Creating income for today, wealth for tomorrow | Issue 56, November 2017

Cash In on the Crypto Craze Without the Insane Risks

This 3.9% Yielder Is a Leader in Blockchain Technology


Marc Lichtenfeld

Dear Member,

My dad isn’t a big risk taker.

So it was no surprise that, when I graduated, he strongly urged me to look for a job with a big, safe company.

Back then, IBM (NYSE: IBM) was considered the model of stability. And its global headquarters is located just a few miles from where I grew up.

At the time, its revenue was $62.7 billion and it had nearly 400,000 employees worldwide. It was the fifth-largest company on the planet and the most profitable one.

I had zero interest in working for a giant computer company as I knew nothing about computers other than what I’d learned in a class I took in BASIC my sophomore year
in college.

So every time my dad asked if I’d sent my resume to IBM, my answer was “not yet.”

Today, I find it ironic that this company is viewed as a slow-moving behemoth, when in fact it is the world leader in a new technology that is going to revolutionize the way business is conducted.

I’m talking about blockchain technology.

If you’ve heard about blockchain, it’s probably been in relation to cryptocurrency – bitcoin and the like.

While it’s true that cryptocurrencies use blockchain, it’s not crypto that has me excited. It’s the other blockchain uses that are going to generate enormous profits for companies that use the technology as well as those that provide and/or service it.

What Is Blockchain?

Blockchain is basically a ledger that is used for keeping track of transactions. But rather than being hosted on a central server, the blockchain is hosted on tens of thousands of computers around the world. This decentralized network of individuals’ computers verifies transactions and keeps track of everything from cash to mangoes to container ships full of oil.

Blockchain is safer than most systems. Its biggest supporters say it’s impossible to hack. I won’t go that far, but it is difficult to hack thanks to the large number of computers needed to confirm a transaction.

The blockchain confirms that any cash, mango, ship full of oil or other store of value belongs to the person who is sending it. It’s as if every time you paid for something in cash, someone verified that the serial number on the bill you were spending rightfully belonged to you.

In a supply chain, there is a long paper trail and each player has their own systems. That causes delays and headaches. The blockchain is transparent and allows everyone involved in the transaction to see each step.

This has major implications for commerce.

Wal-Mart is now experimenting with blockchain. A Wal-Mart executive wanted to find out where a package of mangoes originated from. It took nearly a full week to get an answer. Using blockchain technology, he was able to find out instantly. He learned not only where the mangoes were picked but who had possession of the fruit every step along the way.

Imagine the safety benefits of information that can be retrieved that quickly – especially when there’s an outbreak of foodborne illnesses.

It can speed up the delivery of important goods like oil. When a ship full of oil leaves port, that oil is often bought and sold many times en route to its final destination. Each transaction has loads of paperwork and takes hours to complete.

But recently a cargo ship containing $25 million of African crude delivered the oil to China. Along the way, the oil was sold three times. Using blockchain technology, each trade was done in less than 25 minutes.

Blockchain’s growth is about to explode. Two-thirds of the world’s largest companies expect to deploy blockchain technology by the end of next year. And 91% of financial services executives say blockchain is critical to the future of their firms.

And there’s little doubt who the global blockchain leader is.

“They’re Still a Company?”

IBM was created more than 100 years ago and has reinvented itself several times. In 1911, the company that became IBM sold scales, meat slicers and time recording products. From there, it went on to make giant mainframe computers, PCs and the supercomputer Watson.

And with blockchain, IBM will begin another chapter in its prestigious history. It is already in collaboration with Wal-Mart, Unilever, Nestlé and several other large companies to track the movement of food. The mango example earlier was done with IBM’s technology.

It has teamed up with four international banks to help facilitate trade finance, as with the African oil example. And it was recently selected to build a blockchain-based trading platform for seven of the world’s largest banks.

Tell your friends at a cocktail party you’re investing in IBM, and they’ll likely have the same reaction my hedge fund buddy did when I mentioned the name... “They’re still a company?” he asked sarcastically.

