ip: (nil)) at (unknown file) ============================================================== Profile collected. A report will print at the next yield point ============================================================== ┌ Warning: There were no samples collected in one or more groups. │ This may be due to idle threads, or you may need to run your │ program longer (perhaps by running it multiple times), │ or adjust the delay between samples with `Profile.init()`. └ @ Profile /opt/julia/share/julia/stdlib/v1.13/Profile/src/Profile.jl:1362 Overhead ╎ [+additional indent] Count File:Line Function ========================================================= Thread 1 (default) Task 0x000077d00c0ff490 Total snapshots: 338. Utilization: 0% ╎338 @Base/task.jl:1150 wait_forever() 337╎ 338 @Base/task.jl:1213 wait() [1054] signal 15: Terminated in expression starting at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/SDDP/She2h/docs/src/examples/generation_expansion.jl:93 _ZN5highs8parallel4syncEP15HighsSplitDeque at /home/pkgeval/.julia/artifacts/47a06bffdeda3b990d140fa738e56944ef478765/lib/libhighs.so (unknown line) _ZN18HighsMipSolverData31finishAnalyticCenterComputationERKN5highs8parallel9TaskGroupE at /home/pkgeval/.julia/artifacts/47a06bffdeda3b990d140fa738e56944ef478765/lib/libhighs.so (unknown line) _ZN18HighsMipSolverData16evaluateRootNodeEv at /home/pkgeval/.julia/artifacts/47a06bffdeda3b990d140fa738e56944ef478765/lib/libhighs.so (unknown line) _ZN14HighsMipSolver3runEv at /home/pkgeval/.julia/artifacts/47a06bffdeda3b990d140fa738e56944ef478765/lib/libhighs.so (unknown line) _ZN5Highs12callSolveMipEv at /home/pkgeval/.julia/artifacts/47a06bffdeda3b990d140fa738e56944ef478765/lib/libhighs.so (unknown line) _ZN5Highs13optimizeModelEv at /home/pkgeval/.julia/artifacts/47a06bffdeda3b990d140fa738e56944ef478765/lib/libhighs.so (unknown line) _ZN5Highs3runEv at /home/pkgeval/.julia/artifacts/47a06bffdeda3b990d140fa738e56944ef478765/lib/libhighs.so (unknown line) Highs_run at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/HiGHS/2Rdhm/src/gen/libhighs.jl:328 [inlined] #47 at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/HiGHS/2Rdhm/src/MOI_wrapper.jl:2223 [inlined] disable_sigint at ./c.jl:167 [inlined] optimize! at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/HiGHS/2Rdhm/src/MOI_wrapper.jl:2223 optimize! at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/eRhCr/src/Bridges/bridge_optimizer.jl:367 [inlined] optimize! at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/MathOptInterface/eRhCr/src/Utilities/cachingoptimizer.jl:379 unknown function (ip: 0x761452b55722) at (unknown file) _jl_invoke at /source/src/gf.c:3692 [inlined] ijl_apply_generic at /source/src/gf.c:3892 #optimize!#95 at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/JuMP/LKjRR/src/optimizer_interface.jl:609 optimize! at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/JuMP/LKjRR/src/optimizer_interface.jl:560 [inlined] #solve_subproblem#78 at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/SDDP/She2h/src/algorithm.jl:507 solve_subproblem at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/SDDP/She2h/src/algorithm.jl:481 unknown function (ip: 0x76144cd4dd8c) at (unknown file) _jl_invoke at /source/src/gf.c:3692 [inlined] ijl_apply_generic at /source/src/gf.c:3892 #calculate_bound#84 at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/SDDP/She2h/src/algorithm.jl:910 calculate_bound at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/SDDP/She2h/src/algorithm.jl:870 [inlined] calculate_bound at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/SDDP/She2h/src/algorithm.jl:870 unknown function (ip: 0x761452b795f0) at (unknown file) _jl_invoke at /source/src/gf.c:3692 [inlined] ijl_apply_generic at /source/src/gf.c:3892 iteration at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/SDDP/She2h/src/algorithm.jl:969 #master_loop##0 at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/SDDP/She2h/src/plugins/parallel_schemes.jl:50 disable_sigint at ./c.jl:167 [inlined] master_loop at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/SDDP/She2h/src/plugins/parallel_schemes.jl:49 unknown function (ip: 0x761452b580f1) at (unknown file) _jl_invoke at /source/src/gf.c:3692 [inlined] ijl_apply_generic at /source/src/gf.c:3892 #train#91 at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/SDDP/She2h/src/algorithm.jl:1280 train at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/SDDP/She2h/src/algorithm.jl:1106 [inlined] generation_expansion at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/SDDP/She2h/docs/src/examples/generation_expansion.jl:87 unknown function (ip: 0x76144c97a452) at (unknown file) _jl_invoke at /source/src/gf.c:3692 [inlined] ijl_apply_generic at /source/src/gf.c:3892 jl_apply at /source/src/julia.h:2343 [inlined] do_call at /source/src/interpreter.c:123 eval_value at /source/src/interpreter.c:243 eval_stmt_value at /source/src/interpreter.c:194 [inlined] eval_body at /source/src/interpreter.c:708 jl_interpret_toplevel_thunk at /source/src/interpreter.c:899 jl_toplevel_eval_flex at /source/src/toplevel.c:773 jl_toplevel_eval_flex at /source/src/toplevel.c:713 ijl_toplevel_eval at /source/src/toplevel.c:785 ijl_toplevel_eval_in at /source/src/toplevel.c:830 eval at ./boot.jl:489 include_string at ./loading.jl:2846 _jl_invoke at /source/src/gf.c:3692 [inlined] ijl_apply_generic at /source/src/gf.c:3892 _include at ./loading.jl:2906 PkgEval terminated after 2722.11s: test duration exceeded the time limit