BRIDGE BITES #98
|
ONE WINNER TOO
MANY
Brian Gunnell |
|
♠ J9
♥
AJ98
♦
K87632
♣ 8 |
|
|
Both Vulnerable
South West North
East
1♥
Pass 3♥
Pass
6♥
Pass Pass Pass
South might well have
opened with an artificial game-forcing 2♣, but one way or the other it
seems that N-S should get to slam on these cards. In fact 7♥
is a fine contract, though hard to reach. Sadly, our Declarer even
managed to go down in 6♥,
which took a lot of doing! |
♠ QT42
♥
♦
JT4
♣ JT9542 |
Dummy
West East
Declarer |
♠ K753
♥
543
♦
AQ95
♣ 76 |
|
♠ A86
♥
KQT762
♦
♣ AKQ3 |
|
Against 6♥,
West led the ♣J, Dummy went down and South rued the missed grand slam. Even so,
this being a duplicate bridge event, making the overtrick was important. With
that in mind, he counted four side-suit tricks, and could make the rest with
ruffs back and forth. In fact, with 10 trumps between the two hands he even had
one trump more than was needed to score 13 tricks. So, he cashed the
♥A,
followed by his two remaining Club winners. Tragically for Declarer, East
ruffed the third round of Clubs and fired back a trump. Suddenly, Declarer’s 13
tricks had been compressed into 11 and he was down one!
Where did Declarer go wrong?
►
Declarer’s drawing of a round of
trumps served no useful purpose whatsoever, the missing trumps being miniscule
and offering no overruffing threat. Also, cashing that third Club was a
needless risk, Declarer could count up to 13 with just three side-suit tricks
and ten trumps. Making the overtrick was simple enough: Win the ♣A, cash the
♣K (pitching a Spade), cash the ♠A, and merrily cross-ruff the rest of the hand
for all the tricks. That ♣Q was one winner too many, if instead Declarer had
been dealt ♣AK32 then he would have made 13 tricks with ease!
Back to Index