However, ask any technology executive about IBM and they will have a very different response. In fact, 43% of tech executives say IBM is the best-positioned company when it comes to blockchain.

According to trade publication Data Center Knowledge, “IBM definitely has a lead when it comes to blockchain technology, having been involved in its development almost since the day people first realized that distributed databases might be useful outside the realm of cryptocurrencies.”

Of course, IBM isn’t only about blockchain. It has invested $30 billion in growth areas such as cloud technology, security, analytics and mobile technology. The cloud alone is expected to grow from a $33 billion market in 2015 to $228 billion in 2026, a 591% increase.

And of course, IBM’s Watson is the leader in artificial intelligence. Watson is famous for having won the game show Jeopardy! but its real-world uses go beyond impressing Alex Trebek.

Watson helps diagnose and treat patients with a wide variety of illnesses, helps financial managers analyze risk, and personalizes retail experiences for customers.

The Dividend

IBM pays a $6 annual dividend. That comes out to a 3.9% annual yield. Through the first nine months of the year, IBM’s free cash flow was $8.7 billion while it paid out half of that in dividends.

The company has raised its dividend for 22 straight years by an average of more than 10% for three-, five- and 10-year periods.

And if President Trump’s proposed tax holiday for companies with overseas profits becomes law, there could be a windfall of dividends for IBM shareholders. The company holds more than $71 billion in cash overseas.

The last time there was a tax holiday, in 2004, IBM repatriated $9.5 billion. If IBM were to do the same this time, it would equal $10.10 per share in cash. That could be spent on share buybacks, a special dividend... or both. I’d expect IBM to bring home more cash than it did in 2004, should the tax holiday take place.

Of course, the late-to-the-party Wall Street analysts don’t like IBM. Twenty out of 27 rate it a “Hold” or “Sell,” reinforcing the idea that this is a contrarian play.

You won’t get rich overnight holding IBM. The blockchain is in its infancy. But you’re going to reap a lot of dividends and profits as it grows up.

IBM is the best way to play the blockchain and even cryptocurrency if you don’t want to take on a lot of risk or don’t understand crypto.

That’s the beauty of this play. If cryptocurrencies continue their monster run, blockchain and IBM will be a part of that. If not, the blockchain is so much more than cryptocurrency. It’s going to change the way the world does business.

And IBM is the leader in this technology.

It fits perfectly with the 10-11-12 System and is a terrific addition to the Compound Income Portfolio.

But no, Dad, I still haven’t sent them my resume.

Action to Take: Buy IBM (NYSE: IBM) at the market, and add it to the Compound Income Portfolio.

STEVE’S BOND INSIGHTS

The Writing Is on the Wall... But No One Wants to See It

How to Protect Yourself From Inflation-Driven Interest Rate Hikes


The greatest threat to income investors is inflation. And red flags warning that it’s on its way are popping up everywhere. But no one seems to be paying any attention to them.

And these early indicators are coming from what the Fed considers the most reliable source of inflation data – the labor market.

Everything in the jobs numbers is pointing to higher inflation.

The number of working Americans has been increasing for seven years, and unemployment hit 4.2% in September, its lowest level since 2009.

Low unemployment means increasing wage demand. And wage demand is the primary driver of inflation.

Think about it... When unemployment is low and workers are not desperate for jobs, they aren’t as willing to accept lowball wages.

That also suggests that workers are staying in the job market longer, thus increasing their ability to bargain for wage increases.

In order to maintain profits, companies that are forced to raise wages tend to increase the prices for goods or services they sell. This ultimately puts upward pressure on prices as a result of labor costs.

And we’re certainly starting to feel the pressure...

Between August and September, average hourly earnings for private sector workers rose 0.45%. They rose 2.9% over the past year.

The labor participation rate is up, and unemployment
is down.

Despite two major hurricanes in September, U.S. consumer sentiment rose in October to its highest level since 2004. That means more spending, which leads to higher demand and higher prices.

And analysts are predicting more upward pressure on prices from Trump’s promised tax plan.

