Comments on: Which Matters More in Home: Aesthetics or Functionality? http://www.hsmagazine.net/2013/05/which-matters-more-in-home-aesthetics-or-functionality/ The PlayStation Home Magazine Fri, 13 Feb 2015 21:20:50 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.2 By: Kid Fleetfoot http://www.hsmagazine.net/2013/05/which-matters-more-in-home-aesthetics-or-functionality/#comment-284595 Wed, 08 May 2013 19:35:37 +0000 http://www.hsmagazine.net/?p=50384#comment-284595 OOPS! How did that happen. This is a case of double your pleasure double your fun doesn’t work.
:( Keep the first and delete the next two. Could be worse. I might be a programmer.

]]>
By: Kid Fleetfoot http://www.hsmagazine.net/2013/05/which-matters-more-in-home-aesthetics-or-functionality/#comment-284594 Wed, 08 May 2013 19:33:03 +0000 http://www.hsmagazine.net/?p=50384#comment-284594 My first reply didn’t make it. It was long. This will be short. I’ll start the way I ended the first. LOOT, let the music rock on. Many of my spaces have little functionality without music, the radios.

Aesthetics are important. The park which along with a farm are something I long wanted. ACORN PARK doesn’t work well but just to be able to walk the path is enough. In this case the way it looks is the most important.
BRAMBLENOOK is special. Grow crops raise animals and trying the get the bear out of the tree. (I put the bear there.) It’s a fun place. Interactivity.

HOME TYCOON is what one wants it to be. Mostly grass, farms cities, villages, something we can build. Interactivity.

Little things mean a lot. In the LONDON PUB the dart scoreboard didn’t work and it took away from the space. Now it works and it’s much better. Functionality.

The delightful GNOME CURLING both public and private spaces are ruined for me by an improper working scoreboard. Maybe that too will be fixed. Functionality.

With me the most important thing is music. Others have their own thoughts of importance.

As an old song says, “To Each Their Own.”

Copy & paste your replies, folks, and hope you can the typing right. Replies are kinda’ like programming, eh?

]]>
By: Kid Fleetfoot http://www.hsmagazine.net/2013/05/which-matters-more-in-home-aesthetics-or-functionality/#comment-284591 Wed, 08 May 2013 18:52:16 +0000 http://www.hsmagazine.net/?p=50384#comment-284591 Functionality is the most important. LOOT’s radios don’t work and they’re important to me. Without them and music, several of my apartment spaces are mostly useless and everything on HOME is on hold as to purchasing for me.

The way things look and are set up are important however that’s a matter of taste. As to functionality, several things in ACORN PARK don’t work but I’m happy going there so in that case aesthetics are important. Just gimme a pathway and grass and I’m set. (Aesthetics means the way things look? LOL)

Recently a friend said to me after BRAMBLENOOK came out, “That’s what you always wanted.” and yes they were right. Well, the park with a bridge too. The farm is amazing: grow crops, raise animals and try to get that darned bear out if the tree (I put the bear there). Imagination.

HOME TYCOON starts with with a field and a bridge we can’t access and after that we’re on our home as to customizability. Build a city, a race track or watch the grass grow. Our choice. Ah yes, winter Christmas houses also. Pretty great concept, eh?

We shall see on LOOTs night time apartment space. If the radios work then it’s probably a winner.

Some spaces I like but don’t like if they’re missing something. Leaving radios out, two examples are the scoreboard in the LONDON PUB which was on the blink but now works. Now if they can get the scoreboard working for the delightful GNOME CURLING spaces, both public and private, that would something.

When it comes to functionality, if it don’t work right, it takes away much of the fun. For me it’s the music. C’m LOOT, rock on with the music.

]]>
By: Kassadee Marie http://www.hsmagazine.net/2013/05/which-matters-more-in-home-aesthetics-or-functionality/#comment-284565 Tue, 07 May 2013 22:12:34 +0000 http://www.hsmagazine.net/?p=50384#comment-284565 I don’t think I can answer your title question. I’ve purchase estates just because they are beautiful (and I coveted them) and I’ve purchased estates that don’t appeal to me aesthetically, but have a game I want to play and offer to my friends. I’ve also purchased estates because I had an idea about decorating them that I wanted to try out.

I’d have to say that “Seven Winds” is my favorite space so far. It’s beautiful, can be customized and I can fly there, so what’s not to love?

]]>
By: Burbie52 http://www.hsmagazine.net/2013/05/which-matters-more-in-home-aesthetics-or-functionality/#comment-284558 Tue, 07 May 2013 10:09:45 +0000 http://www.hsmagazine.net/?p=50384#comment-284558 For me it has to do with a balanced combination of all of the above. Bramblenook farm pushed the envelope of all of these things and I bought it immediately. It continues to be a space that is a delight to visit. I am not really buying estates that much anymore as I have reached a saturation level for myself with them. I find I rarely if ever visit many of them and I can’t see adding another unless it has that special something I am attracted to, and that can vary depending on the points you have brought up.
The nDreams Aurora space that is on sale right now has peaked my interest, but it is because it is connected to the game itself and I think that is another perk that can attract people to buy.
Finding a balance is hard, and I imagine many developers have torn their hair out trying to figure out what people want anymore in this genre of purchases. I do believe that I will purchase the Hollywood club skin though, it looks fabulous.

]]>
By: KrazyFace http://www.hsmagazine.net/2013/05/which-matters-more-in-home-aesthetics-or-functionality/#comment-284555 Tue, 07 May 2013 07:53:18 +0000 http://www.hsmagazine.net/?p=50384#comment-284555 Good questions.

Personally, it’s mainly about the full package. How well rounded it is over all as to if I find a space “worth it” or not, example; the tropical island space (I forget it’s name) -- the one at sunset with the little open-walled house and the mini infinity pool at its front? Anyway, beautiful space, absolutely gorgeous! But, nothing more than a pretty box. No extra, space specific rewards, nothing interactive, as an MGS grunt would say “just a box” heh.

Then there’s LOOT’S Space Station (that comes pre-packed with furniture items) has the following; EOD (multiples of), Twitter feed, colour changable floors/lighting, windows that open/close, several floors, a STUNNING view of Earth, oh, and lets not forget the damn ROOF comes off!

Both of these are on polar ends to each other in what they offer the buyer. But then we get things like Darla’s Den -- for FREE! Okay, so Darla’s isnt really a patch on either but still, a trip to the Midway gives you instant access to your private slice of fairground.

Then we have that little Casino gem, also free and arguably pretty useless for decorating. But hey, it CHANGES! Constantly! So you never know what you might face anytime you walk in there. That, to me, is pretty cool -- and the price is right.

LKWD have set the bar however with not only their keen attention to detail and beautifuly textured spaces, but their systems are clever. By “systems” I mean things like the built-in gift machines and daily appearance rewards. Not only do their spaces look gorgeous, but they make you play a game of sorts for items that will not only benefit the space you just purchased, but there’s you own too. All they’re missing is their own version of EOD -- which is probably futile by now.

I guess what I’m saying is, everyone has their own standards and reasons for buying certain spaces. I know mine, and the price I’m willing to pay, but as for one influence or the other? Well, you can be the prettiest damn thing ever, but if you have nothing to contribute other than looks, how can you expect to get anything more from me than a long stare and a quick fling?

]]>