Puritanism and Revolution: Studies in Interpretation of the English Revolution of the 17th Century
Gutes Bild, Showviev via Sat: negativ, Servicehotline mies
habe den LiteOn 5115 gekauft: Macht einen guten Eindruck, das Bild ist gut, auch bei Rec.-Qualität 3h/DVD. Super Menüführung (Guider). Leider läßt sich Showviev nur via den eingebauten Tuner nutzen (also via den RF-Eingang des Rekorders). Mit einem Sat-Receiver der über Scart angeschlossen wird funktioniert Showview nicht. VPS geht übrigens nur mit Analog-Receiver , nicht mit Digital-Receiver. Dies liegt aber nicht am LiteOn, sondern daran, dass die Digitalsender kein VPS ausstrahlen.<br>Die LiteOn Servicehotline ist der Witz: Es wird lediglich auf eine WWW Seite im Internet verwiesen. Persönliche Beratung : nicht vorhanden. Für den Preis jedoch ein recht gutes Angebot.man.\\" Essays about the William Perkins's theories concerning the relief of the poor and about John Preston's political sermons before the king share the theme of the effects of Puritan religion on politics.  Political theory is the theme of essays about Thomas Hobbes and John Harrington. Analyses of Andrew Marvell and Samuel Richardson's Clarissa Harlowe deal with the effects of the Revolution on literature. Even the insane gets its share of attention in essays about John Mason's apocalyptic predictions and Roger Crab, \\"The Mad Hatter.\\" <br /> <br />Hill's use of the medium of essays to prove his thesis rather than arguing it directly is effective. If not exactly subtle, proving the case inductively rather than deductively still more gradually persuades the reader. The method allows Hill to cover diverse and interesting material and still unify it. By focusing on small areas of the English Revolution at one time, Hill gives the reader his erudition in manageable chunks. For example, only in a book like this could an author justify spending a chapter on Roger Crab, who was interesting but not influential because his interesting diet and habits killed all of his disciples who adopted them.   <br /> <br />Hill does, however, strain his method. Because the essays in the first section deal with general trends over lengthy periods of time, they by necessity have clear connections to Puritanism and the English Revolution. The essay about \\"The Norman Yoke\\" begins well before and finishes well after any direct connection to Puritanism, but it is the exception. The essays in the second section, because they are about individuals, do not necessarily have so close a connection. The essays on Lord Clarendon, William Perkins, John Preston, Thomas Hobbes, James Harrington, and John Mason are all tied to some aspect of the English Revolution or to Puritanism more specifically. However, Roger Crab is so bizarre that he really has no connection to much of anything, and he is not shown to be an example of a prevalent trend. The two essays about the literary figures Andrew Marvell and the fictitious Clarissa Harlowe both describe products of the Revolution, but why they are products of the Revolution is not made clear.  Perhaps uncertainty is to be expected as the outcome of the difficult task of unifying what is intended to be diverse. <br /> <br />Hill's work, as might be expected from a Marxist, very often touches on economics. Besides the two essays which are primarily about economics, other essays in the collection are substantially about economics. Trade is discussed in the essay about the brotherhood of man; poor relief is an economic subject; Hill relates the political theories of Hobbes and Harrington to economics. The rest of the essays, even if not about economics, are influenced by Marxist social and literary theories. This overemphasis of economics is regrettable, for in his essay surveying the scholarship of the Revolution, Hill shows more insight into religion than some of his colleagues. He mentions that some historians dismiss Puritan religious beliefs as covers for economic motives but insists that religious beliefs should be studied as genuine. Despite the diversity of his essays, he significantly mentions religion in only a couple of essays and in those the focus is more on politics or society than on religion. The essays primarily about economics are, however, Hill's best in the book. <br /> <br />The few problems in Hill's book could possibly be solved by including additional essays. But perhaps a reader's wish for additional essays is additional evidence that Hill has succeeded in proving his thesis, for the reader wishes for more essays because Hill has convinced him that many more such essays could be written about the diversity of the English Revolution.