Theoretically, once consumers receive the proposed tax breaks, they’ll have more income to spend elsewhere. That should drive up prices... and inflation.

The writing about inflation is on the wall, but most investors have been lulled into complacency by a market that seems to have no top. And they are doing nothing to prepare for the inevitable.

In fact, most people are doing the opposite of what is required to limit the damage of and benefit from an inflationary environment.

Despite near-record-low yields and a huge sell-off in muni bond funds following Trump’s election, there have been record inflows into bond funds at some of the lowest yields in decades.

And bond funds are one of the worst places for your money when inflation and interest rates move up.

I’ve said it many times... Fund managers hold long maturities and leverage their holdings to inflate yields to attract uninformed buyers.

Remember, long maturities and leverage will drive the net asset value and the share price of a fund down in a rising rate and inflationary environment.

The Treasury futures market is telling us there is an 88% chance of another rate increase from the Fed this December. And there will likely be more to come.

So investing in – or being invested in – a bond fund is one of the biggest mistakes you can make right now. If you do nothing else to protect yourself from the ravages of inflation, at least get out of any bond fund with an average maturity that is longer than seven years or has more than 20% leverage.

Despite all this gloomy inflation talk, there are steps you can take to safely hold income investments and even benefit when rates move up. But they require that you shift gears and scale back your yield expectations.

The table above tells the whole story. Please note, this table is for illustrative purposes. It does not represent any specific investment.

If interest rates move up one point, a government-guaranteed 30-year Treasury will drop in market value 17%. A two-point increase in rates will drive the 30-year down 31%.

But the two-year Treasury bond price will drop only 2% with a one-point increase and 4% with a two-point rise.

The same idea of shorter maturities and smaller market price changes applies to corporate and municipal bonds, too. And controlling how much the market price of your holdings drops in response to inflation-driven rate increases is the key to the success and safety of your income sources.

Lower market price volatility reduces panic-selling. And mark my words, panic-selling will escalate as inflation and rates rise and long-maturity bond prices drop.

It will be responsible for almost all losses in bonds.

Shorter maturities also reduce the amount of time your money is exposed to inflation.

If you’re holding long-maturity bonds that drop in value as rates and inflation take hold, you are earning less in interest than the market is offering for a longer period. And inflation has more time to erode the bonds’ value.

If you’re holding 10-, 15-, 20- or even 25-year maturities, or long-maturity bond funds, you have two choices: Hold the bonds and watch your buying power dwindle slowly over the extended period, or sell at a loss to buy into rising rates.

Neither is an appealing option.

With shorter maturities, you can control volatility and limit how long your bonds are exposed to inflation. The best part: You’ll reduce losses due to panic-selling and the effects of inflation.

The problem is that shorter-maturity bonds pay lower yields, and the average guy looks for the higher yields, not the lower ones. That’s the nature of the beast and the reason why so many income buyers will be crucified over the next few years.

Not tomorrow, not after the next set of inflation data and not after the December Fed meeting... right now is when you must adapt your income strategy to accommodate changing market conditions.

So scale back your return expectations in shorter-maturity bonds or prepare to have your head handed to you.

I kid you not!

None of us have the time to refinance our retirements or rebuild our nest eggs. Prepare for rising inflation today.

Infinite Income Strategies

What to Do When the Market Sells Off

An Income-Generating, Bear-Market-Proof Investing Strategy


We received nearly 500 responses to the healthcare survey we sent out a few weeks ago.

Thank you to those who shared their hopes, dreams, fears, difficulties and victories. There were many very personal stories and messages. The fact that you were willing to open yourselves up to me like that is humbling.

I received a lot of very nice compliments as well. I’m not going to toot my own horn here and reprint them, but I read all the responses and I greatly appreciate them.

I was also thrilled to hear from Members who are generating anywhere from $150 per month to $140,000 per year in income from The Oxford Income Letter.

One thing that jumped out at me was the response to the question “What is your biggest concern right now?”

The second most common answer – behind not having enough for retirement – was a downturn in the market.

