Panasonic CT-32HL43 32" HD-Ready TV with PureFlat Screen
One of the best TVs
I actually ordered this TV from Amazon and used the Eagle Freight delivery.  The process went surprisingly smooth considerig I have not had very good experiences with freight delivery companies.  The item took a week and a half (as estimated by Amazon) and was delivered promptly at the appointed time.<br />First of all, as people have mentioned, this TV weighs a ton.  It took three guys to bring it up to the second floor and set it on the TV stand.<br />The TV quality is very good.  I have a Hughes E86 HD DirecTV receiver and off-the-air HD singal and you can instantly see the improvement on HD movies/shows.  It was a treat watching the superbowl in HD especially the half time show. :)  <br />I have to say though that this TV does not seem to handle non-HD programming too well.  Sometimes, it looks worse than the 25&quot; TV it replaced.  However, I have not yet calibrated the TV so that could be a big part of it.  The PIP is a cool feature and very easy to control including resizing, moving, freez framing, etc...<br />The number of AV connections are plentiful with 2 component videos, 1 digital, 4 composites.  All of them with audio inputs.  I used to feed all my AV signals into my Yamaha receivers but with all the connections available on the TV, I now have them all connected directly to the TV.<br />The remote is pretty awesome and can control pretty much all of my components.  The one thing I could not get it to work was the ASPECT button.  I have to navigate through the menu.  I have a call in to Panasonic support.  Also, the TV does not seem to remember the ASPECT ration setting.  The component selection always seem to default to 16:9 even if I set it to 4:3.  This may be an oversight on my part but if there is a way to keep the setting, its not very obvious.<br />Unfortunately, I cannot comment on the audio since I have all the audio fed into my 6.1 receiver.<br />Overall, its an excellent TV and certainly worth the $ especially since its few hundred $ cheaper than the equivalent Sony.  The only reason for a 4 star is the issue with the screen ASPECT as mentioned.<br />BTW, I hear some people recommending a 16:9 HD TV over a 4:3.  After having this TV for about a month now, I'm glad I got this TV. If you watch local HD channels, you'll get a good mix of HD and non-HD programming.  I think for this type of viewing, 4:3 actually works out better.  Of course for DVDs and HD movies, I usually change the setting to 16:9.