Death Sentence In Daniel Pearl Case

CBS News
July 15, 2002



A court in Pakistan has sentenced British-born Islamic militant Ahmed Omar Saeed Sheikh to death for the kidnapping and murder of U.S. reporter Daniel Pearl.

Court officials said Judge Ashraf Ali Shah also found Sheikh Omar's three accomplices, Fahad Naseem, Salman Saqib and Sheikh Adil, guilty and sentenced them to life in prison.

Lawyers for the chief defendant, British-born Ahmed Omar Saeed Sheikh, and the three others said they would appeal.

Pearl was researching a story on Islamic fundamentalism for the Wall Street Journal when he was kidnapped in the port city of Karachi on January 23.

Although his body has never been identified, a videotape emerged clearly showing he had been killed.

Execution in Pakistan is carried out by hanging, but usually only after an exhaustive appeals process.

Sheikh Omar, the London-born son of a Pakistani cloth merchant, denied charges of kidnapping, murder and terrorism. He has been indicted in the United States and faced extradition if acquitted.

The other three men were charged with acting on his instructions.

Omar has had links to Muslim fundamentalist groups since dropping out of the London School of Economics in 1993 after a privileged upbringing that included being educated at a private school where he was described as a model pupil.

Inspired by atrocities against Muslims in the Balkans, Omar, 28, received training in Afghanistan and Pakistan and vowed to devote his life to the Islamic cause.

He was arrested in India in 1994 and charged with kidnapping four foreign tourists. He was released as part of a complicated swap in 1999, shortly before his trial, after hijackers seized an Air India plane and forced it to Kandahar, Afghanistan.

Investigators say they have found many similarities between the Indian kidnappings and the Pearl case.

"We have established that they are guilty," chief prosecutor Raja Qureshi told reporters after the trial ended on Friday. "We are demanding the death penalty for them."

Defense lawyers said earlier they were confident the case against their clients had not been proven - but they expressed fears that pressure for a conviction may sway the verdict.

Pakistan's military rulers have been anxious to prevent attacks against Western targets in the country since President Pervez Musharraf threw his weight behind the U.S.-led coalition against terror following the September 11 attacks on New York and Washington.

"I pray to the learned court to decide the case without succumbing to any pressure and fear, and acquit them honourably so justice could be done," defense lawyer Rai Bashir said in advance of the verdict.

Speaking along the same lines, also before the verdict, the brother of defendant Sheikh Adil said he expected that "the government will impose the decision at the behest of the United States." Sheikh Aslam went on to charge that "all executive decisions in Pakistan are
being imposed by the United States."

Such sentiments had the police on full alert as the verdict was read.

Steel barricades were used to seal off the streets near the jail, while police and soldiers patrolled the area and sharpshooters in steel helmets stood guard on the roof of the hotel across the street.

Pearl, the India-based correspondent for the Wall Street Journal, was researching a story on radical Muslim groups when he was kidnapped.

A month after his disappearance, a gory video showing Pearl had been murdered was delivered to the U.S. consulate in Karachi. Pearl's last words before his throat was cut was that he was a Jew and his father was a Jew.

Police found a body in a shallow grave on the outskirts of Karachi in May, but have not yet confirmed whether the remains are those of Pearl.

The trial started on April 5 inside a jail in Karachi, but was moved to Hyderabad in early May on security concerns. Reporters were barred from proceedings, but were briefed by both prosecutors and defense lawyers at the end of each day's hearings.

 

© MMII, CBS Worldwide Inc.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of criminal justice, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.