I want to address the worries about a market downturn. It’s totally understandable that so many feel that way.

So here are three steps to deal with a market downturn before it happens...

1. Sell if You Can’t Handle the Risk

If you need the money that’s invested in the market in the next three years, sell your stocks and put the money in something safe like a money market or certificate of deposit. You won’t get much interest, but the money will be there for you if the market heads lower.

Anything can happen in the market, especially in the short term.

If a drop in the market will affect your ability to pay bills in the next three years or sleep at night, get that money out of the market immediately.

I realize it can be tough because if you’re invested in stocks in The Oxford Income Letter, you’re earning at least 4% on your money and probably more. That income will disappear if you go to cash.

But what good will that income be if the market is down 15% when you need to pay bills?

I’m not doing myself any favors here, but I’ll say it again because it’s important. If you need the money that’s invested in the stock market within the next three years, sell now and put the money somewhere safe.

2. Take a Deep Breath and Hold On

Dividend stocks tend to be safer than nondividend payers in bear markets. The dividend acts as a buffer, plus their prices fall less.

In a study published in the Journal of Corporate Finance, Professors Michael Goldstein of Babson College and Kathleen Fuller of the University of Mississippi concluded, “Dividend-paying stocks outperform non-dividend-paying stocks by 1 to 2% more per month in declining markets than in advancing markets.”

In the recovery and recessionary phases of the 2001 and 2008 recessions, Dividend Aristocrats (stocks in the S&P 500 that have raised their dividends for 25 years in a row or more) outperformed the S&P 500 by 6.45% annually.

If you have a long-term time horizon, take a deep breath and hold on.

Think back to 2008 and 2009 when it felt like financial Armageddon. It took 5 1/2 years to get back to the previous high. That’s not nothing, but it’s not the end of the world either.

Once the market went positive on a price-only basis, if you included dividends, the total return was more than 12%.

Eight years after the top, the market was 34% higher. You had a 50% total return including dividends.

And as of September 30, the market was 63% above the 2007 high. Your total return was 84% if you included dividends and 102% if the dividends were reinvested.

So even if you had terrible timing and invested at the very top, right before a historic decline in the market, you still had a profit just a few years later. And 10 years after the top, you doubled your money.

Keep in mind, this is investing in the S&P 500. If you invested in Perpetual Dividend Raisers, your dividends were higher and so were the total returns.

Markets go up over the long term, and Perpetual Dividend Raisers outperform the market. So when things get rough out there, hold on, confident that in a few years you should be made whole.

3. Buy More

In my book, Get Rich With Dividends, I mention that a bear market can be a dividend investor’s best friend.

If you have a long-term time horizon and money to invest, you’ll have the opportunity to buy great Perpetual Dividend Raisers at lower prices and higher yields.

Additionally, if you’re reinvesting dividends, the lower share price means you’ll accumulate more shares, which generate more dividends, which buy more shares and
so on.

When you get to the point where you want to stop reinvesting and collect the dividends, you’ll have more shares kicking out more income to you.

Let’s say you have $100,000, you buy stocks with an average yield of 4%, whose dividends grow an average of 8% per year and whose prices rise in line with the historical market average of 7.65% per year, and you reinvest the dividend.

After 10 years, you’ll have $310,764.

But look what happens when there’s a bear market at the beginning of that 10-year investment period.

Let’s assume the market falls 15% per year for two years. That’s pretty rough.

Because of dividend reinvestment, instead of being down nearly 30%, you’re down 21%. It still hurts, but not as bad.

It then takes another 12 years for you to reach that $310,764 figure. So instead of tripling your money in 10 years, it takes 14 because of the bear market at the beginning.

But here’s where it gets exciting for income investors. After 10 years in the first scenario with no bear market, you’d be earning $11,598 per year in dividends.

With a 15% decline in the market in the first two years, because you’re reinvesting the dividends at lower prices, you’d have more shares generating dividends.

As a result, after 10 years (two years with a 15% decline and eight years with a 7.65% increase), your income would be $16,660 per year.

That’s a meaningful difference, all because you accumulated more shares as the market fell in those first two years.

Bear markets fray the nerves. But if you know how to handle them and have a long-term perspective, you can not only withstand them but prosper.


Mailbag

The Oxford Income Mailbag


We believe it’s helpful to share questions and clarifications on dividend-investment strategies with all of our subscribers. Keep in mind, Marc can answer your general strategy and service questions, but he cannot give personalized advice. As always, feel free to send us your questions at mailbag@oxfordclub.com.

I was looking at my income portfolio and decided to check the tickers against SafetyNet Pro. I notice a few holdings – WPC, AWK, MIC, APLE – have “D” or “F” ratings, so should I consider removing these from my holdings? Thank you.

– Martin S.

I haven’t done the research on your particular stocks other than W.P. Carey (NYSE: WPC), which is in the Instant Income and Compound Income portfolios. I can’t give personal advice on an individual’s portfolio.

When it comes to SafetyNet Pro, a “D” or “F” rating should be taken as a warning. It doesn’t mean that you automatically sell the stock. There can be various reasons why a stock has a low rating, even if it’s a quality company.

For example, Las Vegas Sands (NYSE: LVS), which is in both our Instant Income and Compound Income portfolios, is rated a “D.” That’s because cash flow growth has been negative over three years and the payout ratio was too high in 2016.

However, cash flow is expected to grow this year as well as in 2018, and the payout ratio will be well within my comfort zone. So I’m not worried at all about Las Vegas Sands.

Other times, it pays to be concerned. If a company can’t afford its dividend, sees cash flow shrinking and has a history of dividend cuts, you shouldn’t rely on that dividend.

So when you get a “D” or “F” rating on a stock, dig into the financials and see whether it’s a stock you want to continue to hold.

B&G Foods (NYSE: BGS) is trading a lot lower than when you initially recommended it. What with Amazon and all, are you still bullish on the prospects for BGS?

– Lee B.

B&G Foods is one of our worst-performing positions, so it’s not surprising I’m getting lots of emails about this one.

The stock has been weak because of the poor first-half sales of its recently acquired Green Giant brand.

Management recently said it expects Green Giant to hit its full-year sales goals despite the slow first half. As we went to press, the company reported strong third quarter results, including growth in its Green Giant business.

These are long-term positions, so I’m willing to give management the chance to prove itself right. The company last raised its dividend in December, so I also want to see if it will do so again this December.

I’m fine with sitting on a position that is not doing great if the company is growing cash flow and raising the dividend. That allows us to reinvest at lower prices and kick the compounding machine into overdrive.

The good news is some of the company’s other newly acquired businesses, such as Victoria pasta sauce, are performing better than expected.

Marc... Have enjoyed your book, Get Rich With Dividends, and started using your system right after your book came out.

I have bought other copies for family and friends, and recommended it also to other people.

I notice from time to time you mention using Fidelity brokers for trades. I have used TradeStation for seven-plus years.

They only charge $1 per trade for up to 100 shares. Do you have any insight as to why not to use them? Much thanks.

A Very Satisfied Customer,

– MK

Thanks for the kind words and support.

I’ve never used TradeStation, but it is designed for sophisticated traders. TradeStation has lots of tools and education for active traders.

The discount brokers like Fidelity, Ameritrade and E-Trade all have excellent tools for traders as well.

The discount brokers typically charge $6.95 for stock trades with no share limits if you trade online.

Most TradeStation customers pay a flat fee of $5 per trade.

With commissions so cheap and features so comparable, investors should see which brokers’ platforms they are most comfortable with. If you’re looking to switch brokers, most offer commission-free trades when you first open an account.

I don’t see any reason not to use TradeStation, especially if you’re happy with it.


The Compound Income Portfolio

The Oxford Income Letter portfolios fit into the Blue Chip Outperformers level of the Oxford Wealth Pyramid. For more information, go here: www.oxfordclub.com/wealth-pyramid.